Atmospheric Modeling in an Arctic System Model John J. Cassano Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences and Department of Atmospheric.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Weather Research & Forecasting: A General Overview
Advertisements

Meteorologisches Institut der Universität München
A NUMERICAL PREDICTION OF LOCAL ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES A.V.Starchenko Tomsk State University.
WRF Modeling System V2.0 Overview
UU Unitah Basin WRF Model Configuration (same as DEQ) See Alcott and Steenburgh 2013 for further details on most aspects of this numerical configuration:
Discretizing the Sphere for Multi-Scale Air Quality Simulations using Variable-Resolution Finite-Volume Techniques Martin J. Otte U.S. EPA Robert Walko.
Coupled versus uncoupled radiation and microphysicsMicrophysics droplet concentration 5. Conclusions The sea ice state simulated in RASM is sensitive to.
The Problem of Parameterization in Numerical Models METEO 6030 Xuanli Li University of Utah Department of Meteorology Spring 2005.
John J. Cassano, Matthew Higgins, Alice DuVivier University of Colorado Wieslaw Maslowski, William Gutowski, Dennis Lettenmaier, Andrew Roberts.
WRF Physics Options Jimy Dudhia. diff_opt=1 2 nd order diffusion on model levels Constant coefficients (khdif and kvdif) km_opt ignored.
Dynamical Downscaling of CCSM Using WRF Yang Gao 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yun-Fat Lam 1, John Drake 1, Kate Evans 2 1 University of Tennessee, USA 2 Oak Ridge.
Climate modeling Current state of climate knowledge – What does the historical data (temperature, CO 2, etc) tell us – What are trends in the current observational.
Recent performance statistics for AMPS real-time forecasts Kevin W. Manning – National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR Earth System Laboratory Mesoscale.
Issues in Very High Resolution Numerical Weather Prediction Over Complex Terrain in Juneau, Alaska Don Morton 1,2, Delia Arnold 3,4, Irene Schicker 3,
S4D WorkshopParis, France Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio A High-Resolution David H. Bromwich.
THORPEX-Pacific Workshop Kauai, Hawaii Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio David H. Bromwich.
John J. Cassano - University of Colorado Wieslaw Maslowski -Naval Postgraduate School William Gutowski - Iowa State University Dennis Lettenmaier – University.
Weather Research & Forecasting Model (WRF) Stacey Pensgen ESC 452 – Spring ’06.
Larry D. Hinzman University of Alaska Fairbanks Amanda Lynch University of Colorado Kenji Yoshikawa University of Alaska Fairbanks William Gutowski Iowa.
1 An Overview of the NARCCAP WRF Simulations L. Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory NARCCAP Users Meeting NCAR, Boulder, CO April ,
Towards Advanced Understanding and Predictive Capability of Climate Change in the Arctic using a High-Resolution Regional Arctic Climate System Model (RAMC)
WRF-VIC: The Flux Coupling Approach L. Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory BioEarth Project Kickoff Meeting April 11-12, 2011 Pullman, WA.
The National Environmental Agency of Georgia L. Megrelidze, N. Kutaladze, Kh. Kokosadze NWP Local Area Models’ Failure in Simulation of Eastern Invasion.
Mesoscale Modeling Review the tutorial at: –In class.
– Equations / variables – Vertical coordinate – Terrain representation – Grid staggering – Time integration scheme – Advection scheme – Boundary conditions.
Jerold Herwehe 1, Kiran Alapaty 1, Chris Nolte 1, Russ Bullock 1, Tanya Otte 1, Megan Mallard 1, Jimy Dudhia 2, and Jack Kain 3 1 Atmospheric Modeling.
19 December ConclusionsResultsMethodologyBackground Chip HelmsSensitivity of CM1 to Initial θ' Magnitude and Radius Examining the Sensitivity of.
– Equations / variables – Vertical coordinate – Terrain representation – Grid staggering – Time integration scheme – Advection scheme – Boundary conditions.
Improvements of WRF Simulation Skills of Southeast United States Summer Rainfall: Focus on Physical Parameterization and Horizontal Resolution Laifang.
Project Title: High Performance Simulation using NASA Model and Observation Products for the Study of Land Atmosphere Coupling and its Impact on Water.
Jonathan Pleim 1, Robert Gilliam 1, and Aijun Xiu 2 1 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division, NOAA, Research Triangle Park, NC (In partnership with the.
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio David H. Bromwich,
Earth-Sun System Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration SPoRT SAC Nov 21-22, 2005 Regional Modeling using MODIS SST composites Prepared.
Lessons from ARCSyM David Bailey 1 and John Cassano 2 Amanda Lynch, William Chapman, John Walsh, Gunter Weller, Wanli Wu, Andrew Slater, Richard Cullather,
Joe Klemp National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado Convection Resolving NWP using WRF.
Aerosols in WRF-CHEM Eric Stofferahn George Mason University _07:00:00 (UTC)
CPPA Past/Ongoing Activities - Ocean-Atmosphere Interactions - Address systematic ocean-atmosphere model biases - Eastern Pacific Investigation of Climate.
Justin Glisan Iowa State University Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences RACM Project Update: ISU Atmospheric Modeling Component: Part 1 3rd.
Mesoscale & Microscale Meteorological Division / NCAR WRF Modeling System Overview Jimy Dudhia.
3 rd Annual WRF Users Workshop Promote closer ties between research and operations Develop an advanced mesoscale forecast and assimilation system   Design.
Higher Resolution Operational Models. Major U.S. High-Resolution Mesoscale Models (all non-hydrostatic ) WRF-ARW (developed at NCAR) NMM-B (developed.
WRF Problems: Some Solutions, Some Mysteries Cliff Mass and David Ovens University of Washington.
Arctic System Reanalysis David H. Bromwich 1,2 and Keith M. Hines 1 1- Polar Meteorology Group Byrd Polar Research Center The Ohio State University Columbus,
A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional Climate and Weather. Zhang, D.-L., W.-Z. Zheng, and Y.-K. Xue, 2003: A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional.
Large Eddy Simulation of Low Cloud Feedback to a 2-K SST Increase Anning Cheng 1, and Kuan-Man Xu 2 1. AS&M, Inc., 2. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton,
Are Numerical Weather Prediction Models Getting Better? Cliff Mass, David Ovens, and Jeff Baars University of Washington.
Workshop on Tropical Biases, 28 May 2003 CCSM CAM2 Tropical Simulation James J. Hack National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado USA Collaborators:
Autonomous Polar Atmospheric Observations John J. Cassano University of Colorado.
NARCCAP WRF Simulations L. Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory NARCCAP Users Meeting February , 2008 Boulder, CO.
International Workshop on Antarctic Clouds Columbus, OH Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Entrainment Ratio, A R -  R = c p  i / c p  s  sfc  ent c p  i c p  s PBL Schemes  = YSU  = MYJ  = MRF 12Z 00Z  adv Science issue: Assess.
Bogdan Rosa 1, Marcin Kurowski 1 and Michał Ziemiański 1 1. Institute of Meteorology and Water Management (IMGW), Warsaw Podleśna, 61
Modeling and Evaluation of Antarctic Boundary Layer
Numerical Investigation of Air- Sea Interactions During Winter Extratropical Storms Presented by Jill Nelson M.S. Marine Science Candidate Graduate Research.
Mass Coordinate WRF Dynamical Core - Eulerian geometric height coordinate (z) core (in framework, parallel, tested in idealized, NWP applications) - Eulerian.
Module 17 MM5: Climate Simulation BREAK. Regional Climate Simulation for the Pan-Arctic using MM5 William J. Gutowski, Jr., Helin Wei, Charles Vörösmarty,
Module 6 MM5: Overview William J. Gutowski, Jr. Iowa State University.
Vincent N. Sakwa RSMC, Nairobi
Remote sensing and modeling of cloud contents and precipitation efficiency Chung-Hsiung Sui Institute of Hydrological Sciences National Central University.
Arctic climate simulations by coupled models - an overview - Annette Rinke and Klaus Dethloff Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Research.
Do we / why do we want to develop an ASM? Climate working group for WRF – workshop on model developments for climate studies with WRF (summary of.
Atmospheric Circulation Response to Future Arctic Sea Ice Loss Clara Deser, Michael Alexander and Robert Tomas.
Generation of Simulated Atmospheric Datasets for Ingest into Radiative Transfer Models Jason A. Otkin, Derek J. Posselt, Erik R. Olson, and Raymond K.
ESSL Holland, CCSM Workshop 0606 Predicting the Earth System Across Scales: Both Ways Summary:Rationale Approach and Current Focus Improved Simulation.
IASC Workshop Potsdamr, Germany Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA The Arctic System Reanalysis.
Numerical Weather Forecast Model (governing equations)
ASM Project Update: Atmospheric Modeling
Schumacher, R., S., and J. M. Peters, 2017
Coastal Atmospheric Modeling for both Operational and Research Applications using the Weather Research Forecast (WRF) Model.
Presentation transcript:

Atmospheric Modeling in an Arctic System Model John J. Cassano Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences and Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences University of Colorado

Proposed Arctic System Model Domain

Why develop an ASM? The Arctic is a unique region that presents unique challenges for climate modeling –An Arctic specific model can use model components that are developed specifically for polar regions and polar processes Polar clouds and radiative fluxes Boundary layer and surface flux processes Existing regional Arctic climate models do not account for important feedbacks between Arctic climate system components –Current regional Arctic models simulate atmospheric state but have specified ocean and ice properties Arctic regional models are not subject to low latitude errors present in global climate models –Simulations with an ASM can use “perfect” lateral boundary conditions –Can explore polar processes without feedbacks to lower latitudes

Why develop an ASM? Increased horizontal resolution compared to global climate models –Approx. 1 order of magnitude increase in horizontal resolution compared to global models –Increased horizontal resolution allows for: Improved representation of topography and coastlines Improved representation of small-scale processes –Extreme events and storms More realistic representation of interactions and feedback processes among climate model components Better match between model resolution and: – end user needs (e.g. policy decisions) –resolution of other climate system component models –field studies

What Scientific Questions can be Addressed with an ASM? Feedback studies –Atmosphere / land hydrology Changes in permafrost, soil hydrology, and atmospheric circulation –How will degrading permafrost alter near surface soil moisture? –What impact will changes in soil moisture have on the atmosphere? –Will altered atmospheric state intensify or dampen initial soil moisture changes due to permafrost degradation? Impact of extreme storm events on land hydrology –Atmosphere / ice / ocean Role of small scale processes such as polar lows –How does ice / ocean state impact polar low development? –How do polar lows alter the ice / ocean system? –Do these small scale processes impact larger scales?

What Scientific Questions can be Addressed with an ASM? How do high-resolution simulations of the Arctic climate system differ from global climate model simulations? –Consider observed changes in Arctic sea ice How do ASM simulations differ from GCSM simulations? Are different feedback processes acting in the ASM and GCSM? What is the role of lower latitude variability vs internal Arctic system processes on observed Arctic change? –Experiments using lateral boundary forcing from multiple GCSMs and from global reanalyses

Atmospheric Model Requirements Community model with active research and development Suitable for high resolution (O 1-10 km) simulations Capable of long duration climate simulations Model capable of being run on many different computer platforms Optimized for polar applications

ASM Atmospheric Model: WRF Suitable for high resolution (O 1-10 km) simulations –Fully compressible, nonhydrostatic dynamics –Significantly improved numerics and dynamics compared to MM5 –Designed for high-resolution applications Large eddy simulation Cloud resolving model Mesoscale applications

ASM Atmospheric Model: WRF Capable of long duration climate simulations –WRF is formulated for mass and scalar conservation No long term drift due to model numerics –Complete atmospheric physics Radiation Surface fluxes and land surface Planetary boundary layer (PBL) Cloud microphysics Cumulus parameterization Multiple options are available for all physical processes –WRF - Chem is currently under development Will allow coupled atmosphere - chemistry simulations

WRF Physics Interactions From NCAR WRF tutorial

ASM Atmospheric Model: WRF Model capable of being run on many different computer platforms –WRF runs on Unix single, OpenMP, and MPI platforms IBM Linux (PGI and Intel compilers) SGI Origin and Altix HP / Compaq / DEC Cray Sun Mac (xlf compiler)

ASM Atmospheric Model: WRF Optimized for polar applications –Prior atmospheric model development effort led to the widely used Polar MM5 Focus on: –Cloud and radiation processes –PBL and surface fluxes –Treatment of ice covered land –Sea ice –On-going development of Polar WRF Cassano research group at CU Polar Meteorology Group - BPRC / OSU NOAA ESRL - Boulder NCAR - AMPS

Fairbanks - July 2006 WRF - RRTM Bias: -0.1 mb Corr: 0.98 WRF - CAM Bias: 0.8 mb Corr: 0.98

Barrow - January 2006 WRF - RRTM Bias: 10.6 deg WRF - CAM Bias: 2.7 deg

SHEBA Site - January 1998 Courtesy of Keith Hines BPRC / OSU

Questions or comments?

WRF Model Details Mass based terrain following vertical coordinate From NCAR WRF Tutorial

WRF Model Details Uses Arakawa C-grid staggering From NCAR WRF Tutorial

WRF Model Details Lateral boundary conditions –Specified from reanalyses, global, or regional models –Open, symmetric, or periodic for idealized simulations Top boundary conditions –Constant pressure –Rayleigh damping –Absorbing upper layer –Gravity wave radiation condition (planned) Map projections –Polar stereographic –Lambert conformal –Mercator –Cartesian geometry (idealized only)

WRF Model Details 3rd order Runge-Kutte time integration High-order advection scheme Mass and scalar conserving numerics One and two-way nesting options Four dimensional data assimilation (FDDA) Model physics –Radiation –Surface –Planetary boundary layer (PBL) –Cloud microphysics –Cumulus

Radiation Provides: –Atmospheric temperature tendency –Surface radiative fluxes (SW and LW) Options: –Longwave RRTM CAM3 GFDL –Shortwave MM5 Goddard CAM3 GFDL

From NCAR WRF Tutorial

Surface Provides: –Surface turbulent fluxes –Soil temperature and moisture –Snow cover –Sea ice temperature Options: –Fluxes: Monin-Obukhov similarity theory –Noah LSM –NCEP Noah LSM –RUC LSM

From NCAR WRF Tutorial

Planetary Boundary Layer Provides: –Boundary layer fluxes –Vertical diffusion / mixing Options: –YSU PBL –Eta PBL –GFS PBL –MRF PBL

From NCAR WRF Tutorial

Cloud Microphysics Provides: –Atmospheric heat and moisture tendencies –Cloud and precipitation amount –Surface rainfall Options: –Kessler warm rain –Purdue - Lin –WSM 3-class –WSM 5-class –WSM 6-class –Ferrier (NAM) –Thompson

From NCAR WRF Tutorial

Cumulus Provides: –Atmospheric heat and moisture tendencies –Surface rainfall Options: –Kain-Fritsch –Betts-Miller-Janjic –Grell-Devenyi Ensemble –Simplified Arakawa Schubert GFS

From NCAR WRF Tutorial