AIM for Literacy Solutions to Advance Adolescent Literacy in West Virginia Presented by Rebecca Derenge Terry Reale, WVDE Office of Instruction

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RtI Response to Intervention
Advertisements

The Role of the Literacy Coach In a Primary School: A Collaborative Model International Reading Association Annual Conference Atlanta, 2008 Presenters.
RTI: Questions and Answers June, Response to Intervention (RTI) What is it? a problem-solving systema problem-solving system a way to monitor progressa.
Leadership for Advancing Adolescent Literacy RESA-I 21 st Century Education Leadership Series October 21, 2008 Terry Reale, WVDE Coordinator Reading English.
Understanding Response to Intervention
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
3-Tier Reading Model West Virginia Department of Education Division of Student and Instructional Services Office of Instructional Services Catherine A.
AIM for Literacy Solutions to Advance Adolescent Literacy in West Virginia May 2008 West Virginia Department of Education.
West Virginia Department of Education. July 1, 2011 timeline for middle school implementation West Virginia Department of Education.
Instructional Leadership: Focus on Literacy
School Leadership Team Fall Conference West Virginia Department of Education Division of Educator Quality and System Support Bridgeport Conference Center.
SOLUTIONS TO ADVANCE ADOLESCENT LITERACY IN WEST VIRGINIA APRIL 2008 West Virginia Department of Education AIM for Literacy.
Guidelines for Implementation of 21 st Century Content Standards and Objectives, Reading First and Response to Intervention (RTI) Office of Instruction.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Instructional Decision Making
Building Leadership Team October Agenda Big Picture Formative Overview PLC Overview SMART Goal and Action Plan Plan.
Reading Next Writing Next
When Students Can’t Read…
Effective Literacy Today
Read the Quote Below: Why?
Title I School Improvement Where have we been? Where are we going? Presented by Jan Stanley, State Title I Director April 2009.
LITERACY STRATEGY P Loddon Mallee Region.
Parents as Partners in Education
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2011 This multimedia product and its content are protected under copyright law. The following are prohibited by law: Any public.
1 Literacy Leadership Teams December 2004 Common High-Quality Differentiated Instruction for Achievement for All within The Cleveland Literacy System Module.
1 Getting to the Core of the Common Core State Standards What they are! & How they came to be! Implications for Policy and Practice Advanced Literacy Panel.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Arizona Department of Education School Improvement and Intervention.
©Joan Sedita, Keys to Literacy Planning Grades 4-12 Joan Sedita
Comprehensive Literacy Program Louisiana Department of Education
Promoting Equity and Access Lynn Boyer West Virginia Department of Education.
Multi-tiered Systems of Support Improving Outcomes for All Office of Special Programs.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
High School Literacy Don Deshler. LANGUAGE SKILLS STRATEGIES SUBJECT MATTER Building Blocks for Content Literacy HIGHER ORDER.
Oregon Reading First: Statewide Mentor Coach Meeting February 18, 2005 © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
Overview of Gifted Implementation and Advanced Learning Program (ALP)
Secondary Intensive Reading Block Evan Lefsky, Ph.D. Reading Specialist, 6-12.
1 Differentiated Instruction Massachusetts Reading First Plan and John Silber Early Literacy Initiative Advanced Seminar Dorothy S. Strickland, Ph. D.
1 Supporting Striving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach United States Department of Education Public Input Meeting - November 19, 2010 Dorothy S.
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy Program (SRCL) SRCL is a comprehensive literacy development education program to advance literacy skills for students.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Home, school & community partnerships Leadership & co-ordination Strategies & targets Monitoring & assessment Classroom teaching strategies Professional.
Academic Intervention Services: Deepening the Conversation District 75 NYCDOE.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
English Language Arts Program Update Lisa M. White, ELA Coordinator School Committee Meeting March 5, 2012.
+ Is your School's Instructional Program Ready for Common Core? Reach Institute for School Leadership.
Harry Wong Says Procedures are the Way to Go… Response to Intervention is a procedure-based system. It is also a problem solving system. Something isn’t.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
WHAT STATE LEADERS CAN DO TO SUPPORT MIDDLE GRADES LITERACY ACHIEVEMENT COMMENTS FROM ALABAMA Middle Grades Literacy Forum September 28-29, 2006 Phoenix,
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Chapter 1 –organizing principle
Literacy Framework: What Does It Look Like at Shawnee Heights? Tamara Konrade ESSDACK Educational Services and Staff Development Association of Central.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Literacy Centers In-Service January 3, 2007 Facilitator: Amy Lack, Reading Coach.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
TEACHING WITH A FOCUS ON LEARNERS One model of Differentiation: Sousa and Tomlinson (2011) Differentiation and The Brain. Purpose: Understanding Text Complexity.
1 CECV Intervention Framework Module 5A Learning & Teaching EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION.
LITERACY-BASED DISTRICT-WIDE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Aiken County Public School District January 15, 2016 LEADERS IN LITERACY CONFERENCE.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
IES Recommendations Explicit vocabulary instruction
Oregon Leadership Network Spring Institute April 9, 2008
Solutions to Advance Adolescent Literacy in West Virginia May 2008
An Overview April 2012.
Presentation transcript:

AIM for Literacy Solutions to Advance Adolescent Literacy in West Virginia Presented by Rebecca Derenge Terry Reale, WVDE Office of Instruction

KNOW What AIM is How AIM is embedded in 21 st Century Reading and English Language Arts CSOs What the components of a successful adolescent literacy program are How schools can implement the AIM model

DO Revise and discuss statement on literacy Define the vocabulary in the AIM framework/tiered instruction Choose and evaluate elements for a successful adolescent literacy program Complete the Literacy Capacity Survey Locate online and evaluate an intervention program Examine a Literacy Walk Through Checklist Plan the implementation of an adolescent literacy program

ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS How does a multi-tiered model of literacy support the needs of all students? How will the literacy leadership team model the commitment to literacy to all stakeholders?

Tiered Instruction

Provides an instructional framework for delivering assessment drive, differentiated instruction to all students, including students at risk Focuses on instruction that uses scientific research-based core, supplemental and intervention programs Identifies struggling students and provides the support (i.e., additional instruction/intervention) they need

Using assessment data to plan instruction and group students accordingly Teaching targeted small groups Using flexible grouping Matching instructional materials to student ability (use Lexiles) Scaffolding instruction to meet student needs

AIM for Literacy Adolescent Instruction Model for Literacy Adapted from CORE West Virginia Department of Education

Levels of Support Individual Students Classroom Unit Interventions Professional Development Advanced Tier Students consistently exceed the targets and can handle advance materials Assessment: Assessment every 6-8 weeks Classroom text Materials: Standard plus reading 25 books per year; SREB recommends 100 pages of technical text to receive credit for one book Students in the classroom are exceeding the benchmarks as demonstrated through assessment Advanced Placement and Pre-AP trained teachers Time: Policy 2510 RLA requirement N/A Good classroom instruction Advanced Placement training and material; Pre- AP instructional strategies and materials; TEACH 21 Differentiated Instruction training; Training on adopted instructional materials; Instructional guides and/or standards-based unit plans; Assessments for and of learning

West Virginia Department of Education Levels of Support Individual Students Classroom UnitInterventionsProfessional Development Tier 1 Benchmark Students generally can meet the standards; average learner Assessment: Assessment every 6-8 weeks Materials: Adopted grade level instructional materials plus reading 25 books per year; SREB recommends 100 pages of technical text to receive credit for one book 75-80% of students are making good progress; all general classroom teachers Time: Policy 2510 RLA requirement N/A Good classroom instruction by all teachers TEACH 21 Strategy Bank Scientifically based reading research and instruction : Pre reading Vocabulary Background knowledge During reading Graphic organizers for connecting students with text Note taking Questioning the text After reading Graphic organizers for connecting students with text Summarization TEACH 21 Reading in the Content Area Professional Development Module; Lexile training; Differentiated Instruction training; Training on adopted grade level instructional materials; Instructional guides and/or standards-based unit plans; Assessments for and of learning

West Virginia Department of Education Levels of Support Individual StudentsClassroom UnitInterventionsProfessional Development Tier 2: Strategic Students are typically between the 30th- 49th percentile on normative measures; 1-2 years behind; gaps in skills and knowledge Assessment: Assessment every 3- 4 weeks to pinpoint problems and target interventions Classroom assessments for learning Scholastic Reading Inventory Materials: Standard reading program with added support class and materials plus reading 25 books per year; SREB recommends 100 pages of technical text to receive credit for one book Classrooms where about one-third of the students are not making benchmarks (25-30%); reading specialists/special education teachers/coaches/con tent area teachers labeled literacy intensive classes (collaborative and co- teaching ) Time: Policy 2510 RELA requirements; content area classes provide interventions also Extended time for delivery of interventions: Strategic Tutoring-students are taught how to learn curriculum information through learning strategies in content areas; after or during school Flexible grouping Double blocking TEACH 21 Strategy Bank Scientifically based reading research and instruction : Pre reading Vocabulary Background knowledge During reading Graphic organizers for connecting students with text Note taking Questioning the text After reading Graphic organizers for connecting students with text Summarization TEACH 21 Reading in the Content Area Professional Development Module; Lexile training; Differentiated Instruction training; Training on adopted grade level instructional materials; Instructional guides and/or standards- based unit plans; Assessments for and of learning

West Virginia Department of Education Levels of Support Individual Students Classroom Unit Interventions Professional Development Tier 3: Intensive Students test below the 30 th percentile on normative measures; reading skills are limited Assessment: Assessment every 2 weeks to pinpoint problems and target interventions Materials: Intensive intervention for non- readers may replace traditional reading class; special supplementary materials and/or specialized program Classrooms where about half of the students are not meeting benchmark indicators; teachers held accountable to teach the program as designed; reading specialist with assistance from special education/coach (collaborative or co-teaching) Time: Intervention time may be beyond the reading class time for students who are farthest behind Extended time for delivery: Examples of special programs: Language (Sopris West) READ 180 (Scholastic) – 90 minutes required Wilson Reading Fast Track Reading (Wright Group) Program specific training; TEACH 21 Strategy Bank Scientifically based reading research and instruction : Pre reading Vocabulary Background knowledge During reading Graphic organizers for connecting students with text Note taking Questioning the text After reading Graphic organizers for connecting students with text Summarization TEACH 21 Reading in the Content Area Professional Development Module; Lexile training; Differentiated Instruction training; Training on adopted grade level instructional materials; Instructional guides and/or standards-based unit plans; Assessments for and of learning

1.Which tier would your school be able to implement without much trouble? Why? 2.How does your school implement interventions now? Three-Minute Pause…

Reading Next (Biancarosa and Snow, 2004, p.12) Instructional Improvements Infrastructure Improvements Direct, explicit instruction Effective instructional principles embedded in content Motivation and self-directed learning Text-based collaborative learning Strategic tutoring Diverse texts Intensive writing A technology component Ongoing formative assessment of students Extended time for literacy Professional development Ongoing summative assessment of teachers and programs Teacher teams Leadership A comprehensive and coordinated literacy program

What is the optimal mix? Professional development Ongoing formative assessment of students Ongoing summative assessment of students and programs

What does your school need? Choose 3 elements that your school could implement next year. What needs to be in place in order for implementation of these elements?

Literacy Leadership Team (LLT) Identify and discuss the schools strengths and challenges in literacy. AIM Literacy Survey Literacy Capacity Survey Identify and prioritize literacy needs of the students and professional development needs of the teachers. Information serves as the professional conversation about literacy Supports school improvement Provide resources and strategies to support change. Assessments for and of learning

Literacy Capacity Survey Complete the Literacy Capacity Survey. Discuss and rank order your items. Discuss how you will use the data.

Assessments It is the action around assessment-the discussion, meetings, revisions, arguments and opportunities to continually create new directions for teaching, learning, curriculum and assessment-that ultimately have consequences.

A Culture of Literacy: Assessment Assess Student Needs 1.Which assessment(s) will we use? Large group tests as a first cut Assess all struggling students beyond the WESTEST to determine specific needs (Tier 2 and 3) 2.Place students in appropriate tier. 3.Determine movement in tiers.

Considerations for choosing programs The teacher should play a critical role in assessment and instruction. The intervention should be a comprehensive approach to reading and writing. Reading and writing in the intervention should be engaging. Interventions should be driven by useful and relevant assessments. The intervention should include significant opportunities for authentic reading and writing. Fisher and Ivey

Online Activity! 1. Consider the five criteria for choosing an intervention program. 2. Choose a program online. 3. Evaluate the program.

Criteria for moving students in Benchmark/Advanced reading classes Moving down: PH assessments indicate that student is consistently below benchmark level AND G rades/progress reports in subject indicate student is below grade level in reading as measured by in-class assignments Chipman Middle School 2006

How do we keep our work focused? Using data to be clear about the problem Using data to be clear about decisions Using data to improve teacher practice (Literacy Walk) Using data to improve student achievement Using data to improve the quality of what we offer students Chipman Middle School 2006

A Common Vision Core Reading Program Intensive Reading Program Content Area Reading Independent Reading Program