Bridging the Gap between Research and Policymaking in India Seminar, Delhi, 3 rd January 2004 The Analytical Framework The political context – political.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Creating a Window of Opportunity for Policy Change By Nancy Yinger, The Population Reference Bureau AMDD Conference Kuala Lumpur, 2003.
Advertisements

ENGAGING STRATEGICALLY WITH NON-STATE ACTORS IN NEW AID MODALITIES 7th July 2011 DEVCO-Europeaid – D2 civil Society.
EuropeAid ENGAGING STRATEGICALLY WITH NON-STATE ACTORS IN NEW AID MODALITIES SESSION 1 Why this Focus on Non-State Actors in Budget Support and SPSPs?
Bridging Research and Policy East Asia Development Network Workshop Jakarta, July 2004 John Young & Cokro Leksmono Overseas Development Institute, UK
Other models. A Practical Framework External Influences political context evidence links Campaigning, Lobbying Politics and Policymaking Media, Advocacy,
RAPID Programme Civil Society Organizations and Policy Entrepreneurship Julius Court & Enrique Mendizabal Overseas Development Institute, London.
Bridging Research and Policy An Overseas Development Institute Seminar 9th October 2003.
Are you a Policy Entrepreneur? How to promote pro-poor policy & practice? An ODI Workshop London, 16 th March 2004 John Young & Julius Court Research and.
Linking research to policy in Vietnam: how can complexity concepts help?
Context, Evidence, & Links
Day 2. RAPID Programme SMEPOL, Cairo, February, Outline of the Workshop Day 1 General Introductions Theory - Research Policy.
Networks and Policy Influence in International Development Julius Court and Enrique Mendizabal RAPID Programme, ODI
Turning Insight into Impact: Approaches and Tools Research and Policy in Development Programme DSA-BOND Conference 2005 John Young and Julius Court.
Research and Policy in Development Aim for the bulls eye How to maximise the impact of development research John Young Overseas Development Institute,
Are you a Policy Entrepreneur?
1 Modalities for Supporting PRSs Finnish Aid in a PRS Context Helsinki Workshop May 2003.
Promoting Evidence-Based Development Policy DSA Conference 2004 Workshop 1.5 Speakers: John Young, Dominic Furlong, Dylan Winder & Naved Chowdhury Chair:
The Analytical Framework
Bridging the Gap between Research and Policymaking in India Seminar, Workshop, 4 rd January 2004 Some Specific Tools Political context (Engaging Policymakers)
Bridging Research and Policy East Asia Development Network Workshop Jakarta, July 2004 John Young & Cokro Leksmono Overseas Development Institute, UK
The RAPID Analytical Framework. RAPID Programme SMEPOL, Cairo, February, Definitions Research: any systematic effort to increase.
Civil Society Organisations and Policy Entrepreneurship Naved Chowdhury Overseas Development Institute, London.
Bridging the Gap between Research and Policymaking in India Seminar, Delhi, 3 rd January 2004 Definitions Research: any systematic effort to increase the.
A Practical Framework. RAPID Programme SMEPOL, Cairo, February, An Analytical Framework The political context – political.
Role of CSOs in monitoring Policies and Progress on MDGs.
The political economy of climate- compatible development The political economy of climate-compatible development in Ghana, Kenya and Mozambique Andrew.
Roger Harris 1. Two communities Researchers puzzle why there is resistance to policy change despite clear and convincing evidence; generally do not see.
From Research to Advocacy
Maximising the impact of research: experience from ODI’s RAPID Programme John Young Overseas Development Institute
Valuing evaluation beyond programme boundaries: Communicating evaluations to enhance development effectiveness globally Anna Downie
How/When does Research Influence Policy? Duncan Green, Oxfam March 2014.
“Look, Listen & Learn” Promoting the use of CSOs evidence in policies for food security By Lindiwe Majele Sibanda
Dissemination pathways Science and policy
Health Communication, Advocacy and Integrated Strategic Communication. The case of HIV/AIDS Jan Servaes Professor and Chair, Department of Communication.
Making the case: using research-based evidence for policy advocacy John Young, ODI, London BOND Advocacy and Capacity Building Group.
Making Knowledge Count Maximising the value of Research for Development John Young: ODI, London
Fostering an enabling policy environment for youth development: UNESCO’s response Section for Youth, Sport and Physical Education Division for Social Science.
NGO Management Lesson 3 NGO Strategy
INASP- ODI Research – Policy Symposium A practitioner´s understanding of the key factors in play to promote evidence based policy processes Av. Callao.
Social Science Research Use in Policy Penelope Carroll, SHORE Michael Blewden, SHORE Funded by BRCSS Network BRCSS Conference: Social Sciences Research:
Establishing Research and Evaluation Network on Child Issues in Indonesia Nuning Akhmadi Indonesia Research and Evaluation Network Manila, 7 – 8 November.
3ie Grantees Communication for Policy Influence Clinic Negombo 16 th – 18 th July 2012.
Strengthening the quality of research for policy engagement in the African context – achievements and aspirations Tebogo B. Seleka Botswana Institute for.
Lessons from RAPID’s work on research-policy links John Young.
ILRI Process and Partnership for Pro-Poor Policy Change Can ILRI hope to influence pro-poor policy change through research? John Young, ODI, UK Dannie.
Advocacy The practice of the European and the Hungarian Anti-Poverty Networks Kunbábony, 21 June 2011.
KT-EQUAL/ CARDI Workshop: ‘Lost in Translation’ 23 June 2011 Communicating research results to policy makers: A practitioner’s perspective.
CBR 101 An Introduction to Community Based Research.
Inclusive Business in Agrifood Markets: Evidence and Action FANRPAN Model – A Regional Multi-stakeholder Platform for Research, Knowledge Sharing and Policy.
Challenges of putting research into action. Oxfam-Monash Partnership Research that will “make a difference in people’s lives” Research conducted by academics.
Time to act on the Future of Europe …
Statistics and cooperation: Rome, 24 November 2005 Statistics to Inform Development Policy: the Role of PARIS21 Presentation by Antoine Simonpietri, PARIS21.
Effective Research for Development Policy John Young & Louise Shaxson CFHSS Congress 2006 York University
Policymaking and evidence: how can we improve the fit? Sonia Sodha Head of Policy & Strategy The Social Research Unit at Dartington Using evidence to improve.
RAPID Outcome Mapping Approach Simon Hearn, ODI 16 April 2010 Bern, Switzerland.
Tony Karbo, Ph.D. AHSI/UPEACE Africa Program.  Action or inaction taken by interested entities such as NGOs, Think Tanks, government departments, ministries,
Bridging the gap between research and policy making? Ajoy Datta Foundation for the Future, Dead Sea, Jordan Civil Society Partnerships Programme
BCO Impact Assessment Component 3 Scoping Study David Souter.
European Commission Joint Evaluation Unit common to EuropeAid, Relex and Development Methodology for Evaluation of Budget support operations at Country.
(5) Convincing links/ communication Training in Policy Relevant Solutions Oriented Research.
Bond.org.uk Q1 Bond is most useful when it positions itself close to those with power, such as the UK government, multilaterals or big corporate businesses,
(1) Bridging research, policy and politics the RAPID+ framework This presentation is based on: Court, J., and Young, J Bridging research and policy.
Bridging the Research-to-Practice Gap Session 1. Session Objectives  Understand the importance of improving data- informed decision making  Understand.
Knowledge and Effectiveness: Myths and Models for Research HSE Conference on Development Effectiveness Nick Perkins Head of Research Communication.
Bridging research and policy in a supply and demand framework role of external agencies/donors.
RAPID Outcome Mapping Approach Enrique Mendizabal.
Hotel Novotel Accor Calea Victoriei 37 B Sector 1 Bucharest, Romania Sub-brand to go here Pro Global Science Association International symposium Advancing.
THE ROLE OF RESEARCH IN TELECENTER DEVELOPMENT Why does research matter? Raul Roman Center for Internet Studies University of Washington APEC Telecenter.
By Dr. Talat AnwarAdvisor Centre for Policy Studies, CIIT, Islamabad Centre for Policy Studies, CIIT, Islamabad
THE FUTURE EVOLUTION OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION BY 2030
Presentation transcript:

Bridging the Gap between Research and Policymaking in India Seminar, Delhi, 3 rd January 2004 The Analytical Framework The political context – political and economic structures and processes, culture, institutional pressures, incremental vs radical change etc. The evidence – credibility, the degree it challenges received wisdom, research approaches and methodology, simplicity of the message, how it is packaged etc External Influences Socio-economic and cultural influences, donor policies etc The links between policy and research communities – networks, relationships, power, competing discourses, trust, knowledge etc.

Bridging the Gap between Research and Policymaking in India Seminar, Delhi, 3 rd January 2004 Political Context: Key Areas The macro political context (democracy, governance, media freedom; academic freedom) The sector / issue process (Policy uptake = demand – contestation) [NB Demand: political and societal] How policymakers think (narratives & policy streams) Policy implementation and practice (bureaucracies, incentives, street level, room for manoeuvre, participatory approaches) Decisive moments in the policy process (policy processes, votes, policy windows and crises) Context is crucial, but you can maximize your chances

Bridging the Gap between Research and Policymaking in India Seminar, Delhi, 3 rd January 2004 Evidence: Relevance and credibility Key factor – did it provide a solution to a problem? Relevance: –Topical relevance – What to do? –Operational usefulness – How to do it? : Credibility: –Research approach –Of researcher > of evidence itself Strenuous advocacy efforts are often needed Communication

Bridging the Gap between Research and Policymaking in India Seminar, Delhi, 3 rd January 2004 Links: Feedback and Networks Feedback processes often prominent in successful cases. Trust & legitimacy Networks: –Epistemic communities –Policy networks –Advocacy coalitions The role of individuals: connectors, mavens and salesmen

Bridging the Gap between Research and Policymaking in India Seminar, Delhi, 3 rd January 2004 External Influence Big “incentives” can spur evidence-based policy – e.g. EU accession, PRSP processes. And some interesting examples of donors trying new things re. supporting research But, we really don’t know whether and how donors can best promote use of evidence in policymaking (credibility vs backlash)

Bridging the Gap between Research and Policymaking in India Seminar, Delhi, 3 rd January 2004 Framework: Key Questions for WLI The political context – political and economic structures and processes, culture, institutional pressures, incremental vs radical change etc. The evidence – credibility, the degree it challenges received wisdom, research approaches and methodology, simplicity of the message, how it is packaged etc External Influences Socio-economic and cultural influences, donor policies etc The links between policy and research communities – networks, relationships, power, competing discourses, trust, knowledge etc.

Bridging the Gap between Research and Policymaking in India Seminar, Delhi, 3 rd January 2004 Political Context: Key Questions for WLI What are the main policy issues in water and livelihoods policy in India? Who are the key players? What is the policy process – is it transparent and predictable? Are new policy directions implemented? What are the barriers to policy change? Which other political issues affect research-policy links?

Bridging the Gap between Research and Policymaking in India Seminar, Delhi, 3 rd January 2004 Evidence: Key Questions for WLI What is the evidence to support better approaches? Is it credible? Is the evidence contested? Does the research community agree on the policy conclusions? Is it operationally useful? How do researchers communicate their results? What could be improved? What kind of evidence convinces policymakers in this area?

Bridging the Gap between Research and Policymaking in India Seminar, Delhi, 3 rd January 2004 Links: Key Questions for WLI What types of intermediaries are involved in this sector (media, NGOs)? What is their impact? Do researchers use them? Are there different intermediaraies in different areas? What networks are useful? How to build trust and legitimacy?

Bridging the Gap between Research and Policymaking in India Seminar, Delhi, 3 rd January 2004 External Influences: WLI Key Questions What external influences affect research-policy links in the water sector in India? What is the impact of donor funding policies within the sector? Which donors have impact? How is donor-funded evidence viewed – by policymakers and by different groups within the local population (with suspicion or as credible)?