Progress Update: Evaluation of Federal Facilities in WIPs and Milestones CBPO Management Board March 6, 2012 1 Jim Edward, EPA Greg Allen, EPA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
Advertisements

Stormwater Management Initiative Update. ODOTs Goal Develop a streamlined stormwater runoff treatment program to: Develop a streamlined stormwater runoff.
Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Adopting a Local Program in Accordance with the Revised Stormwater Regulations Appomattox County February.
DEQ Mission By the end of the decade, Virginians will enjoy cleaner water available for all uses, improved air quality that supports communities and ecosystems,
Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Tracking Thursday, May 31, 2012 Martin Hurd, Vladislav Royzman, Tetra Tech, Inc. Brian Burch, Megan Thynge,
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
12/2/2011WORKSHOPS & WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN 1 ARRA 604B WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANNING GRANT Guam Environmental Protection Agency.
Mark Dubin Agricultural Technical Coordinator University of Maryland Extension-College Park Modeling Quarterly Review Meeting April 17, 2012.
Update on the District of Columbia’s Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) for the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) November 18, 2010.
Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program (EPA) 1 CBP Program Update Citizens Advisory Committee February 27, 2014.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
Forestry BMP Review Process Mark Sievers, Tetra Tech Forestry Workgroup (FWG) Conference Call—February 1, 2012.
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
CBP Partnership Approach for Ensuring Full Accountability of Best Practices and Technologies Implemented Jim Edward, CBPO Deputy Director CBP Citizen Advisory.
DC Draft Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan Stakeholder Meeting March 1, 2012 Metropolitan Washington Council Of Governments Hamid Karimi Deputy Director.
Department of Public Works NPDES Low Impact Development and Green Streets Resolutions City Council August 17, 2015.
1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Jim Edward EPA Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office DDOE Meeting with Federal Partners February.
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL & Watershed Implementation Plans The Role of Local Governments Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA Presentation.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program, EPA 1 CBP Program Update on Bay Agreement Comments, Final Draft, and 2-Year Milestone Status Citizens.
Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Implementing Local Action Strategies and the Puerto Rico Resolution Proposal to the U.S. Coral Reef Task Force October 3, 2003 Saipan, CNMI.
10/03/021 Stormwater Video-conference Department of Environmental Protection Stormwater Videoconference October 3, 2002.
Wisconsin’s Nutrient Reduction Strategy for Water Quality Wisconsin Crop Management Conference January 16, 2014 Ken Genskow, PhD Associate Professor, Department.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework: Building Confidence in Delivering on Pollution Reductions to Local Waters Maryland.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Implementing Local Action Strategies and the Puerto Rico Resolution Proposal to the U.S. Coral Reef Task Force October 3-5, 2003 Saipan, CNMI.
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementation Plans: Why, What, and When Katherine Antos U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office MACo Winter Conference January.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
Program Overview Town of Wrightsville Beach Public Works Department Stormwater Services.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Meeting March 17, 2011 Virginia Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Approach.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
1 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan – Phase II James Davis-Martin, Chesapeake Bay TMDL Coordinator Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake.
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
Update for the Citizens Advisory Committee February 22, 2017
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy - NLRS
Chesapeake Bay Program Budget & Finance Workgroup Meeting
Moving to Phase II: Watershed Implementation Plans
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Local Planning Process…
Appendix C New Administration General Assembly Session
Federal Facilities and the District’s Phase III WIP
Local Partners Engagement and Communication Strategy
U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office June 1, 2012
Commonwealth of Virginia
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
MDE’s Phase III WIP Inventory 2018 Fall Regional WIP Meetings
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL
2018 BMP Verification Assessment
Citizens Advisory Committee EPA/CBP Program Update Jim Edward Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office February 20-21,2019 Williamsburg, VA.
Chesapeake Bay Program Update Citizens Advisory Committee September 18-19, 2019 Jim Edward Deputy Director-EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office.
Presentation transcript:

Progress Update: Evaluation of Federal Facilities in WIPs and Milestones CBPO Management Board March 6, Jim Edward, EPA Greg Allen, EPA

Progress Update: Federal Facilities in WIP II Drafts and Milestones WIP 2 and Programmatic Milestones Federal Facility Milestones DC Examples Stormwater Agreement Working Toward Final Phase II WIP EPA Support 2

3 Federal Agency Involvement in Phase II WIPs and Programmatic Milestones – Significant improvement across the jurisdictions in WIP II federal facility information – Jurisdiction lead agencies have connected with federal agency coordinators – EPA and the Federal Facility Team working together with the jurisdictions to collectively fill gaps – Extensive programmatic federal milestones developed by EPA and other agencies will support jurisdiction WIPs Federal Facility Team DODFWSNPSUSGS DHSDOTGSAUSDA EPANOAASmiths.USFS

4 Engage Agencies Identify Facilities Planning Targets Specific BMPs Milestone Deck Tracking Federal Facility Integration WIP II Drafts and Milestones

Federal Facility Milestones Effort began with EO; little prior tracking of BMPs on federal land EPA understands the difficulty of projecting future practices given budgets, etc. EPA expects rapid progress and full accounting of planned BMPs in 2014/2015 milestones for all agencies and jurisdictions; DC and its federal partners got this done for 2012/2013. Through adaptive management agencies can make adjustments to 2 year milestones as conditions change. 5

6 Federal agencies submitted two year milestones for – programmatic and BMPs to DDOE. Milestones include practices in the ground from and upcoming practices through Approximately 25 pages of details on federal facilities owned by over a dozen departments or agencies. Federal Facilities in DC WIP II and Milestones In July 2011, DDOE provided federal agencies with proposed planning targets. Targets based upon updated GIS data layers. Draft Phase II WIP includes federal agency strategies to meet targets.

7 Sample DC Federal Agency Milestone Submissions General Services Administration – Install bio-retention at St Elizabeth site to treat stormwater runoff from over 352,000 sq ft (8 acres) of land area. – Install green roofs at St Elizabeth site to manage over 550,000 sq ft of roof area. National Park Service – Install forest buffers as part of reforestation of over 15 acres of park land. – Install approximately 8 miles of riparian buffer.

Jurisdiction Examples WIP II Federal Facility Information 8 Delaware Inventory of existing stormwater infrastructure Maryland Improved description of planned federal WWTP upgrades Appendix D - DOD and USDA facility plans Pennsylvania Identifies 10 facilities that account for 90% of federal land New federal section and plans for continued engagement Virginia Federal lands information included in PDC outreach package Meeting with federal facilities reps. in December 2011 West Virginia Sector-specific strategy discussions in new federal section Progress on inventory of federal facility permits

9 Priorities for Completing Final Phase II WIPs Federal Agency Review of Phase II WIP – Are your agency’s properties reflected? – Do you have an understanding of expected pollution reduction targets? – Have you provided data to the jurisdiction about previously unreported BMPs (post 1/1/2006)? – Have you provided data to the jurisdiction regarding planned additional BMPs during 2012/2013, or provided a description of steps that will be taken leading to future additional BMPs? Jurisdictions – Work directly with agency contacts to fill gaps – Clarify planning targets if necessary – Include fed agencies in plans for BMP tracking

Status of Federal Stormwater Policy in DC DC MS4 permit is being contested by 2 different groups – alternative dispute resolution involving DDOE, EPA, and appellants DC will continue to move forward implementing provisions of the permit. EPA and fed agencies making progress on developing an agreement to provide leadership beyond permit requirements Initial discussion included EPA-DOD –being expanded to include all federal agencies. February 14 th, several agencies participated in a technical session; policy meeting next 10

EPA Phase II Support for Federal Facilities EPA will work with all jurisdictions and the Federal Facility Team to address: – Information gaps in WIP II – Training needs (stormwater, reporting) – EISA 438 workshop for Federal agencies – Design of reporting and tracking system – Identification of cost effective BMPs and sharing information on success stories – BMP maintenance and ongoing verification – Improvements to CAST to better address federal facilities 11

12 QUESTIONS (410) (410) (410)