Background ATF2 (KEK) What could be ATF2 that could be valid for ILC ? Hayg GULER Marc VERDERI LLR-Ecole Polytechnique Palaiseau,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experimental Particle Physics
Advertisements

Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar (SENEGAL)
Advanced Neutron Spectrometer (ANS) Geant4 Simulations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Gamma-Ray Spectra _ + The photomultiplier records the (UV) light emitted during electronic recombination in the scintillator. Therefore, the spectrum collected.
HEP Experiments Detectors and their Technologies Sascha Marc Schmeling CERN.
GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
June Yong Yang, Nuclear physics site Mentor : Dr. Richard Jones.
A Muon Veto for the Ultra-Cold Neutron Asymmetry Experiment Vince Bagnulo LANL Symposium 2006 Outline ● UCNA Experiment ● Muon background ● Proposed Veto.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Hadronic and Electromagnetic Physics: special applications V.Ivanchenko BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia & CERN, Geneve, Switzerland.
Guided Tour of Geant4 Physics Lists II Geant4 Short Course at JPL 10 November 2006 Dennis Wright.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Luminosity Monitor Commissioning MICE Collaboration Meeting March 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
Induced Activity Calculations in Support of D&D Activities at SLAC Joachim Vollaire, Radiation Protection Department.
BDSIM simulations/results: Synchrotron Radiation and Muons Motivation and History Tracking results Synchrotron Radiation Tracking of Halo Muons News from.
Background ATF2 (KEK) What could be ATF2 that could be valid for ILC ? Hayg GULER Marc VERDERI LLR-Ecole Polytechnique Palaiseau,
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
August 2005Snowmass Workshop IP Instrumentation Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Measurement of: Luminosity (precise and fast) Energy Polarisation.
Background measurements and simulation Hayg Guler Marc Verderi LLR – Ecole polytechnique ATF2 project meeting, June 2009.
Planned Geant4 developments for LLR Marc Verderi Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, École polytechnique Annecy ATF-2 meeting October 2006.
Measurement of Gas Bremsstrahlung at the Pohang Light Source Hyosang Lee Seoul National University, Q2C Pusan National University, HANUL HNP2011.
Extending the Bertini Cascade Model to Kaons Dennis H. Wright (SLAC) Monte Carlo April 2005.
Overview Maurizio Ungaro 1HPS Collaboration meetingOctober Status, Future of GEMC.
Development of the beam loss monitor for beam halo measurement in the J-PARC RCS Masahiro Yoshimoto *, Hiroyuki Harada, Shinidhi Kato, Kota Okabe, Michikazu.
Hadronic Interaction Studies for LHCb Nigel Watson/Birmingham [Thanks to Silvia M., Jeroen v T.]
Luminosity Monitor UKNF Meeting 7 June 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
1 Status and Plans for Geant4 Physics Linear Collider Simulation Workshop III 2-5 June 2004 Dennis Wright (SLAC)
Detector Simulation Presentation # 3 Nafisa Tasneem CHEP,KNU  How to do HEP experiment  What is detector simulation?
Radiation Detectors In particular, Silicon Microstrip Detectors by Dr. Darrel Smith.
ATF2 background and beam halo study D. Wang(IHEP), S. Bai(IHEP), P. bambade(LAL) February 7, 2013.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
Interactions of Hadrons and Hadronic Showers
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Beam halo and background Bremsstrahlung photon spectrum modeling Update on 9 th Nov
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
MAMUD Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, March 29, 2005 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation.
V.Ivanchenko Salamanca1 Geant4: Hadronic Processes 1  Cross sections  Secondary generators  Nuclear interactions at rest  CHIPS model.
Interaction Region Issues M. Sullivan for the EIC User Group Meeting Jan. 6-9, 2016.
Graham Sellers Simulations of the beamline and detector regions of the LHC and FP420.
J-PARC でのハイパー核ガンマ線分光実験用 散乱粒子磁気スペクトロメータ検出器の準備 状況 東北大理, 岐阜大教 A, KEK B 白鳥昂太郎, 田村裕和, 鵜養美冬 A, 石元茂 B, 大谷友和, 小池武志, 佐藤美沙子, 千賀信幸, 細見健二, 馬越, 三輪浩司, 山本剛史, 他 Hyperball-J.
1 1 - To test the performance 2 - To optimise the detector 3 – To use the relevant variable Software and jet energy measurement On the importance to understand.
IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 1 IHEP/Protvino Group: Igor Azhgirey Igor Bayshev Igor Kurochkin + one post-graduate student Tools:
Hadronic Physics Models Geant4 Users' Tutorial at CERN May 2005 Dennis Wright (SLAC)
07/24/07 Francisco Carrion OPTIMIZING THE TRACK DETECTOR Francisco Javier Carrión Ruiz Mentor: Hans Wenzel 07/08/09 SID CONCEPT FOR THE INTERNATIONAL LINEAR.
Luciano Pandola, INFN Gran Sasso Luciano Pandola INFN Gran Sasso Genova, July 18 th, 2005 Geant4 and the underground physics community.
Taikan SUEHARA et al., LCWS2007 & DESY, 2007/06/01 R&D Status of ATF2 IP Beam Size Monitor (Shintake Monitor) Taikan SUEHARA, H.Yoda, M.Oroku,
1 Plannar Active Absorber Calorimeter Adam Para, Niki Saoulidou, Hans Wenzel, Shin-Shan Yu Fermialb Tianchi Zhao University of Washington ACFA Meeting.
LumiCal background and systematics at CLIC energy I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Simulation studies of total absorption calorimeter Development of heavy crystals for scintillation and cherenkov readout Dual readout in the 4 th concept.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
LCSW - Beijing, March 2010 ATF2 backgrounds1 What can we learn at ATF2 concerning ILC Backgrounds Hayg GULER LLR-Ecole Polytechnique Palaiseau, France.
Geant4 KISTI Tutorial Marc Verderi LLR – Ecole polytechnique October 2012 Physics II: Overview, Processes, Production Threshold.
Minerva Test Beam 2 Status Geoff Savage for the Test Beam 2 Team March 23, /23/2015AEM - Minerva Test Beam 2 Status1.
Tracker Neutron Detector: INFN plans CLAS12 Central Detector Meeting - Saclay 2-3 December 2009 Patrizia Rossi for the INFN groups: Genova, Laboratori.
E+/e- Backgrounds at BEPCII/BESIII JIN Dapeng Aug. 22, 2011.
Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics, Elba, Italy, May 2015
Luminosity Monitor Status
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Background study plans : from to ILC
Experimental Particle Physics
Hadronic Physics in Geant4
Neutron Detector Simulations for Fast Neutrons with GEANT4
The Hadrontherapy Geant4 advanced example
Beam Dump Experiments with Photon and Electron Beams
Background rejection in P326 (NA48/3)
Experimental Particle Physics
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

Background ATF2 (KEK) What could be ATF2 that could be valid for ILC ? Hayg GULER Marc VERDERI LLR-Ecole Polytechnique Palaiseau, France

Outline  Motivations : why do we want to measure the ATF2  Where and what we plan to measure the background  Set of aparatus we are working on  Conclusion : propositions for measurements

3 ILC background sources  Machine produced background before IP  Beam tails (halo) from linac  Synchrotron radiation  Muons  Beam-gaz scattering  Beam Beam IP  Bremsstrahlung  Coherent/incoherent pair prodution  Hadron prodcution  Spent beam background  Backscattering of particles (specially neutrons) D. Schulte, CERN, 2007

4 ILC vs ATF2 background sources  Machine produced background before IP  Beam tails (halo) from linac  Synchrotron radiation ATF2)  Muons  Beam-gaz scattering  Beam Beam IP  Bremsstrahlung  Coherent/incoherent pair prodution  Hadron prodcution  Spent beam background  Backscattering of particles (specially neutrons)

Tools common to ATF2 and ILC  BDSIM : Beamline Simulation toolkit based on GEANT4  Beam and halo transport  GEANT4 simulation of lost particles  BDSIM is used for ILC studies  Opportunity to validate this ATF2

Background ATF2

7 Beam halo  From where the halo has been generated ?  From which ”parameters” does it depends ?  Beam tube gas pressure  Synchrotron radiation  Touschek scattering  Optics related effects (non scattering process)  ATF2 in HALO measurement  Measure the beam positions  Beam halo transport

8 Example losses vs Z (BDSIM)  Provide information on the beam halo distributions  Provide a test of the BDSIM simulation  PLIC measurement desirable as well as all available detectors

9  Elastic scattering  Mott scattering : deflexion by the Coulomb potential of the particles in the residual gas  Elastic scattering changes the direction of the beam particles while the energy is not affected  Create Halo → Losses  Inelastic scattering  Dominant process at high energy  Bremsstrahlung with the residual nucleon gas  Can be ATF2 ?  Record the beam-pipe gas pressure  Possibilities to changes the beam-pipe gas pressure ?  Measure related impact on background  Related to beam halo measurement  Additionnal background ? Beam gaz scattering

10 Backscattered production  Iron made beam DUMP  1.3 GeV e- hitting the DUMP  Shielding around the beam-DUMP interaction region  Electromagnetic background  Low energetic photons (mainly X rays)  Backscattered electrons  Hadronic background (neutrons)  Mainly produced by photo-production  Slower component : nucleon-nucleon effects  Delayed from EM background  Use TOF to separate from EM background

11 Hadronic background (neutrons) E.M backscattered background (γ,e-,e+) What's coming from the DUMP ? 1.3 GeV Electron Beam BDSIM Simulation

12 Test neutron production ATF2  Many models (physics lists) describe neutron production in GEANT4  1 process -> many possible models -> many cross sections  A process  uses cross sections to decide when and where an interaction will occur  uses an interaction model to generate the final state  For each process – default cross sections  some contain only a few numbers to parameterize cross section  some represent large databases  Simulation : Use the ATF2 (1.3 GeV e-) beam hitting the iron DUMP  Compare different physics lists

13 Neutron production for 3 ”models” QGSP  Quark-Gluon string with precompound  Precompound call nuclear desexitation routine  12 GeV → 50 TeVBERT  BERTini cascade  Unique evaporation model to de-excite the remnant nucleus  Up to 10 GeV HP  High precision neutron  Allow precise transportation of neutrons LHEP  Low and high energy parametrized  Fast parametrized model based on GHEISHA  Average energy and momentum are well described BDSIM user defined Hadronic Physics list

14 Where ? Proposal for dedicated measurements (in addition to those provided by PLIC, Shintake, …)

15  Beam HALO studies through:  Background (Bremsstrahlung photons) measurement  Around LW signal area  Around Shintake Detector Area HALO : Background measurement

16  Wire Scanner generated background  From (All) different Wire scanners  Study angular distributions  measurement around area 1 and 2 Wire Scanner generated background measurement 2 1

17  Backscattered γ/X and neutrons:  Use TOF to separate forward brem, backscattered photons, backscattered neutrons  Possibility to measure neutrons, and be sensitive (?) to rebounds in the beam pipe  Enough space to measure ? Backscattered γ/X and neutrons inside beampipe

18 Backscattered different distances from beam DUMP Gammas e- Fast neutrons (E>5 MeV) Neutrons 1.3 GeV Electron Beam 2m3m4m5m BDSIM Simulation

19 Backscattered neutrons from DUMP E.M background Neutrons background ?  Neutrons detection :  Time of Flight (TOF) based measurements  Angular distribution around the DUMP

20 Backscattered neutrons from DUMP  Neutrons detection :  Time of Flight (TOF) based measurements  Angular distribution around the DUMP

21  TOF different distances from DUMP:  Fast/thermal neutrons discrimination  Fast neutrons/EM background discrimination Backscattered neutrons from DUMP Can use Paraffin to moderate fast neutron to separate fast neutrons from thermal neutrons

22 How ? Set of apparatus we are working on

23 Detector Concept  Constraints :  (small amount of) money to build the detector  ATF2 to measure background  Need a flexible (evolutive) detector  Need a mobile detector  Need an hybrid detector  To detect e.m background  X rays, gammas, electrons  Neutrons  Fast and slow component

24 Our detectors – so far  3 pure CsI detectors  60mm*60mm*20mm  UV filter (keep UV)  5 Plastic scintillators (BC-408)  60mm*60mm*38mm  Readout :  Photomultiplier  Oscilloscope

25 Detection devices 38mm 60mm 20mm 60mm Measured Background Plastic Scintillator Pure-CsI x 5x 3

26 Adaptable configuration, eg: Lead Brick

27 What do we need on site  We would need to measure any place along the ATF2 beamline  No definite place has been define  Need to send our signals from everywhere  Need to know our detector position with a good precision  One need to keep the flexibility the change the detector position as often as needed.  Oscilloscope will be used from the beginning  Other solution would come later on  Dedicated electronic

28 Detector calibration  November-December 2008 :  Receive all crystals from Saint-Gobain  Build the detectors  December-January :  E.M calibration :  Use radioactive LLR  Use DESY e- beam (1 to 6 GeV) ?  Any KEK ?  Calibration to neutron signal :  Need to calibrate neutron response :  Neutron saclay (France) ? ? Others ?

29 Time Schedule Detectors setup design And Detectors Mount and KEK First Measurements

30 To measure list (preliminary) WhatWhereDetector Additional device Additional detectorRemarks Shifts needed (hours) Backscattered neutrons Around the beam dump Complete detector Lead brick and paraffin TOF 1*8h + parasite Neutrons in beam pipe Around the Shintake detector area Complete detector Lead brick and paraffin TOF 1*8h + parasite Beam HALO Around the Shintake and LW area Complete detector Lead brick and paraffin Shintake detector + LW detector + PLIC + WS Measure the different places 1 * 12h + parasite Beam-Gas scattering Around the Shintake and LW area Complete detector Lead brick and paraffin Shintake detector + LW detector + PLIC + WS Change the beam gas pressure 2 * 8h Wire-scanner background Around the Shintake and LW area Complete detector Lead brick and paraffin Shintake detector + LW detector + PLIC + WS Measure the background angular distribution 2 * 8h Losses Along the beam line Complete detector Lead brick and paraffin Shintake detector + LW detector + PLIC Measure background + z and any time 1 * 8h + parasite

Thanks !

32 CsI crystals  Pure CsI Fast (16ns decay time) but low light signal (2 γ/keV)  Sensitive to full E.M + Nuclear background ☺  Can use PMT to ”collect” signal photons  Don't need pre-Shower system  Use TOF to separate neutrons from E.M background☺

33 BC-408 plastic scintillators  Useful to have a second detector which reacts in different way than pure-CsI  Different response to neutron detection  Can separate e- from gamma (use lead pre-shower or not)  Very large light output ☺  Rise time : 0.9 ns  Decay time : 2.1 ns  Capability to separate neutrons from E.M background ?  Use TOF to discriminate neutrons from E.M background

34 Event Biasing in BDSIM → How ? Backround (Bremstrahlung) Backround (Bremstrahlung) Biasing

35 Jane Tinslay - Geant4

36 Movie BDSIM

37 CsI vs Plastic scintillator (1 MeV)

38 CsI vs Plastic scintillator (10 MeV)

39 CsI vs Plastic scintillator (100 MeV)

40 CsI vs Plastic scintillator (1 GeV)

41 Hybrid  The ATF/ATF2 has an electromagnetic component generated by the electron beam HALO hitting the beampipe (and other accelerator components). In addition the electron beam hitting the beam dump generate backscattered electromagnetic background.  The Hadronic component is mainly coming from the beam dump, mainly composed by backscattered thermal neutrons.  The calorimeter “final aim” is to measure and characterize the background. One possible solution is to use different crystals sensitive to each background component (photons, electrons, thermal neutrons, fast neutrons,...).

42 Use additionnal information  Use WS information → Know beam Size  Use LW information → Measure background = f(time)  Use Shintake photon detector information  Measure background = f(time)  Use PLIC information : measure beam losses = f(time) Goal : Have a detailled time dependent picture of the losses and any place around the ATF2 area beamline

43 Our plans in background measurement  Forward background  Measure the beam HALO and transport  Measure the beam losses and compare to simulation (BDSIM)  Evaluate the beam-gaz scattering  Measure the backscattered electromagnetic background  Characterize the hadronic background  Measure the backscattered neutron background from the beam DUMP (separate it from the E.M background)  Measure neutrons any place  Test the neutron transport in BDSIM