Patient Engagement Some of the events that will shape your definition. 1.Meaningful Use – strong emphasis on patient engagement w Stage 2 MU 2.Growth.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How To Get To The Winners Circle with Your Patient Portal; Our Challenges To Get To The Finish Line. Julie Patterson, Baptist Health Carey Ronan, MHA,
Advertisements

ARRA Meaningful Use Update Mount Auburn Hospital Information Systems Update March 2011.
By James Phelps Actuarial Specialist Reimbursement Unit Utah Medicaid and Health Financing.
Denise B. Webb State Health IT Coordinator May 9, 2013.
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
Implementing the American Reinvestment & Recovery Act of 2009.
Transforming Healthcare Nancy M. Strassel Senior Vice President Greater Cincinnati Health Council.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Proposed Rule
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
2015 Edition Proposed Rule Modifications to the ONC Health IT Certification Program and 2015 Edition Health IT Certification Criteria.
Overview of Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Presentation to HIT Steering Committee May 24, 2012.
Interoperability and Health Information Exchange Workgroup April 17, 2015 Micky Tripathi, chair Chris Lehmann, co-chair.
Proposed Meaningful Use Criteria for Stage 2 and 3 John D. Halamka.
Meaningful Use, Standards and Certification Under HITECH—Implications for Public Health InfoLinks Community of Practice January 14, 2010 Bill Brand, MPH,
Meaningful Use The Catalyst for Connected Health Sameer Bade Strategic Product Planner.
MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.
Linette T Scott, MD, MPH Chief Medical Information Officer, DHCS “Population Health” HIMSS NCal Educational Program, Sacramento, CA| February 4, 2014.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Protecting and Promoting the Practice of Good Medicine Getting Started with Meaningful Use: The impact on the professional eligible provider MMIC Health.
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Meaningful Use Personal Pace Education Module: Transitions of Care.
HIT Policy Committee Accountable Care Workgroup – Kickoff Meeting May 17, :00 – 2:00 PM Eastern.
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
Saeed A. Khan MD, MBA, FACP © CureMD Healthcare ACOs and Requirements for Reporting Quality Measures Meaningful Use Are you still missing out? © CureMD.
American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy
Installation and Maintenance of Health IT Systems Unit 8-2 System Selection- Software and Certification Component 8/Unit 2 1 Health IT Workforce Curriculum.
MaineCare Value-Based Purchasing Strategy Quality Counts Brown Bag Forum November 22, 2011.
INFLUENCE OF MEANINGFUL USE AMONG HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS Neely Duffey, Olivia Mire, Mallory Murphy, and Dana Sizemore.
NWH TRANSITION OF CARE DOCUMENT FOR MU STAGE 2 JUNE 6, 2014.
Care Transitions in Georgia: Partnering with your community to move readmissions Jennifer Hodge RN MSBA Aim Lead, Integrating Care for Populations Communities.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
1 HEALTH CARE REFORM – Changes in Delivery Systems Kenneth W. Kizer, MD, MPH Alaska State Hospital and Nursing Home Association Fairbanks, AK September.
Universal Adoption of the EHR What is Meaningful Use and why should it be important to me?
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Meaningful Use: Patient Engagement Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Pilots Proposal CCITI NY 01/27/2014.
INTRODUCTION TO THE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD CHAPTER 1.
Understanding How THE HEALTHCARE CONNECT FUND will assist Meaningful Use 3/11/2014 Mark Renfro, HTH Hometown Health.
State HIE Program Chris Muir Program Manager for Western/Mid-western States.
Making better healthcare possible ® Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Changing Seasons of Healthcare Conference WV-HFMA/WV-HIMSS September 27, 2012.
Component 11: Configuring EHRs Unit 2: Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
Unit 1b: Health Care Quality and Meaningful Use Introduction to QI and HIT This material was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department.
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
Component 8 Installation and Maintenance of Health IT Systems Unit 2 System Selection – Software and Certification This material was developed by Duke.
Provider Data Migration and Patient Portability NwHIN Power Team August 28, /28/141.
Component 3-Terminology in Healthcare and Public Health Settings Unit 15-Overview/ Introduction to the EHR This material was developed by The University.
Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Referral Request and Referral Report Connie Sixta, PhD.
A Journey Together: New Maryland Healthcare Landscape Baltimore County Forum Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission June 2015.
CMS National Conference on Care Transitions December 3,
CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview 1 Robert Anthony.
Washington and Idaho Regional Extension Center: Job Shadow Program Peggy Evans, PhD, CPHIT WIREC Director John Hartgraves WIREC Technical Manager Bellevue.
A NEW REIMBURSEMENT STRUCTURE FOR AMERICA ADVANCED DISEASE CONCEPTS.
Final Rule Regarding EHR Certification Flexibility for 2014 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager Thomas Bennett, Client.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Subgroup 2 - Engaging Patients and Families Christine Bechtel, Subgroup Chair Paul Tang, MU WG Chair July 2,
EHealth Initiative Business and Clinical Motivator Work Group January 21, :00 p.m. EDT.
Patient Engagement Today’s presenter:
David W. Bates, MD, MSc Chief Quality Officer, Brigham and Women’s Hospital Member, HIT Policy Committee President-elect, ISQua Medinfo, 2013.
Meaningful Use and PQRS How to help your practices avoid penalties April 25 th,2015 Washington D.C. Mark Norris Medical Records Services, LLC
Terminology in Healthcare and Public Health Settings Electronic Health Records Lecture a – Introduction to the EHR This material Comp3_Unit15 was developed.
© 2014 By Katherine Downing, MA, RHIA, CHPS, PMP.
Moving Toward HITECH Healthcare EHR Adoption at the Dawn of a New Era
Who’s in Your Neighborhood? The Patient-Centered Medical Community David C. Willis, MD Medical Director Greater Ocala Health Information Trust, Inc.
Conference 2009 Nurse 2.0 Engaging the Healthcare Consumer Remote Patient Monitoring Debbie Schmidt RN, MCSE.
 Proposed Rule by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on 11/03/2015Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services11/03/2015  Revises the discharge.
Health Tech Council: Health IT Supporting Engaged Patients Damon L. Davis Special Assistant to the National Coordinator, Consumer e-Health.
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #8 – Patient Electronic Access Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 19, 2016 Today’s presenter:
Patient Centered Medical Home
Presentation transcript:

Patient Engagement

Some of the events that will shape your definition. 1.Meaningful Use – strong emphasis on patient engagement w Stage 2 MU 2.Growth of social media and access to the internet 3.Focus on improving health among targeted population a.Reducing unnecessary readmissions b.Improving compliance c.On-going healthcare needs – chronic conditions that need continual contact with healthcare staff 4.Patient driven – as deductibles increase, patients may demand greater access to their health information to help them with healthcare decisions Patient Engagement

Stage 2 Meaningful Use CMS released Stage 2 MU criteria on February 23, 2012 Published in the March 7 th Federal Register Public comments due no later than May 7 th Patient Engagement Meaningful Use

Proposed Eligible Hospital/CAH Objective: Provide patients the ability to view online, download, and transmit information about a hospital admission. We propose this as a core objective for hospitals in Stage 2 with the following information that must be available as part of the objective: Admit and discharge date and location. Reason for hospitalization. Providers of care during hospitalization. Problem list maintained by the hospital on the patient. Relevant past diagnoses known by the hospital. Medication list maintained by the hospital on the patient (both current admission and historical). Medication allergy list maintained by the hospital on the patient (both current admission and historical). Vital signs at discharge. Laboratory test results (available at time of discharge). Care transition summary and plan for next provider of care (for transitions other than home). Discharge instructions for patient, and Demographics maintained by hospital (gender, race, ethnicity, date of birth, preferred language, smoking status). Patient Engagement Meaningful Use

Proposed Eligible Hospital/CAH Objective: There are 2 measures for this objective, both of which must be satisfied in order to meet the objective. 1. More than 50 percent of all patients who are discharged from the inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) of an eligible hospital or CAH have their information available online within 36 hours of discharge. 2. More than 10 percent of all patients who are discharged from the inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) of an eligible hospital or CAH view, download, or transmit to a third party their information during the EHR reporting period. Patient Engagement Meaningful Use

Stage 2 MU: The second measure represents a new concept for meaningful use criteria, because it measures the hospital based upon the actions of the patient. Patient Engagement Meaningful Use

Stage 2 MU: Stage 2 Timeline Delay Finally, we propose a minor delay of the implementation of the onset of Stage 2 criteria. In the Stage 1 final rule, we established that any provider who first attested to Stage 1 criteria for Medicare in 2011 would begin using Stage 2 criteria in This proposed rule delays the onset of those Stage 2 criteria until 2014, which we believe provides the needed time for vendors to develop Certified EHR Technology. Patient Engagement Meaningful Use

Stage 3 MU: We anticipate that Stage 3 meaningful use criteria will focus on: promoting improvements in quality, safety and efficiency leading to improved health outcomes; focusing on decision support for national high priority conditions; patient access to self-management tools; access to comprehensive patient data through robust, patient-centered health information exchange; and improving population health pdf Patient Engagement Meaningful Use

Increasing Access to High Speed Internet & the Use of Mobile Platforms (mHealth) 20005% of the population had access to high speed internet 2012>50% have access to high speed internet Source: Kaiser Permanente allows patients access to their EHRs on their mobile devices and just launched an iphone app and has surpassed 3 million users of its online personal health record. Source: Patient Engagement Technology

Improving Health Among a Targeted Population We anticipate that Stage 3 meaningful use criteria will focus on: promoting improvements in quality, safety and efficiency leading to improved health outcomes; focusing on decision support for national high priority conditions; patient access to self- management tools; access to comprehensive patient data through robust, patient-centered health information exchange; and improving population health. Patient Engagement Technology

Reducing Patient Readmissions: CHF Patient Patient Engagement Technology Hospitalization

Patients With On-going Care Needs Depression Compliance issues Patient Engagement Technology

$20,000,000,000 The amount of funding made available in the HITECH Act for HIT. Equivalent to 100,000 homes valued at $200,000 each Healthcare organizations that do not implement EHRs will face penalties. Patient Engagement Funding

Link Between Technology and Patients Involvement CMS is a driving force with the industry following ACO model rewards efficient, quality healthcare Access through technology helps begin the conversation between patient/family and care provider A 2012 National eHealth Collaborative survey found 73% of respondents felt “better care coordination” would be the most important benefit of health info exchange Patient Engagement Why do this

Link Between Technology and Patients Involvement 4 federal programs will drive policy through incentives/penalties that necessitate patients being involved (engaged) in their health & well-being, improving their outcomes and their experiences: 1. VBP 2. Meaningful Use 3. avoidable readmissions 4. ACO’s Patient Engagement Why do this

Comprehension Left behind – may not have insurance provider pushing them Lack of physician leadership / provider adoption Lack of motivation – personal and institutional Access to high speed internet Lack of recognition that they need to take command of their health Funding Interoperability standards Patient Engagement Challenges

Patients Asking for Access to Their Health Information Increasing deductibles Increased activity from insurance providers for their beneficiaries to become involved (engaged) and be self-managers or active consumers of healthcare (lower premiums are the carrot) Increasing use of mobile devices (Gen Y spends more time on the computer than watching TV) Patient Engagement Why patients may drive it

Components of an effective Engagement Strategy 1.Acknowledgement your organization and patients are going to have to communicate in new ways 2.Define not just the patients role, but the role of key healthcare members (case managers, PCP) 3.Assessment of patients needs (comprehension level, communication ability, physical limitations) 4.Tailor information to the individual (relevant information to a patients circumstances) 5.Flexibility and guidance to help reduce patient anxiety and increase dialogue about health- related issues 6.Ability of healthcare members to track patients engagement and comprehension (allows team to adjust educational materials for example) 7.Support the care of the patient across all continuums of care (care transitions) 8.Patient access to information that meets their abilities (based on the assessment) Patient Engagement Key Success Factors

How does your organization define patient engagement? Transforming the traditional relationship of episodic care to one of active participation on the part of the patient. Patient Engagement