Accountability in Health Promotion: Sharing Lessons Learned Management and Program Services Directorate Population and Public Health Branch Health Canada.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute Technical Assistance to North Carolinas Health & Wellness Trust Funds TUPC.
Advertisements

Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
Developing an Evaluation Strategy – experience in DFID Nick York Director – Country, Corporate and Global Evaluations, World Bank IEG Former Chief Professional.
1 Service Providers Capacity Assessment Framework Presentation to the Service Delivery Advisory Group August 28, 2008.
Lucila Beato UNMIL/HRPS
RMS – a collaborative approach Presentation Lyn Dare & Stephen Larmour Authorisation & Audit Comcare.
Collaborative Assessment: A Strategy to Relate, Reflect, and React Leah Barrett, Assistant Vice President, Student Affairs Matt Barone, Assistant Director,
Improving Your Business Results Six Sigma Qualtec Six Sigma Qualtec Six Sigma Qualtec – All Rights Reserved June 26, 2002 BEYOND SIX SIGMA: A HOLISTIC.
Reviewing and Critiquing Research
Canadian Evaluation Society Vancouver – June 4, 2003 Using Integrated Risk Management to Improve Strategic Outcomes and Public Transparency Basil Orsini.
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
Summarizing Community-Based Participatory Research: Background and Context for the Review Lucille Webb, MEd Eugenia Eng, DrPH Alice Ammerman, DrPH Meera.
Comprehensive M&E Systems
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Resource Allocation in Canada Evaluation, Accountability and Control Brian Pagan Expenditure Operations and Estimates Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
From Evidence to EMS Practice: Building the National Model Eddy Lang, MD, CFPC (EM), CSPQ SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, McGill University Montreal, Canada.
Dr.Mohamed E. Osman & Prof.Thuwayba A. Al Barwani With Dr.Abdo M. Al Mekhlafi Dr. Khalid Al Saadi Ms.Laila Alhashar Ms.Fathiya Al Maawali Ms.Zuhor Al lawati.
National Standards for Safer Better Healthcare
BC Injury Prevention Strategy Working Paper for Discussion.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.
Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO): Update Deborah Roseveare Head, Skills beyond School Division Directorate for Education OECD 31.
ORIENTATION SESSION Strengthening Chronic Disease Prevention & Management.
Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.
Whistler 2020 Monitoring Program CSIN February16, 2006.
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT CANADA 1 The Government of Canada and the Non-Profit and Voluntary Sector: Moving Forward Together Presentation to Civil Society Excellence:
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
Community Assessment Process WHY?? To identify and document the opportunities, challenges, strengths, and needs of a specific geographic community and.
JOINT STRATEGIC NEEDS ASSESSMENT Rebecca Cohen Policy Specialist, Chief Executive’s.
Overview June,  Sub-recipients grant applications will go to ADAMHS/ADAS Boards only.  ADAMHS/ADAS Boards will be expected to identify a primary.
Page 1 Fall, 2010 Regional Cross Sector Meeting Elements of an Effective Protocol.
UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.
9 December 2005 Toward Robust European Air Pollution Policies Workshop, Göteborg, October 5-7, 2005.
Performance Planning and Review A Positive Alternative to Superintendent Evaluation NSBA – March 30, 2008.
Maria E. Fernandez, Ph.D. Associate Professor Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences University of Texas, School of Public Health.
 Read through problems  Identify problems you think your team has the capacity and interest to solve  Prioritize the problems and indicate the.
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
Governance and Commissioning Natalie White DCSF Consultant
Framework and Toolkit for UN Coherence, Effectiveness and Relevance at Country Level: Step 7 – Monitor & Evaluate.
INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 1 Click to edit Master title style 1 Evaluation and Review of Experience from UNEP Projects.
Private Health Sector Assessments (PHSA) April Harding 2011.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
Why Community-University Partnerships? Partnerships Enhance quality of life in the region Increase relevance of academic programs Add public purposes to.
1 Evaluation of Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) Initiatives Meredith B. Rosenthal, PhD February 24, 2009.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
EPRC Conference conclusions - Collaboration initiative for sustainable regional Arctic development ARC-NET 1.
Prepared by: Forging a Comprehensive Initiative to Improve Birth Outcomes and Reduce Infant Mortality in [State] Adapted from AMCHP Birth Outcomes Compendium.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
Name Project Management Symposium June 8 – 9, 2015 Slide 1 Susan Hostetter, Reed Livergood, Amy Squires, and James Treat 2015 Project Management Symposium.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
Guidelines Recommandations. Role Ideal mediator for bridging between research findings and actual clinical practice Ideal tool for professionals, managers,
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Dissemination in Canada CICAD Guidelines for School-based Prevention of Substance Abuse VII Meeting of the Expert Group on Demand Reduction September 13,
Workshop and Steering Committee Meeting Globally-important Ingenious Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) Project Rome, 7-9 June 2004 Components and Processes.
Continual Service Improvement Methods & Techniques.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Info-Tech Research Group, Inc. is a global leader in providing IT research and advice. Info-Tech’s products and services combine.
The importance of engaging in Health systems strengthening to ensure Nutrition interventions are truly delivered within the health system TECHNICAL MEETING.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
Introduction Social ecological approach to behavior change
Upcoming Work on the Enabling Environment for Civic Engagement Initiative Jeff Thindwa Participation and Civic Engagement Group Social Development Department,
GCM Community Involvement Tool Kit Glenburn Lodge, Muldersdrift, South Africa November 27-28, 2007.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
DATA COLLECTION METHODS IN NURSING RESEARCH
HEALTH IN POLICIES TRAINING
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Presentation transcript:

Accountability in Health Promotion: Sharing Lessons Learned Management and Program Services Directorate Population and Public Health Branch Health Canada Presentation to the Canadian Evaluation Society June 2, 2003 Vancouver, British Columbia

Health Canada, Population and Public Health Branch Presentation Objectives Share lessons on the process and planning elements of an evaluation synthesis for health promotion programs: Evaluation environment and review ‘Umbrella’ approach Methodology/framework Transferable knowledge developed on tools and approaches 2

Health Canada, Population and Public Health Branch Federal Context: Measuring for Results Increased role for accountability through ‘Results based’ management Shared accountability/horizontal approach ‘Value for money’, relevance, management practices Increased role for prevention/promotion in health policy Evaluators faced with dual task of developing performance measurement strategies while substantiating health promotion outcomes 3

Health Canada, Population and Public Health Branch About the Initiative Obligation to renew authorities under which Grant and Contribution health promotion programs are administered Improving program management practices and knowledge base Evaluation Synthesis for six programs ‘Umbrella’ Results-based Management and Accountability Framework for 15+ programs Horizontal initiative engaging many stakeholders 5

Health Canada, Population and Public Health Branch What is the Synthesis? Summary of evaluations – their methodology and results Integrates findings based on topic/functions, versus looking at practices and outcomes through a single program lens ‘One window’ approach to view net effects of programs (evaluation practices and program outcomes) 6

Health Canada, Population and Public Health Branch Synthesis vs. Single Evaluation Less opportunity for bias in results; add strength to overall results Future application for improving evaluations Systematic, comprehensive, allows for comparability of large amounts of information Combines formative and summative Enhance credibility of process and product, clearer link to policy Bias unchallenged Time-specific, focus on outputs vs. rigour and data quality Activity/project/issue oriented Transferable frameworks

Health Canada, Population and Public Health Branch Basic Steps: Evaluation Strategy  Build the Framework  Build the Team  Develop the Tools 7

Health Canada, Population and Public Health Branch Build the Framework Identify stakeholders and built synthesis review team Develop ‘umbrella’ framework and focus the evaluation Propose a research plan (define and pose questions) using common assessment criteria Establish tools for gathering and analyzing evidence Establish consultative process 8

Health Canada, Population and Public Health Branch Build the Team Build team and assign functions Management team oversees process Functional task group plans and implements Multi-disciplinary research team Assign primary and secondary reviewers Maintain regular communication and document experience Ongoing validation of review process and outcomes being reported

Health Canada, Population and Public Health Branch Project Authority Project Management Team Evaluation Risk-based Audit Renewal  Planning & Product development  Communication, messaging, capacity building  Systematic implementation Executive Management Build the Team and Assign Functions Task Groups 9 Middle Management Program/ Functional Managers

Health Canada, Population and Public Health Branch Develop the Tools Evaluation Synthesis framework and work plan Evaluation synthesis review protocol: Literature review of key supporting documents Assessment of review instrument through pilot Instrument validation These tools and the Evaluation Synthesis will be used for the ‘RMAF’ 10

Health Canada, Population and Public Health Branch Preliminary Findings: Lessons Process Planning intensive Appetite for reorienting evaluation culture Consensus driven approach building trust into process Creating momentum to build evaluation further into program management practices Reports Output (vs. health outcome) oriented due to context Method/data source quality and availability Guidance on evaluation

Health Canada, Population and Public Health Branch Developing common assessment tools with broader applications: Evaluation Synthesis Review ‘Protocol’ Evaluation Framework/Methodology Standard indicators to support integrated approaches Consultation workbook Synthesis research on methods & interventions Documenting experience as a transferable approach Building a ‘community of practice’ and culture of evaluation to be more collaborative Strengthening the evidence base linking to policy and supporting integrated health promotion strategies Added Value 13

Health Canada, Population and Public Health Branch Project Challenges Characteristics of population health promotion Level of implementation and ability to prove ‘effective’ Summarizing key achievements of programs (e.g. time, resources, variety) 11

Health Canada, Population and Public Health Branch Opportunities Establishing a comprehensive, collective, integrated and structured evaluation strategy Taking stock of evaluation methods and techniques in health promotion; their limitations and possibilities Developing integrated tools and mechanisms for accountability to improve program design and delivery 12

Health Canada, Population and Public Health Branch The Way Forward Share lessons learned on process and products: Results of synthesis report Results of ‘RMAF’ Develop generic synthesis model to validate assessments of management practices and their evaluations Maintain focus on building capacity in evaluation… 15