IISU Project N. de Beler. 3tha/c Fire& Cabin Safety Research Oct 20012 IISU Objective Improve identification of usable exits and passengers guidance Plan.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Cabin Safety Seminar Bangkok What are Human Factors?

Advertisements

EMERGENCY EVACUATION.

Civil Aviation Authority of Sri Lanka1 Cabin Crewmember A crew member who performs, in the interest of safety of passengers, duties assigned by the operator.

Crew Compliment. OBJECTIVES The importance of Safety & the effects of reduce crew.

Session No. 4 Implementing the State’s Safety Programme Implementing Service Providers SMS

EMS Checklist (ISO model)

IT’S IN THE EYE OF THE INSPECTOR Overview of visual inspection methods in four countries and lessons learned ISFD4, Toronto 6 May 2008 Jaap Flikweert.

R.G.W. Cherry & Associates Limited International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference Slide 1 – Lisbon November 2004 International Aircraft.

VERRES VLTA Emergency Requirement Research Evaluation Study Building a Mental Representation (Situation Awareness) of the aircraft for Passengers The Fourth.

Passenger Education Past and Present Professor Helen Muir and Lauren Thomas Fourth Triennial International Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference Lisbon,

Direction générale de l’aviation civile p.1 Shifting relationship in a service situation: Management of an emergency evacuation by cabin crew personnel.

VERRES VLTA Emergency Requirement Research Evaluation Study Cabin Crews Behaviour during experimental evacuations in the VERRES project The Fourth Triennial.

VERRES VLTA Emergency Requirement Research Evaluation Study Crew Co-operation in VLTA The Fourth Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety.

Identification of usable exits IISU2 Béatrice Quenin, SFACT, DGAC France Research and Experience Feedback Office Béatrice Quenin, SFACT, DGAC France Research.

The Importance of Synergy Between Flight Deck and Cabin Crews

NEBOSH Fire and Risk Management Certificate Issue October

AGENDA Training Fire Marshals to Evacuate People with Disabilities by DAVE THOMPSON FIRE COMPLIANCE & SAFETY NI LTD.

S TRESS IN THE N EWSROOM AND F IELD.

Understanding what it means to be PIC Some ways to teach it.

The Australian/New Zealand Standard on Risk Management

Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive Inspector’s Competency Model - HSE’s approach Mike Cross 3 June 2014.

Process Analysis: Fire Safety At Workplace CM2180 Student Sample.

Downloaded from AVIA Week 8 Human Factors and Cabin Crew.

Orientation for Volunteers Volunteers Make a Difference Release Date: December 20, 2010.

Safety procedures in sport

S/W Project Management

Management Information Systems

SMS Operation.  Internal safety (SMS) audits are used to ensure that the structure of an SMS is sound.  It is also a formal process to ensure continuous.

©Ian Sommerville 2000 Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 6 Slide 1 Requirements Engineering Processes l Processes used to discover, analyse and.

Safety Health & Welfare at Work Act 2005 Guidance for Employers and Business Managers.

Slide 1Lesson 14: Fundamentals of the CAP Flying Safety Program Fundamentals of the CAP Flying Safety Program.

Simplified Strategic Planning Taking Control, Involving Employees & Linking Systems Joseph Raible Senior Consultant 1The Millennium Group International,

Emergency Management Specialist e-book. Emergency management specialists coordinate activities in response to disasters, such as ordering evacuations.

1 CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT Lecture 2 Project implementation.

Business Process Change and Discrete-Event Simulation: Bridging the Gap Vlatka Hlupic Brunel University Centre for Re-engineering Business Processes (REBUS)

Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment

Systems Analysis and Design

Safety Management in Europe European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Dr. Erik Merckx EUROCONTROL Directorate ATM Programmes Head of Business.

This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium This project is funded by the European Union Projekat finansira.

Future Design Challenges for Passenger Safety in the Evacuation of Very Large Transport Aircraft Helen Muir Cranfield University Mitigating Human Error.

Single Pilot Resource Management (SRM) And The CFI

1 Stéphane DEHARVENGT F-DGAC SFACT/R.E 3rd International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference - October 22-25, Atlantic City (USA)

Airbus Flight Seminar – Kuala-Lumpur March 2007 Human Factors Model.

1 Tempus Tempus Workshop Sarajevo 7 June 2006 « Good practice in Preparing an Application » Anne Collette European Training Foundation Tempus Department.

Effective leadership in airline crews. 2 Good teamwork in aircraft crews (Ginnett) & hospital teams (K-P) Aircraft crewsHospital teams.

Evolution Cabin Crew Training & Assessment for the Future.

Human Reliability HUMAN RELIABILITY HUMAN ERROR

MINE SAFETY MANAGEMENT PLAN. DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF MINES SAFETY DGMS n It is recommended that mines be required to put in place Mine Safety Management.

International Civil Aviation Organization ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user course Module N° 7 Analysis and Codification Mexico City November, 2010.

Revision N° 11ICAO Safety Management Systems (SMS) Course01/01/08 Module N° 9 – SMS operation.

Flight Operations Research Centre of Excellence Dr. Hazel Courteney Head of Research & Strategic Analysis.

OHSAS Occupational health and safety management system.

Overview of the handbook Chapter 5: Levee inspection, assessment and risk attribution.

C.S.R.T.G Third International Fire and Cabin Safety Conference 22 October 2001 PRIORITISATION OF OCCUPANT SURVIVAL FACTORS Ray Cherry Graham Greene Stèphane.

Roles & responsibilities Involving staff in safety management December 2015 Dr Emer Bell Integrated Risk Solutions.

Annex 2 – Rules of the Air Annex 2 – Rules of the Air Annex 3 – Meteorological Services Annex 3 – Meteorological Services Annex 6 – Operation of aircraft.

PST Human Factors Jan Shaw Manchester Royal Infirmary CMFT.

Situational Awareness Airport Safety Week Case Study Situational Awareness – Case Study Location: Ramp Area Scenario  A staff member walked behind.

Safety Moment Evacuation

SAFETY | TRAINING | CONSULTANCY| STAFFING SOLUTIONS

Implementing SMS in Civil Aviation: the Canadian Perspective

MOSH Adoption Team Training

F* India F W Training.

Safety Management in Europe

Union Action and Methodology of Prevention

MOSH Leading Practices Adoption System

CLINICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM

Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture

Stop Work Procedure The answer to a number of issues which arose during the safety committee should have resulted in operatives stopping work due to imminent.

Good practice in preparing an application

Presentation transcript:

IISU Project N. de Beler

3tha/c Fire& Cabin Safety Research Oct IISU Objective Improve identification of usable exits and passengers guidance Plan evacuation Launch evacuationGuide passengers Identify exits condition Sensors? Communication means? Procedures?

3tha/c Fire& Cabin Safety Research Oct IISU Consorsium SFACT

3tha/c Fire& Cabin Safety Research Oct Work breakdown Requirements analysis Assistant tools Specification Technologies research Solution(s) proposition Experiment; IISU 2 in 2002 Non technical Solution(s) We are here

3tha/c Fire& Cabin Safety Research Oct Requirements analysis Previous studies CAA database Interviews Training centre visit JAR 4Evacuations typology 4Occupants tasks modelling

3tha/c Fire& Cabin Safety Research Oct Survivable events analysis (1) ( 256 of the 2426 accidents (about 10.5%) involved an evacuation  Evacuation situations: 4Evacuation involving fire or smoke are the most frequent (53% of the 256 accidents). 4Approach or landing represent the phases of flight the most concerned with an evacuation (52% of the 256 accidents)  Non-usability of the exits is related to: 3Difficulty/impossibility to open an exit 3Obstacle or fire or water behind the door 3Problem with the slides (problem of inflation, fire, split, etc…)

3tha/c Fire& Cabin Safety Research Oct Survivable events analysis (2)  Temporal factor: Majority of evacuations are unplanned (no time to prepare cabin)  Evacuation decision making process: critical phase  Rule on the exits usability: CC role  An exit can be usable only part of the time of the evacuation  Communication problem : means failure, noise, impossibility to move  Passengers pre-flight briefing: influences passengers’ behaviour  Passengers guidance: 3Guidance towards an exit is a serious problem in case of smoke, 3Passengers dangerous behaviour due to panic 3Re-routing of passengers because of unusable exits 3Problem related to emergency equipment in case of ditching

3tha/c Fire& Cabin Safety Research Oct Tasks model

3tha/c Fire& Cabin Safety Research Oct Interest of a Hierarchical task model  Make clear the goal of each activity  Guide the need analysis 4Formalise the links between actors 4Stress the links between tasks 4Understand the information used 4Stress the influence of psychological and cultural factors  Offer a synthetic view of the occupants activity ( Offer a framework to describe the results of evacuation reports analysis è Rich support to formalise the requirements taking account of the activity context

3tha/c Fire& Cabin Safety Research Oct From the need analysis to the solution ( Decide Evacuation ( Understand situation ( Prepare evacuation ( Order evacuation ( Decide usable exits ( Guide passengers Tasks to be improved Related Requirements Solutions ( Data Access ( Data transmission ( Co ordination ( Passengers Briefing ( Guidance ( Procedures ( Training ( Emergency equipment  CHECK  CAMERA  HEADSET  SOUND  SPYHOLE 4 Training 4 Procedures

3tha/c Fire& Cabin Safety Research Oct Identification of solutions  CHECK : for CC, be informed about the usability of all exits, assist passengers guidance, improve flow management.  CAMERA : Check external conditions, provide information on slide usability?  HEADSET : Improve interaction between CC& FC members; be informed about the usability of another exit; know if a CC or FC is operational or not; improve flow management.  SOUND : Assist the guidance of passengers mainly in deteriorated situation (smoke, baggage in the aisle)  SPYHOLE : Improve external conditions checking (widened vision)

3tha/c Fire& Cabin Safety Research Oct CHECK: CHeck Exit and Comunicate Knowledge At each main door: ( Display: overview of all exits usability ( 2 modes: usable ; non usable ( commands: 4By default, automatic usable status when slide inflated 4Manual command to input non usable / usable status       CHECK

3tha/c Fire& Cabin Safety Research Oct Next step ( Finalise the « instruments » specification: 4impact on CC procedures, training 4impact on regulation ( Propose non technical solution replying to the requirements: change in CC procedure & training; FC and CC common training; Change in passengers briefing.  Experiments on realistic simulator (Cranfield) => IISU 2

3tha/c Fire& Cabin Safety Research Oct Conclusion: 3 outcomes  Identification of solutions that are « reasonable » in terms of implementation feasibility, cost and amount of change  Benefits of the use of the tasks modelling methodology to analyse the needs : provide traceability.  Identification of tasks that need further investigations 4evacuation decision process, 4passengers awareness of the safety role of CC, 4passengers briefing.