Jeff Morris Associate Director for Science Office of Science Policy Symposium on Peer Review of Risk Assessments and Related Activities September 30, 2003.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Sub-regional Training Workshop on

Advertisements

HELPING THE NATION SPEND WISELY Performance audit and evaluation: common ground with Internal Audit ? The UK National Audit Office experience Jeremy Lonsdale.

Energy Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2009/71/EURATOM establishing a Community framework for the nuclear safety of nuclear installations.

1 Developing EPA’s Peer Review Program Joint JIFSAN/SRA/RAC Symposium Dorothy E. Patton, Ph.D., J.D. September 30, 2003.

CYPRUS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Internal Evaluation Procedures at CUT Quality Assurance Seminar Organised by the Ministry of Education and Culture and.

1 A View of the United States Federal Statistical System from OMB Katherine K. Wallman Chief Statistician U. S. Office of Management and Budget.

Corporate Social Responsibility in the Road Sector Dr Andy Southern -Atkins (UK) Alexander Walcher -Asfinag (Austria)

Brian A. Harris-Kojetin, Ph.D. Statistical and Science Policy

FDA Research: Clearance Requirements and Implications Steven L. Bradbard, Ph.D. Team Leader, Consumer Studies CFSAN/ORPSS.

From Cutting Red Tape to Maximizing Net Benefits Alexander T. Hunt U.S. Office of Management and Budget Challenges on Cutting Red Tape Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

ExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Inc. (LJH) SRA / FDA Peer Review Workshop - 9/30/03 Peer Review: Challenges Raised by OMB’s Draft Guidelines Leslie Hushka,

Workshops for implementing the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity through the National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans Module 2 The Biodiversity.

State of the Nation - Charities Moira Protani. 2 The New Austerity State of the Nation Banks, FTSE 100s, Public bodies, Members of Parliament and charities.

EISWG The Environmental Information Services Working Group of the NOAA Science Advisory Board Raymond J. Ban April 22, 2009.

Organisational Issues in Sovereign Debt Management Peter McCray Deputy Chief Executive Australian Office of Financial Management.

Public Private Partnerships P3s What the Public Sector Considers When Selecting the Right Private Partner Jose A. Galan - Division Director Miami-Dade.

Analysis of Public Submissions Presidential SOE Review Committee Democracy, Governance and Service Delivery Date: 29 November 2011 Democracy, Governance.

Review of EIA Quality A formal step in the EIA process Purpose is to establish if the information in the EIA report is sufficient for decision –making.

U.S. Science Policy Cheryl L. Eavey, Program Director

Office of Academic Affairs June 1, 2007 Academic Priorities: Next Steps Spring Symposium 2007.

Environmental Decision-Making The Past is Prologue to the Future.

Australia’s Experience in Utilising Performance Information in Budget and Management Processes Mathew Fox Assistant Secretary, Budget Coordination Branch.

The National Academies’ Board on Life Sciences Dr. Frances Sharples Director National Research Council National Research Council.

The Competitive Grants Environment Presented by: Dr. Deborah Sheely Dr. Mark Poth Competitive Programs Unit.

Global Risk Management Solutions Risk Management and the Board of Director: Moving Beyond Concepts to Execution Anton VAN WYK Partner, Global Risk Management.

AgTech Committee Agricultural Research Projects Request for Direction by the Study Agency San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

Improving Corporate Governance in Malaysian Capital Markets – The Role of the Audit Committee Role of the Audit Committee in Assessing Audit Quality.

Developing/Refining Your Stress Testing Framework

Chapter 17 Who’s in Charge Here?.

The Executive Office of the President (EOP). Office of Management and Budget (OMB)

FSIS’s Needs for Peer Review of Risk Assessments Carol Maczka, Ph.D. Senior Scientist for Risk Assessment FSIS/USDA September 30, 2003 Presented at JIFSAN/SRA/RAC.

Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science, CDER, FDA ACPS Subcommittee on Manufacturing Science: Identification and Prioritization.

Strategic Planning for Statistics in Australia PARIS21/UNESCAP Forum on Strategic Planning for Statistics in South-East Asian Countries – Bangkok, June.

EDSP’s Approach to Test Protocol Validation Office of Science Coordination and Policy U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

FDA Science Board Drug Safety Initiative April 15, 2005 Rockville, MD RADM Steven Galson, MD, MPH Acting Director, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.

Building Sustainable Inspection Reforms Jordan Coordination Model Wafa’a M. Aranki June 2014 Amman – Jordan.

Systems Studies Program Peer Review Meeting Albert L. Opdenaker III DOE Program Manager Holiday Inn Express Germantown, Maryland August 29, 2013.

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.

President’s Office of Science and Technology Policy Deborah D. Stine Specialist in Science and Technology Policy December 3, 2008.

Date/Version # Van Ton-Quinlivan, Vice Chancellor Version as of April 18, 2012.

Organization, Roles and Responsibilities of the National CIO Office Karen S. Evans Administrator, Office of E-Government and Information Technology United.

Specific Activities Covering a Wider Field of Research New and Emerging Science and Technology IGLO, December 2003 New and Emerging Science and Technology.

Dr. Nguyen Dinh Cung President, Central Institute for Economic Management.

Strengthening Science Supporting Fishery Management  Standards for Best Available Science  Implementation of OMB’s Peer Review Bulletin  Separation.

NOAA Science Advisory Board …advises the Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere on long- and short- range strategies for research, education,

1 Information Quality Act. Purpose- after this course you will be able to… define what is the Information Quality Act define what is the Information Quality.

Integrating Administrative Records into the Federal Statistical System 2.0 Shelly Wilkie Martinez Statistical and Science Policy U. S. Office of Management.

A GENCY P OLICY : T HEORY & P RACTICE. First. The Theory.

Arnsburger Str. 64, Frankfurt, Germany Tel , Fax Internet:

Position Paper of the 4 independent watchdogs Dr. Philipp Birkenmaier Secretariat of Nationaler Normenkontrollrat Nicosia, 2 April 2012.

1 Federal Lab Technology Transfer, Annual Reporting, and Gauging Performance Mark Boroush Senior Policy Analyst, Office of Technology Policy, Technology.

Developing Proposals for a System of Indicators on the Nation’s Environment (the SINE) H. Theodore Heintz, Jr. Indicator Coordinator White House Council.

1 Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program Environmental Summit May 20, 2008 Jim Alwood Chemical Control Division Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.

Law Seminars International Spectrum Management Conference NTIA: SPECTRUM POLICY FOR THE 21 st CENTURY The Federal Government Spectrum Management Perspective.

New Framework for Strategic Goal Assessment NSF Advisory Committee for Business and Operations November 8-9, 2006 Tom Cooley, Director, BFA.

Virginia Office of Public-Private Partnerships (VAP3) Adopted Public-Private Transportation Act (PPTA) enabling legislation in 1995 Public-Private Education.

Future Approaches to NIAMS Clinical Trials * As presented to the NIAMS Advisory Council on June 2, 2009.

Impact analysis during the harmonisation process with the EU and effects on Lithuanian economy Giedrius Kadziauskas, Senior Policy analyst 23 rd Fabruary.

Sandwell Safeguarding Children Board Annual Report 2015 Presentation to Council January 12 th 2016 John Harris – Independent Chair.

Better regulation in the Commission Jonathon Stoodley Head of Unit C.1 Evaluation, Regulatory Fitness and Performance Secretariat General of the European.

Office of Research and Development Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can be masked by a collage strip of one, two or three images. The photo.

© ARVIR Balancing Funding Priorities for Innovation Projects; Does the South African Government Address the Issue of Portfolio Management?

The CFP AND the role of science, innovation and advice Tallinn 28 th May 2013 SCAR-Fish report:

New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees.

Position Paper of the 4 independent watchdogs Dr

Unidata Policy Committee Meeting

U.S. Information Quality Standards

Allen Chan U.S. Government Accountability Office October 2, 2018

Stakeholder Engagement: Webinar Part I: The Regulatory Development Process for the Government of Canada Part II: Making Technical Regulations Under.

Office of Health, Safety and Security

Presentation transcript:

Jeff Morris Associate Director for Science Office of Science Policy Symposium on Peer Review of Risk Assessments and Related Activities September 30, 2003 Jeff Morris Associate Director for Science Office of Science Policy Symposium on Peer Review of Risk Assessments and Related Activities September 30, 2003 Evolution of Peer Review at EPA

Scientific Peer Review work products identified work products identified  750 identified as needing peer review 91% identified for external peer review Dr. Matanowski of JHU, “I think EPA has taken massive steps to improve their peer review, and the Science Advisory Board is not the only place…from what we have looked at in the EPA, they have done an extremely good job getting almost everything that they look at now peer reviewed.” (House Science Committee – April 2002)

More Scientists and Engineers in EPA’s Decision Process

Peer Review Is a Cornerstone of EPA’s Information Quality Guidelines “Influential Information”  Disseminated in support of top Agency actions (including precedent-setting or controversial scientific or economic issues)  Disseminated in support of economically significant actions  Major work products undergoing peer review as called for under the Agency’s Peer Review Policy  Other information on a case-by-case basis

Products Subject to Peer Review: OMB Proposal and EPA’s Policy OMB’s Proposal Significant Regulatory Information  “ Influential” under OMB IQG and is “relevant to regulatory policies.”  Internal or external peer review Especially Significant Regulatory Information  Support of a major regulatory action  “Clear and substantial impact on important public policies or important private sector decisions with a possible impact of more than $100 million in any year,”  OMB determines to be of “significant interagency interest” or “relevant to an Administration policy priority.”  Formal, independent external peer review. EPA’s Guidance  Scientific and technical work products used to support a regulatory program or policy position, and one or more of the following:  Establishes a significant precedent, model, or methodology  Addresses significant controversial issues  Focuses on significant emerging issues  Has significant cross-Agency/interagency implications  Involves a significant investment of Agency resources  Considers an innovative approach for a previously defined problem/process/methodology  Satisfies a statutory or other legal mandate for peer review

To Summarize – In the past three years:  The number of EPA peer reviews has increased significantly  Agency decisions receive greater scrutiny for peer review needs  Peer review linked to information quality  OMB proposal consistent with EPA’s current peer review policy