Bathymetric Product Specification TSMAD 20 Rostock, May 2010 CHS and NAVO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INSPIRE Drafting Team „Data Specifications“
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1392r0 Submission November 12, 2008 De Vegt (Qualcomm)Slide 1 Inputs for a VHT Selection Procedure Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0237r0 Submission February 12, 2009 Rolf de Vegt (Qualcomm)Slide 1 Inputs for a ac Spec Framework Methodology Date:
Clinical Decision Support TC Order Set Proposal September 14, 2005.
Network Virtualization and Service Awareness Properties of FNs
TSMAD-20 / DIPWG-2 Rostock, Germany May 2010
IHO S-100 Much more than ENCs
1 Comments on S-101 by Japanese ECDIS manufacturers Shinichi Kikuchi Japan Hydrographic Association TSMAD20/DIPWG2 Rostock, Germany.
S-101 Update to Stakeholders March Purpose S-101 represents a major step forward in product specifications for Electronic Navigational Charts. This.
Development and Impact of Inland ENCs/ECDIS on Hydrographic Offices Denise LaDue, USACE.
S-100 The IHO Geospatial Standard for Hydrographic Data 1st CHRIS / MSDIWG Meeting IHB, Monaco 4 – 5 February 2008.
S-101 Project Plan. Purpose S-101 represents a major step forward in product specifications for Electronic Navigational Charts. This consists mainly of.
S IHO Geospatial Standard for Hydrographic Data
S-100 PORTRAYAL MODEL DIPWG-2 May 2010
Reference “IHO S The New Hydrographic Geospatial Standard for Marine Data and Information” R. Ward, L. Alexander, B. Greenslade
Office of Coast Survey IHO S-100 and S st Century Framework Data Structure for Hydrographic and Related Data.
The IHO Data Registry (S-100) Supporting e-Navigation and Maritime Spatial Planning International Hydrographic Organization.
National Environmental Research Institute, University of Aarhus, Denmark GIS Guidance update.
Revision of WIPO Standard ST.14 Committee on WIPO Standards, third session Geneva 15 – 19 April 2013 Anna Graschenkova Standards Section.
Spatial Data Infrastructure: Concepts and Components Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors March 6, 2006.
WRAP Technical Support System Project Update AoH Call October 19, 2005.
S IHO Geospatial Standard for Hydrographic Data
Doug Nebert FGDC Secretariat June 2006
United Nations Expert Group Meeting on Revising the Principles and Recommendations for Population and Housing Censuses New York, 29 October – 1 November.
ISO Standards: Status, Tools, Implementations, and Training Standards/David Danko.
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT. Process Centre receives Scenario Group Work Scenario on website in October Assessment Window Individual Work.
ADC Meeting ICEO Standards Working Group Steven F. Browdy, Co-Chair ADC Workshop Washington, D.C. September, 2007.
Scalable Metadata Definition Frameworks Raymond Plante NCSA/NVO Toward an International Virtual Observatory How do we encourage a smooth evolution of metadata.
CBSC May 2015 (Mexico City, Mexico) Progress Report on the IHO GIS including C-55 IHB.
DEPICT: DiscovEring Patterns and InteraCTions in databases A tool for testing data-intensive systems.
XIth International Congress for Mathematical Geology - September 3-8, 2006 – Liège, Belgium Contribution of GeoScienceML to the INSPIRE data harmonisation.
Archival Workshop on Ingest, Identification, and Certification Standards Certification (Best Practices) Checklist Does the archive have a written plan.
The International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) and The Hydrographic and Oceanographic Service of the Chilean Navy (SHOA) - S-100 – New Geospatial Standard.
International Hydrographic Organization MSDI OPEN FORUM IHO MSDIWG Vision and Deliverables to the IHO London, Tuesday 3rd March 2015 Jens Peter Hartmann.
Cross Support Services Area Cross Support Transfer Service Working Group Monitored Data Cross Support Transfer Service: Scope and Format of Monitored Data.
UNCLASSIFIED 1 Digital Geospatial Information Working Group (DGIWG) Jeffrey Bell – NGA Aeronautical Harmonization Working Group Chair Briefing to AIXM.
Presentation to the International Ice Charting Working Group 22 November 2007 Ice In Electronic Navigation Charts (ENCs) (A Status Report)
Regional Seminar on Promotion and Utilization of Census Results and on the Revision on the United Nations Principles and Recommendations for Population.
May 2007 Registration Status Small Group Meeting 1: August 24, 2009.
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee 7th MEETING OF THE IHO HYDROGRAPHIC SERVICES AND STANDARDS COMMITTEE (HSSC) Busan, Republic of Korea,
CSTS Generic Procedures Assessment of the Current Status and Proposal for Next Steps M.Goetzelmann
Report to ANM 21 on the IALA Workshop on Developing IHO S-100 Product Specifications for e-Navigation Bjorn Erik Krosness Norwegian Coastal Administration.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use INSPIRE Orthoimagery TWG Status Report Antonio Romeo ESRIN 15/02/2012.
Semantic metadata in the Catalogue Frédéric Houbie.
S-101 PT S-57 to S-101 Converter Tom De Puyt.
Introduction to the GEOSS Registries: Components, Services, and Standards Doug Nebert U.S. Federal Geographic Data Committee June 2007.
TRSS Terminology Registry Scoping Study
RADEXT WG RADIUS Attribute Guidelines
S-102 Status Brief S-100 TS-2 (19 – 21 SEP 2017) TSM5-7.1
AIXM 5.1 – Interoperability issues
Julia Powell Coast Survey Development Laboratory
Report of the Data Quality Working Group
Proposal by the DQWG Portrayal of bathymetry quality in S-101
Standards” and by the Council key Priorities
Proposed IHO Work Programme for 2018
UFNPT Planning and Development Work Plan, Milestones and Timelines
Report and Proposals from HSSC
Development and future provision of S-100 based Products
AIXM 5 Development Status
IHO S-121 Standard on Maritime Limits and Boundaries
Updates and Proposals from the HSSC
STIR WG IETF-100 PASSPorT Extension for Resource-Priority Authorization (draft-ietf-stir-rph-01) November, 2017 Ray P. Singh, Martin Dolly, Subir Das,
IHO PORTRAYAL REGISTRY
Proposal of a Geographic Metadata Profile for WISE
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT
IHO-MSDIWG10 Busan, Republic of Korea (4-5 March 2019)
Report of the Data Quality Working Group Rogier Broekman, Chair
Status Report on Inland ENC Development and Standardization
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee Report of the ENCWG
WENDWG – WENSWG Progress Report
Presentation transcript:

Bathymetric Product Specification TSMAD 20 Rostock, May 2010 CHS and NAVO

Overview Context of Bathymetric Product Specification Proposed Drafts S10x/S102 Specifications as initiated by TSMAD 18 S10x Guidelines and Considerations as initiated by TSMAD 19 Proposed next steps

Context of Bathymetric Product Specification Original proposals to TSMAD 18 from : NAVO (S.102) – Ref. Open Navigation surface project Objective: common bathymetric standard for multipurposes data sharing and dissemination CHS (S.10x) Objective: to meet navigation needs with high definition bathymetry and integrate with other data types (Note that this original objective changed after the HSSC meeting in October 2009) CHS and NAVO worked on convergence of the two proposals Investigate and build on strengths of both proposals

S102 and S10x De-confliction CHS and NAVO agreed to: Separate the encoding of carrier and data content A need for common content model for bathymetric data fitting S.100 and carrying appropriate metadata Metadata of S.102 already fits S.100 Consider a few different encoding scheme HDF5 (already used in BAG) GeoTIFF32 (widely used) JPEG2000 (interesting potential) Prepare for the venue of auxiliary information

An initial draft version of S.10x was prepared to be more general structure for Auxiliary Information Layers using different coverages Specifically the draft of S.10x provides a structure for tiling, common metadata, digital security and common referencing that is used by S.102 This draft has been made available as a discussion document (Proposed Specification for Auxiliary Information Layer Integration for use with ENC S.10x) A revised S.102 was prepared built on top of S.10x to be specific for bathymetry using a gridded coverage S102 and S10x De-confliction

S10x components to support S102 In parallel, CHS developed an initial draft version of S.10x (as a separate product specification from S.100) that supports the proposed the S.102 document. This document was built directly upon the S.100 and the ISO models. It allows: Allows different coverage (uniform grid, quad tree grid, TIN, point coverage, vector field point) Partitioning (Tiling) Model Metadata Model Data Certification and Rights management Multiple encodings As needed in S.102

S10x Guidelines and Considerations as initiated by TSMAD 19 Action TSMAD 19 to... develop a paper outlining how how multiple Layers of S-100 compliant Auxiliary Navigational Information can be integrated with S-101 ENC data... Discussion Paper Requirements for the Integration of S-100 compliant Auxiliary Navigational Information with S-101 ENC data. This document sets out metadata requirements and issues for linking data products in layers including addressing updating scenarios, query precedence, and presentation issues.

S10x Meta Data Requirements Abstract Intended Use ( route planning, safety, security, navigation,…) Intended usage Start Intended usage End Minimum Scale Maximum Scale Information Type (Overlay, Extension, new product) Intended interaction (Overlay, interleaved, supersedes) Dependencies Identification of feature catalogue Identification of portrayal catalogue Product category - (HD data, Tides, Aids, ….) Product query precedence C-Square location identification

S10x Considerations Links between data across products, Geo- Referencing Updating Scenarios and Implications Query Precedence logic for pick report Display Priority Presentation Compatible Reference Models

Proposed Next Steps Development of S10x use cases –Simple overlay –Extension to existing product spec. (e.g. AML) –Additional PLA with integrated vertical data column IMO submission – proposal to allow auxiliary information to adjust the water column dynamically

Proposed Next Steps Need to review S.102 to assure independence, but assure S.10x considerations have been addressed. The draft of S.102 is proposed to be circulated for review, suggestions, recommendations. Additional encodings need to be provided for S.102 and testing needs to be done. The draft discussion paper of S.10x needs to be enhanced to address the requirements as outlined in the S.10x requirements paper and scope modified as deemed necessary by TSMAD. Follow-on meetings need to be arranged to discuss the guidelines for Auxiliary layers and the proposed approach given in the S.10x document.

Recommendations S10x specification is more suited to an annex to S100 as users need to take into consideration S10X when building product specifications. Appoint a person/group to look at portrayal issues for interdependent product specifications before entry into the registry