On-Site School Review Leadership Meeting An asset-building model of school improvement... Presenters: ___________________________ The High-Performing School.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.

Advertisements

Self-Study Tool for Alaska Schools Winter Conference January 14, 2010 Jon Paden, EED Deborah Davis, Education Northwest/Alaska Comprehensive Center.

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.

A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning

…what Georgia schools should know, do, and understand.

World’s Largest Educational Community

OVERVIEW OF ClASS METHODS and ACTIVITIES. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Describe ClASS team composition.

 Reading School Committee January 23,

Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski

Muscogee County School District Division of Academics (DOA) District Accreditation Module 4: Quality Assurance.

1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.

Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Catalyst High School May 11,12,13, 2014.

On-Site School Review All-Staff Meeting An asset-building model of school improvement... Presenters: ___________________________ The High-Performing School.

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.

SAM for “Really Smart Dummies” Peggy Goodman, Principal Christine Douthart, Assistant Principal Cindy Bloodworth, Administrative Assistant Five Forks.

So What Can I Expect When I Serve on an NEASC/CPSS Visiting Team? A Primer for New Team Members.

1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.

KEYS to School Improvement Missouri National Education Association Teaching and Learning Director.

The Quality Review A Reflection.

“Just can’t live that negative way… Make way for the positive day.” -Bob Marley Positive Vibration.

PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.

EES-Student v3.0 (Student Engagement Edition) Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.

PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.

Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.

Establishing Training Capacity for Classroom Management Heather Peshak George, Ph.D. Kim Herrmann, S.S.P. University of South Florida Marla Dewhirst Illinois.

Introduction & Step 1 Presenter:. Training Overview Introduction Participation requirements FET Tool Orientation Distribution of username & passwords.

Introduction & Step 1 Presenter: Updated 6/21/2013.

Getting Engaged in Evaluation: How to Develop an Evidence-based Offense for Your Evaluation Presented by Ellen Holmes, NBCT

Title I Schoolwide Planning Comprehensive Needs Assessment Wednesday, October 24, 2012.

How to Prepare for an Ohio Technical Assistance Visit.

1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.

External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.

EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.

AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.

Banner County Schools Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Amy Trauernicht Stacy McDaniel Troy Lurz Maribeth Moore Kaci Kearns Dan Spatzierath.

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.

SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,

Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.

Step 4 Presenter: Updated 6/21/2013. Training Overview Introduction Walk Through Step 4 Scheduled FET Trainings & Completion Dates for FET Step(s) Question(s)

Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.

A Mission of Restoration

Academic Practicum Winter Academic Practicum Seminar2 Agenda 4 Welcome 4 Burning ??’s 4 Routines & Organizational Systems 4 Overview of Academic.

Integrated Media and Technology Program with an Emphasis on Student Achievement.

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Murray County Schools February 26-29, 2012.

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Rapides Parish School District February 2, 2011.

Mathematics Program Improvement Review. KWL Complete the following sections of the KWL Chart K – What you know? W – What you want to know? We will complete.

Mathematics Program Improvement Review. KWL Complete the following sections of the KWL Chart K – What you know? W – What you want to know? We will complete.

Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.

What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary

How to Prepare for an Ohio TAV/TRV September 21, 2006 D.D. Davis, Mill Creek, Youngstown.

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.

Developing Personal and Academic Excellence in the Catholic Tradition Developing Leaders Through the AdvancED Accreditation Process Rapid City Catholic.

Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.

The Nebraska Frameworks External Visitation Team Exit Report.

PSRC FOCUSED INTERVENTION T EAM P ROCESS January 17, 2013 HAPPY NEW YEAR.

Loudon County Schools External Review Exit Report February 19-21, 2013.

About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.

Action Research Purpose and Benefits Technology as a Learning Tool to Improve Student Achievement.

DESE District Review Center for District and School Accountability Site Visit: April 11-14, 2011.

2009 Shelby County Schools District Accreditation Thompson High School.

Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.

School Improvement Updates Accreditation (AdvancED) Process ASSIST Portfolio for Schools May 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna.

Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.

Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.

RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.

Instructional Leadership for a Professional Learning Culture:

SCHOOL and DISTRICT ACCREDITATION

Making Middle Grades Work

Presentation transcript:

On-Site School Review Leadership Meeting An asset-building model of school improvement... Presenters: ___________________________ The High-Performing School © 2009 Solution Tree Press solution-tree.com Visit go.solution-tree.com/schoolimprovement to download this page.

The High-Performing School © 2009 Solution Tree Press solution-tree.com Visit go.solution-tree.com/schoolimprovement to download this page. 2 Outcomes for Today’s Meeting Understand the on-site school review process Be familiar with the effectiveness indicators and where to find the underlying research Know how the data collection determines school improvement needs Determine readiness

The High-Performing School © 2009 Solution Tree Press solution-tree.com Visit go.solution-tree.com/schoolimprovement to download this page. 3 Getting to Know One Another Introductions Review Team Leader: Name, experience in education and with school improvement Leadership Team: Name, assignment, motivation to be on leadership team, and one of the following: Describe your school What has the school been working on over the last 5 years? What has worked well and why? What goals do you have for the school?

The High-Performing School © 2009 Solution Tree Press solution-tree.com Visit go.solution-tree.com/schoolimprovement to download this page. 4 Assessing Readiness What is the level of the staff’s commitment to improving student achievement? What information do we need most to improve our school? How does the staff react to change? How does the staff respond to coaching? How willing are the leadership team members to lead change efforts and to help to ensure schoolwide commitment to agreed-upon practices?

The High-Performing School © 2009 Solution Tree Press solution-tree.com Visit go.solution-tree.com/schoolimprovement to download this page. 5 Effectiveness Indicators 1.Written Curriculum 2.Instructional Program 3.Student Assessment 4.School Leadership 5.Strategic Planning 6.Professional Development Handout: Effectiveness Indicator Overview

The High-Performing School © 2009 Solution Tree Press solution-tree.com Visit go.solution-tree.com/schoolimprovement to download this page. 6 Effectiveness Indicators (contd.) 7.Student Connectedness, Engagement, and Readiness 8.School Environment 9.Family and Community Involvement 10.District Support

The High-Performing School © 2009 Solution Tree Press solution-tree.com Visit go.solution-tree.com/schoolimprovement to download this page. 7 School Review Tools Data analysis Interview questions Survey questions Classroom observation rubric Student work analysis Family and community meeting Document review

The High-Performing School © 2009 Solution Tree Press solution-tree.com Visit go.solution-tree.com/schoolimprovement to download this page. 8 Elements of the On-Site School Review Process Planning Document review Surveying On-site review Data 2 process Communicating results Strategic planning Handout: On-Site School Review Overview

The High-Performing School © 2009 Solution Tree Press solution-tree.com Visit go.solution-tree.com/schoolimprovement to download this page. 9 Planning: Planning Visit With Leadership Team Review team meets school and district leaders Preview on-site school review process Discuss history/context of school Discuss school and district goals Discuss readiness

The High-Performing School © 2009 Solution Tree Press solution-tree.com Visit go.solution-tree.com/schoolimprovement to download this page. 10 Planning: School Leadership Plans for Review Selection of academic focus area Selection of effectiveness indicators Schedule interviews/focus groups Schedule parent meeting Disseminate surveys Coordinate student work collection

The High-Performing School © 2009 Solution Tree Press solution-tree.com Visit go.solution-tree.com/schoolimprovement to download this page. 11 Planning: Planning With All Staff Discuss school history and goals Describe on-site school review process Effectiveness indicators Document review Student work collection Surveys Communication Disseminate schedule

The High-Performing School © 2009 Solution Tree Press solution-tree.com Visit go.solution-tree.com/schoolimprovement to download this page. 12 Document Review State and local performance data and trends Curriculum and instructional materials School strategic plan Staff, student, and parent handbooks Survey data Student work (more information later)

The High-Performing School © 2009 Solution Tree Press solution-tree.com Visit go.solution-tree.com/schoolimprovement to download this page. 13 Survey Creation and Dissemination Surveys (based on effectiveness indicators selected for review) Teachers and administrators Classified staff members Students Parents Review team compiles and analyzes data Handout: Teacher Survey Example

The High-Performing School © 2009 Solution Tree Press solution-tree.com Visit go.solution-tree.com/schoolimprovement to download this page. 14 Collecting Student Work Just prior to the on-site visit, teachers collect all written student work for 1 to 2 weeks No extra planning or grading Folders provided for each class Schoolwide analysis Identify collection dates and point person Handout: Collecting Student Work (Letter)

The High-Performing School © 2009 Solution Tree Press solution-tree.com Visit go.solution-tree.com/schoolimprovement to download this page. 15 On-Site Process (3–5 days) Kick-off meeting with all staff Daily meeting with principal Classroom observations and student interviews Scheduled interviews: teachers and administrators Scheduled focus groups with classified staff members (instructional/noninstructional) Student focus groups Family and community meeting Oral exit report to all staff

The High-Performing School © 2009 Solution Tree Press solution-tree.com Visit go.solution-tree.com/schoolimprovement to download this page. 16 Communication With School and District Daily meetings with school leaders Leadership debrief Oral exit report to all staff Draft written report to school leader Final report workshop School strategic plan design inservice

The High-Performing School © 2009 Solution Tree Press solution-tree.com Visit go.solution-tree.com/schoolimprovement to download this page. 17 Strategic Planning School strategic plan design inservice Update school strategic plan to include recommendations from review Determine time lines Identify staff and resources Determine professional development

The High-Performing School © 2009 Solution Tree Press solution-tree.com Visit go.solution-tree.com/schoolimprovement to download this page. 18 Benefits of External Review Research-driven process and rubrics Neutral perspective and feedback External expertise in school improvement Evidence gathered from a wide variety of sources Analysis and corroboration Data-driven decision-making Basis for targeting resources

The High-Performing School © 2009 Solution Tree Press solution-tree.com Visit go.solution-tree.com/schoolimprovement to download this page.19 Planning Schedule Date: All-staff planning meeting Administer surveys Collect student work On-site review Family and community meeting Oral exit report Written report

The High-Performing School © 2009 Solution Tree Press solution-tree.com Visit go.solution-tree.com/schoolimprovement to download this page.20 Contact Information Team Leader: Phone: