Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no LAMEPS – Limited area ensemble forecasting in Norway, using targeted EPS Marit Helene Jensen, Inger-Lise Frogner,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Medium-range Ensemble Streamflow forecast over France F. Rousset-Regimbeau (1), J. Noilhan (2), G. Thirel (2), E. Martin (2) and F. Habets (3) 1 : Direction.
Advertisements

On the importance of meteorological downscaling for short, medium and long-range hydrological ensemble prediction over France G. Thirel (1), F. Regimbeau.
Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
Recent & planned developments to the Met Office Global and Regional Ensemble Prediction System (MOGREPS) Richard Swinbank, Warren Tennant, Sarah Beare,
MOGREPS-W First-guess Severe Weather Warnings for NSWWS
Recent Developments of Medium-Range EPS at JMA
JMA Takayuki MATSUMURA (Forecast Department, JMA) C Asia Air Survey co., ltd New Forecast Technologies for Disaster Prevention and Mitigation 1.
Nowcasting and Short Range NWP at the Australian Bureau of Meteorology
THOR Annual Meeting - Bergen 9-11 November /25 On the impact of initial conditions relative to external forcing on the skill of decadal predictions:
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Extended range forecasts at MeteoSwiss: User experience.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 Seasonal forecasting activities at the Met Office Long-range Forecasting Group, Hadley Centre Presenter: Richard Graham ECMWF.
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no TEPS/LAMEPS at met.no Marit Helene Jensen, Inger-Lise Frogner, Hilde Haakenstad and Ole Vignes.
Benefits of the full ECMWF product set at a commercial weather provider [dr. Wim van den Berg, meteorological research department] ECMWF Users Meeting.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 Presentation to ECMWF Forecast Product User Meeting 16th June 2005.
HB 1 Forecast Products Users'Meeting, June 2005 Users meeting Summary Performance of the Forecasting System (1) Main (deterministic) model -Outstanding.
ECMWF Slide 1Met Op training course – Reading, March 2004 Forecast verification: probabilistic aspects Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
Slide 1ECMWF forecast User Meeting -- Reading, June 2006 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
User Meeting 15 June 2005 Monthly Forecasting Frederic Vitart ECMWF, Reading, UK.
Slide 1ECMWF forecast products users meeting – Reading, June 2005 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
Danish Meteorological Institute EPS Forecast of Weather Scenarios and Probability Presented at by Michael Steffensen Acknowledgments:
The COSMO-LEPS system at ECMWF
Seasonal forecasts Laura Ferranti and the Seasonal Forecast Section User meeting June 2005.
Slide 1 Forecast Products User Meeting June 2006 Slide 1 ECMWF medium-range forecasts and products David Richardson Met Ops.
Page 1 © Crown copyright 2005 ECMWF User Meeting, June 2006 Developments in the Use of Short and Medium-Range Ensembles at the Met Office Ken Mylne.
Deutscher Wetterdienst Central Forecasting DWD ECMWF Forecast Product Users Meeting June Predicting severe weather by EPS tools - current.
Severe Weather Forecasts
ECMWF Training Course 2005 slide 1 Forecast sensitivity to Observation Carla Cardinali.
AYP Changes for 2007 K-20 Videoconference June 11, 2007 Presented by: JoLynn Berge OSPI Federal Policy Coordinator.
1 1  1 =.
1  1 =.
The University of Reading Helen Dacre UM user 2009 Forecasting the transport of pollution using a NWP model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.
The role of the stratosphere in extended- range forecasting Thomas Jung Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research Germany.
Trond Iversen met.no & Univ. Of Oslo
Recent Experiences with the INM Multi-model EPS scheme García-Moya, J.A., Callado, A., Santos, C., Santos, D., Simarro, J., B Orfila. Modelling Area –
The challenge ahead: Ocean Predictions in the Arctic Region Lars Petter Røed * Presented at the OPNet Workshop May 2008, Geilo, Norway * Also affiliated.
Meteorological Training Course, 20 March /25 Using Combined Prediction Systems (CPS) for wind energy applications European Centre for Medium-Range.
Least Common Multiples and Greatest Common Factors
Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre Object-Oriented Best Member Selection in a Regional Ensemble Forecasting System Christian.
LRF Training, Belgrade 13 th - 16 th November 2013 © ECMWF Sources of predictability and error in ECMWF long range forecasts Tim Stockdale European Centre.
ECMWF long range forecast systems
C ontacts: Marit Helene Jensen, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, P.O.Box 43 Blindern, N-0313 OSLO, NORWAY. HIRLAM at met.no.
14th ALADIN Workshop, Innsbruck 1-4 June 2004 First LAMEPS experiments at the Hungarian Meteorological Service Edit Hágel and Gabriella Szépszó Hungarian.
Verification of Numerical Weather Prediction systems employed by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology over East Antarctica during the summer season.
Performance of the MOGREPS Regional Ensemble
1 LAM EPS Workshop, Madrid, 3-4 October 2002 Ken Mylne and Kelvyn Robertson Met Office Poor Man's EPS experiments and LAMEPS plans at the Met Office.
SRNWP workshop - Bologne Short range ensemble forecasting at Météo-France status and plans J. Nicolau, Météo-France.
SLEPS First Results from SLEPS A. Walser, M. Arpagaus, C. Appenzeller, J. Quiby MeteoSwiss.
ECMWF WWRP/WMO Workshop on QPF Verification - Prague, May 2001 NWP precipitation forecasts: Validation and Value Deterministic Forecasts Probabilities.
How can LAMEPS * help you to make a better forecast for extreme weather Henrik Feddersen, DMI * LAMEPS =Limited-Area Model Ensemble Prediction.
WORKSHOP ON SHORT-RANGE ENSEMBLE PREDICTION USING LIMITED-AREA MODELS Instituto National de Meteorologia, Madrid, 3-4 October 2002 Limited-Area Ensemble.
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no GLAMEPS: GLAMEPS GLAMEPS: Grand Limited Area Model Ensemble Prediction System Overview of activities EWGLAM –
Short-Range Ensemble Prediction System at INM José A. García-Moya SMNT – INM 27th EWGLAM & 12th SRNWP Meetings Ljubljana, October 2005.
Utskifting av bakgrunnsbilde: -Høyreklikk på lysbildet og velg «Formater bakgrunn» -Under «Fyll», velg «Bilde eller tekstur» og deretter «Fil…» -Velg ønsket.
Interoperability at INM Experience with the SREPS system J. A. García-Moya NWP – Spanish Met Service INM SRNWP Interoperability Workshop ECMWF –
Plans for Short-Range Ensemble Forecast at INM José A. García-Moya SMNT – INM Workshop on Short Range Ensemble Forecast Madrid, October,
EurEPS The Realization of an Operational LAM-EPS in Europe A SRNWP Project under EUMETNET Proposed to the EUMETNET Council at its 30 th meeting by Norwegian.
Deutscher Wetterdienst Preliminary evaluation and verification of the pre-operational COSMO-DE Ensemble Prediction System Susanne Theis Christoph Gebhardt,
ECMWF Training course 26/4/2006 DRD meeting, 2 July 2004 Frederic Vitart 1 Predictability on the Monthly Timescale Frederic Vitart ECMWF, Reading, UK.
Verification of ensemble precipitation forecasts using the TIGGE dataset Laurence J. Wilson Environment Canada Anna Ghelli ECMWF GIFS-TIGGE Meeting, Feb.
Munehiko Yamaguchi 12, Takuya Komori 1, Takemasa Miyoshi 13, Masashi Nagata 1 and Tetsuo Nakazawa 4 ( ) 1.Numerical Prediction.
LEPS VERIFICATION ON MAP CASES
Sub-seasonal prediction at ECMWF
Finnish Meteorological Institute
Preliminary test for the development of a 2.8km ensemble over Italy
Deterministic (HRES) and ensemble (ENS) verification scores
2nd Workshop on Short Range EPS 7th–8th April 2005, Bologna
42h forecast HIRLAM 50km 24h accumulated precipitation.
Short Range Ensemble Prediction System Verification over Greece
The Impact of Moist Singular Vectors and Horizontal Resolution on Short-Range Limited-Area Ensemble Forecasts for Extreme Weather Events A. Walser1) M.
Presentation transcript:

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no LAMEPS – Limited area ensemble forecasting in Norway, using targeted EPS Marit Helene Jensen, Inger-Lise Frogner, Trond Iversen and Ole Vignes

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Limited area ensemble forecasting in Norway - outline Ensembles using Norways operational version of the HIRLAM model – LAMEPS Perturbing initial state and lateral boundary conditions with a dedicated version of EPS from ECMWF - TEPS Combining these two systems gives NORLAMEPS Main focus is precipitation, especially extreme precipitation events Running storm surge from EPS,TEPS and LAMEPS

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no TEPS – Targeted EPS A dedicated version of ECMWF EPS. – ensemble members, as opposed to for EPS –Target area Northern Europe and adjacent sea areas, as opposed to NH north of 30°N –Starts at 12 UTC every day –Runs to +72h, as opposed to +240h for EPS T255L40(~80 km), Since Feb 1st: T399L62(~55 km)

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no LAMEPS HIRLAM in ensemble set-up Quasi-operational at met.no since 14 February members + Control, –Control based on Norwegian HIRLAM analysis –20 Initial and open boundary perturbations from TEPS –Starts at 18UTC every day (fresh HIRLAM analysis), i.e. a 6 hour delay compared to TEPS and EPS –Forecast Range: +60h Resolution: 0.2 deg (20km), 40 levels

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no NORLAMEPS Combines simply IFS TEPS and HIRLAM LAMEPS A simple multi-model, multi-initial-state ensemble ensemble members

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Verification area Target area for TEPS SVs Integration area HIRLAM

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Generation of perturbations Running TEPS to +72h members 12 UTC TEPS is automatically transferred to met.no TEPS is made ready to run in the Norwegian model environment TEPS is transferred to Trondheim Generation of HIRLAM perturbations LAMEPS running 18 UTC, to +60h Results from LAMEPS transferred back to met.no Generation of products for users/customers ~02 UTC ~22 UTC 50 minutes ECMWF

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no LAMEPS Precip, Reliability diagrams, percentiles - precip 70% 80% 95%90% Norw. synop sites Sep05-April06

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Wind +24 LAMEPS Reliability diagrams, percentiles - wind 70% 95% 90% 80% Norw. synop sites Sep05-April06

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Verification of Precip. Verify precipitation against super-observations. (Ghelli and Lalaurette): –All precipitation sites in Norway inside the verification area are aggregated using the method of Kriging Distribution of precipitation in Norway is dominated by sharp gradients –We verify in sub-regions with grossly different precipitation climatology separately. –Inside each sub-region precipitation climatology is fairly uniform

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no 1 West 2 East 3 North Average annual precipitation amounts in Norway from 1961 – 90 (mm).

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Reliability diagrams, 20mm, 60h NORLAMEPS TEPS Annual Feb05-Feb06 EPS LAMEPS

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no BRIER SKILL SCORE all three regions Annual Feb05-Feb06

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no ROC and Value(C/L), all three regions 5 mm/24h LAMEPS TEPS EPS NORLAMEPS Annual Feb05-Feb06

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no LAMEPS TEPS EPS NORLAMEPS ROC and Value(C/L), all three regions 20 mm/24h Annual Feb05-Feb06

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Area under ROC-curve all three regions Annual Feb05-Feb06

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no PRECIP. Rms error and bias error of control forecast Jan.-April 2006

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Spread around ensemble mean (Jan-Apr 2006)

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no 100 year precipitation event in the middle part of Norway January 2006 >90mm/24h 130mm/24h

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no LAMEPS P24 > 50mm TEPS P24 > 50mm +12h - +36h +18h - +42h

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no LAMEPS P24 > 60mm TEPS P24 > 60mm

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Future developments Contribute to HIRLAM Ensemble Predictions (GLAMEPS) Include perturbations of model physics in LAMEPS Increase the time resolution of the boundary fields (now every 6 hour) Develop a range of probability products Compute meso-scale initial perturbations in HIRLAM- domain Increase resolution (0.1 degrees or finer) Non-hydrostatic downscaling

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Test LAMEPS on a new configuration for TEPS A system that combines targeted SVs and hemispheric SVs (Martin Leutbecher, ECMWF) –10 leading targeted singular vectors –40 leading hemispheric singular vectors computed in the subspace orthogonal to the targeted singular vectors –Ensemble size –Initial perturbations constructed with (revised) Gaussian sampling Results in increased spread for TEPS after day 2, without increasing the error of the ensemble mean

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no