RF Distribution Alternatives R.A.Yogi & FREIA group Uppsala University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
11/27/2007ILC Power and Cooling VM Workshop Mike Neubauer 1 RF Power and Cooling Requirements Overview from “Main Linac Power and Cooling Information”
Advertisements

Areal RF Station A. Vardanyan RF System The AREAL RF system will consist of 3 RF stations: Each RF station has a 1 klystron, and HV modulator,
Areal RF Station A. Vardanyan RF System The AREAL RF system will consist of 3 RF stations: Each RF station has a 1 klystron, and HV modulator,
PAL/POSTECH 제 2 회 한국 국제선형충돌가속기 워크숍 Waveguide System for Linear Collider Woon-Ha Hwang Linac Division Pohang Accelerator Laboratory 2005,12,28.
ESS End-to-End Optics and Layout Integration Håkan Danared European Spallation Source Catania, 6 July 2011.
Roger Ruber, Volker Ziemann, Gergana Hamberg Uppsala University
DESIGN OF A HIGH POWER TEST STAND FOR ESS SPOKE CAVITIES
ESS Linac WP8 Radio Frequency Systems and Test Facilities ESS TAC Lund, 8 July 2010 Roger Ruber (Uppsala University) for the ESS Linac RF Team.
European Spallation Source RF Systems Dave McGinnis RF Group Leader ESS Accelerator Division SLHiPP-1 Meeting 9-December-2011.
RF Distribution R.A. Yogi ESS RF Group Unit Leader for Spoke Power and RF Distribution FREIA Group Unit Leader.
Collaboration meeting, DL, 19 h – 23 h October 2008 Andrew Moss ASTeC Collaboration meeting, DL, 19 th – 23 th October 2008 MICE RF distribution system.
Discussion on Studies at Test Stands Roger Ruber Uppsala University.
Fermilab I. Terechkine1 RF Phase Shifter R&D Proton Driver Review March 15, 2005 T. Barrak, B. Foster, I. Gonin, M. Huening, V. Kashikhin, T. Khabiboulinne,
High Power RF Systems, Control and Distribution in the HINS Alfred Moretti, Brian Chase, Chris Jensen and Peter Prieto Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee.
Christopher Nantista ARD R&D Status Meeting SLAC February 3, …… …… …… … ….
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
Dave McGinnis Chief Engineer – Accelerator Division
February 17-18, 2010 R&D ERL Alex Zaltsman R&D ERL High Power RF Systems Alex Zaltsman February 17-18, 2010 High Power RF Systems.
Neutrino Factory Workshop, IOP, 28th October 2003 RF Systems David M Wilcox.
RF Development for ESS Roger Ruber and Volker Ziemann Uppsala Universitet 4 Dec Dec-20091RR+VZ: ESS RF Development.
IOTs for ESS Morten Jensen November 12, 2013 EnEfficient RF Sources Workshop Cockcroft Institute 3-4 June 2014.
Anders Sunesson RF Group ESS Accelerator Division
13 th April 2007FFAG 07 Carl Beard EMMA RF System Carl Beard, Emma Wooldridge, Peter McIntosh, Peter Corlett, Andy Moss, James Rogers, Joe Orrett ASTeC,
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
Linac RF Source Recommendations for Items 22,23,24,46,47 Chris Adolphsen.
Ding Sun and David Wildman Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee
RF scheme of electron linear accelerator with energy MeV Levichev A.E. Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS.
ESS RF System Design Stephen Molloy RF Group ESS Accelerator Division SLHiPP2 4-May-2012.
Renovation of the 200 MHz RF system LLRF issues. Cavities redistribution 26 October th LIU-SPS Coordination Meeting 2  2011 : 4 cavities 2 x 4.
FFAG Studies at RAL G H Rees. FFAG Designs at RAL Hz, 4 MW, 3-10 GeV, Proton Driver (NFFAGI) Hz,1 MW, GeV, ISIS Upgrade (NFFAG) 3.
KCS and RDR 10 Hz Operation Chris Adolphsen BAW2, SLAC 1/20/2011.
Comparison of Fermilab Proton Driver to Suggested Energy Amplifier Linac Bob Webber April 13, 2007.
ESS Linac Modifications for ESSnuSB Dave McGinnis Chief Engineer / Accelerator Division August 27, 2014.
SPL waveguide distribution system Components, configurations, potential problems D. Valuch, E. Ciapala, O. Brunner CERN AB/RF SPL collaboration meeting.
GHz High Gradient Testing of a T18 TW StructureUsing a Fast Response Protection and Power Recirculating System GHz High Gradient Testing.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Vector Control Algorithm for Efficient Fan-out RF Power Distribution Yoon W. Kang SNS/ORNL Fifth CW.
CW and High Average Power Workshop BNL The Diamond Storage Ring IOT based High Power Amplifier Morten Jensen on behalf of the SR RF Group.
Status of the 1.2 MW MB-IOT for ESS Morten Jensen CLIC Workshop 2016, January, CERN.
ESS Spoke Linac section RF Anders Sunesson, RF group leader Rutambhara Yogi ESS Carlos Martins ESS Roger Ruber FREIA.
FREIA: HIGH POWER TEST STAND Rutambhara Yogi & FREIA Group ESS RF Group Unit Leader for Spoke Power and RF Distribution FREIA Group Unit Leader, Uppsala.
650 MHz Solid State RF Power development at RRCAT
ALBA RF Systems Francis Perez.
Project X High Power 325 MHz RF Distribution and Control Alfred Moretti, Nov 12, 2007 Project X Workshop.
High-efficiency L-band klystron development for the CLIC Drive Beam High-efficiency L-band klystron development for the CLIC Drive Beam CLIC workshop,
Linac RF System Design Options Y. Kang RAD/SNS/NScD/ORNL Project – X Collaboration Meeting April , 2011.
ESS Linac Upgrade Dave McGinnis Chief Engineer / Accelerator Division May 27, 2014.
A CW Linac scheme for CLIC drive beam acceleration. Hao Zha, Alexej Grudiev 07/06/2016.
High Power RF Solid State Amplifiers at FREIA
ESS LLRF and Beam Interaction
Areal RF Station A. Vardanyan
ILC Power and Cooling VM Workshop
Multi-stage pulse compressor
RF cell Anders Sunesson RF group leader
Development of high-power IOTs as an efficient alternative to klystrons Morten Jensen Energy for Sustainable Science 24 October 2013, CERN.
Overview and System Design for ESS LLRF Systems
A frequency choice for the SPL machine: Impact on hardware
Second SPL Collaboration Meeting, Vancouver May 2009
SPL Collaboration Meeting PAC2009
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
Emanuele (ESS), Alessandro (CERN), Mikel (Tekniker), Hayley (ISIS)
12 GHz High Power RF components requirements for CEA activities
ESS RF Development at Uppsala University
IFMIF-EVEDA RF POWER SYSTEM
EffiCAS Efficient Facility for Ions at CAS
CEPC RF Power Sources System
Part2: Cavities and Structures
RF systems introduction
RF introduction Anders Sunesson RF group leader
Roger Ruber for the FREIA team 11 June 2013, Uppsala
RF system for MEIC Ion Linac: SRF and Warm Options
Presentation transcript:

RF Distribution Alternatives R.A.Yogi & FREIA group Uppsala University.

ESS : pulsed spallation source producing neutrons for scientific research consists of proton linear accelerator, target, neutron beam lines neutrons are extracted in fission process from their bound states in heavy atomic nuclei. Energy required for fission process is created by bombarding nuclei with high energy protons, so proton accelerator is needed.

Specifications of superconducting 5 MW proton linac: Pulse Length = 2.9 mS Pulse Rate = 14 Hz Beam Current = 50 mA Energy = 2.5 GeV

Basic layout of RF distribution system (704 MHz ) : Wave-guide Waveguide designation TE10 mode operating range fc in MHzInside dimensions (inch) Peak voltage handling capability(Vp) Loss (dB/m) WR x kV0.002 WR x kV0.003 Circulators can be made using WR1500 to avoid problem of arcing and pressurizing with SF 6. Loop directional coupler

Due to transit time effects, frequency of Grid tubes is limited upto 500MHz.

ModuleFreq. in MHz Source output power in kW Maximum power to beam in kW Number RFQ DTL (type A) DTL (type B) Spoke Elliptical low  Elliptical high 

Source and distribution scheme at 704 MHz. For elliptical high  cavity, maximum power to the beam at coupler = 850 kW For elliptical low  cavity, maximum power coupled to beam at coupler = 560kW So at 704MHz, power required in the range 560kW – 850kW For calculations, consider Pcoupler = 850kW

Power loss in circulator = 2% Power loss in wave-guide loss in wave-guide = 0.09 dB/100 ft length of wave-guide = 20 m (assumed) Power loss in wave-guide = 1.38% Power loss in joints, bends, dual directional coupler.. = 1% Estimated power loss = 5.08% (After knowing exact layout we can exactly estimate loss)

Calculation of source output power Variation of Pout with Pin for klystron Pop Considering the facts that To avoid saturation / nonlinear effects Operating point is 1.5 dB (30%) down the saturation point. Using LLRF this overhead can be reduced. Let us assume it to be 25% Output power of klystron is also function of match at output flange. Hence to protect klystron from reflected power circulator is needed. Rieke diagram shows output power of klystron as a function of match at the output flange

Critical component: Circulator IL and isolation stated in catalogue related to this curve. Specifications as well as acceptance test should include high power effects.

Power at saturation = ( ) % of power at coupler + Pcoupler Psat = % of 850kW + 850kW Psat = MW So for tendering purpose Klystron with saturation at 1.15 MW will be sufficient to get 850kW at coupler.

Possible layout schemes for RF distribution system 1. Single modulator  single klystron  cavity 2. Single modulator  klystron  cavity  klystron  cavity 3. Single modulator  klystron  vector modulator  cavity  vector modulator  cavity

No.EquipmentCost /item in K$ Qty.Total k$Insertion loss 1.Modulator Klystron 1.15MW Circulator 1.15MW % 4.Circulator load Total Total 184 quantity of each is required.

No.EquipmentCost /item in K$ Qty.Total k$Insertion loss 1.Modulator Klystron 1.15MW Circulator 1.15MW Circulator load % Total Most expensive item is Modulator. Two modulators if combined  the cost 1.5 times instead of double. (Ref. to discussions / mail David )

VM HPL VM 3dB Hybrid    AA Freq. 20 – 100MHz Response time < 6mS Got Indian patent

No.EquipmentCost /item in K$ Qty.Total k$ 1.Modulator Klystron 2 MW Circulator 1.3MW Circulator load Hybrid Hybrid load Phase shifter (mechanical) Vector Modulator 1MWp Total167440

ParameterOne modulator – one klystron – one cavity One modulator – two klystron – two cavities One modulator – one klystron – two cavities (using VM) Cost (k$) Insertion lossX% (X+5)% Simplicity of system Simplest SpaceLarge space is required Space saving achieved * : all these numbers depend upon resonant modulator topology

RF distribution system at 352MHz Power input to the spoke cavity = 280kW Number of cavities = 28 (not yet finalized) Source power = 300 – 350kW (yet to be finalized, depends on components) Consider Psource = 350kW

TetrodeKlystronIOTDichrodeSolid state Cost ($)X10X Power (350 kW) Two tetrodes combined SingleMany IOTs tobe combined SingleMany should be combined sizeSize smallerBigger Very big efficiency %High (60 – 65%) % Gain15 – 20 dB37 dB Pre-driverNeeded.Not needed Life time (hrs) 17 – 20 k hours k hours ReplacibilityVery easy.Difficult Power supply DC power supply Modulator Simplicity of system SimpleNoComplex Delivery time 6 monthsDepends on modulator

Tetrode TH571B, TH cavity Tested upto150kW peak power. So not sufficient. Tetrode TH391, can be used with cavity TH Tested upto 200kW peak power, but hasn’t tested for 3mS. Regularly produced and can be tested. Air cooled. Output of these two systems can be combined with 3-dB hybrid. Tetrode TH kW pulse. But not tested. Cavity not available.

DC Power- supply Matched load Pre-driver stage TH kW pulse DC Power- supply 3dB Hybrid 400kW pulse TH kW pulse

Thank you ! Questions and suggestions are welcome.