Why SAR ? (Support for ACCOMMODATIONS Request) Needed Bridge from High school to Higher Education for students with IEPs. Enhanced communication/ consistent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rubrics for Transition IV: for Students with Severe Disabilities by Dr
Advertisements

Special Education as an Alternative to Academic Failure.
The Impact of RTI on Learning Disabilities Identification.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Module 1: IEP Overview – A Plan for Guiding Instruction and Service Provision.
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
THE IEP PROCESS Cassie A. Newson. Purpose of Initial Evaluation  To see if the child is a “child with a disability,” as defined by IDEA  To gather information.
Section 504 and ADAAA Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
February 21,  Postsecondary follow-up surveys for students in Iowa have shown that students with a disability are significantly less likely to.
The Special Education Process 1 Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators.
Learning Support Program
Entitlement vs. Eligibility The Differences Between Public and Postsecondary Education for Individuals With Disabilities March 30, 2011 Gus Ekhardt, M.Ed.
 Independent educational evaluation (IEE) - an evaluation conducted by a qualified examiner or examiners who are not employed by the local educational.
“Service Only” Plans and Special Education Related Services Karen R. McNamara Director of Student Services Wrentham Public Schools.
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network 1.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
Victoria Perez Licensed Specialist in School Psychology Intern/ Diagnostician for HHS.
ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL How to Select, Administer, and Evaluate Use of Accommodations for Instruction and Assessment of Students with Disabilities.
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
What should be the basis of
ELIGIBILITY PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES Chapter Seventeen.
Special Education Adrienne Lacey-Bushell, Ed.D. Director Special Education.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
1 PROPOSED REORGANIZATION STUDENT SERVICES DIRECTOR DOVER, SHERBORN, AND DOVER-SHERBORN REGIONAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS WINTER, 2012.
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
Identification & Evaluation Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
ARC Chairperson Training Introduction 1. The Language of Special Education Acronyms 2.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
Individualized Education Plan (IEP) GOALS: Provide an understanding of your role as well as other professionals involved. Demystify the basic workings.
Sally Simich, Keith Ozols, and Peter FitzGerald Hood River, Oregon February 2013.
Inclusion: Effective Practices for All Students, 1e McLeskey/Rosenberg/Westling © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved What.
Sally Simich. IDEA 2004 Requires a SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE: “a local educational agency shall provide the child with a summary of the child's academic.
Intervention 1: Sent out example of monthly time card including dates, etc. Intervention 2: Along with continuing intervention 1, public posting and treats.
Making the Grade Grading Practices for Students with Disabilities By Cathy Sartain Industries
Pathfinder Parent Center South Valley Special Education Unit John Porter, Director
January 15, Utilization of the Personal Curriculum.
ACT Now Achieving College Transitions Now: Implementation Strategies for Secondary Youth.
Special Education 101  Special education is:  general and special education teachers working together to meet the needs of a disabled student.  provisions.
Oregon Department of Education March 10, 2005 Video Conference Title ID Subpart 2 Formal Agreements with Facilities to Provide Academic Programs.
Significant Developmental Delay Annual State Superintendent’s Conference on Special Education and Pupil Services October 20-21, 2015.
1 The Development of a Compliant and Instructionally-Relevant Individualized Education Plan Solitia Wilson ADMS 625 Summer 2014.
WISCONSIN’S NEW RULE FOR SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES Effective December 1, 2010.
What are the Differences Between Targeted and Schoolwide Title I Programs?
Collaboration. © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2  Collaboration refers to “ongoing participation of two or more individuals who are.
Under 34 CFR , the public agency must conduct a full and individual evaluation Under 34 CFR , the public agency must ensure: The child is.
Overview of the IEP as a tool in order to access, participate, and make progress in the general curriculum 1.
The Standards-based IEP Process: What You Need to Know Standards-Based IEP State-Directed Project - January 2011.
“ IT IS PROOF NOT TRUTH” THE IEP IS THE PROOF Dr. Jodi Roseman Director of Special Education School District of Springfield Township.
Please sit in the table marked for your subject area.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
IEP Participation Special Education Paraprofessional Workbook Module 3.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) 1990 What Teachers Should know about Title II – Public Educational Institutions. Presented by Janie Beverley.
The PDA Center is funded by the US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Stories from the Field and from our Consumers Building.
Testing Students with Disabilities. Resources Appendix C of Test Administration Manuals – SCPASS Science and Social Studies – End-of-Course English 1.
IEP Participation Special Education Paraprofessional Workbook Module 3.
Chapter 16 Special Education for Gifted Students, Basic Education Circular, and Legal Decisions January 11 & 12, 2007.
Special Education Process Foley Elementary School.
Navigating the Education System as a Preemie Advocate
Exceptionalities Guideline
CHAPTER 2: Steps in the Assessment Process
Working with Transitioning Youth
Standards-aligned IEPs
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Supporting our students in ocsu
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
IEP and the ARD Process.
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12
Presentation transcript:

Why SAR ? (Support for ACCOMMODATIONS Request) Needed Bridge from High school to Higher Education for students with IEPs. Enhanced communication/ consistent process Collaborative Solutions

Context for Developing SAR The environment Non-categorical, k-12 Categorical/designation—Higher Education Differing criteria Lack of consistency between disability services providers of higher education

UNDERSTANDING DIFFERENCES Entitled Individual – Secondary Individuals birth-21 who are determined through an individualized evaluation conducted by a team, including the parent, to be eligible and in need of specially designed instruction.

UNDERSTANDING DIFFERENCES Eligible Individual – Higher Education The disability must have a demonstrated impact on the individual’s ability to perform academically. The individual must be otherwise qualified for the program meeting, including meeting university admission requirements.

UNDERSTANDING DIFFERENCES Who makes the decision? High School Individuals are determined entitled by the IEP team based upon a preponderance of data from multiple sources. Higher Education Individuals are determined eligible by the service provider using documentation provided by outside sources.

UNDERSTANDING DIFFERENCES Who must “prove” disability? Secondary School are required to identify students who need assistance. Laws govern how to document the need. Higher Education Individuals are required to self-identify and show “proof” of their disability. Laws do NOT provide guidance for documenting a disability.

Elements in the Form  Eligibility/Diagnostic Statement  Formal Diagnosis/Date (when available)  Basis for Determination  Current Functional Impact  Response to Instructional Intervention  Progression/Stability of the disability

Elements in the Form  History of Accommodations 9 th -12 th Grade  Suggested Accommodations  Signature Name, Title, Organization, Telephone  Authorization for Release of Information  Student Statement of Goals 3-5 sentences describing hopes to accomplish

Benefits for All Comprehensive Dates—eligibility, assessment, intervention Basis for determination History—intervention, accommodations Current functional impact Student Involvement/Insight

Benefits For the Student Relevant Summarizes relevant information Provides perspective on what has worked Student articulation/advocacy Manageable/Portable

Benefits for Higher Education Relevant Summarizes relevant information Provides perspective on what has worked Student articulation/advocacy Manageable/Portable

Benefits for Secondary Relevant Summarizes relevant information Provides perspective on what has worked Student articulation/advocacy Manageable/Portable

Benefits Consistent Within agency Across agency Multi-agency Alignment of expectations Not consensus but uniformity