LABORATORY OF APPLIED THERMODYNAMICS ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY THESSALONIKI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING DEPT. OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING Giorgos Mellios and Leon Ntziachristos.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Statistical evaluation of model uncertainties in Copert III, by I. Kioutsioukis & S. Tarantola (JRC, I)
Advertisements

Transport Expert Panel Summary Report Istanbul,
WLTP-06-31e WLTP correction algorithms progress report from TUG (chassis dynamometer corrections) and TNO (coast down corrections) preliminary results.
LABORATORY OF APPLIED THERMODYNAMICS ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY THESSALONIKI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING DEPT. OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING European Database of Vehicle.
1 EVALUATION OF EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS FROM ONROAD MOTORCYCLES January 15, 2006.
Impact of MOVES2014 on Emission Inventories from On-road Mobile Sources Alexis Zubrow, Darrell Sonntag, Harvey Michaels, David Brzezinski, Alison Eyth.
European approaches to transport data collection and analysis for strategic policy and impact evaluation TRB 92 nd Annual Meeting Session 824: Transport.
Evaporative Emissions from Small Engines Harold Haskew July 2, 2003.
Off-Highway Recreational Vehicle Workshop 12/18/2012.
Slide 1 of 48 M6 Workshop June 1999 E VAPORATIVE E MISSIONS IN MOBILE6 L ARRY L ANDMAN MOBILE6 Workshop June , 1999.
Evaporative Emission Inventory Small Offroad Equipment November 2002.
Emission Factor Modeling Graciela Lubertino, HGAC.
COPERT 4 Training 2. General Methodology.
Mobile Sources. Mobile sources Gasoline car: 4-strokes Diesel car Automobile : 4-strokes, 2-strokes.
LABORATORY OF APPLIED THERMODYNAMICS ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY THESSALONIKI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING DEPT. OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING Dimitrios Gkatzoflias
Experimental Evaluation of Various Biofuel-Diesel Blends as Diesel Engine Fuels Georgios Fontaras and Zissis Samaras Laboratory of Applied Thermodynamics.
ARB’s Intent to Establish Evaporative Emission Standards for Pleasure Craft NMMA/ARB Meeting Feb. 7, 2006.
Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine (former Ministry of Transport and Communications) State Enterprise «State Road Transport Research Institute» (SE.
Modelling Motor Vehicle Emissions
COPERT 4 Training 3. Activity Data – Beginner’s Guide.
B.H. Baek and Catherine Seppanen Institute for the Environment-UNC at Chapel Hill Allison DenBleyker, Chris Lindhjem and Michele Jimenez ENVIRON International.
The ARTEMIS tools for estimating the transport pollutant emissions Artemis project - EC DG Tren COST346 - Heavy duty vehicles emissions M. André, INRETS,
Transport Expert Panel Summary Report Bern,
Emission Factor Development in Thailand Panya Warapetcharayut Director of Automotive Air Pollution Section Air Quality and Noise Management Bureau Pollution.
Mobile Source Control Division November 13, 2002 Planning and Technical Support Monitoring and Laboratory Division California Air Resources Board Proposed.
WORKSHOP ON VEHICLE EXHAUST PARTICULATE EMISSION MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGY San Diego, 21 Oct 2002 Zissis Samaras Lab of Applied Thermodynamics Aristotle.
12/25/2009 Pleasure Craft Proposal Draft Pleasure Craft Evaporative Emissions Regulation and Standards.
Transport Expert Panel Summary Report Milan,
1 Evaluation Of Evaporative Emissions From Pleasure Craft June 27, 2007.
Igor Trpevski University of St. Cyril and Methodius Skopje,
Monitoring and Laboratory Division April 25, 2002 Planning and Technical Support Division Mobile Source Control Division California Air Resources Board.
UK road transport emission projections: comparison of national & TREMOVE data Melanie Hobson 30 th October, Thessaloniki.
Final Presentation of the Project, 21 Jan Uncertainty estimates and guidance for road transport emission calculations A JRC/IES project performed.
Presents/slides/alison/awmapaper1.ppt Alison K. Pollack ENVIRON International Corporation Novato, California Rich Wilcox U.S. Environmental Protection.
Volvo Technology AB / Volvo Technology Corporation Dept / UW / 03/11/2015 / page 1 Particulates, Lemnos, 2003 Deliverable 13 Effects on particulate.
FINAL1 Inventory, Emissions, and Population July 2, 2003 AIR, Inc.
13/3/2010 Spark-Ignition Marine Engine Draft Proposal.
Portable Fuel Container Spillage Control Project Monitoring and Laboratory Division June 28, 1999 California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources.
1 Setting Evaporative Emission Standards for Off Highway Recreational Vehicles (OHRV) March 23, 2006.
IBEX 2007 Session 310 The Evolution of Automotive Fuel Tanks Presented by: Roy Giacomazzi Senior Development Engineer.
Timetable  Submission of draft Reports to LAT  The reports must be simple and straightforward (see proposal of contents)  We do not deal.
25 January 2016 European Commission - Joint Research Centre (JRC)
VOCs Emissions from Vehicle Evaporative Processes Take-home Messages: ( 1 ) Emission factor measurements : diurnal, hot soak, permeation, refueling regular.
Final Presentation of the Project, 21 Jan Uncertainty estimates and guidance for road transport emission calculations A JRC/IES project performed.
Centralised and national submissions of transport emissions Giorgos Mellios Thomas Papageorgiou Leon Ntziachristos EEA project manager: Martin Adams LABORATORY.
IET - Institute for Energy and Transport Petten - The Netherlands Ispra - Italy Joint Research.
Glen Whitehead Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency October 2012 Transport 1.
Transport Expert Panel. Agenda 10:30 – 11:00Aviation Chapter: Correction of emission allocation, input from Eurocontrol 11:15 – 11:35Coffee Break 11:35.
Dimitris Gkatzoflias EMISIA S.A. Thessaloniki Dimitris Gkatzoflias EMISIA S.A.
UEP Steering Review December 2008 Exploring the use of MOLAND as a system to predict emissions from mobile sources Edward Casey Under the supervision.
COPERT 4 – Software updates
COPERT 4 Training 2. COPERT versions and recent updates
COPERT 4 – Quick Start Instructions
4. Activity Data – Beginner’s Guide
Date of download: 10/17/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
EVALUATION OF EVAPORATIVE AND EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM OFF-HIGHWAY RECREATIONAL VEHICLES (OHRV) September 06, 2006.
DTP Conventional Engines HEV/PHEV/EV Reference Fuels PM/PN
COPERT 4 Training (10. Outlook)
COPERT 4 training workshop
COPERT 4 Training 3. General Methodology.
Calculation of evaporative emissions with COPERT Giorgos Mellios
PARTICULATES PROGRAM WP500
Zissis Samaras Professor
Calculation of evaporative emissions with COPERT Giorgos Mellios
vkm in transport modelling
Status report of Evap Task Force
Calculation of evaporative emissions with COPERT Giorgos Mellios
Emissions testing in the laboratory and on the road: Preliminary results for one Euro 6 diesel vehicle Pierre Bonnel Martin Weiss Joint Research Centre.
Emissions and Health Unit Institute of Environment and Sustainability
Review of the European test procedure for evaporative emissions
Presentation transcript:

LABORATORY OF APPLIED THERMODYNAMICS ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY THESSALONIKI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING DEPT. OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING Giorgos Mellios and Leon Ntziachristos Updated methodology for estimating evaporative VOC emissions Copenhagen, 17 th June 2008

Recent updates Chapter 0706 (Gasoline Evaporation from Vehicles) of the Guidebook was updated in August 2007 The chapter has been extensively reviewed by a number of expert users; mistakes were identified and corrected and the updated chapter will be included in the revised Guidebook The new methodology and emission factors were incorporated in COPERT 4 Version 5.0 in December 2007

Evaporative emissions from gasoline vehicles Emission sources Breathing losses (fuel tank, activated carbon canister) Fuel permeation and/or leakage (fuel and vapour control systems) Mechanisms causing evaporative emissions Diurnal emissions Hot soak emissions Running losses Parked vehicle Vehicle engine running

Background data Joint JRC/CONCAWE/EUCAR Programme on Evaporative Emissions 7 vehicles 10 fuels (including ethanol blends) Regulatory SHED test procedure LAT/CONCAWE/JRC work 5 vehicles 3 fuels (HC only) Modified test protocol (improved vehicle preconditioning, more temperature profiles, consecutive diurnal tests, permeation tests) Literature data Motorcycles (Artemis) Carburetted and uncontrolled vehicles (older CONCAWE studies)

Activated carbon canister loading with fuel vapour Canister weight: a, b are linear functions of temperature & vapour pressure Vapour pressure effect Temperature effect vapour loadbreakthrough emissions

Fleet emissions calculation Total evaporative emissions: E eva,voc,j = 365 N j (HS j + e d,j + RL j ) Hot soak emissions HS j = x {c [p e s,hot,c + (1 – p) e s,warm,c ] + (1 – c) e s,hot,fi } Running losses RL j = x {c [p e r,hot,c + (1 – p) e r,warm,c ] + (1 – c) e r,hot,fi }

Overview of the calculation procedure Input parameters Fuel vapour pressure (kPa) Tank size (l) Canister size (small, medium, large) Fuel tank fill level (%) Temperature variation (°C) Cumulative mileage (km) Intermediate calculations Fuel vapour generation (g) Initial canister weight (g) Canister breakthrough emissions (g) Permeation and/or leakage emissions (g) Total evaporative emissions (g)

Parking time distribution Parking duration distributed into 24 time classes ranging from 11.5 h Each combination of parking duration and parking end-time has a probability factor f k f k = 1

Parking time distribution

Intermediate calculations Fuel tank vapour generation (g) Canister breakthrough emissions (g) Permeation and leakage emissions (g)

Emission factors – Gasoline passenger cars Diurnal emissions (g/day) Canister-equipped Uncontrolled

Emission factors – Gasoline passenger cars Hot soak emissions (g/procedure) fuel injection and returnless fuel systems carburettor and/or fuel return systems uncontrolled

Emission factors – Gasoline passenger cars Running losses (g/trip) fuel injection and returnless fuel systems canister-equipped with carburettor and/or fuel return systems uncontrolled with fuel return systems

Emission factors – Motorcycles Diurnal emissions (g/day) Canister-equipped Uncontrolled

Emission factors – Motorcycles Hot soak emissions (g/procedure) canister-equipped uncontrolled

Emission factors – Motorcycles Running losses (g/trip) canister-equipped with carburettor and/or fuel return systems uncontrolled with fuel return systems

Comparison with COPERT III – controlled vehicles Compared to the new methodology, COPERT III: overestimates diurnal and running losses underestimates the effect of temperature and/or overestimates the effect of fuel volatility

Comparison with COPERT III – uncontrolled vehicles Compared to the new methodology, COPERT III: overestimates diurnal and running losses underestimates the effect of temperature and/or overestimates the effect of fuel volatility

Contributions to total emissions Fleet information and exhaust emissions taken from TREMOVE v2.5 Observed differences on a country level are due to differences in ambient temperatures (minimum and maximum), fuel volatility, vehicle usage (annual mileage) and technology mix (share of older uncontrolled vehicles, diesel vehicles, etc) Country% % AT2.9HU4.4 BE6.8IE12.7 CH11.2IT8.5 CZ5.0LU6.6 DE11.5NL4.9 DK6.1NO16.7 ES9.0PL9.4 FI5.1PT3.5 FR10.5SE10.2 GR8.8SI3.6 UK15.2