Teaching Effectiveness Committee Recommendations on Teaching Evaluation Forms.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Under New Management : Developing a Library Assessment Program at a Small Public University Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable,

Advertisements

University-Wide Course Evaluation Committee Peter Biehl, Chair, Department of Anthropology Krissy Costanzo, Committee Staff Support; Academic Affairs March.

GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,

Student Learning Outcomes at PCC Adapted from a presentation to the PCC Board of Trustees in 2007.

Faculty Senate Report March 12, 2008 Student Evaluation Committee Teaching Academy.

Service to Leadership Freshmen Orientation Assessment Service to Leadership Professional Development Training August 14, 2012 Agriculture Research Complex.

PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,

Supporting Faculty Use of IDEA David Starrett Dean, School of University Studies and Academic Information Services and Director, Center for Scholarship.

ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION Assessment, data analysis and evaluation of findings as essential components of the self study for determining if objectives.

Student Evaluations. Introduction: Conducted: Qualtrics Survey Fall 2011 o Sample Size: 642 o FT Tenured: 158, FT Untenured: 59 o Adjunct: 190 o Students:

Meeting of Assistant Professors Discussion of Promotion and Tenure July 25, 2011.

Preparing for NCATE October 22-26, 2005 Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.

Faculty Evaluation Systems: Student Evaluations of Faculty What are we measuring? “The evaluation of teachers is a mark of a good college.” Ernest Boyer,

IN SUPPORT OF STUDENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE COURSE TRANSFORMATION PROGRAM Senate Resolution 1012.

New Web-Based Course Evaluation Services Available to Schools and Departments Presentation to Faculty Council November 6, 2009.

Teaching Effectiveness Committee & CoursEval Implementation Committee Status Update to University Senate October 4, 2011 October 4, 20111TEC/CIC University.

Academic Careers Adapted from presentations and slides by: T. Williams - Texas A & M University C. Ellis - Duke University S. Castaneda, Clarke College.

University of Delaware What Should Be Expected of Graduate Teaching Assistants? George Watson College of Arts & Science Dept. of Physics & Astronomy.

Peer-Led Team Learning: A Model for Enhancing Student Learning Claire Berardini & Glenn Miller Third Annual Faculty Institute Pace University.

Coordinator of Assessment Coordinate assessment efforts on campus Maintain the NCCC General Education Assessment Plan Collect assessment results from course.

Review of SUNY Oneonta Course Evaluation Form Report and Recommendations from The Committee on Instruction: Part II October 4, 2010.

Survey of Current Teaching Evaluation Forms Teaching Effectiveness Committee.

Analyzing and Improving College Teaching: Here’s an IDEA Alan C. Lacy, Associate Dean College of Applied Science and Technology Illinois State University.

Tips on Preparing a Successful Educational Research Proposal Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah, professor, BIT Nancy J. Stone, professor and chair, Psychological Science.

Report of the Results of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement William E. Knight and Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Presentation to the Faculty.

November 9,  Proving that students are learning  Reaction to challenges in public education  Rising potential, stagnant performance  Regional.

Commission on Accreditation for Respiratory Care The Site Visitors Are Coming! Transitioning from Successful Self- Study to Successful Site Visit Bradley.

C.E.L.T Developing a Comprehensive Faculty Evaluation System Jeff Schlicht, Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Health Promotion and Exercise Sciences.

Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.

Academic Assessment Task Force Report August 15, 2013 Lori Escallier, Co-Chair Keith Sheppard, Co-Chair Chuck Taber, Co-Chair.

Core Curriculum Oversight Committee Committee Update University Senate Linda S. Glaze Associate Provost for Undergraduate Studies.

Creating a Teaching Dossier Shea Wang, Ph.D Interim Faculty Evaluation Coordinator Oct. 21, 2013.

Student Centered Teaching Through Universal Instructional Design Part II.

NCATE Standard 6 Governance and Resources: Debunking the Myths AACTE/NCATE Workshop Arlington, VA April 2008 Linda Bradley James Madison University

Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.

Recommendations on Professional Improvement Leave.

End of Course Evaluation Taimi Olsen, Ph.D., Director, Tennessee Teaching and Learning Center Jennifer Ann Morrow, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Evaluation,

Faculty Evaluation Procedures: What Committee Members and Evaluees Need to Know 1.

Final Update on the New Faculty Course Evaluation & Online System November, 2003.

First Tuesday Series February 2, SACS -- Quality Enhancement Plan SACS requires that universities develop a comprehensive plan to enhance student.

San Joaquin Delta College Flex Calendar Program General Flex at Delta Types of Activities Administration of Program Process Filling Out the Flex Contract.

SETE ABOR POLICY ON STUDENT EVALUATIONS 6-221B. General Policy It is the policy of the Arizona Board of Regents that faculty shall be evaluated on their.

Students Course and Teacher Evaluation Please refer to notes at the bottom of this slide.

+ Meeting of Assistant Professors June 29, Faculty and Academic Affairs Leadership Steven Abramson, M.D., Vice Dean for Education, Faculty and.

What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.

Student Evaluation of Teaching Task Force 1 Final Report and Proposal Presented to OSU Faculty Senate February 9, 2012.

Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.

Changes in the Faculty Review Process for United Academics Faculty Presenter: Patricia Linton, College of Arts & Sciences.

Visioning 2 Committee 15,800 by 2018 JoyceArmstrongFamily Sciences 13 JessicaGullionSociology GovernorJacksonFinancial AidMarkHamnerInstitutional Research.

POST-TENURE REVIEW: Report and Recommendations. 2 OVERVIEW Tenure Field Test Findings Recommendations This is a progress report. Implementation, assessment,

 Office of Student Affairs › All about students › Admission, tracking progression, and graduation › Facilitate student success › Administer the curricular.

A Journey through the Seas of Tenure, Permanent Status, and Promotion at the University of Florida 2012: Angel Kwolek-Folland, Associate Provost for Academic.

Teaching Effectiveness Committee Status Report. Teaching Effectiveness Committee Members in Gisela Buschle-Diller (Polymer & Fiber.

Teaching Council Recommendations to the Faculty Senate DRAFT 2/9/09 & 3rd DRAFT Feb 13, 2009 for use by the FS Exec Committee, March 4, 2009.

Faculty Handbook Review Committee Proposed revision to and

Evaluation of Teaching Recommendations of the Teaching Effectiveness Committee University Senate Meeting May 1, 2007.

1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,

The Use of Formative Evaluations in the Online Course Setting JENNIFER PETERSON, MS, RHIA, CTR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCES.

Fall 2006 Faculty Evaluation and Tenure Review Process Tenure Review Process Riverside Community College District.

P&T Update: College of Medicine, Carol S. Weisman, PhD Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs Distinguished Professor of Public Health Sciences.

Deborah Lee James Nail Gail Peyton Mississippi State University Libraries Supporting Graduate Education: A Library – Wide Approach.

Recent Standards Changes and Revised Site Report Template

Course Evaluation Committee

Faculty Performance Reviews at MSU

Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations

Faculty Workshop on Promotion and Tenure

Title I Annual Meeting Pinewood Elementary, August 30, 2018.

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

COURSE EVALUATION Spring 2019 Pilot August 27, 2019.

Presentation transcript:

Teaching Effectiveness Committee Recommendations on Teaching Evaluation Forms

Teaching Effectiveness Committee Members in Gisela Buschle-Diller (Polymer & Fiber Eng., Chair) John Heilman (Provost) Howard Clayton (Management) Al Fromhold (Physics) Sareen Gropper (Human Sciences) Raymond Kessler (Horticulture) Marcus Kieltyka (Library) David LaBand (Forestry) Jill Salisbury-Glennon (Educational FLT) Saralyn Smith-Carr (Vet. Medicine) Carole Johnson (Communication Disorders) Kem Krueger (Pharmacy) Scott Kramer (Building Science) Hakan Balci (graduate student) Marianne Clancy (undergraduate student) James Groccia (Biggio Center) New members in Peter Livant (Chemistry) Juliet Rumble (Library) David Weaver (Agronomy & Soils) William Boulton (Management) Kristen Helms (Pharmacy) Mert Serkan (graduate student) Virginia Planz (undergrad. student) New members in Linda Ruth (Building Science) Peggy Shippen (Rehab. Spec. Ed.) Jan Kavookjian (Pharmacy) Selda Tarkin (grad. student) Amanda Cummings (undergrad. student)

TE Committee charge 1. Design an instrument for the end-of-semester evaluation of teaching with proven validity and reliability 2. Develop standardized administration procedures to insure that all departments/schools/colleges follow these procedures to increase reliability and validity of comparisons 3. Develop suggested guidelines and procedures to assist with the interpretation and formative & summative use of evaluation results by individual faculty members, department chairs, deans and T&P committees

Faculty Handbook The University views the evaluation of teaching as an on-going process which relies on multiple assessment measures. One such measure is the University's computerized Teaching Effectiveness Survey for gathering student perceptions. Faculty members are required to have this standardized instrument administered in their classes one semester per year, usually fall semester.

Recommended Guidelines Standard procedures for administering teaching evaluations will be applied campus wide Student evaluations of teaching will be conducted for every class and section assigned Teaching evaluations will not be administered by the instructor of the course Student identities must remain anonymous Results of the evaluations will not be provided to instructors until after grades are submitted

Recommended TE Forms Teaching Assessment System of the University of Washington Adaptable to diversity of AU campus Flexible, easy to use, yet reliable Standardized in 1960s; in use at over 80 university campuses across U.S. Separate sections for evaluation Formative – towards improvement of instruction Summative – personnel decisions (tenure and promotion, awards, etc.)

Instructional Assessment System of the University of Washington Main features: Instructors select an appropriate form from 13 standardized forms to fit the size, type, and methodology used in classroom Accommodation of additional questions, created by the instructor or department to assess unique course components or support program accreditation Individual course reports Summary reports for departments, divisions, or instructors

Form A is designed for small lecture/discussion courses. Form B is designed for large lecture classes, with little or no in-class interaction between instructor and student. Form C is designed for seminar discussion classes which include a minimal amount of formal lecturing by the instructor. Form D is designed for those classes whose purpose is the teaching of problem-solving or heuristic methods. Form E is designed for those classes which are skill oriented and "hands on“, such as clinical nursing, art studio, social-work field experience, Form J is designed to evaluate instruction provided through clinical experience rather than traditional academic coursework. The back of all IAS Forms (Forms A-J, and X) are identical and permit individual instructors to query students on any subject they think is appropriate to the course. Examples of Standardized Forms

Forms evaluate Course Organization Instructor Preparedness Extra Help Grading Student Effort Required/elective course

Back of form Room for additional questions relevant to course, instruction or department accreditation (scanned items)

Hand-written student comments are included

Report Instructor copy Course Organization Instructor preparedness Extra help Grading Student effort and grade expectation Hours/week spent Valuable hours in regard to learning Grade expected Required or elective Rating in percentage average

Recommendations of the TE Committee Auburn University will adopt the teaching evaluation forms and processing supplied by the University of Washington The Provost’s Office will provide funding of TE forms, processing, and reports The University Senate will review TE policies and procedures every 3 years Implementation will begin Fall 2007

Additional Recommendations The Biggio Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning will develop and conduct annual workshops related to the implementation and use of TE system policies and procedures. The Biggio Center will also provide an annual report on workshops and implementation issues to the AU Senate, including feedback from administrators and instructors.