4-1 Model Input Dollar Value  Dollar value of time  Accident costs  Fuel costs  Emission costs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview Examples of TranSight Applications What Does TranSight Analyze? Model Structure.
Advertisements

Beltline Highway ITS – Ramp Metering Project ODOT Planners Meeting April 25, 2012.
JUSTIFY. Methodology for Measuring NaviGAtor ITS Performance ITS Georgia Annual Meeting 2010 Presented By: Prasoon Sinha, P.E, PTOE Department Manager,
Accidents and Air Quality Models for EMME/2 Marwan AL-Azzawi.
Emission Factor Modeling Graciela Lubertino, HGAC.
How Do Traffic Control Measures Affect Vehicle Gas Emissions Presented by: Ryan O’Connell Co-Authors: Kevin Lu Dr. Wen Cheng Dr. Xudong Jia.
ARC’s Strategic Thoroughfare Plan Bridging the Gap from Travel Demand Model to Micro-Simulation GPA Conference Fall 2012 Presented By: David Pickworth,
By: Pranav Koshiya Committee Member Huaguo Zhou, PhD 1 CE 491 dacq/idotmapdistrict.gif.
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MANAGEMENT. PURPOSE Purpose: Foster understanding through development of educational outreach materials Illustrate benefits and basic techniques.
1 Travel Model Application for Highway Vehicle Emission Estimation Ho-Chuan Chen, Ph.D., P.E. King County Department of Transportation Seattle, Washington.
Coordinated Highways Action Response Team -Performance and Benefits- Dr. Gang-Len Chang Department of Civil Engineering University of Maryland February,
Economic Analysis in Transportation Systems CE 7640: Fall 2002 Prof. Tapan K. Datta, Ph.D., P.E.
Evaluation Tools to Support ITS Planning Process FDOT Research #BD presented to Model Advancement Committee presented by Mohammed Hadi, Ph.D., PE.
Gresham Traffic Signal System Optimization A Comprehensive Evaluation of Corridor Performance After Deploying Adaptive Signal Control.
June 16, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Michael Rose Evaluation of the “COMET” Incident Response Program Oregon Department of Transportation.
2015 GDOT PowerPoint Title Page
Benefit Cost Analysis For Intersection Driver Support Systems David Levinson & Xi Zou 2004.
SUMMARY OF BENEFITS AND RETURN ON INVESTMENT GPS FLEET TRACKING.
1 Calculating Mode Shift and Congestion Relief-Related Greenhouse Gas Displacement For the Current Year (see last slide for contact information)
May 10, 2011 Life-cycle Benefit-Cost Analysis of Alternatives for Accommodating Heavy Truck Traffic in the Las Vegas Roadway Network Dr. Alexander Paz,
Network Benefit Cost Analysis: An Overview of the Application of NET_BC Software for Caltrans District 5’s System Analysis Study TRB Planning Applications.
Odysa ® Experiences with an individual “green wave” Marcel Willekens / Arjan Bezemer / Kristiaan Langelaar.
An Intelligent Transportation System Evaluation Tool in the FSUTMS Regional Demand Modeling Environment By Mohammed Hadi, Florida International University.
ITS Sketch Planning Tool Webinar 2:00 – 4:00 PM January 8, 2009.
AT Benefit Cost Analysis Model Highway Design, Project Management and Training Section Technical Standards Branch Presented by Bill Kenny, Director: Design,
Benefit Cost Analysis for WRTM Mike Lawrence Jack Faucett Associates ITS PCB T3 Webinar July 8, 2014.
Kip Billings, P.E. Andy Li, Phd Wasatch Front Regional Council October 14, 2010.
Fast Forward Full Speed Ahead Presented at the Joint ITS Georgia / Tennessee Annual Meeting September 25, 2006 by Carla W. Holmes, P.E., PTOE Georgia Department.
Simpson County Travel Demand Model Mobility Analysis November 7, 2003.
Incident Management in Central Arkansas: Current Settings and Proposed Extensions Weihua Xiao Yupo Chan University of Arkansas at Little Rock.
Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance.
2-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
HDM-4 Road User Costs Model Version 2.00 Rodrigo Archondo-Callao February 18, 2010
SHRP 2 TOOL EXAMPLES Minnesota Pilot Test Site 1.
Benefit-Cost Analysis of the SMART SunGuide Operations in Fort Lauderdale, Florida June 2006 Steve Corbin District ITS Operations Manager FDOT District.
Abstract Transportation sustainability is of increasing concern to professionals and the public. This project describes the modeling and calculation of.
Maintenance & Rehabilitation Strategies Lecture 5.
November 15, 2005 Dr. Robert Bertini Dr. Sue Ahn Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of a System-wide Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) System.
Abstract Transportation sustainability is of increasing concern to professionals and the public. This project describes modeling, calculation, and necessary.
Environmental Impacts Socio-Economic Environment Land Use Transportation System Design & Construction of Facilities Operations & Maintenance Activities.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
Emission Inventories and EI Data Sets Sarah Kelly, ITEP Les Benedict, St. Regis Mohawk Tribe.
Calibrating Model Speeds, Capacities, and Volume Delay Functions Using Local Data SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting February 6, 2009 Dean Lawrence.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop presented by Krista Jeannotte Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March.
Emission Inventory Basics & Collecting Data Alice Edwards & Clint Farr ADEQ Air Non-Point & Mobile Source Program.
Missoula Air Quality Conformity Analysis Required by Federal and Montana Clean Air Act – Transportation-specific air quality requirements enacted in Federal.
Portland State University 11 By Maisha Mahmud Li Huan Evaluation Of SCATS Adaptive Traffic Signal Control System.
Utah Research Benefits Value of Research Taskforce July 29, 2015 Cameron Kergaye Utah Department of Transportation.
Interstate 95 Managed Lanes PD&E Study (95 Express) Project Development and Environment Study SE FSUTMS Users Group The Corradino Group November 2, 2007.
Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of a System-wide Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) System Data Collection Plan / Experimental Design May.
Term Paper Presentation Course: CVEN 632 Presented by: Shailendra Matoria Evaluating Electronic Toll Collection System against Conventional Toll Plaza.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 9 January 19, 2016.
2007 Urban Mobility Report Principal Speaking Points.
Performance Measures Used in the DFW Region – How to Track and Report the M & O Investment and Results AMPO Management and Operations Work Group September.
1 Air Pollution Automobile Emissions: An Overview Emissions from an individual car
Do Mobility-Based Performance Measures Reflect Emissions Trends? Congestion and Emissions Co-performance Alex Bigazzi & Dr. Miguel Figliozzi ITE Western.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Performance Measurement.
ATDM Analytical Methods for Urban Streets Urban Streets Subcommittee Meeting January 10, 2016 David Hale.
Safer Work Zones Through ITS Interim Traffic Management System Florida Department of Transportation Tahira Faquir.
Road Investment Decision Framework
Caldwell and Wilson (1999) 1. Determine primary rating factor for a road section based on traffic volume and user types 2. Primary rating factor is then.
Performance Measure Exploration Preparing for the 2018 RTP
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
TRB Application Conference
Sensitivity Analysis Update
Improving Transportation Inventories Summary of February 14th Webinar
  Advanced Tools to Assess Managed Toll Lane Operations Model Task Force Toll Subcommittee Meeting September 16, 2010.
Performance Measurement
Presentation transcript:

4-1 Model Input Dollar Value  Dollar value of time  Accident costs  Fuel costs  Emission costs

4-2 Model Input Equipment and Costs  Discount rate

4-3 Model Input Equipment and Costs (Con’t)  Equipment and unit costs for incident management, DMS, and HAR

4-4 Modeling Procedure  Deployment  Performance measures and benefits  Costs  Benefit/Cost ratio Overall Structure

4-5 Travel Time  Loop over all the analysis periods  Calculate the traffic volume during the study period  Prepare the calculation of travel time on alternative route  Calculate incident delay and total time savings  Save the performance and benefits for each analysis period Example of Modeling Procedures

4-6 Safety  Loop over all the analysis periods  Calculate number of fatalities, injuries, PDO  Calculate accident costs  Save the performance and benefits for each analysis period Performance Measures and Benefits

4-7 Fuel Consumption  Loop over all the analysis periods  Calculate vehicle miles in queue and fuel consumption in queue  Calculate fuel savings  Save the performance and benefits for each analysis period Performance Measures and Benefits

4-8 Model Output Summary of Performance  Incident delay in vehicle-hour  Number of accidents  Fuel consumption in gallons

4-9 Model Output Summary of Performance (Con’t)  Emissions in grams  Number of road ranger activities

4-10 Model Output Summary of Annual Benefits for Each Period

4-11 Model Output Summary of Benefits and Costs

Assessment Elements Performance modules (emission, fuel consumption, safety, TT) ITS impacts ITS costs Dollar values of benefits

Time-of-Day Analysis can be conducted using Daily and Time- of-Day Model The benefits for each analysis time period calculated separately and summed to produce the total For peak period models, modules are applied to each period module and the benefits are summed. For daily models, period-specific multiplication factors utilized to convert the daily link volume to analysis period volumes default factors derived on data from Broward County state roads.

Performance Measures Vehicle miles of travel (VMT); Vehicle hours of travel (VHT); Average speed; Number of accidents Fatality Injury Property damage only Fuel Consumption (gallons) Monetary benefits to users and/or agency, as appropriate Emission (gm) Hydrocarbon Carbon monoxide Oxides of Nitrogen

Benefit Evaluation Methods A method developed for each component Review and assessment of methods used in evaluation tools Review of literature Default ITS impact parameters derived based on a review of previous evaluation studies, USDOT benefit database and the values used in existing ITS sketch planning tools. The user will be able to change the default ITS impact parameters and perform sensitivity analysis.

ITS Cost The cost information include the number and types of equipment required for each type of evaluated ITS deployment The cost information include initial cost, operation and maintenance cost, estimated interest rate, and life time of each equipment Based on information from ITS agencies collected in a previous FDOT effort and information collected in this study User can change the defaults and is encouraged to do this based on projects at hand

Dollar Values Travel Time value is dollars per person-hour. For commercial vehicles $71.0 per hour based on TTI study. $3,200,000 per fatal crash, $74,730 per injury crash, and $3,000 per PDO crash Fuel Consumption $3 per Gallon Emission using IDAS defaults -  $1,774, $3,731, and $3,889 per gallon, for the HC, NOx, and CO pollutants.

Air Pollution Dollar Values IDAS does not mention the source of the dollar values Pollution impacts human health and causes ecological and esthetic degradations Review indicates that IDAS values could be conservative estimates. Thus, they were used in this study.

ITS impact parameters Default ITS impact parameters derived based on a review of previous evaluation studies, US DOT JPO benefit database and the values used in existing ITS sketch planning tools. The user will be able to change the default ITS impact parameters and do sensitivity analysis.

Fuel Consumption (Freeways)

Fuel Consumption (Arterials)

Emission Module (CO 2000)

Emission Module (CO 2030)

Safety Module IDAS model modified for Florida conditions v/c versus PDO, injury, and fatality crash rate per MVM

V/CFatality InjuryPDO Freeway AutoArterial Auto Freeway Truck Arterial Truck Freeway Auto Arterial Auto Freeway Truck Arterial Truck 0.09 A constant of for freeways and for arterials

Case Study

Case Study Results

DMS Benefits Peak Period IDAS Method Implemented in FSUTMS Enhanced Method Implemented in FSUTMS AM Peak Period$1,010,503$1,511,443 PM Peak Period$1,552,072$3,664,827 Off-Peak Period$5,246,229$1,105,612 Total$7,808,804$6,281,882