PanCanadian RDA Training Module: Providing Context for RDA Derived from IFLA documents and various presentations delivered by RDA Joint Steering Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WELCOME TO TE PUNA LIBRARIES FORUM 2011 Day one Te Puna Libraries Forum 31 March – 1 April 2011 Te Puna Strategic Advisory Committee.
Advertisements

RDA : the Inside Story The Genesis OLA, February 2, 2008 Ingrid Parent Library and Archives Canada.
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
RDA & Serials. RDA Toolkit CONSER RDA Cataloging Checklist for Textual Serials (DRAFT) CONSER RDA Core Elements Where’s that Tool? CONSER RDA Cataloging.
Resource Description and Access (RDA): a new standard for the digital world Ann Huthwaite Library Resource Services Manager, QUT.
FRBR: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records it is the Final Report of the IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic.
RDA and libraries Gordon Dunsire Presented at a College Development Network webinar, 13 June 2013.
RDA Test at LC Module 1: Overview What RDA Is; Structure.
RDA: a new international standard for resource discovery and access Gordon Dunsire Based on a presentation created by the Joint Steering Committee for.
RDA Terminology: A Summary Atoma Batoma. RDA Terminology RDA Vocabularies: Controlled Vocabularies -Closed – Open –
RDA: A New Standard Supporting Resource Discovery Presentation given at the CLA conference session The Future of Resource Discovery: Promoting Resource.
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
AACR2's Strategic Plan and IFLA Work towards an International Cataloguing Code Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Library of Congress Representative to the Joint Steering.
Cambridge University Library RDA - Hugh Taylor, 7 Jan 09 RDA: Past, Present, Future Hugh Taylor CILIP Representative, Joint Steering Committee for Development.
FRBR: BASICS & INFLUENCE ON AACR A presentation by Kate Harcourt Columbia University Libraries April 19, 2004 ARLIS 2004 New York.
AACR3: Resource Description and Access Presented by Dr. Barbara Tillett Chief, CPSO Library of Congress 2004.
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen OLAC 2006 Conference October 27, 2006
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen Cornell University May 16, 2006
RDA AND AUTHORITY CONTROL Name: Hester Marais Job Title: Authority Describer Tel: Your institution's logo.
RDA Test “Train the Trainer Module 1: What RDA is and isn’t [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
Structure AACR2 Part I - Description Part II - Headings, Uniform titles, References RDA Attributes (of entities) Relationships (between entities)
Music Library AssociationFeb. 18, 2005BCC Open Meeting Development of AACR3 Kathy Glennan University of Southern California.
1 RDA and CJK Materials CEAL CTP Training Workshop March 13, 2012 Location: Room 2214, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.
FRAD: Functional Requirements for Authority Data.
Moving Cataloguing into the 21 st Century Presentation given at the CLA pre-conference Shaping Tomorrow’s Metadata with RDA June 2, 2010 by Tom Delsey.
RDA Basics: Foundations and Background September 13, 2011 Tami Morse McGill & Susan Wynne Logo used by permission of the Co-Publishers for RDA (American.
7/14/09. Robert L. Maxwell RDA Lecture Series National Library of South Africa 22 July /14/09 Cataloging: Still a Professional Asset to Become Excited.
CONSER RDA Bridge Training [date] Presenters : [names] 1.
Jan. 29, 2004OLA SuperConference Changes to AACR2 Problems and Solutions Pat Riva (McGill University) Maureen Killeen (A-G Canada Ltd.)
Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian IU Digital Library Program New Developments in Cataloging.
Update on RDA & cataloguing standards developments Deirdre Kiorgaard Australian Committee on Cataloguing Representative to the Joint Steering Committee.
IME ICC5 Report Working Group 3: Seriality Working Group Leader: Elise Roberts Co-leader: Martha de Waal Working Group Recorder: Marion Chibambo IME ICC5,
RDA Toolkit With thanks to Lori Robare (University of Oregon) and Robert Maxwell (Brigham Young University) for most of these slides.
Entity Relationships for the Bibliographic Universe Jacquie Samples September 7,2010 FRBR.
Resource Description and Access Since We Last Met… Marjorie E. Bloss RDA Project Manager 1.
Module 8: Changes to RDA LC RDA for NASIG - June 1, in general and for serials.
From AACR2 to RDA: An Evolution Kathy Glennan University of Maryland.
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen RDA Forum ALA Annual Meeting, New Orleans, June 24,
The Future of Cataloging Codes and Systems: IME ICC, FRBR, and RDA by Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Cataloging Policy & Support Office Library of Congress.
What users want & how FRBR can help Diane Vizine-Goetz Research Scientist OCLC Research.
Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard Australian Committee on Cataloguing Representative to the Joint Steering Committee for the Development.
Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard ACOC Seminar, September 2007.
Setting a new standard Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard 18 September 2006.
Linked Data by Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Policy and Standards Division Library of Congress For Texas Library Association Conference April 12, 2011.
RDA Compared with AACR2 Presentation given at the ALA conference program session Look Before You Leap: taking RDA for a test-drive July 11, 2009 by Tom.
RDA, the Next Phase Joy Anhalt Marjorie Bloss Richard Stewart.
RDA DAY 1 – part 2 web version 1. 2 When you catalog a “book” in hand: You are working with a FRBR Group 1 Item The bibliographic record you create will.
Building blocks for RDA Theory behind RDA ALLUNY Annual Meeting September 28-30, 2012.
Intellectual Works and their Manifestations Representation of Information Objects IR Systems & Information objects Spring January, 2006 Bharat.
Based on an earlier presentation made at the BCLA Annual Conference in 2010 Prepared for Pan-Canadian RDA Training by: Linda Woodcock, Technical Services.
Chris Oliver May 4 th, 2009 for MLA RDA and AACR2.
AACR2 versus RDA Presentation given at the CLA Pre-Conference Session From Rules to Entities: Cataloguing with RDA May 29, 2009 by Tom Delsey.
FRBR: Cataloging’s New Frontier Emily Dust Nimsakont Nebraska Library Commission NCompass Live December 15, 2010 Photo credit:
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records The Changing Face of Cataloging William E. Moen Texas Center for Digital Knowledge School of Library.
Module 4 Key differences from AACR2 Structure This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia License
LC Training for RDA: Resource Description & Access Module 5: Authorities I Part 4: RDA Toolkit Cooperative and Instructional Programs Division Library.
RDA Training University of Nevada, Las Vegas May2013 Module 3 RDA Basics Using the RDA Toolkit.
RDA: a new cataloging standard for a digital future RDA Update Forum ALA Midwinter Meeting Philadelphia, PA January 13, 2008 John Attig ALA Representative.
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
RDA: history and background Ann Huthwaite Library Resource Services Manager, QUT ACOC Seminar, Sydney, 24 October 2008.
FROM AACR2 to RDA (and a few things in between) The history and context of RDA development Jenny Stephens, National Library of Australia, October 2010.
RDA in NACO Module 1.b Background : FRBR/FRAD. 2 FRBR Foundation of RDA If you want a more detailed background, watch this webcast by Barbara Tillett:
Key differences from AACR2 Structure 1. Learning Outcomes Understand similarities between RDA and AACR2 Understand the structural differences between.
CASEY A. MULLIN WITH: LALA HAJIBAYOVA SCOTT MCCAULAY DECEMBER 8, 2008 FRBR in RDF: a proof-of-concept model 1 ©2008 Casey A. Mullin.
1 CLA June 2, 2010 IFLA’s Conceptual Models and RDA presented by Pat Riva.
Some basic concepts Week 1 Lecture notes INF 384C: Organizing Information Spring 2016 Karen Wickett UT School of Information.
Introduction to FRBR Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records GACOMO Oct. 16, 2008.
FRAD: Functional Requirements for Authority Data
RDA: Cataloguing in the 21st century
FRBR and FRAD as Implemented in RDA
Presentation transcript:

PanCanadian RDA Training Module: Providing Context for RDA Derived from IFLA documents and various presentations delivered by RDA Joint Steering Committee members at IFLA, ALA or CLA conferences Compiled by: Sue Andrews University of British Columbia Library

Resource Description and Access … how did we get here?

Objectives of this module Identify major developments in cataloguing that have influenced RDA Be introduced to the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records Understand the origins of the organization and terminology of RDA Understand RDA’s role in an international cataloguing context RDA Module - Context3

Outline Major events and studies influencing RDA – Stockholm Seminar and FRBR – Barbara Tillett’s work – Toronto Conference – RDA-ONIX alignment – Delsey’s Logical structure work – Paris Principles update – FRAD and FRSAD RDA RDA Module - Context4

Stockholm Seminar on Cataloguing (1990) IFLA-sponsored seminar with participants from around the world Agreement on the need for a re-examination of existing international cataloguing practices Proposed an IFLA-sponsored study to: Examine the relationships between the data elements in bibliographic records and the user needs to be met. Recommend an internationally acceptable basic level of functionality and a set of basic data requirements for records created by national bibliographic agencies. i.e. what do we really need in our records? The findings were reported in the (1998) IFLA publication: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records RDA Module - Context5

Methodology of the study A user-based approach No a priori assumptions An entity analysis technique – entities – attributes – relationships Consideration of all users, all formats Independence from any particular cataloguing code RDA Module - Context6

Fundamental User Needs To find (e.g. materials on a given topic, by a given author). To identify (e.g. confirm that the record retrieved corresponds to the document or format sought) To select (e.g. have enough information to decide which of multiple records best suits the user’s needs for language, format, etc.) To obtain (e.g. have enough info to find on shelf, order, access electronically, etc.) Since first publication of FRBR: To navigate (e.g. among records in a database, headings in an index) Other suggestions have been: to manage and to preserve RDA Module - Context7

Entity Analysis technique Identified the “entities” in bibliographic records that would support fundamental user needs. Grouped the entities into 3 groups. Determined basic relationships among the entities. Identified the most significant attributes of the entities. (RDA: “core”) RDA Module - Context8

Group 1 entities Works Expressions Manifestations Items RDA Module - Context9 Are the products of intellectual or artistic endeavour

Group 2 entities Persons Corporate bodies Families RDA Module - Context10 are responsible for the production or custodianship of group 1 entities

Group 3 entities Concepts Objects Events Places RDA Module - Context11 serve as subjects of “works” (along with group 1 and 2 entities)

Relationships of Group 1 entities to each other RDA Module - Context12

Examples of “Works” Robertson Davies’ Fifth Business Da Vinci’s Mona Lisa Mozart’s Magic Flute The Bible The Hurt Locker RDA Module - Context13

Examples of “Expressions” Text Music notation Sound Still image Moving image Three-dimensional object Combinations of the above RDA Module - Context14

Examples of “Manifestations” Printings Optical discs Magnetic tapes Microfilm reels Digitizations accessed online RDA Module - Context15

Sample entities and their relationships to each other: Work: Expression: Manifestation: The Novel Orig. Text Transl. Critical Edition The Movie Orig. Version PaperPDFHTML Item: Copy 1 Autographed Copy 2 RDA Module - Context 16

Relationships are not just hierarchical: Work  Expression  Manifestation  Item Work to work – sequels, supplements, chapters within Expression to expression – revisions, abridgements, translations Manifestation to manifestation – reproductions, simultaneous editions Item to item – bound-together copies RDA Module - Context 17

Examples of relationships between Group 2 and Group 1 entities Authors, artists, composers – create Works Editors, translators – “realize” Expressions Publishers, printers – issue or manufacture manifestations Donors, libraries – own items RDA Module - Context18

Here is a sample MARC record showing some FRBR entities and attributes Work - red Expression - blue Manifestation - green Item - orange RDA Module - Context19

Barbara Tillett’s work (1990s) Seven categories of bibliographic relationships (2001) 1. Equivalence relationships 2. Derivative relationships 3. Descriptive relationships 4. Whole-part relationships 5. Accompanying relationships 6. Sequential relationships 7. Shared characteristic relationships RDA Module - Context20

“Toronto Conference” (1997) International Conference on the Principles and Future development of AACR: – Raised a number of “issues” with the cataloguing code. – Some issues have already been addressed in updates to AACR2, For example: redefinition of “seriality”, introduction of “mode of issuance” RDA Module - Context21

Revising AACR2 to Accommodate Seriality (Hirons, 1999) RDA Module - Context 22 Ch.12 Continuing resources

Other issues are still outstanding: – Content vs. carrier and the dissatisfaction with GMDs. – Problems with the logical structure of the code (inconsistencies, not extensible to new media). – Need for greater internationalization of the code. RDA Module - Context23

Content vs. Carrier – RDA and the ONIX community have collaborated on resource “categorization” – Three new elements in RDA will replace GMD: Content type Media type Carrier type RDA Module - Context24

Logical Structure Tom Delsey’s “The Logical Structure of the Anglo- American Cataloguing Rules” (1998) Problems identified, for example: – Chapter per “class of material” – Focus on “document” implying an item-in-hand – Published/unpublished vs. “online” – Focused on “fixed” attributes rather than changing attributes common in “online” resources RDA Module - Context25

Internationalization IME-ICC work The new “Statement of International Cataloguing Principles” (2009) (which also uses the FRBR model and language): – international-cataloguing-principles international-cataloguing-principles – Update to the Paris Principles (1961) RDA Module - Context26

IME-ICC General principles General principles: 1.Convenience of the user. 2.Common usage. 3.Representation. 4.Accuracy. 5.Sufficiency and necessity. 6.Significance. 7.Economy. 8.Consistency and standardization 9.Integration. The rules in a cataloguing code should be defensible and not arbitrary. It is recognized that these principles may contradict each other in specific situations and a defensible, practical solution should be taken. RDA Module - Context27

FRAD (published 2009) “Functional Requirements for Authority Data” Functions of Authority Data : – Document decisions – Serve as reference tool – Control forms of access points – Support access to bibliographic file – Link bibliographic and authority files RDA Module - Context28

FRAD (continued) User tasks: – Find (e.g information on an entity and its associated resources) – Identify (e.g. confirm that the entity described corresponds to the entity sought) – Contextualize (rda: clarify) (e.g. clarify the relationship between two or more entities, or between an entity and a name it is known by) – Justify (rda: understand) (e.g. understand why a particular name or title is chosen as the “preferred” name or title) Entities: – FRBR Group 1 (work,expression,manifestation, item) – FRBR Group 2 (person, family, corporate body)  RDA RDA Module - Context29

FRAD basic relationships RDA Module - Context30

FRSAD “Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data” Focuses on FRBR Group 3 entities (concept, object, event, place)  RDA User Tasks (as of final report, June 2010) : – Find (e.g. a subject corresponding to the user’s stated criteria) – Identify (e.g. a subject based on specific attributes or characteristics) – Select (e.g. a subject appropriate to the user’s needs) – Explore (e.g. relationships among subjects in order to understand the structure of the subject domain) RDA Module - Context31

FRSAD basic relationships RDA Module - Context32 Group 1, 2 or 3 entities June 2010 FRSAD report:

Enter... RDA Let’s quickly explore the highlights of how these developments manifest themselves in the new code (details will come in later modules): General introduction: – Scope: states support of basic user tasks from FRBR and FRAD: FISO, FICJ (or RDA clarify & understand) – Principles: guided by IME-ICC: Differentiation,sufficiency, relationships, representation, accuracy, attributions, language preference, common usage or practice, uniformity “principles” not “rule by example” – Core Elements: Guided by FRBR/FRAD “high value” elements to support user tasks, ISBD mandatory elements RDA Module - Context 33

RDA Description Section 1: describing manifestations and items – All physical formats, not one per chapter (Delsey) – Media/carrier types (from RDA/ONIX work) Section 2: describing works and expressions – Content types (from RDA/ONIX work) Section 3: describing persons, families, corporate bodies (FRBR group 2) Section 4: describing concept, object, event, place (FRBR group 3 : first three still at placeholder stage) RDA Module - Context34 FRBR group 1

RDA Relationships Section 5: Primary Work-expression-manifestation-item relationships (primary FRBR group 1) Section 6: Relationships to people, families, corp bodies (FRBR group 2 to group 1) Section 7: Subject relationships (FRBR group 3 to group 1) (placeholder) Section 8: Relationships among group 1 entities (includes Tillett’s categories) Section 9: Relationships among FRBR group 2 entities Section 10: Relationships among group 3 entities (placeholder) RDA Module - Context35

RDA Appendices Further influence of FRBR and other work: Abbreviations : fewer! (cf. IME-ICC principle of “Representation”) Record syntaxes are now in appendix – MARC21, ISBD (supports: Internationalization) Relationship designators (FRBR and Tillett) Glossary (FRBR language) RDA Module - Context36

In summary RDA is really a convergence of the pathways of a number of initiatives over the past twenty years. RDA Module - Context37 AACR FRBR IME-ICC TORONTO ETC.

Questions? Comments? My RDA Module - Context38

Acknowledgements Thank you to the copyright holders of RDA Toolkit for permission to copy screens and the RDA logo for educational purposes. All screens copied are identified with: "Screen image from the RDA Toolkit ( used by permission of the Co-Publishers for RDA (American Library Association, Canadian Library Association, and CILIP: Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals”. RDA Module - Context39