© E. Kowch 2002 1 iD Instructional Design Evaluation, Assessment & Design: A Discussion (EDER 673 L.91 ) From Calgary With Asst. Professor Eugene G. Kowch.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Analyzing and Synthesizing Findings Prof. Dr. Khalid Mahmood Department of Library & Information Science University of the Punjab.
Advertisements

Session 2: Introduction to the Quality Criteria. Session Overview Your facilitator, ___________________. [Add details of facilitators background, including.
Guideline for discussion/presentation/critique #1: Really understand the paper …
Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
WEBQUEST Let’s Begin TITLE AUTHOR:. Let’s continue Return Home Introduction Task Process Conclusion Evaluation Teacher Page Credits Introduction This.
Integrating Digital Media & Branding
STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES (SLOs) “Designing” © Pennsylvania Department of Education.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Screen 1 of 24 Reporting Food Security Information Understanding the User’s Information Needs At the end of this lesson you will be able to: define the.
Publishing qualitative studies H Maisonneuve April 2015 Edinburgh, Scotland.
© E. Kowch 2003 iD Instructional Design ID Process Theory : Learner Motivation Media Selection ( EDER 673 L.91 ) From Calgary Asst. Professor Eugene G.
© E. Kowch iD Instructional Design Evaluation, Assessment & Design: A Discussion (EDER 673 L.91 ) From Calgary With Asst. Professor Eugene G. Kowch.
Template.
Coaching for School Improvement: A Guide for Coaches and Their Supervisors An Overview and Brief Tour Karen Laba Indistar® Summit September 2, 2010.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
Literature Review and Parts of Proposal
COMPONENT 3A: COMMUNICATING WITH STUDENTS Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction.
Professional Development Presentation REED 526 ORGANIZING, IMPLEMENTING, AND EVALUATING SCHOOL READING PROGRAMS.
Curriculum development A brief guide to the construction of relevant curricula.
How to Write a Critical Review of Research Articles
© Copyright 2005 by Peter Chan Dr. Peter Chan Asst Professor of Instructional Technology, Brigham Young University Hawaii Visiting Professor, Chinese University.
Title of Training Module Design Plan
Experimental Research Methods in Language Learning Chapter 16 Experimental Research Proposals.
Inquiry-Oriented Learning Tasks, Group work & Office Applications CPE4112 Computer-Based Teaching & Learning Session 3.
© E. Kowch iD Instructional Design Evaluation, Assessment & Design: A Discussion (EDER 673 L.91 ) From Calgary With Asst. Professor Eugene G. Kowch.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
Instructional Plan | Slide 1 AET/515 Instructional Plan December 17, 2012 Kevin Houser.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Comprehensive Curriculum Now that I have it, what do I do with it? July 2005.
ED5545 Curriculum & Instruction Master Practicum II
W HAT IS A C URRICULUM T OPIC S TUDY ? Acronym CTS Process used to inform you before you plan an actual unit/lesson or syllabus. Process used to help plan.
 Read through problems  Identify problems you think your team has the capacity and interest to solve  Prioritize the problems and indicate the.
© E. Kowch 2003 iD 1 Instructional Design ID Process Theory : Learner Motivation Media Selection ( EDER 673 L.91 ) From Calgary Asst. Professor Eugene.
Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.
© E. Kowch iD Instructional Design Evaluation, Assessment & Design: A Discussion (EDER 673 L.91 ) From Calgary With Asst. Professor Eugene G. Kowch.
Microsoft Innovative Teacher Awards READ THIS CAREFULLY The following slides provide you with guidelines for the content of your Innovative Teacher Awards.
© E. Kowch 2003 iD 1 Instructional Design T he ID Process : Needs Analysis & Task Analysis (EDER 673 L.91 ) From Calgary With Asst. Professor Eugene G.
M= Math in STEM College and Career Ready- Conference Summer, 2015.
Leadership Teams 1.Innovators (team 1) 2.Visionaries (team 2) 3.Strategizers (team 3) 4.Motivators (team 4) 5.Collaborators (team 5) 6.Managers (team 6)
Agenda Debrief on past module development Tools for online content development Module development template Timeline Suggested guidelines for developing.
PBL Instructional Design. PBL Instructional Design Name: Name of PBL: Grade Level: Content Area:
Greenbush. An informed citizen possesses the knowledge needed to understand contemporary political, economic, and social issues. A thoughtful citizen.
An AAC Professional Learning Module Book Study based on the AAC publication Creating Credible Criteria Creating Credible Criteria Module 4: The “I Can”
Welcome to HE 510 Seminar 1! We’ll be starting our conference shortly…
ESL Online Course Institute March 16-20, Overview  Introductions  Overview of Institute  Exploration of Exemplary Online & Hybrid Courses  Examining.
Best Practices: Model of Science Inquiry Ann Cavallo and Greg Hale MATH, SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY TEACHER PREPARATION ACADEMY.
Aaron Panych eLearning & Instructional Designer Identify key elements of an well-designed online course Describe my process of developing an online course.
Welcome to Seminar ED503 ED 503. Agenda  General comments  Rules of engagement  Best time for seminar—Survey Monkey  Holiday Schedule  Getting to.
Intel Transforming Learning Learning with One to One Transformative Technology.
Syllabus Unit 1: Intro to Civics: Government, Citizenship, Economics Unit 2: American Revolution & Founding America (Constitution & Amendments) Unit 3:
Chapter 6 Assessing Science Learning Updated Spring 2012 – D. Fulton.
Talk about the assignment! April 27th 2015 #TOOC15 Webinar.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Learning Goals Development & Assessment The Basics of Goals-Based Course Design.
Set Sail on a Three-Course Tour: Three examples of a QM Reviewed Course Krista MacDonald Doña Anna Community College Sharon Lalla New Mexico State University.
Joyce Bahhouth Bladen Community College
ECI 475 Welcome Back!.
Outline What is Literature Review? Purpose of Literature Review
NSG 4028 Enthusiastic Studysnaptutorial.com.
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
AET/515 Instructional Plan Template (Shirmen McDonald)
Journal-Keeping to Enhance Student Engagement in Learning
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
ECI 475 Welcome Back!.
Presentation transcript:

© E. Kowch iD Instructional Design Evaluation, Assessment & Design: A Discussion (EDER 673 L.91 ) From Calgary With Asst. Professor Eugene G. Kowch march 27 (An Synchronous Meeting using WebCT discussion Thread and WWW Course Home Page Material)

© E. Kowch iD Agenda 1. Housekeeping 1. Timetable 2. Course Objectives 3. Blueprint Guidelines (online) 4. ID Model Guidelines (online) 2. Assessment and Evaluation - a Quick Overview 3. Discussion

© E. Kowch iD Timetable Keep an eye on the home page :-) Date (Class)TopicReadings/ Assts. Due March 27 (Vclass)Evaluation Rubrics Evaluation Review Lickona / nothing due April 03 (WebCT)Ethics & Values, Leadership Issues Optional online article / Blueprint Due April 10 (Vclass)Student Instruction Blueprint Presentations None / Present your Instruction Blueprint per guide April 17 (Vclass)Student ID Model Presentations None / Present your ID Model per guide

© E. Kowch iD Update: EDER 673 History of ID ID Terminology Instructional Design Philosophies Learners and Learning Theories Context based designs ID Models: A peek Needs Analysis Task Analysis Ordering Content (elaboration) Media Selection Motivation Ethics/ Ldrship SMCR/Feedback Communication Model Evaluation

© E. Kowch iD Course Objectives: A Review 1. Explore theories of learning and instruction, exploring implications and possible applications for their own practice, 2. Explore, develop and articulate their own instructional design models, to see how theory and practice can be articulated, 3. Design and present efficient, effective and appealing instructional interventions informed and referenced to theory, 4. Participate and present in a collaborative learning community to exchange and consider developing design ideas as instructional designers, 5. Examine the potential and limitations of media and technology use 6. Analyze some models critically and instructional interventions associated with the selection and sequencing of content across the instructional spectrum and 7. Explore and analyze the matching of instructional strategies to characteristics of learners and content.

© E. Kowch iD Blueprint Guidelines I. Approach: ism II. Introduction: State the purpose of this instruction. III. Audience: State the intended audience for your report IV. The Performance Problem: Explain the gap you will fill by your designed instruction. V. Learners: Provide a description of the learners for whom this instruction is intended. VI. Objectives: State the learning outcomes that you desire from this 30 minute instructional module. VII. Scope and Sequence: Describe the decision making process you went through VIII. Indicate optimal and minimal requirements for media and technology IX. Indicate the instructional flow / process X. Conclusion

© E. Kowch iD Blueprint Guidelines Grading Method for this project: Format: did the student follow the requested blueprint format? 10% Content: ID Model Application: did the student include and explain how the instructional blueprint uses the student's personal ID model? 30% Is the performance problem clearly identified? 10% Clarity & Coherence: is the report clear and legible/logical? 20% Scholarly / Theoretical basis: Are key models and theories cited? 10% Conclusion: Does the conclusion explain the blueprint to someone who might contract the designer for exactly this instruction? 20% total: 100%

© E. Kowch iD Blueprint Presentation Guidelines: 6 elements

© E. Kowch iD Blueprint Presentation Guidelines: 6 elements ElementsDoes not meet requirements (B-) Meets Partial Requirements (B to B+) Meets Full Requirements (A- to A+) 1. Model application Does not present model or presentation is incomplete. Presentation and explanation of the model are satisfactory or adequate. Presentation and explanation of the model are superior.

© E. Kowch iD Blueprint Presentation Guidelines: 6 elements

© E. Kowch iD Blueprint Presentation Guidelines: 6 elements IntegrationPresentation does not include integration of model, instruction, and/or theories. Presentation includes integration of model, and instructional unit Presentation includes integration of model, instructional unit, and theories.

© E. Kowch iD Blueprint Presentation Guidelines: 6 elements

© E. Kowch iD Blueprint Presentation Guidelines: 6 elements

© E. Kowch iD Blueprint Presentation Guidelines: 6 elements See the bottom of the home page for guidelines

© E. Kowch iD ID Model Guidelines 1. Informed: Do theories underpin the model? 2. Referenced: Are theorists referenced/understood? (APA not needed) 3. Relationships: Between Elements are indicated/explained 4. Granularity: Visual Model addresses most elements of models covered in EDER 673… 5. Missing Elements: A rationale is provided for element exclusion in your model 6. Limitations of the ID Model: Are defined 7. Generalizability: Evidence or explanation of use of this model in 1. 2 different content areas 8. Scalability: Can I understand the lesson and the program design via your model? 9. Innovation: Uniqueness - do you explain a new approach?

© E. Kowch iD ID Model Guidelines

© E. Kowch iD ID Model Guidelines

© E. Kowch iD ID Model Guidelines

© E. Kowch iD ID Model Guidelines

© E. Kowch iD ID Model Guidelines

© E. Kowch iD ID Model Guidelines

© E. Kowch iD ID Model Guidelines

© E. Kowch iD ID Model Guidelines

© E. Kowch iD ID Model Guidelines

© E. Kowch iD ID model Presentation (April 17)Guidelines. ElementsDoes not meet requirements (B-) Meets Partial Requirements (B to B+) Meets Full Requirements (A- to A+) ModelDoes not present model in Power Point or presentation is incomplete for VClass Presentation and explanation of the model are satisfactory or adequate, Powerpoints are clear and file is smaller than 300 KB Presentation and explanation of the model are superior, and meets Vclass Time Management Is over 5 minutes5 minutes in length but file upload is not ready/prepared 5 minutes in length

© E. Kowch iD ID model Presentation (April 17)Guidelines.

© E. Kowch iD ID model Presentation (April 17)Guidelines. Load file B here