Call to Community: Building Connections that Make a Difference for Students with Disabilities CA Community Meeting April 28, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Audience: Local school/PTA leaders (PTA president, school principal, school board members, PTA board) Presenter: State/district PTA leader.
Advertisements

Bridging Race, Income and Cultural Differences to Support Student Success.
Hart. Interagency Coordination and Management of Supports College/Career Connection Debra Hart University of Massachusetts, Boston.
National Community of Practice on Transition Expanding Effective Practices.
Leading by Convening: The Power of Authentic Engagement
Telling the Story of Canada’s Children A Comprehensive Approach to Accountability National Children’s Alliance November 26, 2004.
Using medicaid with HUD’s Homeless Assistance Programs
CALGARY ACTION COMMITTEE ON HOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS FRAMEWORK FOR COLLABORATION? Collaboration Working Group.
Growth Generation Leaders
The Partnership Way: Blueprint Development Session Joanne Cashman Director, The IDEA Partnership At NASDSE Luann Purcell Executive Director, CASE Stacy.
Transforming Transition at the National, State, and Local Levels through Communities of Practice: Strategies for Fostering Interagency Collaboration NSTTAC.
The Network To come together to transform the partnerships among families, community and service providers to do everything possible to promote strong,
Communities of Practice: The Leading Edge Jill Larson, CDE Joanne Cashman, The IDEA Partnership The CA CoP Team.
Communities of Practice: The Leading Edge Joanne Cashman, IDEA Partnership Emilie Braunel, WI Facets Jen Ledin, WI CoP.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
National Community of Practice on Transition Past, Present and Future.
CoP: Getting Started 2. What are Communities of Practice? A way of working Involving those who do shared work Involving those that share issues Always.
The Connect Effect: Working across Groups in a Community of Practice Nancy Reder, Deputy Director, National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
Oral Health in Maryland Florida Oral Health Conference The Nuts and Bolts of Coalitions August 23, 2012 Penny Anderson, M.S.W. Executive Director.
Improving Secondary Education and Transition Using Research-Based Standards and Indicators An initiative of the National Alliance on Secondary Education.
2011 SIGnetwork Regional Meetings Guidance in Structuring a Communities of Practice.
A Model for Collaborative Technical Assistance for SPP Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14 Loujeania Bost, Charlotte Alverson, David Test, Susan Loving, & Marianne.
CLAIMING THE FUTURE THE ASSOCIATION OF THE FUTURE.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Strengthening Service Quality © The Quality Service Review Institute, a Division of the Child Welfare Policy & Practice Group, 2014.
NSW Department of Education & Training Aboriginal Education and Training Policy Making it real: Working with Aboriginal Communities.
Implementing the Scottish Government’s Strategic Guidance for Community Learning & Development The Voluntary Sector Role Third Sector Interface conference,
Implementing the Scottish Government’s Strategic Guidance for Community Learning & Development Learning Link Scotland Conference, 1/11/12 - Workshop.
AN INVITATION TO LEAD: United Way Partnerships Discussion of a New Way to Work Together. October 2012.
Communities of Practice: The Human Side of Implementation Joanne Cashman, Ed. D. Director The Policymaker Partnership at The National Association of State.
◦ Administrators ◦ Teachers ◦ Speech/Language Professionals ◦ Occupational Therapy ◦ Behavior Intervention ◦ And more… ◦ Access the range of skills on.
Engagement as Strategy: Leading by Convening in the SSIP Part 2 8 th Annual Capacity Building Institute May, 2014 Joanne Cashman, IDEA Partnership Mariola.
Summary of the U.S. Task Force on United Way’s Economic Model & Growth.
National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs and the A.P.P.L.E. Project Models of Parent Leadership Development.
The IDEA Partnership at The National Association of State Directors of Special Education (NASDSE) IDEA INFO Building Unified.
EFedLink A Community of Practice (CoP) Website Advancing the Federal Employment of People with Disabilities.
Module 5 Successful Strategies for Promoting Collaboration and Coordinated Service Delivery.
1 The Federal Shared Youth Vision Partnership A Federal Partnership between the Corporation for National community Service;
Human Services Integration Building More Effective Responses to Peoples’ Needs.
Module 4 :Session 4 Working with others Developed by Dr J Moorman.
ASHHRA 2008 – 2010 STRATEGIC PLAN Vision By joining together, by raising our skills and by speaking with one voice, we, as ASHHRA members will enhance.
Kansas Youth Vision Team: Serving Our Neediest Youth Atlanta, GA September, 2006.
Leadership is the ability to influence a group towards the achievement of goals.
The Pennsylvania Community of Practice in Support of Secondary Transition National Association of State Directors of Special Education March 10, 2004.
Take Charge of Change MASBO Strategic Roadmap Update November 15th, 2013.
1 The Federal Shared Youth Vision Partnership A Federal Partnership between the United States Departments of Education, Health.
Community Level Team Community Level Teams. “No one can do it alone. Improving the quality of life and the education of children with disabilities and.
Angela M. Denning State Special Education Director Nancy Konitzer State Title I Director Authentic Stakeholder.
Strange Bedfellows: Building and Maintaining Collaborations between, among, and within State agencies for PROMISE Grant partnerships.
COMMUNITY RESOURCE MAPPING Train the Trainer MAST - NH December 15, 2006 Facilitated by: Kelli Crane.
Business Retention and Expansion What it is Why it is important How it works What makes it successful Business Retention and Expansion.
Tying it all together Sharon D. Kruse March 14, 2011
1 Partnerships and Collaboration: Building Interagency Teams Strategic Service Delivery Component Disability Employment Initiative.
Building Understand and Igniting Change through a Community of Practice Joanne Cashman Director, The IDEA Partnership at NASDSE Members of the National.
Meeting the Challenges in NCLB: The Title 1 and IDEA Connection Joanne Cashman, Ed. D. Director, The IDEA Partnership at The National Association of State.
Participatory Framework Knowledge, skills and dispositions to create and sustain change are distributed across groups, settings and levels of the system.
Education: An Essential Component of Systems of Care The National Community of Practice on Collaborative School Behavioral Health July 13, 2006 Training.
Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.
CoP : Getting Started 1. Thinking Like a Partner: The Strategic Value of Communities of Practice in Achieving Goals Everyone has something to share and.
Connect2Complete Theory of Change Development for Colleges and State Offices November 10, 2011 OMG Center for Collaborative Learning.
How United Way Works to Advance the Common Good. How United Way Works 2 To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of communities Mission of the.
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
Effective Outreach to Youth with Disabilities Through Interagency Collaboration CWA Conference, 2016 Sacramento, CA Presenters: Sue Sawyer Vicki Shadd.
NSTTAC Institute May 2, :30 p.m. - 3:30 p.m.
Where Does Special Education Fit Within MTSS?
National Community of Practice on Transition
IDEA Partnership at NASDSE March 20, 2006
Habitat for Humanity CONNECT! Donor Experience 101 Bridget L. Brandt.
People Lead: This is the visual representation of our model. This model supports and reinforces our definition of leadership - achieving results, with.
National Community of Practice on Transition Past, Present and Future
Presentation transcript:

Call to Community: Building Connections that Make a Difference for Students with Disabilities CA Community Meeting April 28, 2008

“In theory there is no difference between theory and practice; in practice, there is.” Yogi Berra”

The New Focus on Information and Experience “Knowledge is an asset to be managed like other assets” Etienne Wenger

We Need A New Way of Working We have a ‘knowing’ and ‘doing’ gap. We need to move promising strategies ‘to scale’. We have a need for security when undertaking change. Problems are complex and interrelated. We need to find a course of action through the complexity

The ‘Knowing’ and ‘Doing’ Gap ‘Knowing’ isn’t ‘doing’! Practices often do not transfer across organizations. Practices often do not transfer across sites within the same organization.

Moving Promising Strategies ‘To Scale’ Pockets of excellence persist! Many sites need direct and ongoing support to adopt practices. It is unlikely that we will have sufficient TA resources to provide direct assistance to all that will need it.

The Need for Security In Making Change Implementers are people first! Fear limits the ability of people to turn knowledge into action. People need support to make changes. In the absence of support, change does not go deep. In the absence of support, backsliding is common.

Finding a Course of Action through Complex Issues We need to be able to operate at the intersection of research, policy and practice. States as leverage points Stakeholders as partners State agencies as collaborators State investments as resources

What If..... The state agencies routinely connected to teachers, VR counselors, families, etc for their views The State agencies provided a way for you to connect with others that care about an issue The State agencies made you a real partner in creating new solutions to persistent problems

What If... The state agencies created a way to share best practice within the state and coach each other The state affiliates of your national organizations consistently offered opportunities for you to be involved in the real work of changing outcomes in CA You could learn and share with individuals in other states and they could learn and share with you

Communities of Practice for Strategic Advantage There is untapped knowledge that resides with those that do the work To achieve results, leaders need to partner with and support those that are closest to the work. Real change requires that leaders, practitioners and consumers build a shared sense of purpose around the change

What are Communities of Practice? A way of working Involving those who do shared work Involving those that share issues Always asking “who isn’t here?” A way of learning To create new knowledge grounded in ‘doing the work’ With those who can advocate for and make change

Can a ‘Community’ Strategy Address Unmet Needs? Communities Are a ‘way of working’ Are the natural bonds between people that share common work Are organized around common goals Are committed to using what we know Move from ‘knowing’ to ‘doing’ Open, inviting and supportive others ‘doing’ the work

What Do Communities Do? Seek and invite others doing shared work Share learnings within organizations, agencies and roles Share learnings across organizations, agencies and roles Decide to do things together that will address a shared concern Create new knowledge grounded

Why Are Communities of Value? Provide the support that implementers need Respect the ‘expertise’ that implementers bring Recognize the differences in the settings where implementer do their work Inviting differing viewpoints Seek commonality within differing viewpoints Unite individuals in in action Focus on ‘lesson drawing’ and ‘learning’ Turn existing ‘networks‘ into ‘communities’ Use the ‘community’ to transform practice Building bridges between research, policy and practice

How Do Communities Make a Difference? Build on a voluntary affiliation Use the natural bonds between people that do common work Create communication mechanisms Maintain communication that strengthen natural bonds Use the ‘community status’ to bring attention to issues Use the ‘community status’ to engage the people that can help move the issues Keep the community members focused on ‘learning by doing’ Keep community members focused on outcomes

How Do Organizations and Individuals Get Their Needs Met Within a Community? Communities focus on ‘big picture’ goals ‘Practice Groups’ unite individuals with special interests or specific issues Practice groups help the community understand specific interests and issues in more depth The community keeps the practice group focused on the ‘bigger picture’ Both the ‘community’ and the ‘practice group’ are necessary to get needs met Both the ‘community’ and the ‘practice group’ are necessary to respond to issues in context

How Do Organizational and Stakeholder Groups Enlarge and Enrich the Community? Individuals ‘hear’ messages differently from groups with which they voluntarily affiliate Individuals are more open to influence from their organizational/stakeholder networks Organizational/stakeholder network support moves ideas more quickly Organizational/stakeholder networks translate ideas and make concrete connections for their constituents When organizational/stakeholder networks are engaged, they create leadership opportunities for their members When organizational/stakeholder networks are engaged they can bring the learning the realities of implementation into the work When organizational/stakeholder networks are engaged they can disseminate new learning that is grounded in the realities of implementation The community provides organizations and stakeholders with a stronger voice in bringing policy and practice together!

An Example of A Community and It’s Practice Groups Community Focus: Interagency Transition Potential Practice Groups: Employment Health Post –secondary issues Transition and high school redesign Transition for youth with unique needs: youth with autism, youth returning from the juvenile justice system, youth in foster care, etc. Youth empowerment and leadership Data Sharing and data-based decisionmaking

Learning as a Community Focus Local-to-Local State-to-Local Local-to-State State-to-State

National Community on Transition: We Are Trying to Model a New Way 10 states, 12 national organizations… connected with federal investments in ED and VR Focus on learning across states and modeling community within states Key Issues: oInteragency (engagement, roles, relationships, common goals, unique indicators and data systems) oYouth role oImpact of HS redesign on transition oYear-round program oLocal engagement and local-to-state learning oState meetings as catalysts for community building and allied action

First Steps to Community Building among Stakeholders Ask: Who is interested in this issue and why? What efforts are underway separately to address the work? How can we build new connections? What ‘real work’ goal could unite us?

Helping State Agencies Learn the Value of Community Ask: What does the data tell you? If you are to improve the data, who needs to be involved? What will make the work need fulfilling for others? Reach out and invite through the community!

How Can Separate Work Become Shared Work? Be intentional about collaboration Invite others into core work Invest in collaborative strategies Plan together Share training Make shared work your ‘work style’…not an ‘add on’ Invent new ways to connect Issue Forums Routine Learning Calls Create Issue Focused Practice Groups Involve Practice Groups in advising and decision making Create online workspace for connecting Focus on the task, the relationship and the learning!

New Eyes on Challenges through Communities of Practice For you, is there value in building a community that aligns separate initiatives in support of transition? For you, is there value in building a community that supports relationships and learning within states? For you, is there value in building a community that supports relationships and learning across states?