Economically Relevant Traits Mark Enns Colorado State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Selection and Judging of Beef
Advertisements

It’s All Bull Seminars UW Extension Livestock Focus Team March 23 rd, Elk Mound March 25 th, Almond March 26 th, Platteville.
Genetic improvement of Brahman in Southern Africa Prof Norman Maiwashe (PhD, Pri Sci Nat) Agricultural Research Council, Private Bag X2, Irene 0062 University.
Utilizing Performance Data for Livestock Selection Developed by: Celina Johnson University of Florida.
West Virginia University Extension Service Genetics in Beef Cattle Wayne R. Wagner.
Can You Breed a “Good Breeder” Kristi M. Cammack Department of Animal Science University of Wyoming.
Multiple Breed Evaluation Can MBE enhance crossbreeding? John Pollak Cornell University Director, NBCEC.
Introduction to LAMBPLAN for the USA Texel Society.
Selection Decisions Using Economically Relevant Traits: The Pathway to Indexes B. L. Golden 1 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo.
Making the Web equal Profit Surfing for Genetics Dorian Garrick & Mark Enns Department of Animal Sciences Colorado State University.
Colorado Agriscience Curriculum
BEEF GENETICS NEXT What color are Shorthorns? n A. White n B. Red n C. Roan n D. All the above A B C D NEXT.
BEEF CATTLE GENETICS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
EPD 101 PredictingProfit… Red Angus – EPD 101. EPD 101 Members (Seedstock producers) succeed through enabling the success (profit) of their commercial.
Principles of Livestock Judging University of Florida H/FFA Livestock Judging Clinic Full presentation online at
Beef Production. Terms to Know Polled –born naturally without horns Horned –Born naturally with the ability to grow horns….may never grow though Marbling.
Systems of Crossbreeding – Experiences in Research & Do’s and Don’ts R. Mark Enns Colorado State University.
Jared E. Decker 1.
Breed and Trait Selection Considerations Dan W. Moser Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University.
Straightbreeding – A simple way to reduce your bottomline D. A. Daley California State University, Chico NCBCEC Brown Bagger Session October 17, 2012.
Using EPDs in Selection Stolen and edited by: Brandon Freel and Daniel Powell Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
EBLEX Better Returns Programme Material produced for EBLEX Beef BRP by Signet Breeding Services Genetic Improvement of Beef Cattle in the UK.
WHAT ARE EPD’S?. What is an EPD? E-xpected P-rogeny D-ifference A measure of the degree of difference between the progeny of the bull and the progeny.
The Brown Bagger Beef Cattle Adaptability Current Tools of Assessment John L. Evans Oklahoma State University 1.
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How Do I Decide What Traits are Important? Carcass/Ultrasound EPDs Bob Weaber GRA-Cornell.
Wade Shafer American Simmental Association. In the pursuit of genetic improvement all traits are antagonistically related to each other.
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How do I decide what traits are important ? Selection Indices Dorian Garrick Department.
Introduction to Selection Indexes Bob Weaber, Ph.D. State Extension Specialist-Beef Genetics University of Missouri-Columbia
Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education “Economic value of genomic information: Sire and commercial heifer selection" Van Eenennaam 10/19/2011.
Choose a category. You will be given the answer. You must give the correct question. Click to begin.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
Identifying Genetic Antagonisms Megan Rolf Oklahoma State University.
- Typically, retained ownership refers to a producer sending calves/feeders to a feedlot and owning some percentage of them. The calves/feeders can be.
Selection of Breeding Program An S 426 Fall 2007.
Evaluating Longevity: 10 Years of Using Stayability EPD Larry Keenan Research & Special Projects Coordinator, RAAA.
Beef Cattle Production
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Understanding Cattle Data Professor N. Nelson Blue Mountain Agriculture College.
Genetic Evaluations & Decision Support to Improve Feed Efficiency Dorian Garrick Department of Animal Sciences Colorado State University.
NBCEC Brown Bagger: Economic Selection Index Wade Shafer American Simmental Association.
Introduction to Breeding Livestock Judging and Evaluation
How Does Additional Information Impact Accuracy? Dan W. Moser Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University, Manhattan
Genetics for Producing Profitable and Sustainable Grass-Fed Beef Dr. Scott M. Barao Executive Director The Jorgensen Family Foundation Hedgeapple Farm.
Breeding Objectives for Terminal Sires Michael MacNeil USDA ARS Miles City, MT.
Cow Herd Performance Testing. Introduction Help evaluate economically important traits Calving ease Birth weight Weaning weight Calving interval Calf.
What is an EPD? Expected Progeny Difference
Selection & Judging of Beef Cattle
MANAGEMENT OF BULLS FOR REPRODUCTIVE AND ECONOMIC SUCCESS Cliff Lamb Beef Specialist University of Florida.
Selection Decision Tools Revisited Economically Relevant Traits vs. Indicator Traits B. L. Golden California Polytechnic State University, SLO.
Feed Efficiency Genetic Projects. Terms Gain/Feed = Feed Efficiency FE Feed/Gain = Feed Conversion FC: -FE Residual Feed Intake RFI Net Feed Intake NFI:-RFI.
National Beef Cattle Evaluation Consortium Brown Bagger Seminar Carcass EPDs Integrating Carcass and Ultrasound October 22, 2008 Sally L. Northcutt Genetic.
Advanced Animal Breeding
Sally L. Northcutt American Angus Association Selection Tools Beef Improvement Federation April 20, 2006.
Genetics – Trait Selection An S 426 Fall Genetics – Trait Selection Has led to development of Economically Relevant Traits (ERT) and Indicator Trait.
Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal 1. 2 Expected Progeny Differences Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal Unit 7 – Lesson 7.2 Predicting.
Using EPDs in Selection Edited by: Jessica Hawley & Brandon Freel Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
Gene350 Animal Genetics Lecture August 2009.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
Sustainable Agriculture
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
Using EPDs in Selection
Quiz for Beef Cattle EPDs.ppt
Keith Vander Velde UW Extension
WHAT ARE EPD’s?.
Selection Tools for Beef Cattle Improvement
Using EPDs in Selection
Definition of EBVs of Economically Relevant Traits in Sheep Production
History of Selection From Phenotypes to Economic Indexes
Expected Progeny Differences
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
Presentation transcript:

Economically Relevant Traits Mark Enns Colorado State University

Beef Producers’ Motivation Hobby Property tax reduction Profit

Two basic tools of animal breeding Selection –EPD Mating –Mate allocation –Crossbreeding

4 Typical Genetic Evaluation Birth Weight Weaning Weight Milk Total Maternal Yearling Weight Carcass Traits –Actual REA, BF, etc –Ultrasound REA, BF, et Calving Ease Mix of others… If you can measure it, we can produce an EPD for it

Typical Genetic Evaluation Proven Accepted Well-used Assumption: –More EPD allow us to better characterize the genetic potential of animals –Should be able to make more profitable selection decisions But …

Sire Summary of the Future? Birth direct Birth maternal Weaning direct Weaning maternal Total maternal Yearling direct 600 d direct Calving direct Calving maternal Carcass wt Rib fat Rump fat LMA Marb score Quality grade % Retail yield Lbs (kg) retail yield Yield grade Us LMA US rib fat Us % IMF Fat percentage Condition score Gestation length Days to calving Calving interval Stayability Heifer pregnancy rate Rebreeding rate Calf weaned/cow exposed Scrotal circumference Pelvic area Frame score Muscle score Udder score Docility Tick score Parasite egg count Mature weight Maintenance energy Feed efficiency Drop weight Type score Uterine score Tooth score Precocity score Feedlot feed consumption Feedlot surv. Pre-wean surv. Serving capacity Serving proportion Semen volume Hip height Leg score Length productive life Doing ability Grand-maternal weaning Twinning rate Days to 11mm BF Days to 75% Choice Days to carc wt. Hair whorl score Average daily gain Wt. /day of age Liver weight Resting heart rate Pulmonary arteriole pressure Brisket disease rate Bravery Aggression

Proliferation of EPD –An ever-increasing list of traits –Many EPD indirectly related to economic goals Methods for using EPD to make financially sound selection decisions

EPD and Profitability We can combine genetic evaluation to make –Genetic progress in multiple traits simultaneously –Increase profitability

Genetic Trends Economic Breeding Objective

Goal Produce tools that can make the producer more profitable

Terminology Economically Relevant Traits: traits that are directly associated with a revenue stream or cost of production of a commercial operation.

Indicator Traits: traits that add accuracy to the prediction of ERT by pleiotropy (e.g. genetic correlation).

ERT Does selecting on a trait directly effect your income or cost?

Economically Relevant: Probability Of Calving Ease Indicators: –Birth Weight –Pelvic Area –Gestation Length –Calving Ease Score ?

Practically Sire A –Average birth weight of calves is 80 pounds Sire B –Average birth weight of calves is 90 pounds Is there a difference, if all offspring are born unassisted?

Double counting Birth weight vs Calving Ease EPD Getting rid of animals that are better calving than you expect for their birth weight How do we make sense of these EPD to increase profitability?

Indicators: –Scrotal circumference –Pregnancy observations ? Economically Relevant: Heifer Pregnancy

Unexpected results B.L. Golden Indirect = indicatordirect = ERT

Relationships between Carcass and Ultrasound Information Observed Carcass Data Observed Ultrasound Data Ultrasound EPD Carcass EPD True Carcass Attribute Carcass Attributes of Progeny

Our desire is that producers use EPDs objectively in the context of their business goal(s) Profit = Income – Expense

In our vision… Have EPD for ERT that allow producers to better associate value/cost with genetic improvement

In the Current Situation Must distinguish between traits that are economically relevant (ERT) and traits that are indicators –Focus on ERTs for valuing animals –Use indicator EPD to support ERTs Need decision support models to allow us to objectively interpret ERTs in a system context

Examples Application (under development) Charolais Sire Selector

EPDs For The Future Weaning Direct Weaning Milk Yearling Weight Carcass Weight Mature Weight Cow Maintenance Feed Requirement Docility Stayability (LPL) Prob of Heifer Pregnancy Prob of Calving Ease Calving Ease Maternal Days to Finish Target

Different approaches for development of ERT for the finishing phase Universal (constant) target endpoint –Predetermined data adjustment prior to calculation of EPD Different (variable) target endpoints –Random Regression –No predetermined endpoint (different endpoints can be constructed for different circumstances using the same st of random regression EPD)

Why Days to Finish? Accounts for costs –Time value of money –Yardage –Cost of feed ? Can use existing carcass data In concert with a value at finish EPD, will account for revenue and therefore overall profit

Final System Decision Support Center Genetic Evaluation Feedlot system Background And Stocker system Cow/Calf System Web Delivered Flexibility in the system –Not limited to one target endpoint Feeding program Marketing program Evaluation of profitability Prediction of phenotypic outcomes Producer Producer

Web-based 58% of all farmers have access to a computer (Drover’s and USDA-NASS) Greater flexibility