Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Center for Satellite Applications.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Helen Amanda Fricker Scripps Institution of Oceanography Ted Scambos National Snow and Ice Data Center Bob Bindschadler NASA/GSFC Space Flight Center Laurie.
Advertisements

Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 A Cloud Object Based Volcanic.
6/9/2010Monarch-A, Hamburg, H. Skourup1DTU Space, Technical University of Denmark WP 2.6 Improved estimate sea ice fluxes and the freshwater cycle in the.
ESTO Advanced Component Technology 11/17/03 Laser Sounder for Remotely Measuring Atmospheric CO 2 Concentrations GSFC CO 2 Science and Sounder.
A thermodynamic model for estimating sea and lake ice thickness with optical satellite data Student presentation for GGS656 Sanmei Li April 17, 2012.
David Prado Oct Antarctic Sea Ice: John N. Rayner and David A. Howarth 1979.
Monitoring polar climate change from space Thorsten Markus Cryospheric Sciences Branch NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD.
The ICESat-2 Mission: Laser altimetry of ice, clouds and land elevation T. Markus, T. Neumann NASA Goddard Space Flight Center W. Abdalati Earth Science.
MR P.Durkee 5/20/2015 MR3522Winter 1999 MR Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Ocean - Winter 1999 Active Microwave Radar.
ICESat Overview H. Jay Zwally NASA Goddard Greenbelt, Maryland Bob E. Schutz The University of Texas at Austin Center for Space Research Laser Ranging.
Ice studies off West Greenland 2006 Bureau of Minerals and Petroleum Government of Greenland Data compiled by Sine M Hvidegaard, Rene Forsberg, Susanne.
IceBridge Science Objectives The following are the major science objectives of Operation IceBridge in priority.
Ola M. Johannessen Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center Bergen, Norway Arctic Climate – Present and Future 20 September 2012 Longyearbyen, Svalbard.
Sea Ice Thickness from Satellite, Aircraft, and Model Data Xuanji Wang 1 and Jeffrey R. Key 1 Cooperative.
Circulation in the “Freshwater Switchyard” of the Arctic Ocean Michael Steele Polar Science Center, APL/UW Peter Schlosser & Bill Smethie Lamont-Doherty.
Michael Studinger & IceBridge Science Team & Instrument Teams.
IceBridge Program Overview Tom Wagner IceBridge Program Scientist.
Monitoring the Arctic and Antarctic By: Amanda Kamenitz.
ICESat dH/dt Thinning Thickening ICESat key findings.
7/14/2015 IceBridge Observations of Sea Ice Thickness, Structure, and Volume Change: Bringing a NOAA Viewpoint Update Summary: Jan 19, 2011 PI: Dave McAdoo,
A Multi-Sensor, Multi-Parameter Approach to Studying Sea Ice: A Case-Study with EOS Data Walt Meier 2 March 2005IGOS Cryosphere Theme Workshop.
Monitoring the Global Sea Level Rise Budget with Jason, Argo and GRACE Observations Eric Leuliette and Laury Miller NOAA/Laboratory for Satellite Altimetry.
Global Inter-agency IPY Polar Snapshot Year (GIIPSY): Goals and Accomplishments Katy Farness & Ken Jezek, The Ohio State University Mark Drinkwater, European.
Profiling Clouds with Satellite Imager Data and Potential Applications William L. Smith Jr. 1, Douglas A. Spangenberg 2, Cecilia Fleeger 2, Patrick Minnis.
ODINAFRICA/GLOSS Sea Level Training Course
New availability of near real-time Arctic sea ice thickness results from IceBridge and CryoSat-2 data New availability of near real-time Arctic sea ice.
Sea-ice freeboard heights in the Arctic Ocean from ICESat and airborne laser H. Skourup, R. Forsberg, S. M. Hvidegaard, and K. Keller, Department of Geodesy,
The Rapidly Changing Arctic Sea Ice: New surprises in 2012 Walt Meier, National Snow and Ice Data Center 25 September 2012 Cooperative Institute for Research.
OC3522Summer 2001 OC Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Ocean - Summer 2001 Active Microwave Radar.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Center for Satellite Applications.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Commerce and Transportation.
Sea Level Change Measurements: Estimates from Altimeters Understanding Sea Level Rise and Variability June 6-9, 2006 Paris, France R. S. Nerem, University.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Image: MODIS Land Group,
CryoSat Workshop, March 9, CryoSat: showing the way to a future of improved ocean mapping Walter H. F. Smith NOAA Lab for.
Agency, version?, Date 2012 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Add CGMS agency logo here (in the slide master) Coordination Group.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Image: MODIS Land Group,
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Climatology of Hurricane.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 POES Microwave Products Presented.
CryoSat: ESA’s Ice Mission CryoSat: ESA’s Ice Mission Measuring change in the Earth’s ice fields Jérôme Benveniste slides from Mark R. Drinkwater & Richard.
Potential applications for highly resolved shorelines: a cross- validation approach with radar altimetry Ron Abileah (1), Jesus Gomez-Enri (2), Andrea.
Using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Climate Theme Introduction.
Sea ice thickness from CryoSat – A new data set for operational ice services? Christian Haas German CryoSat Office AWI.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Infrared Temperature and.
Analysis of Arctic ice thickness, freeboard, and snow cover from the data of Russian Sever expeditions V.Y. Alexandrov S. Sandven Nansen Environmental.
ICEBell Ice Mass Balance in the Bellingshausen Sea James Clark Ross, Nov 2010 Participants BAS (Maksym), SAMS (Wilkinson) WHOI, DTU, U Manitoba,UTSA Partners.
University of Kansas S. Gogineni, P. Kanagaratnam, R. Parthasarathy, V. Ramasami & D. Braaten The University of Kansas Wideband Radars for Mapping of Near.
Arctic Sea Ice – Now and in the Future. J. Stroeve National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 The Influences of Changes.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March Arctic Aircraft Altimeter (AAA) Experiment Envisat and ICESat underflights.
Greenland ice melt Ben Lee EPS 131 Friday 10/28/2005.
The Variability of Sea Ice from Aqua’s AMSR-E Instrument: A Quantitative Comparison of the Team and Bootstrap Algorithms By Lorraine M. Beane Dr. Claire.
Ocean processes affecting ice-cover in the Arctic, and their impact on hydrocarbon exploration William Crawford Eddy Carmack Josef Cherniawsky Institute.
Fig Decadal averages of the seasonal and annual mean anomalies for (a) temperature at Faraday/Vernadsky, (b) temperature at Marambio, and (c) SAM.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Closing the Global Sea Level.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Image: MODIS Land Group,
Recent SeaWiFS view of the forest fires over Alaska Gene Feldman, NASA GSFC, Laboratory for Hydrospheric Processes, Office for Global Carbon Studies
SeaWiFS Views Equatorial Pacific Waves Gene Feldman NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Lab. For Hydrospheric Processes, This.
Sea ice thickness from airborne laser scanning Sine M. Hvidegaard, Rene Forsberg, Henriette Skourup, and others.
Snow and Ice Products from the Aqua, Terra, and ICESat Satellites at the National Snow and Ice Data Center Introduction Sensors on the NASA Earth Observing.
Global Ice Coverage Claire L. Parkinson NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Presentation to the Earth Ambassador program, meeting at NASA Goddard Space Flight.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Weather & Water Synthesis.
Atmospheric Circulation Response to Future Arctic Sea Ice Loss Clara Deser, Michael Alexander and Robert Tomas.
The OC in GOCE: A review The Gravity field and Steady-state Ocean Circulation Experiment Marie-Hélène RIO.
ICE-ARC airborne campaigns
Measuring sea ice thickness using satellite radar altimetry
AOMIP and FAMOS are supported by the National Science Foundation
“Operation IceBridge, CryoSat-2, ICESat”
jOmegak, San Carlos CA, USA,
Recent Activities of Ocean Surface Topography Virtual Constellation (OST-VC) Remko Scharroo (EUMETSAT)
Presentation transcript:

Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Presented by Dave McAdoo Presented by Dave McAdoo Arctic Sea Ice Freeboard Measurements from Satellite Altimetry

Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March Objective, Science, and Benefit Requirements/Objective Research area: Document and understand changes in climate forcings and feedbacks, thereby reducing uncertainty in climate projections Priority research activity: Monitor changes in the Arctic and impacts on ecosystems Science At what volumetric rate is loss of Arctic sea ice occurring and how accurately can we track sea ice thickness changes using altimetry? What is the role of observed sea ice flux in climate system ? Benefits New, refined sea ice volume constraints on climate models. Near-real-time tracking of thick, multi-year sea ice in support of NSPD-66 and Commerce Transportation and Goal #8. Improved oceanographic and geodetic constraints for Arctic Ocean circulation modelling.

Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 CryoSat-2 Science Challenges -Deriving precise (to ~3-5 cm), detailed (to ~ 10 km) sea ice freeboard and thickness estimates from complex satellite altimeter data sets Next Steps -Publish analyses of CBSIT (2009) data sets -Prepare for and conduct BESIE Beaufort Sea Ice Camp as advisors to NASA’s OIB Airborne Campaigns in Antarctic and Arctic -Validate, analyze and exploit sea ice data from ESA’s CryoSat-2 (as ESA Data AO and Cal-val investigators). Process the complex returns from its advanced altimeter for ice freeboard -Prepare for ICESat-2 as members of the Science Definition Team Transition Path -Multi-year ice tracking and thickness products for the NIC, as well as climate models. 3 Challenges and Path Forward

Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March From passive microwave satellite data Sep 2007: Minimum Sea Ice Extent for 30 yrs NSIDC Total: 4.3 million sq. km Motivation: Diminishing Arctic Sea Ice Extent Sep Anomalies Projected Sep Ice Extent (5-model Average) ACIA

Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March SNOW SEA ICE WATER RADAR LASER Ice Freeboard Satellite Altimetry (laser and radar) over Sea Ice Sea Ice Thickness Altimeters provide basin-scale freeboard and sea surface height data over the Arctic Ocean Snow Thickness RADAR LASER Satellite Altimetry

Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March Ice - Open Water Discrimination: Detecting Leads Specular Echo (Leads) Diffuse Echo (Ice Floes) Satellite Radar Altimetry (Envisat & ERS) Provides unambiguous detections of leads for sea surface height measurements Large footprint means returns from “mixed” surfaces (distorted echoes) have to be discarded (e.g. Peacock & Laxon, 2004) Satellite Laser Altimetry (ICESat) Leads Ice Floes Highly specular reflections from leads Difficult to distinguish leads from ice floes Several methods for determining SSH (e.g. Kwok et al. 2007; Zwally et al., 2008 ; Farrell et al., 2009)

Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March Seasonal mean removed to create anomaly Change in Arctic Sea Ice Freeboard from ICESat 2003 – Fall (Oct-Nov) Winter (Feb-Mar)

Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March Validating Satellite Altimeter Data over Sea Ice In-situ measurements on ice Airborne surveys above ice NOAA Validation Experiments (all joint with NASA; airborne & in situ)  LaRA–FASIT (2002) Fram Strait  AAA (2006) - Beaufort Sea  Canada Basin Sea Ice Thickness (CBSIT, April 2009)  BESIE (2011)

Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March Envisat Under-flight April Canada Basin Near 2006 survey line Thick MY ice to FY ice Ice Camp Over-flight April GreenArc Ice Camp Thick, Old MY ice Nares Strait Component of NASA’s Operation Ice Bridge (OIB) CBSIT Experiment: April 2009 For details see: Connor et al. poster, “Airborne & in situ validation of aatellite altimetry measurements over sea ice”

Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March In Situ Measurements: EM-31 Ice thickness profiling Snow depth Snow pits Drill holes for calibrations Courtesy J. Yungel, NASA GreenArc Ice Camp Over-flight (CBSIT 2009)

Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 CryoSat-2 Science Challenges -Deriving precise (to ~3-5 cm), detailed (to ~ 10 km) sea ice freeboard and thickness estimates from complex satellite altimeter data sets Next Steps -Publish analyses of CBSIT (2009) data sets -Prepare for and conduct BESIE Beaufort Sea Ice Camp as advisors to NASA’s OIB Airborne Campaigns in Antarctic and Arctic -Validate, analyze and exploit sea ice data from ESA’s CryoSat-2 (as ESA Data AO and Cal-val investigators). Process the complex returns from its advanced altimeter for ice freeboard -Prepare for ICESat-2 as members of the Science Definition Team Transition Path -Multi-year ice tracking and thickness products for the NIC, as well as climate models. 11 Challenges and Path Forward

Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Extra Slides

Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March Envisat and ICESat Validation over Sea Ice AAA Experiment flight path in the Canada Basin From Connor et al., RSE, 2009 Arctic Airborne Altimetry AAA: 2006 Along Envisat/RA-2 track - AB Std dev = 0.08m  Envisat vs ATM Lead elevs (using lead detection algorithm)

Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March Principle of Satellite Altimetry Measuring the third / vertical dimension Measuring Surface Elevation (h): R = ct / 2 R = range measured by satellite altimeter c = speed of light t = round-trip travel time h = H – R h = sea surface height relative to reference ellipsoid H = satellite altitude above reference ellipsoid