Summary of Activities up to Now March 16, 2012 20 th ITS Informal Group Meeting K. Hiramatsu and M. Sekine NTSEL: National Traffic Safety and Environmental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Warning Timing for AEBS AEBS/LDWS Proposal of Warning Timing 1) Warning has two functions; to induce the driver to take an avoiding maneuver.
Advertisements

IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2013 Overview of International Activities to Limit Distraction Document No. ITS (21st ITS,
The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan September / 2012 Informal document GRRF (73rd GRRF, September 2012,
Concept of Driver Assistance The ASV Project of Japan Geneva November 2003 Informal Document No. 20 (131 st WP.29, agenda item 2.4.)
Proposal of Automated Driving from Ad- hoc group on LKAS/RCP Submitted by the Chair of the Special Interest Group on Lane Keeping Assist Systems (LKAS)
REPORT TO GRPE 68 TH SESSION EVE IWG 1 Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE IWG) Informal document No. GRPE (68 th GRPE, 9-10 January, 2014,
AFS Main Beam (Driving Beam) Improvements Presentation to WP th Session November 2008 Informal document No. WP th WP.29, November.
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - September 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT.
Definition for Levels of Automation
Review of ITS/IG Activity March 15, 2013 WP29/ITS Informal Group Takao Onoda Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Japan Document No.
United States Rulemaking on Electronic Stability Control (ESC) for Light Vehicles 138 WP.29 March, 2006 Informal document No. WP (138th WP.29,
1-1 Roles and Responsibilities. 1-2 Module Objectives  Recognize the roles of LEOs and others in work zones  List LEO responsibilities and expectations.
Development of Guidelines for Improvement of Vehicle Safety Regarding Infant-Carrying Vehicles Presentation material for 53rd session of GRSP & 104th session.
Guidelines for Safety Critical Warnings Peter Burns IHRA-ITS Transmitted by the representative of Canada Informal Document No. ITS th ITS informal.
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Damage Mitigation Braking System
Transmitted by the representative of JAPAN Toward Realization of the “Mutual Recognition of International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA)” under the.
General Development Procedures for In- Vehicle Icons John L. Campbell Battelle Human Factors Transportation Center Seattle, Washington May 22, 2003 ITS.
Human Factors Concerns for Design & Performance of Warnings J.L.Harbluk & P.C. Burns Ergonomics & Crash Avoidance, Transport Canada Human Factors Forum.
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - February 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT Japan.
EFV Conference 2007 in Germany 14th March Session WP.29 Geneva Informal document No. WP , March 2007, agenda item 11.3.
Vehicle Safety - (R)Evolution of Driving Assist Systems Jochen Schäfer Heiner Hunold Submitted by the experts from Informal document GRRF th GRRF,
Working Party on Brakes and Running Gear (GRRF) General information Participants/Address list A provisional address list has been prepared: please check.
1 Automotive industry Reducing Noise Emissions from Motor Vehicles: New EU Commission legislative proposal World Forum on Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) 156.
IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2011 Design Principles for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: Keeping Drivers In-the-Loop Transmitted.
VIAQ IWG The 1st Meeting Vehicle Interior Air Quality Informal Working Group 1p Vehicle Interior Air Quality (VIAQ) Informal Working Group The 1st Meeting.
ACEA comments on EU WLTP issues EU WLTP, 30 TH OF NOVEMBER November 2015.
Outcome of Meeting on “Environmentally Friendly Vehicle” on Noise Date : 15 th February th Informal Group Meeting on Environmentally Friendly Vehicle.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism New Priorities of Japan -Future Measures for Vehicle Safety for a Society with No Traffic Accidents-
Brief Review up to Now 1 March 11, 2011, Geneva UNECE/WP29/ITS Informal Group 19th Meeting T. Onoda & K. Hiramatsu, Japan Transmitted by expert from JAPANInformal.
Progress report of GRSG informal group on Accident Emergency Call System (AECS) Transmitted by the Chair of AECS IWG Informal document GRSG
Project management and communication structure Nataša Urbančíková Faculty of Economics Technical University of Košice.
REPORT TO GRPE 69 TH SESSION EVE IWG 1 Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE IWG) Informal document GRPE th GRPE, 5-6 June 2014 Agenda item.
1 GRPE Informal Working Group on Heavy Duty Hybrids UNITED NATIONS Report to GRPE 65 Geneva, 17 January 2013 Informal document No. GRPE (65th GRPE,
Development of Guidelines for Improvement of Vehicle Safety Regarding Infant-Carrying Vehicles Presentation material by Japan for 53rd session of GRSP.
IWVTA Informal Group WP th Session March 13, Transmitted by the representative of Japan Informal document WP (156 th WP.29, 13.
Cycle of Vehicle Safety Measures in Japan - Study process before & after rulemaking procedure Issue of safety regulations Enforcement (type approval &
1. Overview of the past and future work of WP29 ITS Round Table 18/2/2004 Geneva Kenji Wani Co-chairman of ITS informal Group, ECE/WP29 Ministry of Land,
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles Excerpts from the relevant sections of the ToR: II. Working items to be covered (details.
Transmitted by the Experts of TRL (EC)
OICA „Certification of automated Vehicles“
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles
Submitted by the expert form Japan Document No. ITS/AD-09-12
Facebook Campus Expansion Project EIR
ITS-Related Work Items in ITU-R Study Group 5, Working Party 5A
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Report Task Force UNR46 5th Meeting OICA Paris, 26-27th September 2016
JASIC Japan ______ 61st GRSP Session May 2017
Status Report to GRB #68 Task Force on Reverse Warning issues
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Informal document GRPE-74-20
Informal document GRRF-86-36
Statement of Principles on the Design of High-Priority Warning Signals
Working Party on General Safety Provisions (GRSG) General information
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Local Runway Safety Team (RST)
Chair: Jin Seop Park, Republic of Korea Secretary: Thomas Kinsky, OICA
NHTSA Research Overview: Automation, ADAS, and Human Factors
Participants/Address list
Working Party on General Safety Provisions (GRSG) General information
Local Runway Safety Team (RST)
Working Party on General Safety Provisions (GRSG) General information
Highlights of the 177th WP.29 session and
Working Party on General Safety Provisions (GRSG) General information
THE FEDERAL LAW «ON STANDARDIZATION IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION»
ACSF B2 SAE Level 2 and/or Level 3
Comparison between EDR/DSSAD
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Highlights of the 178th WP.29 session and
Status of discussion after 8th meeting
Presentation transcript:

Summary of Activities up to Now March 16, th ITS Informal Group Meeting K. Hiramatsu and M. Sekine NTSEL: National Traffic Safety and Environmental Laboratory 1 Document No. ITS (20th ITS, 16 March 2012, agenda item 3)

Past Activities : TOR : November 2004 To develop common understanding of driver assistance systems Report of Two Years Activities : March 2007 Appropriateness of "Driver in the Loop" under normal driving condition Effectiveness of damage mitigation under pre-crash condition where collision is no longer avoidable Proposal of Warning Guidelines to WP29 : March

How does ADAS assist driver ? : 3 Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 recognitionjudgmentoperation recognition judgmentoperation recognitionjudgment operation recognitionjudgmentoperation Assistance by Advanced Technologies Behavioral Model of a Driver Conventional driving Information Warning Control

44 Report of two years activities : Information : To keep monitoring the situation of self-commitment basis guidelines, ESoP, AAM and JAMA, in each region for a time being Warning : To develop high-priority warning guidelines in cooperation with IHRA-ITS WG Control : To have baseline ideas for effective use of control systems in ADAS

Warning Guidelines : Purpose : to provide basic recommendations for the design of high-priority warnings on ADAS  Better understanding from drivers  Reduced confusion  More accurate and consistent expectations High-priority warning : to be delivered at critical situation where the driver is required to take immediate action or decision to avoid crash event Adoption : at 154 th session of WP29, June,

6 Warning guidelines : – ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2011/90 – 1.High-priority warning should be noticeable in the driving environment. 2.High-priority warning should be distinguishable from other messages in the vehicle. 3.High-priority warning should provide spatial cues to the hazard location. 4.High-priority warning should inform the driver of proximity of the hazard. 5.High-priority warning should elicit timely response or decisions. 6.Multiple warnings should be prioritized. 7.False/nuisance warnings rate should be low. 8.System status and degraded performance of high-priority warnings should be displayed.

Conventional Driving Driver only Assistance Driving Driver + System Substitute Driving System only Level of Driver Assistance 7 ManualAutomation Driver’s role : partial operator to supervisor

 Systems should be designed in which driver is always held responsible for his/her driving. For this purpose followings are effective. Installation of auditory or visual announcement devices providing information on the system functioning  Control systems activated under normal driving condition should be designed based on “Driving in the loop”, where driver should be involved in driving in a way or other. For this purpose followings are effective. Announcement is made when the driving initiative is transferred from system to driver. Driver is kept involved in driving operation. For example, starting initiative should not be given to system. System allows switching on or off by driver System allows overriding by driver  As for Control systems to reduce collision speed activated under pre- crash condition where collision is no longer avoidable, there is no time for necessity of overriding and driver is not very likely to depend on system. Report on Control Systems in WP29/ITS Informal Group(2007): 8

Background :  Rapid technology evolution in ADAS makes the driver handling easier and more comfortable.  Roles of driver assistance systems varies dependent upon system configurations.  Such advanced systems should not be hindered by the reason of different rules among the regions. Aim :  Baseline ideas on driver-system interaction are needed for proper development of advanced systems.  The first draft was submitted at the last meeting of ITS Informal Group, and revised several times. 9 Control Principles - Background and Aim -

Activities :  Submission of the first draft from IHRA-ITS WG in November, 2010  Presentation at 19 th ITS Informal Group Meeting in March, 2011  Comments from OICA, JAMA and others  Revision and circulation to relevant quarters in February, 2012 Next step(provisional) :  Introduction of revised control principles : ITS Informal Group Meeting in March, 2012  Presentation to WP29 in 2012  Examination among related GRs in Control Principles - Activities up to Now -

Thank you for your attention 11