8 and 9 February, 2010Presenter: Dave Bender (USPTO) 1 Statistics Considered When Prioritizing Common Hybrid Classification (cHc) Projects.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Speeding It Up at the USPTO July 2013 July 23, 2013.

Advertisements

§ 1.10 Properties of the Real Number System. Angel, Elementary Algebra, 7ed 2 Commutative Property Commutative Property of Addition If a and b represent.

Slide 1 Insert your own content. Slide 2 Insert your own content.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Chapter 5 FUTURE POPULATION TRENDS.

1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 3.1 Chapter 3.

1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.

National Economic Conditions John Weinberg August 11, 2010.

Combining Like Terms. Only combine terms that are exactly the same!! Whats the same mean? –If numbers have a variable, then you can combine only ones.

Arndt Mecke (Siemens AG, Munich)

Antonios Farassopoulos Head of International Classifications and WIPO Standards Service Global IP Infrastructure Department Combined CPC/FI Introduction.

IPC REFORM Objectives and principal Features Antonios Farassopoulos World Intellectual Property Organization IPC Forum 2006 Geneva.

Quality of Classification. Optimum: All documents pertaining to specific technical area (concept) are found by classification search What to achieve ?

United States Patent and Trademark Office – IP5 Foundation Projects: why are they necessary for work sharing and what challenges are IP5.

Trilateral Classification Harmony Project IPC Forum Geneva, 13 February 2006 Yoshihiro FUJI Director Examination Policy Planning Office Japan Patent Office.

Organization of IP5 Meeting

The Harmony Project: Trilateral Classification Harmonisation Status January 2008.

Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) IPC Committee of Experts

Revision Policy and Procedure of the reformed IPC Limitations and Perspectives Antonios Farassopoulos - WIPO February 2008.

Title slide European Patent Office The Master Classification Database Jürgen Rampelmann IPC Forum, Geneva 13 February 2006.

The IP5 view on the future of classification IPC Committee of Experts March 2009.

Global Business Solutions for Patent Prosecution Niclas Morey Geneva, 22 September 2011 Director International Organisations, Trilateral and IP5 European.

1 Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) IPC CE Meeting Geneva, 27 February 2013 Pierre Held, EPO Directorate Classification Christopher Kim, USPTO CPC.

Third IPC Workshop (WIPO)

Eugen Stohr Director International Legal Affairs, PCT

The Common Hybrid Classification project of the Pierre Held Directorate Classification ( ) IPC Workshop, 8-9 February 2010, WIPO, Geneva.

IPC Reclassification Website Antonio Carlos Souza de Abrantes Daniel Barros Júnior February 4, WIPO/Geneva.

Use of Classification at the EPO Pasquale Foglia DG1 Director, EPO WIPO, IPC Workshop 5 February 2008.

MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)

MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.

Teacher Name Class / Subject Date A:B: Write an answer here #1 Write your question Here C:D: Write an answer here.

Korean Intellectual Property Office March 2010 Tackling the Backlog Tackling the Backlog.

IPC - International Patent Classification Basics.

© S Haughton more than 3?

International Economics: Theory, Application, and Policy, Ch. 15;  Charles van Marrewijk, Figure 15.1 Joseph Schumpeter (1883–1950)

5.9 + = 10 a)3.6 b)4.1 c)5.3 Question 1: Good Answer!! Well Done!! = 10 Question 1:

1 Directed Depth First Search Adjacency Lists A: F G B: A H C: A D D: C F E: C D G F: E: G: : H: B: I: H: F A B C G D E H I.

Opioid-Related Deaths and Mortality Rates by County, Wisconsin Residents Office of Health Informatics and AIDS/HIV and Hepatitis C Program Bureau.

IPC - International Patent Classification Other Classification Systems.

Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.

Microsoft Office Grade 10 A / B Cahaya Bangsa Classical School (C) 2010 Digital Media Production Facility 14 Microsoft Excel – 05.

Overall Planning Process Strategic Goals - Long-range planning - Balanced Scorecard - Performance Targets Analysis - Mgmt Systems - Program Tradeoffs -

Addition 1’s to 20.

NI Executive Budget 2010 BRIEFING FOR CAL COMMITTEE.

Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts

11 = This is the fact family. You say: 8+3=11 and 3+8=11

Bottoms Up Factoring. Start with the X-box 3-9 Product Sum

NI Executive Budget 2010 Pre-Consultation. Outline Background and Context UK Fiscal Position Implications for NI Budget Way Forward Key Questions.

PDG IMPACT, Kallas, Frers/ WIPO_IPC_8_User view.ppt PDG IMPACT IPC Reform – User‘s view PDG IMPACT Working Group IPC Forum Open Day, February.

SUBELEMENT T6 [4 Exam Questions - 4 Groups]

February 2012 Presentation to the Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Introduction to the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)

Sept 2001Adele Hoskin Patents, continued US International Patents.

Competitive Sourcing of Classification at the United States Patent and Trademark Office Terrence Mackey International Liaison Staff U.S. Patent and Trademark.

The IPC development plan for the next five years IPC Workshop February 2013 Geneva Antonios Farassopoulos Director, International Classifications and Standards.

Plans to Accelerate Revision and Publication Procedure of the IPC IPC Workshop February 2013 Geneva Ning XU IPC Section - WIPO.

IPC Revision in Practice EPO8 February MCD revision life-cycle 3-6 months before entry into force Load Revision Concordance List (RCL) and Valid.

A Centralized Service for Reclassification? Anders Bruun, Swedish Patent & Registration Office IPC Workshop February 4th, 2008.

Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) Pierre Held, EPO & John Salotto, USPTO 14th February 2011 IPC Committee of Experts.

Niclas Morey23 October 2015Director, International Organisations, Trilateral and IP5 Technical Harmonization in the IP5 EPO’s Global Dossier, CCD and CPC.

February 2017 JAPAN PATENT OFFICE

February 2018 JAPAN PATENT OFFICE

Head, IT Systems Section

Current Conflicts and Complications

PUBLICATION OF IPC NEW FEATURES IN IPC-2009

Report on IPC-related IT systems IPC Revision Working Group 39

The National Association of Patent Practitioners (NAPP)

February 2019 JAPAN PATENT OFFICE

Presentation transcript:

8 and 9 February, 2010Presenter: Dave Bender (USPTO) 1 Statistics Considered When Prioritizing Common Hybrid Classification (cHc) Projects

8 and 9 February, 2010Presenter: Dave Bender (USPTO) 2 Common Hybrid Classification Goals Common searches for cross-filed applications Reclassification work sharing

8 and 9 February, 2010Presenter: Dave Bender (USPTO) 3 cHc Project Basics Identify the best schemes/groups to use from IP5 local classifications (CN, EP, JP, KR, US) Integrate selected groups into cohesive schemes Implement schemes in IPC

8 and 9 February, 2010Presenter: Dave Bender (USPTO) 4 cHc Project constraints Time Resources Existing local classifications (primarily) IPC administration

8 and 9 February, 2010Presenter: Dave Bender (USPTO) 5 Factors affecting harmonization priority Goal based factors: 1.Filing activity Cross filings between IP5 Offices Domestic filings 2.Back file growth rates 3.Local classification development Resource based factors: 4.Back file size 5.Back file distribution Within subclasses Between subclasses

8 and 9 February, 2010Presenter: Dave Bender (USPTO) 6 Factors affecting harmonization priority A23LA61BA61FA61KA61MA63FB01DB01J B08BB23KB24BB29CB32BB41JB60JB60R B62DB65DB65HC01BC07CC07DC07KC08F C08GC09KC12NC22CC23CF02CF02DF02M F04BF16CF16HF21VF25BF28FG01NG01R G02BG02FG03BG03GG05BG05FG06FG06K G06QG08BG09GG10LG11BG11CH01BH01J H01LH01MH01PH01QH01RH01SH02JH02K H02PH03FH03KH03MH04BH04LH04MH04N H04RH05K 1.Filing activity – high cross filing subclasses

8 and 9 February, 2010Presenter: Dave Bender (USPTO) 7 Factors affecting harmonization priority 1.Filing activity – high gross filing subclasses (US) H04LH01LH04BG06FH04NG02BH04M A61BB32BC12NG01NA61MC07DG06Q A61KG11BG06KB01DB29CB01J

8 and 9 February, 2010Presenter: Dave Bender (USPTO) 8 Factors affecting harmonization priority 2.Back file growth Subclass% Increase in Number of Families Published Annually from 2005 to 2008 A01B8 A01C32.9 A01D9.03 A01F15.63 A01G9.4 A01H44.97

8 and 9 February, 2010Presenter: Dave Bender (USPTO) 9 Factors affecting harmonization priority 3.Local classification development – IPC with no FI A01JA01L*A21BA22BA23JA24FA41CA41FA41G A41HA42CA45CA45FA47DA61DA61JA61PA63C A63DA63G*A63JA63KA99Z*B03D*B09CB21GB21H B21LB23GB24CB25FB25GB27BB27GB27H*B27J B29KB29LB41BB41GB41KB41LB42BB42CB42D B43MB44BB44CB44DB44FB60BB60CB60DB60F B60MB60PB60VB61BB61CB61DB61FB61GB61H B61J*B61KB62CB62HB62JB62LB62MB63BB63C B63G*B63HB63J*B64BB64CB64DB64FB64GB66D B68B*B68CB68GB81BB81CB82B*B99Z*C01CC01D C06BC06C*C06D*C06F*C07MC08H*C09F*C09G*C09H* C10F*C10H*C10J*C10NC12CC12GC12L*C12RC12S* C13C*C13DC13FC13GC13H*C13JC13KC22FC22K C23DC25F*C99Z*D01BD01C*D03CD06LD99Z*E02C* E03BE05CE05GE21FE99Z*F01BF01CF01PF02C F02GF02KF02NF03GF03HF15CF15DF16GF16M F16NF16PF16SF16TF17BF21HF21KF21LF21S F21WF21YF22DF22GF23HF23MF23RF24BF24J F28BF28CF28GF41AF41BF41CF41FF42BF42C F42DF99ZG01W*G04BG04DG06C*G06D*G06EG06G G06JG06MG06NG09D*G10B*G10CG10F*G21BG21D G21FG21GG21HG21J*G99Z*H01KH03DH05C*H99Z* *Subclasses with neither ECLA nor FI divisions

8 and 9 February, 2010Presenter: Dave Bender (USPTO) 10 Factors affecting harmonization priority 3.Local classification development – IPC with no ECLA A01PB04CB41DB68FC12FC12JC14BD02H D04CD04GD06JF23BG09C

8 and 9 February, 2010Presenter: Dave Bender (USPTO) 11 Factors affecting harmonization priority 3.Local classification development – ECLA/FI IPC SubclassECLA ExistsFI ExistsNumber of Families Requiring Reclassification into FI Number of Families Requiring Reclassification into ECLA A01GTRUE F16MFALSETRUE F23BFALSE 00 G03FTRUEFALSE075317

8 and 9 February, 2010Presenter: Dave Bender (USPTO) 12 Factors affecting harmonization priority 4.Back file size IPC SubclassTotal Families A01B87370 A01C72761 A01D A01F53761 A01G A01H28978 A01J13494 A01K A01L2297

8 and 9 February, 2010Presenter: Dave Bender (USPTO) 13 Factors affecting harmonization priority 5.Back file distribution – within subclasses IPC SUBCLASS NO OF US DOCS NO OF GROUPS AVG US DOCS PER GROUP A23G A23J A23K A23L A23N

8 and 9 February, 2010Presenter: Dave Bender (USPTO) 14 Factors affecting harmonization priority 5.Back file distribution – between subclasses Average number of IPC symbols/family: 2.4 Source Subclass Target SubclassCommon Families Percentage of Source Families Percentage of Target Families A61KA61P A61KC07D A61KA61Q A61KC07K A61KC12N H01LG03F

8 and 9 February, 2010Presenter: Dave Bender (USPTO) 15 Conclusion - Prioritizing IP5 projects While IP5 projects are limited by Office budgets, i.e. resources available over a given period of time, statistical data about the IPC and the documents classified therein can help prioritize and organize projects to more quickly achieve the goals of IP5 and to maximize the efficiency of reclassification.