Institute for Environment and Sustainability1 Meteorology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comparing TitanWRF and Cassini Results at the End of the Cassini Prime Mission Claire E. Newman, Mark I. Richardson, Anthony D. Toigo and Christopher Lee.
Advertisements

Institute for Environment and Sustainability1 Sea outlet coding Knowing to where the water flows to with 4 digits. …a Structured basis to code hydrological.
Institute for Environment and Sustainability1 POMI Kick-off Meeting 07/03/2008.
Parametrization of surface fluxes: Outline
Introduction Irina Surface layer and surface fluxes Anton
Institut für Meteorologie und Klimatologie Universität Hannover
Micrometeorology Surface Layer Dynamics and Surface Energy Exchange
Page 1 NAE 4DVAR Oct 2006 © Crown copyright 2006 Mark Naylor Data Assimilation, NWP NAE 4D-Var – Testing and Issues EWGLAM/SRNWP meeting Zurich 9 th -12.
4. 2 Moist air thermodynamics (Reading Text
1 Use and Abuse of MM5 Chris Davis NCAR (MMM/RAP) Acknowledgements: Fei Chen, Kevin Manning, Simon Low-Nam, Jimy Dudhia, Jim Bresch, Wei Wang Presented.
A NUMERICAL PREDICTION OF LOCAL ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES A.V.Starchenko Tomsk State University.
A thermodynamic model for estimating sea and lake ice thickness with optical satellite data Student presentation for GGS656 Sanmei Li April 17, 2012.
GEM Climate Performance over Arctic *** A Simulation on MARVIN *** Minwei QIAN, Colin Jones, Katja Winger.
Shortwave Radiation Options in the WRF Model
Meteorological Data Issues for Class II Increment Analysis.
PBL simulated from different PBL Schemes in WRF during DICE
Assessing the impact of soil moisture on the diurnal evolution of the PBL and on orographic cumulus development over the Santa Catalina Mountains during.
Meteorological Driver for CTM Freie Universität Berlin Institut für Meteorologie Eberhard Reimer.
Climate modeling Current state of climate knowledge – What does the historical data (temperature, CO 2, etc) tell us – What are trends in the current observational.
This is the footer WRF : “Great North Run” and COPS Ralph Burton, NCAS (Leeds) Alan Gadian, NCAS (Leeds) Alison Coals, NCAS (Leeds)
1 AirWare : R elease R5.3 beta AERMOD/AERMET DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen AUSTRIA
Atmospheric Analysis Lecture 3.
John J. Cassano - University of Colorado Wieslaw Maslowski -Naval Postgraduate School William Gutowski - Iowa State University Dennis Lettenmaier – University.
Hector simulation We found simulation largely depending on: Model initialization scheme Lateral boundary conditions Physical processes represented in the.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 Evaluation of WRF Using High-Resolution Soil Initial Conditions from the NASA Land.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 2011 WRF Modeling Model Performance Evaluation University of North Carolina (UNC-IE)
Evaporative heat flux (Q e ) 51% of the heat input into the ocean is used for evaporation. Evaporation starts when the air over the ocean is unsaturated.
Jamie Wolff Jeff Beck, Laurie Carson, Michelle Harrold, Tracy Hertneky 15 April 2015 Assessment of two microphysics schemes in the NOAA Environmental Modeling.
Tanya L. Otte and Robert C. Gilliam NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC (In partnership with U.S. EPA National Exposure Research.
JSS17BIO1Huttula Lecture set Temperature models.
GLOBAL PATTERNS OF THE CLIMATIC ELEMENTS: (1) SOLAR ENERGY (Linked to solar insolation & R, net radiation)
Regional Climate Modeling in the Source Region of Yellow River with complex topography using the RegCM3: Model validation Pinhong Hui, Jianping Tang School.
ASSIMILATION OF GOES-DERIVED CLOUD PRODUCTS IN MM5.
Chris Birchfield Atmospheric Sciences, Spanish minor.
Development of WRF-CMAQ Interface Processor (WCIP)
Mesoscale Modeling Review the tutorial at: –In class.
Modelling surface mass balance and water discharge of tropical glaciers The case study of three glaciers in La Cordillera Blanca of Perú Presented by:
Coupled Climate Models OCEAN-ATMOSPHEREINTERACTIONS.
EGU General Assembly C. Cassardo 1, M. Galli 1, N. Vela 1 and S. K. Park 2,3 1 Department of General Physics, University of Torino, Italy 2 Department.
Understanding the USEPA’s AERMOD Modeling System for Environmental Managers Ashok Kumar Abhilash Vijayan Kanwar Siddharth Bhardwaj University of Toledo.
Verification and Case Studies for Urban Effects in HIRLAM Numerical Weather Forecasting A. Baklanov, A. Mahura, C. Petersen, N.W. Nielsen, B. Amstrup Danish.
Dataset Development within the Surface Processes Group David I. Berry and Elizabeth C. Kent.
Coupling of the Common Land Model (CLM) to RegCM in a Simulation over East Asia Allison Steiner, Bill Chameides, Bob Dickinson Georgia Institute of Technology.
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Conditional verification of all COSMO countries: first.
1/26 APPLICATION OF THE URBAN VERSION OF MM5 FOR HOUSTON University Corporation for Atmospheric Research Sylvain Dupont Collaborators: Steve Burian, Jason.
Partnership for AiR Transportation Noise and Emission Reduction An FAA/NASA/TC-sponsored Center of Excellence MCIP2AERMOD: A Prototype Tool for Preparing.
INSTYTUT METEOROLOGII I GOSPODARKI WODNEJ INSTITUTE OF METEOROLOGY AND WATER MANAGEMENT TITLE : IMPLEMENTATION OF MOSAIC APPROACH IN COSMO AT IMWM AUTHORS:
An air quality information system for cities with complex terrain based on high resolution NWP Viel Ødegaard, r&d department.
Introduction to and validation of MM5/VIC modeling system.
Evaluating forecasts of the evolution of the cloudy boundary layer using radar and lidar observations Andrew Barrett, Robin Hogan and Ewan O’Connor Submitted.
Comparison of HIRLAM data with Sodankylä soundings – tools and results Evgeny Atlaskin Russina State Hydrometeorological University Saint-Petersburg.
Modeling and Evaluation of Antarctic Boundary Layer
Surface Energy Budget R = - (G + H + L )
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Component testing of the COSMO model’s turbulent diffusion.
Evaluation of cloudy convective boundary layer forecast by ARPEGE and IFS Comparisons with observations from Cabauw, Chilbolton, and Palaiseau  Comparisons.
Parameterization of the Planetary Boundary Layer -NWP guidance Thor Erik Nordeng and Morten Køltzow NOMEK 2010 Oslo 19. – 23. April 2010.
A revised formulation of the COSMO surface-to-atmosphere transfer scheme Matthias Raschendorfer COSMO Offenbach 2009 Matthias Raschendorfer.
Meteorological Variables 1. Local right-hand Cartesian coordinate 2. Polar coordinate x y U V W O O East North Up Dynamic variable: Wind.
Evaluation of the Noah-MP Land Surface Model in WRFV3.4
Coupled atmosphere-ocean simulation on hurricane forecast
IMPROVING HURRICANE INTENSITY FORECASTS IN A MESOSCALE MODEL VIA MICROPHYSICAL PARAMETERIZATION METHODS By Cerese Albers & Dr. TN Krishnamurti- FSU Dept.
Weather forecasting in a coupled world
INFLUX: Comparisons of modeled and observed surface energy dynamics over varying urban landscapes in Indianapolis, IN Daniel P. Sarmiento, Kenneth Davis,
Conditional verification of all COSMO countries: first results
Non rotating planet.
RegCM3 Lisa C. Sloan, Mark A. Snyder, Travis O’Brien, and Kathleen Hutchison Climate Change and Impacts Laboratory Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences.
REGIONAL AND LOCAL-SCALE EVALUATION OF 2002 MM5 METEOROLOGICAL FIELDS FOR VARIOUS AIR QUALITY MODELING APPLICATIONS Pat Dolwick*, U.S. EPA, RTP, NC, USA.
TFMM – Trends Available Meteorological Forcing
WRAP 2014 Regional Modeling
Presentation transcript:

Institute for Environment and Sustainability1 Meteorology

Institute for Environment and Sustainability2 METEOROLOGY (I) Computational Domains: D1 D2

Institute for Environment and Sustainability3 METEOROLOGY (II) MM5 runs: (1): 28 periods of 14 days with restart (2): 28 independent periods of 14 days with 4 days spin-up 2-way nested domains: D1 and D2 D1: resolution 6x6 km (95x65 cells) D2: resolution 2x2 km (136x112 cells) 24 vertical layers (up to 12 km) WRF run: Similar to MM5(1) with 5 km (115x79 cells) and 2.5 km (95x87 cells)

Institute for Environment and Sustainability4 METEOROLOGY (III) Meteo availability: MM5: cdf format: D1 365 x 161 Mb ~ 60 Gb D2 365 x 390 Mb ~ 142 Gb WRF: cdf format: D1 365 x 161 Mb ~ 75 Gb D2 365 x 390 Mb ~ 68 Gb TRAMPER:? Transfer: USB disk? Grid configurations – interpolation on own grid left to each modelling group.

Institute for Environment and Sustainability5 Variable descriptionUnitDim East-West wind component m/s XYZT North-south wind component m/s Vertical wind component m/s Real Temperature K Potential TemperatureK Water vapour mixing ratio kg/kg Cloud water mixing ratio kg/kg Rain water mixing ratio kg/kg Ice cloud mixing ratiokg/kg Snow mixing ratio (snow fraction) kg/kg Graupelkg/kg Momentum diffusion coefficient m2/s Heat diffusion coefficient m2/s Pressure Pa Model half-sigma levels sigma Landuse category corine XY Longitude Deg Latitude Deg Planetary boundary layer height m Variable descriptionUnitDim Surface temperature K XYT Accum. Convective rainfall cm Accum. Non-convective rainfall cm Surface sensible heat flux W/m2 Surface latent heat flux W/m2 Frictional velocity m/s Surface downward shortwave radiation W/m2 Surface downward longwave radiation W/m2 top outgoing shortwave radiation W/m2 top outgoing longwave radiation W/m2 2m real temperature K 2m water mixing ratio Kg/kg 10m U wind component m/s 10m V component of wind m/s Monin –Obukov length m Sea surface temperature K METEOROLOGY (IV) Terrain height, Coriolis, Soil temp, Albedo, Surface moisture,Surface roughness

Institute for Environment and Sustainability6 Meteorological monitoring network and data availability JRC Ispra, 7. March 2008 Po Valley: 464 stations: - Lombardy: 292; - Veneto: 29; - Piedmont: 43; - Emilia-Romagna: 13; - Trentino-Alto Adige: 84; - Aosta Valley: 3. METEOROLOGY (V) Variables: T2, UV10, dirUV10 Validation: Visualisation Tool

Institute for Environment and Sustainability7 JRC Ispra, 7. March 2008 Validation of meteorology Statistical benchmarks Environmental Report: MM5 Performance Evaluation Project, Matthew T. Johnson, Kirk Baker (2001) ParameterGross ErrorBiasRMSE Temperature 2 K 0.5 K Wind Speed 0.5 m/s 2 m/s Wind Direction 30 deg 10 deg METEOROLOGY (VI)

Institute for Environment and Sustainability8 JRC Ispra, 7. March 2008 Po Valley meteorology, example LAMI long-term evaluation: summary, 2006 ParameterRMSE T 2m 3 C (spring/winter) RH 2m for Appenine: overestimation ~20% Wind Speed~ 2.5 m/s (Po Valley, winter) Wind Direction ~ 70 (Po Valley, Appenine) METEOROLOGY (VII)

Institute for Environment and Sustainability9 JRC Ispra, 7. March 2008 Taylor diagram and scatter plots for the annual mean 2 m temperature over all Po Valley stations. METEOROLOGY (VIII)

Institute for Environment and Sustainability10 RMSE (with the 3 C benchmark) and BIAS (with -0.5 C benchmark) for the annual mean 2 m temperature over all Po Valley stations. JRC Ispra, 7. March 2008 METEOROLOGY (IX)

Institute for Environment and Sustainability11 JRC Ispra, 7. March 2008 GE (with the 2 C benchmark) for 2 m temperature for chosen stations (left: Po Valley, right: Lombardy domain). METEOROLOGY (X)

Institute for Environment and Sustainability12 JRC Ispra, 7. March 2008 Taylor diagram and scatter plots for the annual mean 10 m wind speed over all Po Valley stations. METEOROLOGY (XI)

Institute for Environment and Sustainability13 JRC Ispra, 7. March 2008 RMSE (with the 2 m/s benchmark) and BIAS (with the 0.5 m/s benchmark) for the annual mean 10 m wind speed over all Po Valley stations. METEOROLOGY (XII)

Institute for Environment and Sustainability14 JRC Ispra, 7. March 2008 RMSE (with the 2.5 m/s benchmark) for 10 m wind speed (left: winter, right: summer) over all Po Valley stations. METEOROLOGY (XIII)

Institute for Environment and Sustainability15 JRC Ispra, 7. March 2008 Taylor diagram and scatter plots for the annual mean 10 m wind direction over all Po Valley stations. METEOROLOGY (XIV)

Institute for Environment and Sustainability16 JRC Ispra, 7. March 2008 RMSE (with the 70 benchmark and BIAS (with the 10 benchmark) for the annual mean 10 m wind direction over all Po Valley stations. METEOROLOGY (XV)

Institute for Environment and Sustainability17 JRC Ispra, 7. March 2008 GE (with the 30 benchmark) for 10 m wind direction for chosen stations (left: Po Valley, right: Lombardy domain). METEOROLOGY (XVI)

Institute for Environment and Sustainability18 JRC Ispra, 7. March 2008 Conclusions: 1.Both MM5 and WRF produce T2 data with quality corresponding to the statistical benchmarks given by Johnson and Baker and in general – better than it is shown in LAMI long term evaluation for Po Valley (but for other year). However temperatures are slightly underestimated. 2.Both models show large overestimation for wind speeds, although MM5 produces lower RMSE and BIAS values. Benchmark for BIAS is exceeded in both cases. However the values correspond to the example of LAMI. Wind direction has been calculated with similar quality as for the wind speed. 3.The quality of the relative humidity calculations corresponds to the example of LAMI. 4.Evaluation work still on-going 5.Comparison with other meteorological drivers is welcome (e.g TRAMPER,...) METEOROLOGY (XVII)