CIT eDoc: A case of collaborative & democratic design Rema Nilakanta (ISU), Olatz Lopez (UB), Tom Nyvang (AAU) & Laura Zurita (AAU) August 27 2004, Aalborg.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some impressions from the school visits and the conference -No systematic report 1 st Some general wisdom 2 nd Key analysis questions of the project Conference.
Advertisements

CASS Network of 21 st Century School Systems Rocky View School Division – February 15,2011.
Project-Based Learning and Performance-Based Assessment.
The 21st Century Context for
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Session Learning Target You will gain a better understanding of identifying quality evidence to justify a performance rating for each standard and each.
An ePortfolio System for Life Shane Sutherland ePortfolio Project Director University of Wolverhampton.
PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING & CAPACITY BUILDING
An Overview of Service Learning: Building Bridges, Making Connections
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Matthew Russell, Ph.D. Academic Technologist Learning Technology Center University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Connecting social technologies with information literacy. Internet Librarian International 2006 Kara Jones Subject Librarian University of Bath, UK
Holyoke Public Schools Professional Development By, Judy Taylor
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Adopting Electronic Portfolios at Northern Arizona University’s College of Education.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Advancing Campus Internationalization Through an Integrated Approach: The Role of Languages and Cultures Across the Curriculum Regional Meeting of the.
Agenda Overview Problems of Practice – (same triads) – Break School Visits – Personal reflection – Partner share Research overview On PLCs and the connection.
Teacher Portfolios “The Computer as an Educational Tool: Productivity and Problem Solving” ©Richard C. Forcier and Don E. Descy.
THROUGH AN ONLINE PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP) INDIANA UNIVERSITY-PURDUE UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS OCTOBER 2010 Generating and Assessing Learning.
Week 7 Managing eLearning. “...an approach to teaching and learning that is used within a classroom or educational institution... It is designed to.
AN INTRODUCTION TO PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR POSTGRADUATES.
Using a logic model to help you use the ePortfolio Implementation Framework Katherine Lithgow.
New England Regional Colloquium Series “Systems of State Support” B. Keith Speers January 24, 2007.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Portfolios: A Useful Resource For All Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Beth Schefelker The Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP), an initiative of the Milwaukee.
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
Student Electronic Portfolios for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Susan Kahn Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 31 st EAIR Forum Vilnius,
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Eportfolio: Tool for Student Career Development and Institutional Assessment Sally L. Fortenberry, Ph.D., and Karol Blaylock, Ph.D. Eportfolio: Tool for.
TNE Program Assessment Creating the Culture and Practice of Performance Assessment.
Models of Online Learning – Identifying Components Week 3 Introduction to Web-Based Mentoring and Distance Education.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Electronic Portfolios Preparing Our Students for the 21 st Century The Future.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Peer Review: Promoting a quality culture Associate Professor Gordon Suddaby & Associate Professor Mark Brown Massey University New Zealand Contact details:
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
FLAGSHIP STRATEGY 1 STUDENT LEARNING. Student Learning: A New Approach Victorian Essential Learning Standards Curriculum Planning Guidelines Principles.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Understanding Truth. Pursuing God. Developing Diligence. Cultivating Virtue1 Using E-Portfolios For Evaluating Students' Learning Performance.
Electronic Portfolios as a Summative Assessment Team Purple – Todd Taylor.
Professional Learning Teams Cascade High School September 18, 2015.
AN INTRODUCTION TO PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR UNDERGRADUATES.
Texas STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Results of WP 4: Implementation, experimentation of teacher training actions Open University of Catalonia - From November 4th to December 19th.
Electronic Portfolios Define. Design. Deliver. Elon University Virginia Assessment Group
Chapter 19: Action Research: The School as the Center of Inquiry
Identifying Assessments
What is an ePortfolio? “Created by the three principal activities of collection, selection, and reflection, student portfolios can be succinctly defined.
Agenda Debrief on past module development Tools for online content development Module development template Timeline Suggested guidelines for developing.
Cynthia Brown, DNS, RN, AHN-BC,CNE University of West Georgia Bekir Mugayitoglu, EdD(c) Duquesne University Sharon A. Cumbie, PhD, RN, CNS University of.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Digital Teaching Portfolios: Authentic Professional Development... FOR TEACHERS Creating Digital Teaching Portfolios: An Authentic Professional Development.
INTRODUCTION TO ONLINE FACILITATION- DAY TWO Anna N Perry.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Mary Ann Roe e-Colorado Portal Coordinator Colorado Department of Labor and Employment Jennifer Jirous Computer Information Systems Faculty Pikes Peak.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
E VALUATION PLAN FOR COURSE DESIGN Embedding Literacy and Numeracy Module.
D RAFT OF F RAMEWORK OF C OLLABORATION A CTIVITIES “SEAEDUNET 2.0: D IGITAL -A GE T EACHING AND L EARNING M ODEL ”
+ Priory Curriculum & Instruction Faculty Inservice, August 2014.
Purdue Electronic Portfolio P 3 T 3 : Purdue Program for Preparing Tomorrow’s Teachers to use Technology School of Education Purdue University
Course credit hour definition (7.13)
Purdue Electronic Portfolio
Presentation transcript:

CIT eDoc: A case of collaborative & democratic design Rema Nilakanta (ISU), Olatz Lopez (UB), Tom Nyvang (AAU) & Laura Zurita (AAU) August , Aalborg University, DK

What is a portfolio? Typically, a portfolio is a purposeful collection of artifacts Different types of portfolios: –Marketing/Employment/Showcase –Assessment –Learning –Teaching –Course

Marketing/Showcase/Employment & Assessment portfolio Purpose: evaluation/employment/showcase A static collection of artifacts, usually of exemplary work Portfolio structure directed by educational institution or potential employer/s (Wolf & Dietz, 1998)

Learning & Teaching portfolio Purpose: Learning, professional development reflective journal documents the process of learning - includes works in progress - drafts - demonstrates progress over time contains feedback - formative evaluation or collaborative mentoring Author-owned and directed; student/teacher as the audience

Course portfolio Purpose: Improve a course, one’s teaching, and understand student’s learning Teacher’s analysis of a course (Cerbin, online, Barkley, 2003) Similar to a learning/teaching portfolio but focused on a single course Contains content from course, student work, teacher’s reflections

What is a portfolio? Four dominating perspectives: –a collection (physical) pragmatic –a tool for reflection cognitive –a process (e-foliation) cognitive/psychological –a theoretical activity theoretical/philosophical

Portfolio Types Portfolio TypePerspective  Marketing/Showcase/ Employment  Assessment Collection  Learning  Teaching  Course Reflective tool Process Theoretical act

Portfolio as a physical entity A portfolio is a “representative sample of one’s work. As the word’s roots suggest (and as is still the case in the arts) the sample of work is fashioned for a particular objective and carried from place to place for inspection or exhibition” (Wiggins in Barrett, on-line)

Portfolio as tool for reflection An electronic portfolio is not a haphazard collection of artifacts (i.e., a digital scrapbook or a multimedia presentation) but rather a reflective tool that demonstrates growth over time … [and is based] around a set of standards or learning goals. (Barrett, on-line)

Portfolio as a process [E]foliate might be to peel back the layers of learning in an electronic or technological format (wherein the creator sees unique connections throughout the process) (Norton-Meier, 2003).

Portfolio as a theoretical act Every time you design, organize, or create in your teacher education program a template, a framework, or a model for a teaching portfolio, you are engaged in an act of theory. Your theory of teaching will determine a reasonable portfolio entry (Shulman, 1998)

CIT eDoc: Context The eDoc Project IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FSHN eDoc (Food Science & Human Nutrition) ISUComm eDoc (ISU Communication) ELPS eDoc (Educational Leadership & Policy Studies) CIT eDoc (Curriculum & Instructional Technology)

CIT eDoc Context –Part of a larger campus-wide project called eDoc ( The aim of eDoc is to design and develop discipline specific electronic portfolio “themes” for students to compile and display evidence of their knowledge and skill acquired during their study program – Utilizes open source technology –Integrated with uPortal - aggregates all servers on campus to provide a common entry point. (

CIT eDoc Aim –Design and develop an electronic portfolio system for Ph.D. students to facilitate their learning, professional development, and annual assessment –Develop a community of scholars of educational technology where identities are formed and transformed (Wenger 1998) - democratic learning

CIT eDoc Design Features: –Easy and quick access to artifacts (evidence of knowledge gained) with the help of the artifact grid –Informative display of artifact and accompanying reflections –Integrated discussion forum equipped with qualitative research tools enhancing the resourcefulness and utility of asynchronous communication –Assessment integrated with learning with the help of the artifact grid

CIT eDoc Design Process End users as designers - ISU and non ISU Ph.D. students and faculty members Collaborative and democratic –Design team includes students, faculty members, programmer, interface designers, trainers Iterative with several prototypes Reflective - revisit themes and critically analyze decisions Negotiated process involving designers, programmers, and students

Comments from an outsider… Tom Nyvang, Aalborg University

Comments… Process and product Context and transferability

CIT eDoc – Process and Product The technology we use shapes our perception of the task at hand – and existing practice shapes our perception of a new technology The CIT eDoc acknowledges this in two ways: –The eDoc is designed with existing practice as a springboard –The eDoc is used as a springboard for a new practice

Existing Practice as a Springboard Goals defined based on knowledge of what it takes to do a Ph.D. and problems defined by students and faculty –Learning objectives –Quality assurance objectives –Administrative objectives Faculty involvement Student driven (to a large extent) Grounded in an emerging tradition for electronic portfolios Grounded in research

A Springboard For a New Practice Electronic portfolio: From an emerging practice to a fully implemented mode of operation Towards more collaboration between Ph.D. students

Context and transferability ISU CIT Ph.D. –Heavy course load –Requirements to course load, subjects and products –Many Ph.D. students AAU HCI Ph.D. –Lesser courses and course load –Growing requirements to course load, subjects and product –Growing number of Ph.D. students HCI portfolio – learning, quality assurance and administrative objectives?

CIT eDoc Design Process from UB A monthly eDoc meeting (all ISU teams) A weekly CIT eDoc meeting (1h): –Agenda, distributed tasks, taking decisions… COLLABORATIVE DESIGN WebCT Platform –As a research electronic environment –Info about the project, people involved, resources, mock ups, minutes, discussions… UB/GREAM: Moodle platform

UB ILET participation GREAM: –ILET: ge.html ge.html –ILET UB: –ILET personal website: