1 Bridging long-term scenario and strategy analysis: current practice and future directions in environmental policy The 3rd International Seville Conference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why does ERA Need to Flourish
Advertisements

Impact Assessment in the policy cycle at the European Commission
Research and the Lisbon Strategy - giving renewed impetus to ERA European Research Area New Perspectives Green Paper COM(2007)161 James Gavigan - Euopean.
Southern Voices networks Asia Consortium and networks.
Mutual accountability and aid transparency Mutual accountability and aid transparency Republic of Moldova 1IATI meeting, OECD Conference center.
Leveraging inter-sectoral action to address the social determinants of health: view from the health system Lucy Gilson University of Cape Town; London.
1 A review of Evaluation and Impact Assessment by DAC Heads of Information in 2006 Ida Mc Donnell Annual Meeting of DAC HoI Canberra May 2006.
OECD World Forum Statistics, Knowledge and Policy, Palermo, November
29 July 2007 Association of the Lebanese Software Industry (ALSI) Joe Abi-Aad President of ALSI Lebanon Soft Shore The result of a successful collaboration.
ClimDev-Africa Program & African Climate Policy Center (ACPC)
1 POLICY ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BY: M.B. WILLIAMS DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY.
Delivering as One UN Albania October 2009 – Kigali.
Forward Look Long Range Plan 2010 Scoping Workshop Dr. Thibaut Lery Science Officer Frankfurt Oct.2009.
LAO PDR Summary Findings from NOSPA Mission and Possible Next Steps.
Assessment of administrative and institutional capacity
Research and Innovation Why does ERA Need to Flourish ERA - State of Play Octavi Quintana Trias Brussels, 19th April 2013.
1 Reflections on the future Cohesion Policy DG Regional Policy European Commission.
Second International Seville Seminar on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA): Impacts on policy and decision making 28th- 29th September 2006 Foresight.
Partnerships: influencing local economic and employment development Brussels, October 9th, 2007 Gabriela Miranda Policy Analyst OECD, LEED Programme.
Technical meeting with the Regional representative offices in Brussels Brussels, 17 March 2009 The INTERACT II Programme – Knowledge Management and Capitalisation.
FUTURE SCENARIOS TO INSPIRE INNOVATION Peter De Smedt & Kristian Borch SVR (BE) DTU (DK) Theme 3b: Creative futures The 4th International Seville Conference.
Regions for Economic Change: Networking for Results LMP Workshop 3C: When exchanging is good for innovation: Experiences from the Lisbon Monitoring Platform.
1 Background EEA A European Union institution Established by EU Regulation Staff: about 80 Budget: 22 Meuro Copenhagen EEA home page:
1 Regional Policy investing in ecosystems & green infrastructure for regional development Mathieu Fichter Policy Analyst Environment European Commission.
Normative-narrative scenarios as a tool to support strategic R&D processes: benefits and limits Hannah Kosow, Dr. Robert Gaßner IZT – Institute for Futures.
Embedding Foresight in the Joint Programming in Research
POLISH PRESIDENCY IN THE EU: COHESION POLICY AND EVALUATION-RELATED ACTIVITIES Presentation of Objectives and Programme Stanisław Bienias, Ministry of.
IPTS workshop on ICTs for learning the host country language by adult migrants in the EU Seville 1-2 October Welcome and Introduction Clara Centeno.
Consistent context scenarios: a new approach to ‘story and simulation’
Structural and Cohesion Funds – an Important Tool to Support Climate Protection Improving the climate resilience of Cohesion Policy Funding Programmes:
| | Learning from EuroHealthNets Health Inequalities Projects.
Trend of international discussions on the UNFCCC
FOREST EUROPE Preparing the Sixth Ministerial Conference, including a possible legal instrument on forests EFI Annual Conference 15 September 2010, Dresden,
Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building
STATE OF TRANSPORT CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION ACTIONS IN EEA COUNTRIES, RECENT EXPERIENCES Natalia Sobrino (TRANSyT- UPM) ETC/CCA Task Adaptation.
Results from the UK The National Ecosystem Assessment and its utilisation Dr. Robert Bradburne Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs May 2013.
C ZECH BLOSSOM CASE STUDY FLIS Blossom meeting 17 –18 June 2013, Copenhagen Klára Vočadlová CENIA, czech environmental information agency.
Findings from a survey of HGIEs in eight countries and policy implications Mutual Learning Seminar Session II: Policies to support high-growth innovative.
CARMEN Policy Observatory and Dialogue Proposal Presentation to the CARMEN Directing Board Meeting San Juan, Puerto Rico 30 June 2003.
Tools and Methodologies in Assessing Technology Needs: An Overview Contact: Prof. Zou Ji Dept. of Environmental Economics and Management Renmin University.
The Use and Impact of FTA Attila Havas and Ron Johnston Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, and Australian Centre for Innovation Third.
IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre 31 May 2013 Monitoring for Learning and developing Capacities in WASH 1.
Developing an Evaluation Strategy – experience in DFID Nick York Director – Country, Corporate and Global Evaluations, World Bank IEG Former Chief Professional.
European Roadmaps for Research Infrastructures presentation by Hans Chang (chair ESFRI) (1st meeting ESFRI Steering Groups, autumn 2005)
WP3: Fixing RES-H/C targets Lukas Kranzl, Andreas Müller RES-H Policy Kick-off, October 2008.
BLOSSOM in Hungary FLIS BLOSSOM meeting June 2013, Copenhagen Szandra Szomor Hungarian Ministry of Rural Development, Department of Strategy.
Interest Group Climate & Adaptation within the network of European EPAs Jelle van Minnen Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL)
BISE platform on Ecosystem assessments EIONET Biodiversity NRC – European CHM network November 2012, Copenhagen, EEA Valérie LAPORTE.
© UKCIP 2011 Learning and Informing Practice: The role of knowledge exchange Roger B Street Technical Director Friday, 25 th November 2011 Crew Project.
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation Inspiring other policy domains – towards the establishment of a European.
Building open regional innovation strategies: New opportunities provided by Smart Specialisation Strategies Claire Nauwelaers Independent STI policy expert.
ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme EU Stakeholder consultation 27 March 2013 ESPON renewal, refocus and upgrade: Mission, Priority Axes, Specific Objectives,
IMPROVING POLICY MAKING WHAT ARE THE OPTIONS FOR GOVERNMENTS? An OECD Perspective Stephane Jacobzone OECD Public Governance and Territorial Development.
Knowledge base for Forward- Looking Information and Assessment (FLIS) Development of a platform to support long-term decision making.
Climate Change – Defra’s Strategy & Priorities Dr Steven Hill Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs 22 nd May 2007 FLOODING DESTRUCTION AT.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Stakeholder Workshop Brussels – 5 February 2014 INTERREG EUROPE Nicolas Singer | Senior Project Officer INTERREG IVC.
EPRC Conference conclusions - Collaboration initiative for sustainable regional Arctic development ARC-NET 1.
How to measure the impact of R&D on SD ? Laurence Esterle, MD, PhD Cermes and Ifris France Cyprus, 16 – 17 October L. ESTERLE Linking science and.
Networking, capacity building and institutional setup.
Bridging LOng-term Scenario and Strategy analysis – Organisation and Methods Workshop introduction 29th and 30th of April 2008 Copenhagen.
Monitoring, reporting and evaluating climate change adaptation policies at national level in Europe - An overview of where we stand Stéphane Isoard, EEA.
Version VTT TECHNOLOGY STUDIES Evaluating the societal impacts of Public research organisations: A (belated) paradigm shift in the making Kaisa.
Stimulating innovation in engaged practice and developing institutional cultures that support it 3. Capacity building and skills development  Supporting.
ARIMNet Presentation ARIMNet A cooperative network for Agricultural Research in the Mediterranean Michel DODET Coordinator.
EU Horizon 2020 Coordination and support action Enhancing ecoSysteM sERvices mApping for poLicy and Decision mAking Project coordinator: Benjamin Burkhard,
FORESIGHT WHY? WHAT? HOW? by Sergio Azzopardi.
Fitness Check EU Water Policy
Being a Local University: Towards New Assessment Tools and Indicators Dr John H Smith Senior Adviser, European University Association (EUA) Brussels Member,
Date and venue: 23 September, MSFD PCG, DG Environment, Brussels
Preparatory meeting for the establishment of the Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD 13 November :00-13:30 European.
Presentation transcript:

1 Bridging long-term scenario and strategy analysis: current practice and future directions in environmental policy The 3rd International Seville Conference on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA): Impacts and implications for policy and decision making Axel Volkery Scenarios and Forward Studies Group

2 The European Environment Agency A specialised European Agency based in Copenhagen 32 member countries Mission is to provide timely, targeted, relevant and reliable information on the state and prospects of Europes environment

3 BLOSSOM project BLOSSOM = Bridging LOng-term Scenario and Strategy analysis – Organisation and Methods Take stock of existing practice Analyse institutional approaches Review methodological approaches Foster information exchange and learning First phase run in 2008 as a scoping activity together with RAND Europe

4 Direct and indirect forms of scenario based decision-support… IndirectDirect Stimulating wider debate about possible futures Getting stakeholder buy-in or engagement Triggering cultural change within the organisation Clarifying an issues importance and framing a decision-making agenda Generating options for future action Appraising robustness of options for future action

5...across the cycle of policy-making More indirect forms More direct forms

6 Estimating the outcomes/impacts of scenarios in public policy making Source: draft AoA, UNEP/UNESCO, adapted from Eckley 2001 Influences from scenarios/foresight exercises may take considerable time to become evident (see Mitchell et al for a similar assessment of the influence of Global Environmental Assessments)

7 Literature review 54 suitable pieces were identified The evaluative literature remains nascent - major gaps identified: Factors that influence the effectiveness and efficiency of uptake of scenarios / other foresight tools Failure of related exercises SWOT for institutional arrangements Case studies beyond the world of business

8 Workshop participants survey

9

10 Workshop participants survey

11 Bridging scenario and strategy analysis Source: adapted from van der Heijden (2004), Barre (2007) One-off / ad-hoc (more product- oriented) Ongoing / permanent (more process- oriented) Thinking (broadening/ opening up) Making senseAnticipation Acting (closing) Optimal strategyAdaptive learning

12 Barriers Particular challenges Heterogenous nature of objectives and interests faced by governmental agencies Weak institutionalisation, silo mentality, unclear benefits Different time horizons, but also different attention foci of policy-makers and analysts Contradictions between process and product functions Contradictions between deliberative and representative democracy

13 Key topics User and stakeholder participation Making knowledge useful Linking strategic planning to the policy cycle / timing Skills and capacity Accountability and incentives Organisational choices

14 Clustering approaches OngoingAd-hoc Cross- sector ExternalUK-Foresight Horizon Scanning Centre FISTERA Numerous long-term strategic analysis studies InternalUK-Foresight Horizon Scanning Centre Finland Futures Centre Centre danalyse stratégique, France Swedish inter-ministerial foresight network Sector- based ExternalUK Climate Impacts ProgrammeTyndall Centre, UK InternalDepartmental Strategy units (e.g. NL Dept of Agriculture) UK Meteorological Office IPCC RMNO (NL) Source: EEA forthcoming

15 Some options to consider Virtual network or physical location? Interdep. steering groups or not? Centralised or decentralised? Government funded or contribution based? Temporary or permanent? Formalised inputs or space for discussion? In-built or outsourced expertise? Expert-led or stakeholder-driven? Issue-based network or think tank with own agenda?

16 Outlook on EEA activities Technical report available soon in 2009: review and compare practice in greater depth across EEA member countries More systemic comparison of advantages / disadvantages of approaches Build toolbox matrix Better understanding how to evaluate impacts and effectivness Networking - your cooperation is highly welcome...

17 Thank you Dr. Axel Volkery European Environment Agency Kongens Nytorv 6 DK – 1050 Copenhagen K