Workshop with EU Member States: Work Package B Session 4a – Cost-benefit analysis for transport investments 3 February 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why does ERA Need to Flourish
Advertisements

Evaluation at NRCan: Information for Program Managers Strategic Evaluation Division Science & Policy Integration July 2012.
1 of 21 Information Strategy Developing an Information Strategy © FAO 2005 IMARK Investing in Information for Development Information Strategy Developing.
1 Measurement of Production of Financial Institutions Conclusions and recommendations 3-10 by the OECD Task Force on Financial Services (Banking Services)
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
Smarter Travel Programmes– Financial impacts for Transport for London COLIN BUCHANAN
1 Dr. Peder Jensen Project Manager, Transport and Environment TERM TERM Transport and environment: on the way to a new common transport policy.
Planning and use of funding instruments
EU-Regional Policy Structural actions 1 GROWING EVALUATION CAPACITY THE MID TERM EVALUATION IN OBJECTIVE 1 AND 2 REGIONS 8 OCTOBER 2004.
February 16, 2014Ministry of Regional Development - 2 Mid-term assessment of information and publicity measures Commission Regulation (EC) No 1828/2006.
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
1 The role of macro- regional strategies after 2013 The Commissions view (or rather the view of one official) David Sweet, DG Regional Policy, European.
1 Dr. Peder Jensen Project Manager, Transport and Environment TERM TERM Transport and environment: on the way to a new common transport policy.
Ex-ante Impact Assessment Unit Directorate for Impact Assessment and European Added Value 9 October 2013.
Joint presentation by respective units in DGs AGRI, EMPL and REGIO IPA Components III, IV and V: Conditions for successful preparation and absorption of.
Performance Framework
Workshop with EU Member States: Work Package B Session 1 – Introduction 3 February 2011.
1 Ex post evaluation of the Cohesion Fund (including former ISPA) Work Package B: cost - benefit analysis of selected transport projects Jurate Vaznelyte,
Planning and Timely Implementation of Structural Funds Interventions Katarína Mathernová Director, DG Regional Policy European Commission 24 November 2005.
1 Practical Work and Experience With Performance Management ICAO Performance Management Symposium John Crichton, President and CEO NAV CANADA March 28,
Training for Teachers and Specialists
Executive Session Office of Asset Management
Addition Facts
Project Appraisal Module 5 Session 6.
Implementing NICE guidance
1 Alberto Montanari University of Bologna Basic Principles of Water Resources Management.
Chapter 7 Capital Budgeting Processes And Techniques
1 Seminar on the economic evaluation of transport projects The rationale for economic evaluation in Europe The case of EU regional policy A.Mairate, European.
NETLIPSE Infrastructure Project Assessment Tool Stuart Baker, Deputy Director of National Rail Projects Department for Transport, UK Zagreb, November 10,
Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building
Journey Management Nigel DAth Journey Manager Bay of Plenty RTIM Seminar 18 March 2014.
© The Treasury 1 Better Business Cases “Investing for change” Overview.
BOARD EFFICIENCY: The Agenda Setting Role and Information Needs of the Supervisory Board Holly J. Gregory Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP.
Strategic Financial Management 9 February 2012
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
European Roadmaps for Research Infrastructures presentation by Hans Chang (chair ESFRI) (1st meeting ESFRI Steering Groups, autumn 2005)
Addition 1’s to 20.
Overview M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Maputo 19 and 20 September 2011.
Figures in Chapter 1. Learning objectives After studying this chapter, you should be able to; Define logistics and supply chain management. Describe logistics.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 11 Development Policymaking and the Roles of Market, State, and Civil Society.
Mid-term Evaluation Implementation of the EU Structural Funds in R&DI and Higher Education, Stage 1: Strategic view
NETLIPSE Infrastructure Project Assessment Tool Professor Hans-Rudolf Schalcher, ETH Zürich Amsterdam, 21 April 2009.
The economic impacts of counterfeiting Presentation for BASCAP congress December 2009.
DISTILLATE An introduction Final workshop of the DISTILLATE programme Great Minster House, London Tuesday 22 nd January 2008 Professor Tony May ITS, University.
The effects of ICT investment on productivity in Spain Prepared for the NEREC conference on Electronic Communications Madrid, 11 September 2009.
ACT CANADA 2014: Using Business Cases To Get Great Projects Financed and Delivered December 1, 2014| Michael Sutherland.
Regulatory Transparency and Interaction with the Government Dr. Konstantin Petrov Head of Section, Policy and Regulation.
PEIP National workshop in Montenegro: developing environmental infrastructure projects in the water sector Feasibility Study Preparation Venelina Varbova.
Vertical mergers - EWS/Marcroft
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS- PUBLIC SECTOR INVESTMENTS Lucky Yona.
IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.
Regional Policy Major Projects in Cohesion Policy Major Projects Team, Unit G.1 Smart and Sustainable Growth Competence Centre, DG Regional and Urban Policy.
The TIDE impact assessment methodology TIDE Final Conference Barcelona, September 2015 Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy Oliver.
111 Synthesis of Questionnaires. Thematic concentration  Most of the new member states support the suggested principle while maintaining the element.
4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation 1 Common monitoring and evaluation framework Jela Tvrdonova, 2010.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
Frontier Economics Limited 150 Holborn London, EC1N 2NS The Frontier Economics Network Boston  Cologne  London  Melbourne
1 Cohesion Fund (including former ISPA) ex post evaluation Jurate Vaznelyte, Adam Abdulwahab Evaluation Network Meeting Brussels, April 14 th.
4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation Common monitoring and evaluation framework for evaluation of rural development programs.
Merger clearance procedures Melbourne Law School 19 May 2014.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
Road Investment Decision Framework
GUIDELINES Evaluation of National Rural Networks
EWG Study Tour, Galway, 18/09/2006
Initial Observations workshop
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TOOLS
Project Appraisal Guidelines for National Roads
Preparations for post-2020 Impact Assessment European Commission Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy Unit DGA Policy.
ESF monitoring and evaluation in Draft guidance
Presentation transcript:

Workshop with EU Member States: Work Package B Session 4a – Cost-benefit analysis for transport investments 3 February 2011

2 Frontier Economics Content 1A – The strengths and weaknesses of the ex ante CBA methodologies observed 1B – The effectiveness of ex ante CBA as a tool supporting decision-making Part 1 EX ANTE CBA Part 2 EX POST CBA 2A – The utility of ex post CBA 2B – Ex post CBA as tool for impact evaluation

3 Frontier Economics 1A – Strengths and weaknesses of the ex ante CBA 1B – Effectiveness of ex ante CBA as a tool supporting decision-making EX ANTE CBA

4 Frontier Economics Scope of ex ante CBA Scope of ex ante studies focuses on the main impacts Environmental impacts, wider impacts and impacts on other modes are often excluded 1A

5 Frontier Economics Overview of ex ante analysis EC Guidelines Choice of marginal values Unit costs Good compliance with EC guidelines In some instances significant divergence from HEATCO unit values (e.g. for time savings) Unit costs are not available except in the main at a Level 1 Adherence to guidelines, but are guidelines sufficient? 1A

6 Frontier Economics Demand forecasting Demand forecasting is the foundation for a CBA Dominance of sketch models Scope limited in terms of network, time periods, modes. No details available on model validation Significant journey time errors were present in one ex ante CBA Forecasting simplistic Based on external growth factors in the main Only 5 studies considered re-assigned traffic Only 4 studies included induced traffic Demand forecasting 1A

7 Frontier Economics Sensitivity tests omitted Sensitivity tests undertaken Risk analysis Future economic growth Changing traffic growth Changing fuel prices Cost overruns/underspend Varying the discount rate Growth in marginal values over time Operating cost values changing over time Change in project scope (more or less interventions included) Project delays/early completion Length of the appraisal period Future population growth Additional development Impact of other transport infrastructure schemes Impact of pricing policies Risk analysis has been undertaken, but not all risk bearers identified 1A

8 Frontier Economics 1A – Strengths and weaknesses of the ex ante CBA 1B – Effectiveness of ex ante CBA as a tool supporting decision-making EX ANTE CBA

9 Frontier Economics Pros and cons of using ex ante CBA Pros Prioritisation Efficient use of resources Financial viability Choice between alternatives/options Optimise timing Pros Ensures transparency Cons Lack of alignment with policy objectives Too much transparency Pros Focuses on easy to measure direct impacts Cons A lack of understanding of CBA by officials and politicians Partial analysis Modal comparisons difficult TechnicalPoliticalPractical 1B

10 Frontier Economics Use of CBA in the 10 case studies Limited role of these 10 CBAs in Member States decision-making Why is this the case? Compliance with EC CF application requirements (9) Ensure value for money (6) Choose alignment (2) Choose design standards (2) Prioritise elements of national transport strategy (1) Allocate budget and optimise timing (0) 1B

11 Frontier Economics Part 1: Ex ante CBA - Questions 1A – Strengths and weaknesses of CBA Reasons for divergence of unit values used from HEATCO? Why doesnt ex ante CBA play a more significant role in strategic decision-making? 1B – CBA as tool to support decision- making Obstacles to more developed demand modelling and risk analysis? Need for additional guidance / regulation (e.g. externalities)?

12 Frontier Economics 2A – Utility of ex post CBA? 2B – Ex post CBA as tool for impact evaluation EX POST CBA

13 Frontier Economics POPE – Englands Highways Agency ex post programme The merits of an ex post programme Objective Have impacts of highway schemes materialised? What lessons can be learned? Method Before data collection 1 yr and 5 yr after opening studies Findings: Has improved transparency and accountability Improved practice and development of new techniques (includes bi-annual meta- analysis) Strengthened evidence base Ex post CBA is seen as an asset by UK transport authorities 2A

14 Frontier Economics What is the utility of ex post CBA? Definition of counterfactual Background impacts can dominate transport impacts Simultaneity in the opening of transport investments Definition of counterfactual Institutional memory loss Indirect effects take time to feed into land use and the economy Majority of benefits still occur in the future (there is a need to forecast) Needs a monitoring programme 2A Challenges and requirements faced with ex post CBA

15 Frontier Economics 2A – Utility of ex post CBA? 2B – Ex post CBA as tool for impact evaluation EX POST CBA

16 Frontier Economics Is ex post CBA an appropriate tool for impact evaluation? Pros Cons Alternatives Focuses on direct impacts and externalities Monitoring programme is more straight forward than alternative ex post methods Gives a single indicator of a projects worth that avoids double counting CBA output may not align with policy objectives Suffer from the same challenges and requirements, and may be more difficult to undertake 2B

17 Frontier Economics Part 2: Ex post CBA - Questions Potential benefits and costs of an ex post evaluation framework in your country? Do you think that such a framework would be financially viable? Is ex post CBA a good methodology to capture relevant impacts? Should it be complemented or replaced by other methodologies? Timing of ex post evaluation? 2A – Utility of ex post CBA? 2B – Ex post CBA as tool for impact evaluation

18 Frontier Economics Frontier Economics Limited in Europe is a member of the Frontier Economics network, which consists of separate companies based in Europe (Brussels, Cologne, London and Madrid) and Australia (Melbourne & Sydney). The companies are independently owned, and legal commitments entered into by any one company do not impose any obligations on other companies in the network. All views expressed in this document are the views of Frontier Economics Limited.

19 Frontier Economics FRONTIER ECONOMICS EUROPE LTD. BRUSSELS | COLOGNE | LONDON | MADRID Frontier Economics Ltd, 71 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6DA Tel. +44 (0) Fax. +44 (0)