Terra Incognita (Again? Again! Again.) The zonal nature of the spectrum of lateral heterogeneity in the mantle as function of depth: five zones A very.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Earth’s Interior.
Advertisements

SPP 1257 Modelling of the Dynamic Earth from an Integrative Analysis of Potential Fields, Seismic Tomography and other Geophysical Data M. Kaban, A. Baranov.
The Transition Zone: Slabs ’ Purgatory CIDER, Group A Garrett Leahy, Ved Lekic, Urska Manners, Christine Reif, Joost van Summeren, Tai-Lin Tseng,
An estimate of post-seismic gravity change caused by the 1960 Chile earthquake and comparison with GRACE gravity fields Y. Tanaka 1, 2, V. Klemann 2, K.
The Myth of Whole Mantle Convection JUDGE FOR YOURSELF… Don L. Anderson.
How Important is the Motion of Subducting Slabs Relative to the Underlying Mantle: A Proposed Study Walter R. Roest & R. Dietmar Müller The University.
…you ought to have done a better job! -Ernest Rutherford “The probability that 18…out of 24 randomly chosen points lie within the belts (23.5% of the.
The Earth’s Structure Seismology and the Earth’s Deep Interior The Earth’s Structure from Travel Times Spherically symmetric structure: PREM - Crustal.
Dynamic topography, phase boundary topography and latent-heat release Bernhard Steinberger Center for Geodynamics, NGU, Trondheim, Norway.
Have plumes been detected seismologically? Maeve O’Shea University of Durham October 2004.
Predicting Global Perovskite to Post-Perovskite Phase Boundary Don Helmberger, Daoyuan Sun, Xiaodong Song, Steve Grand, Sidio Ni, and Mike Gurnis.
Global Distribution of Crustal Material Inferred by Seismology Nozomu Takeuchi (ERI, Univ of Tokyo) (1)Importance of Directional Measurements from geophysicists’
Determining the nature of the LLSVP Post-AGU CIDER Workshop 2012 Maxim Ballmer, Jamie Barron, Rohan Kundargi, Curtis Williams, Rick Carlson, Jasper Konter,
Seismic Profiles of Earth’s Interior
Seismic tomography Tomography attempts to determine anomalous structures within the Earth as revealed by deviations from “average” seismic properties at.
EARTH’S INTERNAL STRUCTURE AND MAGMA FORMATION PROCESSES.
GreatBreak: Grand Challenges in Geodynamics. Characteristics of a Desirable Geodynamic Model Ties together observational constraints on current state.
3D seismic imaging of the earth’s mantle Barbara Romanowicz Department of Earth and Planetary Science U.C. Berkeley.
GG 450 April 15, 2008 Refraction Applications. While refraction is used for engineering studies such as depth to basement and depth to the water table,
SISMA Seismic Information System for Monitoring and Alert Galileian Plus Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Milano, Italy Politecnico di.
Dynamics of Mantle Plumes Methods for modeling basic thermal plumes (with and without tracers) Plumes interacting with plates (and ridges) Plumes in thermo-chemical.
A manifesto by Group 7. What we sample at MOR, a great reflection of the upper mantle, is not the whole mantle, as it does not add up to chondritic conditions.
Past, Present and Future What have we learned? -Mantle and Plates are an intimately coupled system -Deep mantle structure is important for the surface.
TPW unplugged: Absolute plate motions and true polar wander in the absence of hotspot tracks, 320 — 130 Ma Bernhard Steinberger In collaboration with Trond.
An model for mantle structure evolution and its implications for mantle seismic and compositional structures and supercontinent process Nan Zhang,
Cooling of the Earth: A parameterized convection study of whole versus layered models by McNamara and Van Keken 2000 Presentation on 15 Feb 2005 by Group.
Large Low Shear Velocity Provinces in the lowermost mantle, and Plume Generation Zones at their margins Bernhard Steinberger Collaborators: Kevin Burke.
Paradigms versus paradoxes: Developing a new paradigm for the mantle Attreyee Ghosh, Ricardo Arevalo Jr., Ved Lekic, and Victor Tsai with Adam Dziewonski,
What is a plume? By Julian Winter Alexandra Witze (2003)
Geology 5640/6640 Introduction to Seismology 15 Apr 2015 © A.R. Lowry 2015 Read for Fri 17 Apr: S&W (§3.6) Last time: Structure of the Deep Earth’s.
Seismological observations Earth’s deep interior, and their geodynamical and mineral physical interpretation Arwen Deuss, Jennifer Andrews University of.
17.1 Notes: Earth’s Mantle & Crust Continental crust Thickness: Continental crust is thicker (30-40Km) Age: older (up to 4.4 billion yrs old) Composition:
G. Marquart Gravity Effect of Plumes Geodynamik Workshop, Hamburg, Modeling Gravity Anomalies Caused by Mantle Plumes Gabriele Marquart Mantle.
Plumes, hotspots and the CMB Lecture 6: Geodynamics Carolina Lithgow-Bertelloni.
Global seismic tomography and its CIDER applications Adam M. Dziewonski KITP, July 14, 2008.
Chapter 17 Earth’s Interior and Geophysical Properties
Adam M. Dziewonski in cooperation with Ved Lekic and Barbara Romanowicz Terra Incognita Again ; Five zones in the mantle KITP July 19, 2012.
1994 Bolivian Earthquake Eric Kiser Bolivian Earthquake Moment Magnitude (Mw): 8.3 Epicenter: 13.84°S and °W Depth: 631km.
Colloquium Prague, April, A Numerical Approach to Model the Accretion of Icelandic Crust Gabriele Marquart and Harro Schmeling.
Hindsight Heresy. Examples of “Hindsight Heresy” in which a hypothesis is constructed after looking at a data set, and then using the same data to support.
The crust and the Earth’s interior
Chapter 12: Earth’s Interior
Constraints on the observation of mantle plumes using global seismology Arwen Deuss University of Cambridge, UK.
1/24/09 Updated 12/23/09 What about Hawaii? Don L. Anderson.
The influence of lateral permeability of the 660-km discontinuity on geodynamic models of mantle flow. Annemarie G. Muntendam-Bos 1, Ondrej Cadek 2, Wim.
EXPLORING EARTH’S INTERIOR Chapter 14. Seismic rays are refracted away from the normal as they penetrate the earth, which causes them to bend, because.
Reference Earth model: heat-producing elements & geoneutrino flux *Yu Huang, Roberta Rudnick, and Bill McDonough Geology, U Maryland *Slava Chubakov, Fabio.
Geology 5640/6640 Introduction to Seismology 13 Apr 2015 © A.R. Lowry 2015 Read for Wed 15 Apr: S&W (§3.6) Last time: Ray-Tracing in a Spherical.
Twinkle Twinkle Hot Afar Oh We Wonder What You Are By Alex Hornby, Ross Findlay, Adam Lewis, Libby Rose, David Redpath, Megan Roberts, Emma Reynolds.
Do hotspots correlate with– asthenospheric shear (Conrad et al., King), extensional stress (Favela, Lithgow-Bertelloni), plate architecture & anisotropy.
Principal Components Analysis ( PCA)
How can global seismic tomography help in studies of “Early Earth” Berkeley, December 10, 2011.
Seismic Waves Surface Waves Seismic Waves are shock waves given off by earthquakes. There are 2 types: 1. Body Waves originate from the focus (F) travel.
The slowing factor s is 4, and the correlation includes all 12 harmonic degrees.
Seismotectonics Mathilde B. Sørensen and J. Havskov.
Fig. 2 Two-dimensional embedding result obtained using nMDS.
Douglas A. Wiens & James Conder
Crust, Mantle, & Convection Jagmark
Lithosphere Delamination and Small-Scale Convection Beneath California Imaged with High Resolution Rayleigh Wave Tomography Donald W. Forsyth and Yingjie.
Deep Earth dynamics – numerical and fluid tank modelling
Length scale of heterogeneity
Archean continental terranes commonly have deep keels, but the whole upper mantle of western North America shows very slow seismic velocities.
John Woodhouse Symposium
How do plates move? MANTLE CONVECTION.
Seismic tomography Tomography attempts to determine anomalous structures within the Earth as revealed by deviations from “average” seismic properties at.
Seismic tomography Tomography attempts to determine anomalous structures within the Earth as revealed by deviations from “average” seismic properties at.
Medial Axis Shape Coding in Macaque Inferotemporal Cortex
Constructing synthetics from deep earth tomographic models
5% of all known volcanoes in the world are not located close to a plate margin. These are known as intraplate volcanoes and occur as a result of mantle.
Earthquakes track subduction fluids from slab source to mantle wedge sink by Felix Halpaap, Stéphane Rondenay, Alexander Perrin, Saskia Goes, Lars Ottemöller,
Presentation transcript:

Terra Incognita (Again? Again! Again.) The zonal nature of the spectrum of lateral heterogeneity in the mantle as function of depth: five zones A very informal presentation; KITP July 9, 2012 Adam Dziewonski

Geoid Hot spots Seismic structureSubduction 0 – 120 Ma Geodynamic functions; degrees 2 & 3 only Richards & Engerbretsen, 1992

Slabs go to the bottom of the mantle !!! 1997 Grand et al., 1997

Five zones in the mantle heterosphere Moho – 225 km upper mantle buffer zone km transition zone km lower mantle buffer zone km abyssal zone 2400 km - CMB (Dziewonski et al., 2010)

Spectral characteristics of three models All models show five zones

Velocity anomalies change abruptly between 200 and 300 km depth From Ritsema et al., 2004

Five zones in the mantle heterosphere Moho – 225 km upper mantle buffer zone km transition zone km lower mantle buffer zone km abyssal zone 2400 km - CMB (Dziewonski et al., 2010)

Comparison of five models After Ritsema et al., 2011

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) A multi-dimensional function – a 3-D velocity model, for example – may be represented by a sum of multi-dimensional functions that are orthogonal: Δv(r,θ,φ) = ∑ λ i f i (r, θ, φ) Where λi are eigenvalues and ∫ f i f j dV = δij The advantage of PCA is to determine the importance of different elements of the model.

Variance reduction and the radial components of the largest PC’s of model S362ANI

The first six PC’s: horizontal component

Model obtained by using two largest PC’s compared to S362ANI (right) 69% variance reduction

Model obtained by using four largest PC’s compared to S362ANI (right) 88% variance reduction

Model obtained by using six largest PC’s compared to S362ANI (right) 95% variance reduction

Comparison of five models at a depth of 2800 km

Lower mantle “slow – fast” regionalization How similar are regionalizations based on cluster analysis of different tomographic models? Lekic et al. (2012)

Vs Profiles of 2 Clusters

Voting vs. harmonic order

Comparison of seismic model S362ANI (left column) at 2800 km and integrated mass anomaly for slab model L-B&R (right column). The top maps show the velocity model at 2800 km and the whole- mantle integrated slab model for degrees The middle row shows degree-2 pattern only (note the changed color scale), while the third row shows the combined degree 2 and 3 pattern km All degrees Degree 2 Degrees 2 & 3

Degree 2 velocity anomalies at 2800 km, the Earth’s rotation axis and TPW paths of Besse and Courtillot (2002) S362ANISAW24BS20RTS

You cannot unmix convection After 4.5 billion years after the Earth accreted, the dominant component of lateral heterogeneity in the lowermost mantle still looks like the initial model of the convection experiment

Degrees 2 & 3 tell most of the story S362ANI Degrees 2 & 3 Five model voting All degrees

Two main points: The characteristics of the spectrum of heterogeneity as a function of depth indicates the presence of five different regions: three in in the upper mantle and two in the lower mantle. A very large structure at the bottom of the mantle imposes a permanent imprint on the tectonics at the surface. It determines a broad ring in which subduction can occur and regions of high hot-spot activity.

Deep mantle and convecting mantle do not mix Mukhopadhyay (2012) ; figure from Ballentine (2012)