THE NIH SUBMISSION AND ASSIGNMENT PROCESS Suzanne E. Fisher, Ph.D Director, Division of Receipt and Referral Center for Scientific Review January 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NIH Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Grants (R15) SOT 2010 Mike Humble, PhD Program Administrator Division of Extramural Research and Training.
Advertisements

Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Early Stage Investigators and the Program Perspective
NIH and New and Early Stage Investigators
Why R03? Something is better than nothing The R03 (Small Grant) mechanism supports small research projects that can be carried out in a short period of.
FY 2012 NIH Budget Roll-out Francis S. Collins, M.D., Ph.D. Director, NIH.
NIH Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) R15 AASCU November 5, 2009 Mary Ann Guadagno, PhD Office of Extramural Research National Institutes of Health.
Expiring Funds April Update SAC Meeting April 24, 2013.
Laurie Tompkins, PhD Acting Director, Division of Genetics and Developmental Biology NIGMS, NIH Swarthmore College May 14, 2012 NIH 101.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Office of Research Support.  Departmental Grant Manager – Enters information into SPS.  Sponsored Projects System (SPS) is where Grant Managers can.
How Your Application Is Reviewed Vonda Smith, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
The LEADS Database at ICPSR: Identifying Important Social Science Studies for Archiving Presentation prepared for 2006 Annual Meeting of the IASSIST Friday,
Decoding RFAs and PAs Charlotte FlippDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health (EpiCH) Anne EverettDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health (EpiCH)
NIH Brown Bag Lunch SOT 2010 March 9, 2010 Janice Allen, PhD Michael Humble, PhD Division of Extramural Research and Training (DERT) National Institute.
What you need to know about NIH when applying for Research Grant Support May 6, 2015 Franziska B. Grieder, DVM, PhD Director, Office of Research Infrastructure.
What You Need to Know about Application Receipt and Referral
FY 2009 Expired Lines Update & Stale Transactions Guidance SAC Meeting June 23, 2014 Nieshia Blocker.
Finding Funding Opportunities: Choosing the Best Grant for You
The Life Cycle of an NIH Grant Application Alicia Dombroski, Ph.D. Deputy Director Division of Extramural Activities NIDCR.
Program Project & Center Grants – How to Be Competitive The Nuts and Bolts Amy Gantt Office of Proposal Development.
OPERA Electronic Submission of Administrative Supplement and Change of Institution Requests David Curren and Emily Linde Office of Policy for Extramural.
Phuong Thi Kim Pham, National Cancer Institute Speakers
Page Rankings: What do they teach us? Faina Linkov, PhD Ronald LaPorte, PhD And the Global Health Network Supercourse project University of Pittsburgh.
Introduction to the NIH Grants System
Bethesda, MD. NCI National Cancer Institute NCCAM National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine NCMHD National Center for Minority Health.
The R21 Mechanism. Your guide through the R21 jungle* Patricia Parmelee, PhD (Pat to you) * jun’ gle, n.: a confused or disordered mass of objects; something.
The Office of Research Program Development. The Office of Research Program Development (RPD) was established in 1993 to facilitate and foster multidisciplinary.
NCRR American Society of Plant Biologists NIH Science Education Partnership Award (SEPA)
MAY 9, 2012 GRAFTON CAMPUS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES NIH Training & Career Development Awards - Fs & Ks.
NIH Implementation and Guidance Syracuse University Office of Sponsored Programs Stuart Taub.
INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH SUPPORT Kassie M. Obelleiro Funding Opportunities Program Coordinator Rainbow Vogt Editorial Coordinator Pivot: Identifying.
1. Proposal deadline 2. Timeline  A grant opportunity announcement will include a sponsor deadline for receipt of the proposal.  The instructions will.
Electronic Submissions of Grant Applications Muhsin Aboud Principal Investigator, IEARDA Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences.
NIH SMALL GRANT PROGRAM (R03) WORKSHOP: ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY Mindy Solivan.
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.
SUBMITTING AN SBIR/STTR APPLICATION FOR DECEMBER 5? November 25, 2008 National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Suzanne.
National Institutes of Health. Much of the biomedical research in the United States is supported by the Federal Government, primarily the National Institutes.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 5 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
1 ASSOCIATION OF INDEPENDENT RESEARCH INSTITUTES PRESENTATION San Antonio Texas September 24 – 26, 2007.
1 Agenda for CWG Meeting January 6, Update on Commons V 2.0 schedule 2.Close Out/FSR Interface Requirements 3.Discussion of Competitive Application.
Summary of NIH Enhancing Peer Review Implementation Changes to NIH Proposals due on or after January 25, 2010 Slide Content Provided by Dr. Michael Sesma,
NIH F-32 Application Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Awards for Individual Postdoctoral Fellowships
Discovery: Stem Cell Biology Proposed Actions Continue infrastructure award program Characterize cell lines Stimulate more research on basic biology Train.
1 Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD NIH AREA Program Director NIH Regional Seminar Scottsdale, Arizona April 28, 2011.
Components of a Successful AREA (R15) Grant Rebecca J. Sommer Bates College.
1 Preparing an NIH Institutional Training Grant Application Rod Ulane, Ph.D. NIH Research Training Officer Office of Extramural Research, NIH.
FY 2011 Acquisition Charts CHART 1 - Displays total NIH FY 2011 acquisitions in dollars. It is divided into the seven components of acquisition at the.
National Institutes of Health Ask The Experts: SBIR/STTR Grant Application Submissions Webinar November 25, 2008.
Carilion Clinic, Office of Sponsored Projects Frequently Asked Questions Pre-Award Procedures For Principal Investigators.
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Richard E. Swaja, Ph.D. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering BERAC –
1 FEDERAL UPDATES NIH OSP Roundtable March 24, 2011 DHMC.
Alex Galea Assistant Director ORA Review. Grant Instructions: RFA or PA Read through the guidelines carefully Make notes on specifications in the announcement,
Office of Sponsored Projects & Industry Partnerships 1 OSPIP Process Meeting February 3, 2011 NIH Regional Seminar in April New Adobe Forms for NIH Recent.
Expired Funds SAC March 26, 2014 Cristy Perrin, OALM.
1 AIRI Statistics – Trends in NIH Awards Presented at Association of Independent Research Institutes (AIRI) 2008 Annual Meeting September 10, 2008, Washington,
Data provided by the Division of Information Services, Reporting Branch NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH) DATA BOOK Fiscal Year 2010.
JANUARY 10, 2012 SERIES 2, SESSION 2 OF AAPLS – PART 1: INTRODUCTION TO GRANT MECHANISMS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module E:
What University Administrators Need to Know About Getting from Submission to Review Cathleen Cooper, Ph.D. Director, CSR Division of Receipt and Referral.
Proposed Future for the ECB, CAM, & QVR Electronic Council Book (ECB) Council Administration Module (CAM) Query/View/Report (QVR) eRA Project Team July.
Closing FY 2009 Expired Funds- Update SAC April 23, 2014 Cristy Perrin OALM.
Office of Research Support.  Departmental Grant Manager – Enters information into SPS.  Sponsored Projects System (SPS) is where Grant Managers can.
Michael Sesma, Ph.D. National Institute of Mental Health Early Stage Investigators and the Program Perspective.
NIH/AHRQ/NIOSH UPDATES effective January 25, 2017
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
How to Write a Successful NIH Career Development Award (K Award)
How does NIH Work? HRSA PECARN EMS Research Meeting
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
National Institutes of Health
Presentation transcript:

THE NIH SUBMISSION AND ASSIGNMENT PROCESS Suzanne E. Fisher, Ph.D Director, Division of Receipt and Referral Center for Scientific Review January 2002

WHAT’S IN A NAME? n NIH perspective - Receipt and Referral n Applicant perspective - Submission and Assignment n Multiple activities involving a variety of procedures, policies, and decisions – critical to the NIH Extramural process

SUBMISSION n The Division of Receipt and Referral,CSR receives all competitive applications for NIH, also applications for AHRQ, SAMHSA, NIOSH, and small business applications for CDC and FDA –Twenty-four funding components of NIH –More than 46,000 applications/year –Three Receipt/Review/Award cycles per year

THREE FAVORITE TOPICS FOR DRR n I would like permission to submit my application late. n Did you receive my application? I sent it Fed Ex. n I sent my application and then I looked at it…

OPPORTUNITIES ABOUND – A BLESSING AND A CURSE n Many different grant mechanisms used by the Institutes/Centers n Support ranges from individual predoctoral level to very large resources n Each Institute/Center uses a different array of mechanisms and may have special requirements n Investigator-initiated and solicited applications (RFAs) n Application kits and deadlines vary

NIH FUNDING COMPONENTS n NCI n NEI n NHLBI n NHGRI n NIA n NIAAA n NIAID n NIAMS n NICHD n NIDCD n NIDCR n NIDDK n NIDA n NIEHS n NIGMS n NIMH n NINDS n NINR n NLM n NIBIB n NCCAM n NCRR n NCMHD n FIC

COMMON GRANT MECHANISMS n C06 n F31, F32, F33 n K01, K02, K08, K07, K12, K23, K24, K25 n P01 n P20 n P30, P40, P50, P60 n M01 n R01 n R03 n R21 n R25 n R41, R42 n R43, R44 n T32 n U01

STAGES IN PROCESSING OF APPLICATIONS n Loading Dock n Application Receipt n Project Control Unit 1 n Referral n Project Control Unit 2 n Scanning/Duplication/Delivery to review group/IC

LOADING DOCK n Receive packages n Unwrap n The step we know goes away with electronic submissions!

APPLICATION RECEIPT –Date stamp –Accession number –Open and count letters –Separate bulky appendices –Identify RFAs, other applications for special handling

PROJECT CONTROL - UNIT 1 n Record data from page 1, budget, Checklist, Personal Data page n Match any ARAs (Awaiting Receipt of Application) n Identify noncompliant budgets ($500k, modular) n Identify noncompliant forms n Identify potential duplicates n Screen for format compliance n Print PI application history (sponsor history for fellowships)

REFERRAL PROCESS n Make sure application is in compliance with policies and should be assigned –$500k –Modular budget –Format –Revised application –A2/2 year limit –Duplicate applications –Virtual A3s –Supplement time period matches parent grant –HESC –Next policy

REFERRAL PROCESS (cont.) n Determine if NIH or other agency application n CSR or IC review n Assign –New, competing, supplement –Mechanism –Review location –Primary and secondary ICs

PROJECT CONTROL – UNIT 2 n Final data quality check n Final check for compliance (format, budget, etc.) and matching of any ARAs n Generation of unique number for new applications n Prepare application for scanning/duplication and distribution to review and ICs

NONCOMPLIANT APPLICATIONS n Fix directly if possible –Shorten title –Match letters, other material received separately n Contact IC –$500k –Supplements that do not match parent grant

NONCOMPLIANT APPLICATIONS (cont.) n Contact PI to correct –Form –Format –Missing reference letters –Modular Budget –Supplements n Return to PI –Not corrected/or not corrected in time –$500k –Not appropriate for NIH (mechanism/IC)

POST SUBMISSION INTERACTIONS WITH INVESTIGATORS n Add missing information n Replace sections n Assignment suggestions n Assignment changes n On time information

CURRENT PAPER SUBMISSION PROCESS n Poor track record of compliance in many areas –Vertebrate Animals, Human Subjects n Considerable interaction with PIs, institutions, ICs in process n Applications may be held for correction/clarification at various stages of process

ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION – OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES n Completeness/Compliance n Research Plan n Investigator requests n Receipt dates n Equity n Shorten submission to award cycle

COMPLETENESS/COMPLIANCE n Facilitate the submission of complete applications; avoid errors of omission n Facilitate the submission of applications that comply with NIH procedures and policies (and accommodate changes in policies) n Include “other” materials – letters of reference, collaboration, etc. n Minimize post submission corrections n Allow post submission additions n Integrate on-time information n Facilitate administrative review by NIH staff at many levels (referral, review, program, grants management)

RESEARCH PLAN n Enable investigators to present scientific information in a way that they feel makes the best case, shows necessary information in figures, tables, etc. n Apply appropriate limits for text size, font, margins, etc.

INVESTIGATOR REQUESTS n Identification of mechanism and any special requirements n “Self Referral” - suggestions for assignment for review and potential funding IC(s)

RECEIPT DATES n Handle large volume –47,000 or more a year –4,000 in one day –Application and Appendix materials n Reasonable flexibility for late applications (study section members, natural disasters, family emergencies)

EQUITY n Accommodate wide range of application types (fellowship, small business, research, centers) n Accommodate range of applicant organizations n Referral, review, award processes will be using both electronic and paper modes for some time n Need to be sure that neither mode is advantaged or disadvantaged

SHORTEN CYCLE n Elimination of paper handling, data entry, etc. will eventually allow change in receipt dates, less time for receipt and referral stages n May not lead to significant changes in time allowed for recruitment of reviewer or “homework” by reviewers n Still expect to convene study section meetings

CONCLUSION n Change to electronic submission provides an opportunity to re-engineer grant application practices and improve the process n This will require a lot of “hard” thinking and work in advance