Organization of IP5 Meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VANCOUVER GROUP MUTUAL EXPLOITATION Collaboration between UK, Canada and Australia Fatima Beattie Deputy Director General, IP Australia.
Advertisements

Speeding It Up at the USPTO July 2013 July 23, 2013.
Use of Social Media by Swiss Higher Ed Initiative of the State Secretariat for Education and Research SER Annex of the Consulate General. Swiss Knowledge.
Enterprise and Industry Directorate-General Unit D1 Innovation Policy development European Commission Non-technological innovation and EU innovation policies.
From Productivity Analysis in Asia to Creating Asia KLEMS Database The 1 st World KLEMS Conference August 19-20, 2010 Tsutomu Miyagawa (GakushuinUniversity)
ASTM Member Website Tools Jeff Adkins Diane Trinsey 1 September 2012 Officers Training Workshop.
Río de Janeiro 18 July 2009 Science & Technology Indicators for EULARINET Indicators for bi-regional cooperation comparison Documents analysed: OST: S&T.
PCT Supplementary International Search Service (PCT Rule 45bis applicable from January 1, 2009)
1 Geneva, October 2008 YUN Young-Woo IP INFORMATION & WIPO STANDARDS.
For Improvement of IP Infrastructure For Improvement of IP Infrastructure Japan Patent Office.
Antonios Farassopoulos Head of International Classifications and WIPO Standards Service Global IP Infrastructure Department Combined CPC/FI Introduction.
IPC REFORM Objectives and principal Features Antonios Farassopoulos World Intellectual Property Organization IPC Forum 2006 Geneva.
The IP Experts 1 BY P. KANDIAH KASS INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD SHAPING BUSINESS STRATEGY THROUGH COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE STRATEGIC USE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
PCT – Statistics Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Working Group Sixth Session Geneva, May 21 to 24, 2013.
WPIS WIPO's Patent Information Service for developing countries Current WPIS Analysis of Clients Future Options.
United States Patent and Trademark Office – IP5 Foundation Projects: why are they necessary for work sharing and what challenges are IP5.
WIPO Patent Information Services
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) IPC Committee of Experts
Title slide European Patent Office The Master Classification Database Jürgen Rampelmann IPC Forum, Geneva 13 February 2006.
1 The PATLIB (Patent Library) Network in Europe Heidrun Krestel European Affairs, Member States 19 May 2010.
The IP5 view on the future of classification IPC Committee of Experts March 2009.
1 The EPO Co-operation Programme to reorient patent information centres Heidrun Krestel European Affairs, Member States 4 October 2010.
Global Business Solutions for Patent Prosecution Niclas Morey Geneva, 22 September 2011 Director International Organisations, Trilateral and IP5 European.
IPC – a sound tool for Environmentally Sound Technologies?
1 Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) IPC CE Meeting Geneva, 27 February 2013 Pierre Held, EPO Directorate Classification Christopher Kim, USPTO CPC.
Third IPC Workshop (WIPO)
PATENTSCOPE® Search Service: Tool for Access to and Dissemination of International and National Patent Documents William Meredith Head, Global IP Information.
Eugen Stohr Director International Legal Affairs, PCT
The Common Hybrid Classification project of the Pierre Held Directorate Classification ( ) IPC Workshop, 8-9 February 2010, WIPO, Geneva.
IP5 Foundation Projects and the User Community Michael Brunner, Secretary General AIPPI.
IPC Reclassification Website Antonio Carlos Souza de Abrantes Daniel Barros Júnior February 4, WIPO/Geneva.
Presentation of the Chinese Delegation on Its Proposal March 15 to 17, 2011 Moscow.
WIPO 2nd Global Symposium 17 Sep 2010 IP5 Foundation Projects – why are they necessary and what are the challenges? Jan Modin, FICPI CET Special Reporter,
Korean Intellectual Property Office March 2010 Tackling the Backlog Tackling the Backlog.
KIPO’s Policies on IP Marketplace Choongjae Lee Intellectual Property Promotion Division KIPO (Korean Intellectual Property Office)
(Proposed) WIPO STANDARD ST.36 RECOMMENDATION FOR THE PROCESSING OF PATENT DOCUMENTS USING XML (E X TENSIBLE M ARKUP L ANGUAGE) Presented to the SCIT/SDWG.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
Michael D. Stein Principal Stein IP LLC 1400 Eye Street, NW Suite 300 Washington, DC (202) Patent Prosecution.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
PCT – Statistics Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Working Group Seventh Session Geneva, June 10 to 13, 2014.
PCT – Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twenty-First Session Tel Aviv, February 11 to 13, 2014.
IPC - International Patent Classification Other Classification Systems.
Center on Knowledge Translation for Disability and Rehabilitation Research Information Retrieval for International Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
Clock will move after 1 minute
PDG IMPACT, Kallas, Frers/ WIPO_IPC_8_User view.ppt PDG IMPACT IPC Reform – User‘s view PDG IMPACT Working Group IPC Forum Open Day, February.
Recent Trends in Patent Harmonization and Modernization JPAA International Activities Center Kazuhiro Yamaguchi October 21-22, 2014 AIPLA Annual Meeting.
February 2012 Presentation to the Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Introduction to the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
Seminar on WIPO Services and Initiatives Topic 5; Global Databases for Intellectual Property, Platform and Tools for Connected Knowledge Economy Oslo October.
ACTING FOR THE IP PROFESSION WORLDWIDE State of Play and Expectations in Substantive Patent Law Harmonisation: IP5, the Global Dossier and.
1 Worksharing: A Cooperative Approach to Patent Workload Management Charles Eloshway Patent Attorney, Office of External Affairs USPTO.
Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association “The Global Dossier Initiative” Anthony Venturino – Novak Druce Connolly Bove + Quigg.
AIPLA 2012 Annual Meeting Washington 25 October 2012 Worksharing, utilisation and the CPC Niclas Morey Director, International Organisations, Trilateral.
The IPC development plan for the next five years IPC Workshop February 2013 Geneva Antonios Farassopoulos Director, International Classifications and Standards.
1 IP Infrastructure for Promotion of Work Sharing - Japan’s Perspective - Koichi MINAMI Deputy Commissioner Japan Patent Office WIPO Global Symposium of.
Niclas Morey23 October 2015Director, International Organisations, Trilateral and IP5 Technical Harmonization in the IP5 EPO’s Global Dossier, CCD and CPC.
Global Dossier Mr. Mark Powell Deputy Commissioner
1 Worksharing n Facilitated in the long-term by: –Legal harmonization –Systems harmonization n Current programs, projects and pilots aimed at worksharing:
Introducing EPO PATSTAT EPO Worldwide Patent Statistical Database James Rollinson.
Japan’s activities for achieving the world’s fastest and highest quality examination system Atsushi Kimura Assistant Director International Cooperation.
Far East: Patents, Trademarks and Designs
FAR EAST AND PATENT INFORMATION
Retrospective of 2016 & plans for 2017
ASEAN PATENTSCOPE Service
Head, IT Systems Section
9.a Report on IPC-related IT systems IPC Committee of Experts 50
PCT Statistics PCT Working Group Eleventh Session
Artificial Intelligence applied to IPC and Nice classifications
The National Association of Patent Practitioners (NAPP)
Presentation transcript:

Second WIPO Global Symposium of Intellectual Property Authorities Foundation Projects at IP5 Offices - Details and Progress - Koichi Minami Deputy Commissioner Japan Patent Office September17, 2010 Second WIPO Global Symposium of Intellectual Property Authorities

Organization of IP5 Meeting IP5 Heads Meeting IP5 Deputy Heads Meeting Programme Management Group (Assisting Deputy Heads) WG2 IT-supported Business Processes WG3 Examination Practice-related Projects WG1 Common Hybrid Classification Common Documentation Common Search and Examination Support Tools Common Application Format Mutual Machine Translation Common Access to Search and Examination Results Common Training Policy Search and Exam. Rules / Quality Management Common Approach to Sharing and documenting Search Strategy Common Statistical Parameters (EPO) (EPO) (USPTO) (USPTO) (JPO) (KIPO) (JPO) (KIPO) (SIPO) (SIPO) ( )Lead Office of each project 1

WG1: Common Hybrid Classification Concept Subdivided Classification FI IPC ECLA IP5 Cooperation A01A1/00 △△△ A01A1/24・△△△      A ○○○      B・○○○      C・○○○      Z Other A01A1/00 △△△ A01A1/24・△△△ A01A1/00 △△△ 1/00A・××× A01A1/24・△△△ H01L33/00 H01L33/00     33/02  33/04       ・  101・○○○  103・・○○○  104・・・○○ Harmonized Classification Subdivided Classification   1/24A ・・×××   1/24A1・・・××   1/24B ・・×××   1/24B1・・・××   1/24B2・・・×× Proposal into IPC H01L33/00     33/02     33/04       ・ Revised IPC Revised FI Revised ECLA A01A1/00 △△△ 1/06・○○○ 1/12・・○○○ 1/18・・・○○ A01A1/24・△△△ 1/30・・××× 1/36・・・×× 1/42・・××× 1/50・・・×× 1/56・・・×× A01A1/00 △△△ 1/06・○○○ 1/12・・○○○ 1/18・・・○○ A01A1/24・△△△ 1/30・・××× 1/36・・・×× 1/42・・××× 1/50・・・×× 1/56・・・×× A01A1/00 △△△ 1/06・○○○ 1/12・・○○○ 1/18・・・○○ A01A1/24・△△△ 1/30・・××× 1/36・・・×× 1/42・・××× 1/50・・・×× 1/56・・・×× Search Service Practitioners etc. Patent Offices in each country Applicants/ Inventors etc. 2

Pilot Projects - Timeline WG1: Common Hybrid Classification Pilot Projects - Timeline Timeline of the 5 pilot projects on classification (Note: Timeline varies depending on project.) Start! Entry into force IP5 Phase 2 2nd IP5WGC 3rd IP5WGC 4th IP5WGC 4 (=WG1) 3 IPC Phase IPC/WG IPC/WG 1 5 IPC/CE 1 =F001 Project Reclassification Oct 2009 Mar 2010 Oct 2010 Jan 2012 May 2010 Nov 2010 Feb 2011

WG2: IT-supported Business Processes Common Documentation: (1) data exchange for improvement of each in-house DB Improve existing scheme for data exchange (e.g. Standardization of data exchange, media-less exchange etc.) Create in-house database by collecting frequently cited documentation under each Office’s operation and management Select the language for searching/viewing documents JPO IP5 Offices(e.g. EPO) ・JP Patent (JP B1,B2) ・JP unexamined Pat.(JP A) ・JP Patent (JP B1,B2) ・JP unexamined Pat.(JP A) Ja Bulk Data Exchange (with MT if necessary) En ・JP Utility Models (JP U) ・US Patent (US A,B) ・US PGPub.(US A1) Ja En ・US Patent (US A,B) ・US PGPub.(US A1) ・EP Patent (EP B1,B2) ・EP unexamined Pat.(EP A1,A2) En En/Fr/Ge ・EP Patent (EP B1,B2) ・EP unexamined Pat. (EP A1,A2) Bulk Data Exchange ・KR Patent (KR B1,B2) ・KR unexamined Pat.(KR A1,A2) ・KR Patent (KR B1,B2) ・KR unexamined Pat. (KR A1,A2) En En ・CN Patent (CN B1,B2) ・CN unexamined Pat.(CN A1,A2) Kr/Ja En ・CN Patent (CN B1,B2) ・CN unexamined Pat.(CN A1,A2) ・GB Patent(GB A) ・FR Patent/Utility(FR A) ・DE Patent(DE A,B,C) Cn/Ja En/Fr/Ge ・GB Patent(GB A) ・FR Patent/Utility(FR A) ・DE Patent(DE A,B,C) *Each office selects the type of text-data language. ・ DE Utility Models(DE U) En En 4

WG2: IT-supported Business Processes Common Documentation:         (2) Mutual Access to each Office’s DB Mutual Access by using API (Application Programming Interface) Establishment of All-in-One platform Docs A Docs B JPO Docs C Virtual Database Docs A Docs D Docs E Docs B Docs F Docs G Docs C USPTO EPO Docs A Docs A Docs B Docs B Docs D Docs D Docs E SIPO KIPO Docs A Docs A Docs C Docs B Docs G Docs C Access to foreign documents via network as the occasion demands 5

One Portal Dossier (Image) WG2: IT-supported Business Processes One Portal Dossier (Image) Input Application Number (Priority Number, Application number or Publication Number is available.) JP2005-008213 OK EPO App. No. ****** Pub. No. Pat. No. Date Documents 17/Sep/2010 ***** JPO 16/Sep/2010 KIPO **/**/**** SIPO **** USPTO ********* ******** EN JP KR CN 1. All Documents 2. Application 3. Office Actions 4. Applicant’s Response 5. Citation 6. Classification 7. Patent Family (Except for IP5)

One Portal Dossier (Image) WG2: IT-supported Business Processes One Portal Dossier (Image) EPO App. No. ****** Pub. No. Pat. No. Date Documents 17/Sep/2010 ***** JPO 16/Sep/2010 KIPO **/**/**** SIPO **** USPTO ********* ******** EN JP KR CN 1. All Documents 2. Application 3. Office Actions 4. Applicant’s Response 5. Citation 6. Classification 7. Patent Family (Except for IP5) Examination Report Reason: 1. The following documents (D1/D2), of which D1 is considered to …. D1= EP-A-0709779 D2= Yasuda et. al, Color Still Picture Sub-Division Coding International Standards, Journal of the Institute of Image Electronics Engineers of Japan, Japan, December 25, 1989, Vol.18, No.6, P.398-407 2. Lack of novelty, Articles 52(1) and 54 EPC: The present applications does not comply with the requirements…… Citation Information EPO: 1. EP 0709779 A 2. Yasuda et. al, USPTO: 1. US 2000-325675 A 2. US 2001-292215 A 3. EP 0709779 A WIPO: 1. US 2001-292215 A 2. EP 0709779 A KIPO: ************** Classification Information ECLA: 1. H01L 21/23D1A 2. G03B 3/00A2B USC: 1. 312/06 2. 215/09 3. 21/234 FI : 1. H01L 21/23, 101@A 2. G03B 3/00@Z IPC: 1. H01L 21/23 Patent family (Except 5 offices) DE 100000 A FR 100000 A

WG3: Examination Practice-related Projects Common Training Policy (IP5 Examiners’ Workshop) Discuss search and examination tools and practices of the IP5 Offices Develop mutual trust among IP5 examiners The first IP5 Examiners’ Workshop KIPO: International Intellectual Property Training Institute 2009. 10. 20 - 23 2nd IP5 Examiners’ Workshop: Oct 2010 at EPO (Munich) 8

WG3: Examination Practice-related Projects Common Training Policy (Cross-Participation) Enhance: Utilization of training resources Efficiency of examiner training EPO Basic Patent Examination PCT Procedure; Non-unity Advance Patent Examination JPO USPTO Search Expert Training Training of applicable skills for examination Examination Overview Claim Interpretation & Search Training for New Examiners Examination Case Study Chinese Patent System SIPO KIPO

Ten foundation projects contribute to work-sharing. Next Steps Ten foundation projects contribute to work-sharing. Next IP5 Heads Meeting evaluates progress towards short term goals. IP5 Website: http://www.fiveipoffices.org/index.html 10