ACD Calibrations in L&EO Needed Calibrations Pedestals (low and high range) Low range gains via MIP peak positions Veto and HLD discriminator set points.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Online Monitoring and plane checkout Online monitoring is used at the mine for: –sanity checks - “is everything working” –diagnostics - rates, hot/dead.
Advertisements

NLC – The Next Linear Collider Project Colorado Univ. - Boulder Calorimetry-Arlington Calorimetry Detector Study Plans at Colorado Uriel Nauenberg for.
2 Introduction   MiniCal test-beam studies started at the beginning of March (till March 6 we only had 17 APD’s, then 33 APD’s)   A few days were.
Study of the MPPC Performance - contents - Introduction Fundamental properties microscopic laser scan –check variation within a sensor Summary and plans.
Adding electronic noise and pedestals to the CALICE simulation LCWS 19 – 23 rd April Catherine Fry (working with D Bowerman) Imperial College London.
Alex Moiseev, 02/01/021 ACD VETO SIGNALS AND EFFICIENCY With the recent changes, the following ACD VETO signals will be generated: AEM VETO HIT MAP, created.
Standalone VeloPix Simulation Jianchun Wang 4/30/10.
1 Scintillating Fibre Cosmic Ray Test Results Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Monday 29 th March 2004.
Status of the MICE SciFi Simulation Edward McKigney Imperial College London.
SVAC/ISOCInstrument Analysis Meeting, April 14, 2006 Anders W. Borgland 1 The LAT In Every Which Way You Want It! Anders W. Borgland Science Verification,
Checking the Acd hardware veto setting The hardware veto is generated in the front-end electronics Discriminator with coarse and fine settings Both are.
SVAC/ISOCInstrument Analysis Workshop, February 27, 2006 Anders W. Borgland 1 Overview Of LAT Data Taking Anders W. Borgland Science Verification, Analysis.
Analysis of AcdPedestal during EMI runs During the EMC-EMI scans we are looking for discrete changes in the behavior of the ACD as we scan the frequency.
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectCalibration and Analysis group meeting, April, 3, 2006 CAL on-orbit calibration with protons. Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU.
GLAST LAT Project IA weekly meeting, February 3, 2006 ACD subsystem Alex Moiseev 1 ACD Pedestals ACD Team at Goddard: Alex Moiseev Dave Thomspon Bob Hartman.
9/11/2007JC Wang1 Track Resolution Scale, assume equal  meas for different planes. HP3 HP4 All 6 measurements. Without leftmost one. Without rightmost.
GLAST LAT Project May 25, 2006: Pre-Environmental Test Review Presentation 6 of 12 LAT Test Results 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Pre-Environmental Test.
SVAC Instrument Analysis Meeting Aug 5, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva and Anders W. Borgland 1/7 SVAC 8 tower testing+ACD Anders and Eduardo.
GLAST LAT ProjectGLAST Flight Software IDT, October 16, 2001 JJRussell1 October 16, 2001 What’s Covered Activity –Monitoring FSW defines this as activity.
SVACInstrument Analysis Meeting, January 13, 2006 Anders W. Borgland 1 Data Is (Nearly) Here! Anders W. Borgland Science Verification, Analysis and Calibrations.
Jianchun (JC) Wang, 08/21/99 RICH Electronics and DAQ Chip Carrier Short Cable Transition Board Long Cable Data Board Crate J.C.Wang Syracuse University.
GLAST LAT Project IA Workshop, July 14, 2005 ACD subsystem Alex Moiseev 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: IA Workshop July 14, 2005 AntiCoincidence Detector.
Trending ACD performance Parameters of interest Online tests (CPTs) TCI (charge injection) -> PHA TCI -> Veto mapping Timing PHA Pedestals Offline tests.
GLAST LAT Project SE Test Planning meeting October 4, 2004 E. do Couto e Silva 1/13 SVAC Data Taking during LAT SLAC Oct 4, 2004 Eduardo.
Alex Moiseev NASA/GSFC 12/16/2005 Some ACD Calibration issues I.ACD mip peak monitoring 1. ACD mip peak monitoring requires the measurements to be done.
GLAST Large Area Telescope Engineering Meeting 23 November 2004 Charge Injection Calibration James Swain Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
ACD calibrations Pedestals Measured from online script Measure PHA w/ HV off, no charge injection Use cyclic triggers ~ ADC counts, very narrow.
CFT Calibration Calibration Workshop Calibration Requirements Calibration Scheme Online Calibration databases.
Sep/26/05Trigger test plan Trigger ACD/LAT Test Plan Eric Grove, Martin Kocian, Su Dong.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, Nantes, July2002 SVT Analysis/Status Update Jun Takahashi – University of Sao Paulo.
Performance test of STS demonstrators Anton Lymanets 15 th CBM collaboration meeting, April 12 th, 2010.
Eric Charles ACD Software review Phase I Walkthrough of major ACD software compontents Jan
Updates on GEMs characterization with APV electronics K. Gnanvo, N. Liyanage, K. Saenboonruang.
Run Coordinator Weekly Report EG6 Commissioning October Raffaella De Vita.
DC12 Commissioning Status GOALS: establish operating conditions, determine initial calibration parameters and measure operating characteristics for the.
ECFA Sep 2004Paul Dauncey - CALICE Readout1 CALICE ECAL Readout Status Paul Dauncey For the CALICE-UK electronics group A. Baird, D. Bowerman, P.
“End station A setup” data analysis Josef Uher. Outline Introduction to setup and analysis Quartz bar start counter MA and MCP PMT in the prototype.
Montpellier, November 15, 2003 J. Cvach, TileHCAL and APD readout1 TileHCAL- fibre readout by APD APDs and preamplifiers Energy scan with DESY beam –Energy.
1 xCAL monitoring Yu. Guz, IHEP, Protvino I.Machikhiliyan, ITEP, Moscow.
GLAST LAT Project SVAC Workshop, February 27, 2006 ACD subsystem Alex Moiseev 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: SVAC Workshop February 27-28, 2006 AntiCoincidence.
Nigel Watson / BirminghamCALICE ECAL, UCL, 06-Mar-2006 Test Beam Task List - ECAL  Aim:  Identify all tasks essential for run and analysis of beam data.
E. GaruttiCALICE collaboration meeting, Prague CERN Test beam (part II) Erika Garutti, Fabrizio Salvatore.
LM Feb SSD status and Plans for Year 5 Lilian Martin - SUBATECH STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL - February 2005.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Muons at NRL 28 Feb 2006 J. Eric Grove Naval Research Lab Washington DC LAT Muon Data Taking During Environmental Test at NRL J. Eric.
ScECAL Beam FNAL Short summary & Introduction to analysis S. Uozumi Nov ScECAL meeting.
F Don Lincoln, Fermilab f Fermilab/Boeing Test Results for HiSTE-VI Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
1 Oct 2009Paul Dauncey1 Status of 2D efficiency study Paul Dauncey.
Performance of new MPPC Nov. 21 Korea-Japan joint meeting Takashi Maeda Hideki Yamazaki Yuji Sudo (University of Tsukuba) --- Contents ---
Muons at CalDet Introduction Track Finder Package ADC Corrections Drift Points Path Length Attenuation Strip-to-Strip Calibration Scintillator Response.
Overview of PHENIX Muon Tracker Data Analysis PHENIX Muon Tracker Muon Tracker Software Muon Tracker Database Muon Event Display Performance Muon Reconstruction.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T Test Planning Telecon, 8 Nov 2004 CAL Test and Calibration DefinitionJ. Eric Grove GLAST LAT GLAST LAT Calorimeter Subsystem Gamma-ray.
Comparison of MC and data Abelardo Moralejo Padova.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
1M. Ellis - MICE Tracker PC - 1st October 2007 Station QA Analysis (G4MICE)  Looking at the same data as Hideyuki, but using G4MICE.  Have not yet had.
GLAST ACD Status. GLAST Overview McPositionHitCol AcdDigiCol AcdRecon AcdDigiAlg AcdReconAlg TkrFitTrackCol TDS Gaudi Algorithms.
GLAST LAT ProjectACD CDR January 7 & 8, 2003 Section 8 EGSE, Performance Monitoring, Calibration 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: AntiCoincidence Detector.
GLAST LAT Project SE Test Planning Dec 7, 2004 E. do Couto e Silva 1/27 Trigger and SVAC Tests During LAT integration Su Dong, Eduardo do Couto e Silva.
Acd Veto Latching The Acd front end electronics generate a veto primitive when a discriminator goes above threshold. But. The signal is split: One path.
Background Rejection Prep Work
Overview of Acd Reconstruction
CMS Preshower: Startup procedures: Reconstruction & calibration
PCAL Cosmic Ray Tests Progress Report C. Smith μ U V W MODULE 2
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
ScECAL+AHCAL+TCMT Combined Beam FNAL
LAT Test Results GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Pre-Shipment Review
Calorimeter calibrations with Flight Software.
B. Genolini for the IPNO detector dept.
GLAST LAT System Engineering
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout
Presentation transcript:

ACD Calibrations in L&EO Needed Calibrations Pedestals (low and high range) Low range gains via MIP peak positions Veto and HLD discriminator set points Expressed in terms of PHA (aka ADC) counts High range gains via CNO data Coherent Noise correction Calibrations pedestal oscillations seen after event readout Magnitude of oscillations in ~ MIP range This effect is not simulated, so we need to remove in correctly Simulating is difficult b/c it requires event to event timing

Data taking needs Pedestals and Coherent Noise Low range pedestal come from 2Hz periods in nomSciOps Special “LCI” run for high range pedestals (few minutes) MIP peak positions 2K mips / tile -> Hz of MIPS Veto and HLD discriminator set points Special runs to scan 3 set points around nominal setting Veto: 0.30, 0.45, 0.60 MIPs HLD: Z = 4,5,6 Couple hundred events near threshold / tile Rate in orbit configuration still uncertain ~ 200 Hz with MIP filter -> 45 minutes / point High range calibration via CNO data Use CNO events, but not certain about usable rate in orbit configuration yet

Data Processing Needs, Timescale Analysis scripts exist for: Pedestals MIP peaks Veto and HLD set points Coherent Noise correction Analysis turnaround time is < 1 hour after run is processed Configuration generation and validation turnaround is < 1 day Need work for ACD high range calibration w/ CNO events Important to note that the timescale for getting this done is longer that the other analyses See talk by Alex Moiseev

Data taking configurations for L & EO Preliminary versions of all configurations needed for L&EO are specified Some tuning of Onboard filter settings might Run types AcdPedestal LCI (charge injection) run Pedestals VetoCal (aka Veto and HLD scan) Veto and HLD set points nomSciOps, conSciOps, calibOps MIP peaks, coherent noise, high range calibration Cal* ACD can piggyback on various CAL calibration run types Not currently set up that way.

Current status from TVAC Pedetals, MIP peaks and veto thresholds measured at Ambient temperature HOT thermal balance (closest to expected orbit conditions) COLD thermal balance Moderate thermal variation observed Pedestals vary by ~1 PHA count / deg MIP peaks increase by ~5-10% at COLD Veto set points vary only slightly Configurations built from HOT calibrations Validated against existing configurations from room temp Differences agree with know thermal variations

Other analysis topics for L & EO Mapping out tile and ribbon efficiencies Should be done with existing muon data Edge effects Screw holes in tiles Light loss along ribbons Characterizing backsplash into ACD Using ACD to study tracking alignment/ resolution Preliminary work has been done in all these areas