WRI What’s fair? Equity and Global Climate Change Conference April 17, 2001 Nancy Kete World Resources Institute

WRI “The United States Senate would not ratify any protocol, any treaty that did not …include all nations of the world under the same kind of mandatory, legally binding conditions as Europe or the United States.” –U.S. Senator Chuck Hagel, “Big Shot” interview on Tech Central Station 11/13/00 Here’s one view

WRI “The right to emit carbon dioxide is a human right that should be allocated on an equal basis to all of humankind.” Aubrey Meyer, Contraction and Convergence: The global solution to climate change Here’s another

WRI “It is obvious that in the future the world will have to accept some common maximum per capita emission for each country in order to deal with global warming.” Anil Agarwal and Sunita Narain, in The atmospheric rights of all people on earth, CSE website And a third

WRI “ For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.” H.L. Mencken

WRI These claims all have a ring of moral certitude that doesn’t withstand scrutiny. Beware of moral certitude

WRI The Byrd-Hagel resolution seems mainly aimed at ensuring no progress -- it’s a smokescreen. The per capita rights talk seems mainly aimed at redistributing global wealth and is fraught with ethical and practical difficulties. Both are inconsistent with FCCC provisions on equity.

WRI What is fair? Solutions that are consistent with FCCC provisions -- complex, multi-faceted, qualitative. Beyond this, it is not at all obvious what constitutes a fair response to climate change

WRI The climate convention on equity 3.1. equity, common but differentiated responsibilities, North takes the lead & 3.4 consider specific needs, circumstances, conditions of all Parties, especially developing countries 3.3. policies and measures should “ensure global benefits at the lowest possible costs” 4.7. developing country commitments are conditional upon successful developed country implementation of commitments related to financial resources and technology transfer

WRI Formulas won’t work “Equity as a legal concept is a direct emanation of the idea of justice.” (International Court of Justice, 1982, case concerning the continental shelf ) Equitable cannot be reduced to egalitarian. Emissions Population Wealth Etc. = Equity?

WRI The moral ambiguities of fairness Many theories of what is just, fair, or equitable –Utilitarianism: nations equally “share burdens” –Maximin: give entitlements to the poor countries –Entitlement theories: build on the status quo –Egalitarianism: equal share to nations or persons Which theory of justice one adopts or applies depends on: –what information one has –and one’s own circumstances Most theories of fairness apply to individuals, not countries

WRI Scrap the rights talk Talk of rights and entitlements focuses unduly on: –Allocating atmospheric rights (dividing the pie) –Trading of atmospheric rights Emission rights will be balanced by demanding obligations: –binding targets and non-compliance consequences –sound measurement and reporting –third party verification systems –transparent registries and accounting systems For many countries, these are excessively hard

WRI The atmosphere is not divisible No one can, or does, own the atmosphere Atmospheric use rights are or ought to be: –collectively managed by the COP for the purposes of meeting UNFCCC’s safe climate objective –time-bound and subject to review and revision –conditional (upon undertaking specific obligations) Lessons from the U.S. Clean Air Act Amendments: an allowance is defined as limited authorization to emit SO 2 in accordance with provisions of the law. Allowances are not property rights.

WRI Avoid one-size-fits-all ideas The treaty will need: – different levels of participation for different countries – mechanisms and policy tools that can enable more equitable outcomes (e.g., carbon intensity)

WRI Carbon Intensity Not a global planning principle; not a convergence criterion; doesn’t deliver equity It is a way to think about how countries can reduce emissions

WRI Carbon Intensity For developing countries, it could provide a way to make new, formal commitments, while avoiding environmental and economic risks associated with emissions caps. Carbon intensity can also be an indicator of progress for countries not ready to commit.

WRI Carbon intensity focuses on energy and fuels Well known identity: CO 2 Emissions = GDP X Population X Energy X CO 2 per person GDP Energy “Activity” levels (GDP p/c and Population) Energy Intensity of Economy Fuel Mix

WRI Carbon intensity focuses on energy and fuels Energy X CO 2 GDP Energy CO 2 = GDP Carbon intensity: measures mainly energy intensity and the fuel mix, not economic activity Energy Intensity of Economy Fuel Mix

WRI Can broaden participation without insisting all countries take binding emissions caps It avoids the categorical error that the atmosphere can be divided among all living persons Carbon Intensity