Supplement 1 of ISPM 5 Guidelines on the interpretation and application of the concepts of official control in relation to regulated pests and not widely.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC)
Advertisements

Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) Training
MODULE THREE The IPPC Standard Setting Process. What this Module Covers The 4 stages of the IPPC Standard Setting Process:
International Framework and the IPPC MODULE ONE IPPC Participation.
Member consultation 2007 Draft ISPM: Sampling of Consignments Steward: David Porritt.
ESTABLISHMENT OF AREAS OF LOW PEST PREVALENCE FOR FRUIT FLIES (TEPHRITIDAE) Country Consultation 2006 DRAFT ISPM: ESTABLISHMENT OF AREAS OF LOW PEST PREVALENCE.
AMENDMENTS TO ISPM No. 5 (GLOSSARY OF PHYTOSANTIARY TERMS) Steward: John Hedley.
Draft International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures Consultation 2010 Submission of New Treatments for inclusion in ISPM 15 Steward: Gregory Wolff.
The Role and Relationship of Scientific and Official Information Allan Hruska/Orlando Sosa & Dave Nowell/Jan Breithaupt IPPC Secretariat Rome Italy.
The Role and Relationship of Scientific and Official Information IPPC Secretariat July 2011 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
The Role and Relationship of Scientific and Official Information Dave Nowell & Jan Breithaupt IPPC Secretariat Rome Italy.
Flow-chart explaining information exchange and document dissemination under the IPPC IPP Training WS – Handout no. 4a.
Draft ISPM: International movement of seeds ( )
Draft ISPM: INTERNATIONAL MOVEMENT OF USED VEHICLES, MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT (Steward Ngatoko Ta Ngatoko) IPPC Member Consultation 1 July to 30 November.
Draft Amendments to ISPM 5 (2014) GLOSSARY OF PHYTOSANITARY TERMS ( ) IPPC Member Consultation 1 July to 30 November 2014.
Draft ISPM: Minimizing pest movement by sea containers ( ) IPPC Member Consultation 1 July to 1 December 2013.
Draft ISPM: Amendments to ISPM 5 (Glossary of phytosanitary terms) ( ) IPPC Member Consultation 1 July to 1 December 2013.
1 Development of Electronic Reporting Tools for IPPC Directive and WI Directive Workshop – Objective and next steps Tuesday 3 rd March 2009 Meeting room.
ICH Q4B Regulatory Acceptance of Analytical Procedures and/or Acceptance Criteria (RAAPAC) Overview and Update Robert H. King, Sr. Office of Pharmaceutical.
REVIEW OF COSAVE ACTIVITIES 21th TC, Entebbe, Uganda Ing. Agr. Soledad Castro Dorochessi ArgentinaBrasilChileParaguayUruguay COMITE DE SANIDAD VEGETAL.
Regulated non-quarantine pests. UNECE Extended Bureau meeting June 2012 Ana Maria Peralta IPPC Secretariat.
Access to ITU information / documents KEY CONCEPTS.
Pest Risk Analysis International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC)
EMS Today: Emerging Issues Energy & Environmental Division National Conference San Antonio, Texas September 20, 2005.
Support for the coordination of activities TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS Taking Account of Strategic Research Agendas in the Research Themes of the FP7 Co-operation.
THE INTERNATIONAL YEAR OF PLANT HEALTH and other future challenges for the IPPC Ralf Lopian Consultant to the IPPC Secretariat (Ministry of Agriculture.
RISK COMMUNICATION VELIA ARRIAGADA RIOS INGENIERO AGRONOMO SERVICIO AGRICOLA Y GANADERO CHILE.
REVIEW OF COSAVE ACTIVITIES 20th TC, Rome, Italy Ing. Agr. M. Sc. Ana Maria Peralta COSAVE Coordination Secretary ArgentinaBrasilChileParaguayUruguay.
The International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) Technical Panel on Diagnostic Protocols July 2010 Washington DC, USA International Plant Protection.
INFORMATION SESSION ON PHYTOSANITARY REGULATIONS IN GRAIN IMPORTS.
20 th Session of the Technical Consultation among Regional Plant Protection Organizations Rome, Italy Aug APPPC Update Yongfan Piao Executive.
Systems Approach Concept and Application 24º Technical Consultation among ORPF, August 2012 Maria Inés Ares President of Directive Committee.
LMO RISK ASSESSMENT UNDER THE IPPC AND THE CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY Velia Arriagada Rios Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero, Chile.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsInternational Atomic Energy Agency The Role of Codex and the International Plant Protection Convention.
Stage 3. Consultation and Review Standard Setting Training Course 2016.
Standard Setting Training Course 2016
IPPC Member Consultation 1 July to 1 December 2013
General introduction and welcome to the IPPC Standard Setting Course
IPP Training, IAPSC & IPPC/FAO/FAORAF
Ralf Lopian Senior Advisor
TERMINOLOGY OF THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IN RELATION TO THE GLOSSARY OF PHYTOSANITARY TERMS Introduction (1) IPPC Contracting Parties are.
The International Plant Protection Convention
May 21-25th, 2012 Cairns, Australia
IPPC Consultation Period 1 July to 30 September 2016
IPPC second consultation 1 July to 30 September 2018
IPPC first consultation 1 July to 30 September 2018
IPPC Standard Setting Process
Trade and Pest Management
IPPC first consultation 1 July to 30 September 2018
Stage 4. Adoption and Publication
The International Plant Protection Convention
IPPC first consultation 1 July to 30 September 2018
Stage 1. Developing the List of topics for IPPC standards
IPPC second consultation 1 July to 30 September 2018
IPPC Member Consultation 1 July to 1 December 2013
Standard Setting Process – Information Flow
Standard Setting Process – Information Flow
IPP Training WS – Handout no. 4a
IPPC Standard Setting Process
IPP Training, IICA & IPPC/FAO, Trinidad & Tobago
REVIEW OF COSAVE ACTIVITIES
Module 8 Bilateral and Other Agreements
IPP Training, IAPSC & IPPC/FAO/FAORAF
IPP Training, EPPO & IPPC/FAO, York, U.K.
IPPC Member Consultation 1 July to 1 December 2013
IPP Training, IAPSC & IPPC/FAO/FAORAF
IPPC Consultation Period 1 July to 30 September 2016
Draft revision of ISPM 6: National surveillance systems ( )
The International Plant Protection Convention
IPP Training, IICA & IPPC/FAO, Trinidad & Tobago
Presentation transcript:

Supplement 1 of ISPM 5 Guidelines on the interpretation and application of the concepts of official control in relation to regulated pests and not widely distributed in relation to quarantine pests that are present in an area IPPC Member Consultation 20 June to 30 September 2011

Background Call for Topics: Guidelines for the interpretation and application of the phrase not widely distributed in relation to quarantine pests Added to the List of Topics for IPPC Standards: ICPM-7 (2005) Specification 33: May 2006 Drafted by EWG: November 2006 SC-7 reviewed: May 2008 Sent to TPG: November 2008 SC approved for Member Consultation: May 2011

General Considerations The status of NWD is a key criteria in the definition of a quarantine pest that may trigger phytosanitary restrictions No guidance for this term is found in IPPC documents This situation may lead to different interpretations and applications which could affect international trade

Drafting Issues EWG considered NWD concept not a pest status but to mean that the pest has not spread fully throughout the endangered area EWG underlined a pest NWD does not trigger an automatic Official Control response but cost and benefits factors should be considered also

Drafting Issues EWG clarified that NWD has to do with spatial distribution and not with time factor (transience and trends), prevalence or intensity SC-7 decided NWD concept is closely related to the Official Control (OC) concept in ISPM 5, Supplement 1. Draft was sent to the TPG to integrate these two concepts under the same document without changing any part of the OC

Drafting Issues TPG decided not to include a definition for NWD on this draft since this concept is covered throughout the Supplement The size of the NWD area was not considered to be the most important factor. A quarantine pest limited to any size area and of potential economic importance may trigger official control

Drafting Issues The concept of NWD strictly related to the definition of a quarantine pest and not independent from the other two concepts in the definition, i.e. official control and potential economic importance