TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 EVALUATION PROCESS AND AWARD CRITERIA Anna Livieratou-Toll TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Policy & Programme Coordinator.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation at NRCan: Information for Program Managers Strategic Evaluation Division Science & Policy Integration July 2012.
Advertisements

Project Cycle Management
EU CORIN Supporting Cross-border Cooperation BiH – Croatia/Serbia/Montenegro Europeaid/122730/C/SER/BA ________________________ Topical Training for JMC.
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
29 November Research Infrastructures in FP7 Jean-Louis Picqué European Commission DG Research.
Research and Innovation Why does ERA Need to Flourish ERA - State of Play Octavi Quintana Trias Brussels, 19th April 2013.
Planning and use of funding instruments
Implications for the Regions EU-Regional Policy 1 Governance White Paper Introduction Adoption of White Paper on European Governance, July 25, 2001 Aim:
Anna Panagopoulou TEN-T Executive Agency Head of Unit, T4
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
1 Information meeting Communications Activities in the framework of the MEDA regional Information & Communication Programme targeting Youth in the Mediterranean.
Draft Framework Guidelines on System Operation - Process Presentation Workshop, Ljubljana, 24 August 2011 Uroš Gabrijel (ACER)
Final Report Anton Schrag REGIO D1
How to improve the technical and financial management of the TEN-T projects? Ioannis Giogkarakis-Argyropoulos, Head of Unit T2 – Road and Rail Transport,
TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 Daniel von Hugo TEN-T Executive Agency Evaluation Manager, Unit T4 TEN-T Info Day 29 November 2012 Application.
TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 Closing Points Dirk Beckers TEN-T Executive Agency Executive Director TEN-T Info Day November 2012.
TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 Introduction Dirk Beckers TEN-T Executive Agency Executive Director TEN-T Info Day November 2012.
The Management of European Structural Funds in Western Scotland ISPA Partners Meeting April 2003 Laurie Russell Strathclyde European Partnership.
María Muñoz General Directorate for Community Funds Ministry of Economy and Finance SPAIN María Muñoz General Directorate for Community Funds Ministry.
INFSO/F3 1 Guide for proposers Willy Maes INFSO/F3, EC TEN-TELECOM Information Day.
Information Day Call 2001/1 - Brussels 19 June Call for proposals 2001/1 HOW TO PREPARE AND PRESENT YOUR PROPOSAL Willy MAES DG INFSO/F3
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT, 15 June 2006 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
JI Governance – review of JI Guidelines
1 RHODE ISLAND House Committee on Separation of Powers April 21, 2004 Kate Wade Program Evaluation Director Wisconsin Legislative Audit Bureau.
Belgrade December With support from the European Union Progress Programme.
Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building
SAI Performance Measurement Framework
1 Department of State Program Evaluation Policy Overview Spring 2013.
1 The Data Protection Officer at work Experience, good practices and lessons learnt Pierre Vernhes – former DPO at the Council of the EU Workshop on Data.
GRI-S : Infrastructures The Union list of projects of common interest European Commission DG Energy Internal Market I: Networks and Regional Initiatives.
EUROPEAN NEIGHBOURHOOD AND PARTNERSHIP INSTRUMENT - ENPI CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMMES.
1 EFCA - 21th March 2002 Raul Mateus Paula. 2 This presentation underlines: The key objectives of the Relex Reform The division of the responsibilities.
Second Independent Evaluation Roles / Responsibilities & Relationships.
2014 CEF Transport Calls National Info Day – Czech Republic Michal Ziliak Innovation and Networks Executive Agency Prague, 28 November 2014.
How experts evaluate projects; key factors for a successful proposal
Australia’s Experience in Utilising Performance Information in Budget and Management Processes Mathew Fox Assistant Secretary, Budget Coordination Branch.
ZHRC/HTI Financial Management Training
Eng Introduction to the application form 17/10/2014 Marie von Malmborg Karin Tjulin Tytti Voutilainen.
Culture Programme - Selection procedure Katharina Riediger Infoday Praha 10/06/2010.
TEN-T Experts Briefing, March Annual Call Award Criteria.
Dr. Marion Tobler, NCP Environment Evaluation Criteria and Procedure.
Expert group meeting on draft delegated act on the European code of conduct on partnership (ECCP) under cohesion policy
IPA Funds Monitoring and Evaluation December Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.
Transport Enhancing TEN-T funding Pawel Stelmaszczyk Special Envoy for European Mobility Network DG MOVE Warsaw, 18 December 2013.
Application procedure From theory to practice Dieter H. Henzler, Steinbeis-Transfercenter Cultural Resources Management, Berlin.
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
CONFERENCE IMPLEMENTATION OF MARKETS IN FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DIRECTIVE -MiFID- Split, June 2007 OPENING SPEECH Ante Samodol President of the Board.
Session 3 – Evaluation process Viera Kerpanova, Miguel Romero.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
1 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND BUDGET PRIORITISATION IN CROATIA Francois-Roger Cazala, Rimantas Veckys SIGMA - Lithuanian Ministry of Finance.
Ministry of Finance Compliance assessment of the management and control systems of the managing authorities under the Operational programmes. Conclusions.
LIFE+ Project evaluation and selection Markéta Konečná 9 April 2013.
The Role of the Economic and Social Council of Bulgaria for the Development of Civil Dialogue and New Forms of Consultations Prof. Lalko Dulevski President.
Quality assessment of internal audit activities performed on a periodical basis Nikolina Bibić, Ministry of Finance, Central Harmonization Unit Republic.
Sharing solutions for better regional policies European Union | European Regional Development Fund Erika Fulgenzi Policy Officer | Interreg Europe JS
Proposed Organisation of Evaluation of the Romanian NSRF and Operational Programmes, Niall McCann, Technical Assistance Project for Programming,
What is a grant? A direct financial contribution – donation – from EU budget An action - contributing to EU policy achievement Functioning of a body acting.
INEA Innovation and Networks Executive Agency
Money Bills Amendment Procedure and Related Matters Bill [B 75–2008]
European Environment Agency
Preparations for post-2020 Impact Assessment European Commission Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy Unit DGA Policy.
Evaluation processes Horizon 2020 Info Days November 2017
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
The evaluation process
Prof. Lalko Dulevski President of the ESC of Bulgaria
Key steps of the evaluation process
2012 Annual Call Steps of the evaluation of proposals, role of the experts TEN-T Experts Briefing, March 2013.
Roles and Responsibilities
Programme for Employability, Inclusion and Learning
Presentation transcript:

TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 EVALUATION PROCESS AND AWARD CRITERIA Anna Livieratou-Toll TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Policy & Programme Coordinator Unit T4 –Technical & Financial Engineering, GIS & Monitoring TEN-T Info Day November 2012

Contents of the session: Evaluation and selection process step-by step Award criteria and how they are applied Application forms and guidelines Practical recommendations on the submission process How you can maximise your chance of getting EU support TEN-T Info Day – 29 November

3 Evaluation & selection of proposals: Principles (1) Strict guiding principles are followed: Equal treatment: All proposals evaluated against the same criteria. No preferential treatment to any candidate Transparency: Adequate feedback to applicants on the outcomes of the evaluation

Evaluation & selection of proposals: Principles (2) Objectivity: each proposal is assessed strictly on the basis of the information submitted Accuracy: each proposal is assessed against the four official award criteria: relevance maturity impact quality Consistency: the same standard of judgment is applied to all proposals TEN-T Info Day – 29 November

External evaluation & selection of proposals Shared responsibility and collaboration between the TEN-T EA and DG MOVE TEN-T Info Day – 29 November

6 External evaluation organised by TEN-T EA The TEN-T EA is responsible for: checking the eligibility of the proposals (March 2013) conducting the external evaluation (April 2013)

TEN-T Info Day – 29 November … selection by DG MOVE DG MOVE is responsible for the (May 2013): final selection of proposals (with the assistance of the TEN-T EA), based on: recommendations of the external evaluation available budget, strategic objectives of the calls and the policy relevance of the proposals consultation of other EU services (DG Environment, DG REGIO…) consultation of: Financial Assistance Committee (Member States) (July 2013) European Parliament (right of scrutiny) (July 2013) adoption of Framework Decision followed by Individual Financing Decisions (from September 2013)

External evaluation organised by TEN-T EA – Eligibility checking Applicants are not in an exclusion situation Applicants have the financial and technical capacity to carry out the project… Proposals arrived on time, are complete, signed by the applicant, approved by the Member State… Proposals in compliance with EU legislation (environment…) TEN-T Info Day – 29 November

External evaluation - Objectives Provide sound technical advice on the proposals submitted Check that proposals address the objectives and priorities defined in the work programmes and calls for proposals TEN-T Info Day – 29 November

10 External evaluation: The role of external experts Conduct an in-depth technical and impartial evaluation of proposals submitted Check that proposals address the objectives and priorities defined in the work programmes and calls for proposals Award, for each criterion, a score on a six- point scale from 0 to 5

Moderators: their role in external evaluation High professional standards Fairness and impartiality Equal treatment Transparency Efficiency and speed Confidentiality TEN-T Info Day – 29 November

The Independent Observer An Independent Observer gives independent advice and recommendation to the Agency on: the conduct and fairness of all phases of the evaluation ways in which experts assess the evaluation any possible improvements that could be put into practice immediately or in the future The Observer may not express views on the proposals under assessment or the experts opinions on the proposals TEN-T Info Day – 29 November

External evaluation – the award criteria 4 blocks of award criteria: 1.Relevance: contribution of the Action to the TEN-T policy and the objectives of the calls, and EU dimension 2.Maturity of the Action: is the Action ready to go? 3.Impact of the Action: anticipated socio-economic effects and impact on the environment 4.Quality of the Action: completeness and clarity of the proposal, description of the planned activities, coherence between objectives, activities and planned resources, soundness of the project management process TEN-T Info Day – 29 November

External evaluation – the award criteria for ongoing actions Relevance. Necessity and stimulating effect of the requested increased co-funding rate Maturity. Soundness of the revised implementation plans under the new co-funding conditions as well as of the maturity of proposed new activities (if any. Quality. Consistency of the revised implementation plans with the project objectives, completeness and clarity of the proposal, coherence between any proposed new activities and the objectives of the action TEN-T Info Day – 29 November

External evaluation Step 1. Individual assessment Each proposal is assessed independently by at least three experts The experts first carry out individual readings No contact between experts Each expert completes the evaluation form in TENtec, commenting and scoring each block of criteria Scores must be in line with comments TEN-T Info Day – 29 November

External evaluation Step 2. Consensus meetings The three experts meet in a consensus meeting moderated by an Agency staff to agree on: comments and a score for each of the block of 4 criteria a general recommendation A rapporteur is appointed to draft the Consensus Report TEN-T Info Day – 29 November

Evaluation of proposals against the award criteria Only the best proposals are recommended for EU funding… Experts will not recommend for funding proposals that score <3 points for one or more of the four blocks of award criteria! TEN-T Info Day – 29 November

TEN-T Info Day – 29 November Internal evaluation An Internal Evaluation Panel composed of representatives of DG MOVE, TEN-T EA and DG ENV review each proposal individually to: consider each proposal in view of the TEN-T objectives, priorities and restrictions, as defined in the TEN-Guidelines, the work programmes and the call texts cut any costs and/or activities that would be not eligible or not recommended for funding recommend a selection of proposals for funding

Communication on the results After the eligibility check: Applicants whose proposals have not met the eligibility and selection criteria will be officially informed After the external evaluation and the internal selection: Results will be submitted to and agreed with the Financial Assistance Committee (Member States) and scrutinised by the European Parliament Following the institutional agreement: Successful applicants will be invited to enter into discussions with the TEN-T EA to finalise their individual financing Decision The lists of successful proposals will be published on the TEN-T EA and DG MOVE websites TEN-T Info Day – 29 November

Still have more questions? Read carefully the Guide for Applicants Consult the FAQ lists on the TEN-T EA website, which are regularly updated Send your questions before 18 February 2013 to the Helpdesks: MAP: AP: Please note that: To ensure equal treatment between applicants, only general questions will be answered and published in the FAQ list The FAQ list will be frozen on 21 February 2013 TEN-T Info Day – 29 November

Thank you! TEN-T Info Day – 29 November