Mark Baker Mario Botros Terry Huang Erin Mastenbrook Paul Schattenberg David Wallace Lisa Warren Team Ptolemy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Israeli Universal Spacecraft Bus Characteristics and Design Trade-Offs
Advertisements

Unit 6 Fuel Cells
Analysis of Rocket Propulsion
Study Guide Mission to Mars. Contents Astronauts Going to Mars People in space Space food Newton’s Laws of Motion Landing on target Vasimr rocket Designing.
Low-thrust trajectory design ASEN5050 Astrodynamics Jon Herman.
MAE 5391: Rocket Propulsion Overview of Propulsion Systems
Launch Vehicles. LAUNCH SYSTEM CONCEPTS SHROUD PROTECTS THE SPACECRAFT SHROUD PROTECTS THE SPACECRAFT MAIN VEHICLE PRIMARY LIQUID OR SOLID ROCKET PROPELLANT.
Space Shuttle Justin Schultz. Space Shuttle Space Shuttle is the first orbital space craft designed for reuse Delivers payloads and a rotation of crew.
NEO Surveyor Thomas M. Randolph Jet Propulsion Laboratory
February 1, 2005HYPERION ERAU 1 Thermal Analysis of a Radiation Shield for Antimatter Rocketry Concepts Jon Webb Embry Riddle Aeronautical University.
EGR 4347 Analysis and Design of Propulsion Systems
Attitude Determination and Control
AAE450 Spring 2009 Final Presentation Draft Slides Description: Some draft slides and ideas 3/26/09 Kris Ezra Attitude 1.
An Introduction to Rocket
Class 4: Fundamentals of Rocket Propulsion
Spacecraft Propulsion Dr Andrew Ketsdever Lesson 13 MAE 5595.
EEE440 Modern Communication Systems Satellite Systems.
A Comparison of Nuclear Thermal to Nuclear Electric Propulsion for Interplanetary Missions Mike Osenar Mentor: LtCol Lawrence.
ZENITH SYSTEM DESIGNS ”ALWAYS LOOKING UP” Blaise Cole, Paola Alicea, Jorge Santana, Scott Modtl, Andrew Tucker, Kyle Monsma, Carl Runco.
Launch System Launch Vehicle Launch Complex Orbit Insertion Orbit Maneuvers.
Today’s APODAPOD  Read NASA website:  solarsystem.nasa.gov solarsystem.nasa.gov  IN-CLASS QUIZ THIS FRIDAY!!  Solar Lab, Kirkwood, Rooftop this week.
Samara State Aerospace University (SSAU) Samara 2015 SELECTION OF DESIGN PARAMETERS AND OPTIMIZATION TRAJECTORY OF MOTION OF ELECTRIC PROPULSION SPACECRAFT.
CONTRACTOR 3 Manifest Destiny Michael Pierce Jacob Hollister Jack Reagan Alex Herring Andrew Nguyen Sarah Atkinson Chris Roach AERO 426 – Fall 2012 Texas.
Chapter 23 Space Transportation Systems. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Understand.
AE 1350 Lecture #14 Introduction to Astronautics.
Launching, Orbital Effects & Satellite Subsystems
Rocket Engine Physics and Design
Rockets Tuesday: Rocketry Wednesday: Meet in my room 601: hydrogen demo and Quiz over rocketry. Thursday: Satellites and Orbital Mechanics Friday: Satellites,
1 Formation Flying Shunsuke Hirayama Tsutomu Hasegawa Aziatun Burhan Masao Shimada Tomo Sugano Rachel Winters Matt Whitten Kyle Tholen Matt Mueller Shelby.
Team Force Field Leslie Chapman Scott Cornman Adam Johnson Richard Margulieux Brandon Phipps.
Satellites and Launch Vehicles. “Gee Whiz” Facts Number of satellites currently in orbit is over 900 Satellites orbit at altitudes from 100 miles (Low.
Oh, Thank Heaven for 7-Eleven: Fueling Up in Space with In-Situ Resource Utilization ASTE-527 Final Presentation Riley Garrett.
Space Environment Neutral Environment Hydrogen
Comprehend the different types of rockets Comprehend the propulsion and flight of rockets Comprehend the types of launch vehicles Comprehend the factors.
Rockets Need to overcome Earth's gravity Therefore need to obtain escape velocity Accelerate by throwing out mass (fuel) at very rapid speeds Newton's.
AAE450 Senior Spacecraft Design Kate Mitchell - 1 Kate Mitchell Week 4: February 8 th, 2007 Human Factors – Group Lead HAB, TV, Integration Group This.
Team PM8 Eventus Slide 1. Commercial spaceflight has seen increased activity as more privately owned companies invest in the venture. To avoid a catastrophic.
Energy, Power and Climate Change
ERV 4 Fall 2003 Sean M. Barraclough Benjamin R. Eastmond Jessica E. Gatto Matthew F. Kauffmann Joel D. Richter Amber M. Wilson The Pennsylvania State University.
Contractor 3. I. Launch III. Formation Alignment with Star Pictures Data downlink Stationkeeping II. Deployment IV. Deorbit.
VASIMR: The Future of Space Travel (?) Kevin Blondino 8 October 2012.
ELECTRIC PROPULSION Introduction Classification of Electric Thrusters Professor, Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Pisa, Italy Chairman.
Mars Orbit Rendezvous Robert Dyck. Only land what you need Mars Direct ERV contains stuff not needed on Mars Food & life support for transit to Earth.
The Atmosphere. What is the Earth’s Atmosphere?  Our atmosphere is the mixture of gases and particles that surround the Earth.  The atmosphere is held.
MIT : NED : Mission to Mars Presentation of proposed mission plan
Minimalist Mars Mission Establishing a Human Toehold on the Red Planet Executive Summary DevelopSpace MinMars Team.
ROCKET PROPULSION LECTURE 1: INTRODUCTION Propulsion Lecture 1 - INTRODUCTION.
CubeSat Design for Solar Sail Testing Platform Phillip HempelPaul Mears Daniel ParcherTaffy Tingley December 5, 2001The University of Texas at Austin.
Juno Mission To Jupiter NASA New Frontiers Program Launch Date: Aug. 5, 11:34 a.m. EDT Launch Period: Aug. 5 – 26 (~60 min window) Launch Vehicle: Atlas.
Lecture 11 : Space Exploration
MAE 4262: ROCKETS AND MISSION ANALYSIS
ERV - 1 End of Semester Presentation Brad Buchanan – Group Leader Dominic Amaturo.
Nuclear Propulsion Allen May. What is it?  Any Propulsion Method that uses some form of nuclear reaction.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Brian Erson Attitude Control Systems Trans Lunar Phase Alternative Design Comparison [Brian Erson] [Attitude] 1.
SFINX Surveying Flying IN-situ eXplorer Old Dominion University
Basic Satellite Communication (3) Components of Communications Satellite Dr. Joseph N. Pelton.
PTAR Presentation Jonathan DeLaRosa, Jessica Nelson, Ivan Morin, JJ Rodenburg, & Tim Stelly Team Cronus.
ERV Team 2 Final Report Alicia Cole-Quigley James Gilson Erin Hammond Domenic Marcello Matt Miller Jeff Rosenberger.
Nuclear Thermal Propulsion for Robotic and Piloted Titan Missions Brice Cassenti University of Connecticut.
Flight Hardware. Flight Profile - STS Flight Profile - SLS Earth Mars 34,600,000 mi International Space Station 220 mi Near-Earth Asteroid ~3,100,000.
The Future of Human Spaceflight *** A Journey to Mars
Callisto Mission LaRC Option
Space Tug Propellant Options AIAA 2016-vvvv
Rockets AND PROJECTILE MOTION.
Technological Developments are Making Space Exploration Possible and Offer Benefits on Earth Unit E: Topic Two.
Unit D – Space Exploration
Development and Principles of Rocketry
Bellwork 1/8 What do you know about the International Space Station? If you could ask someone living on the International Space Station some questions,
Unit 5: Lesson 2 Accommodations for Space
Team A Propulsion 1/16/01.
Presentation transcript:

Mark Baker Mario Botros Terry Huang Erin Mastenbrook Paul Schattenberg David Wallace Lisa Warren Team Ptolemy

Outline  Introduction  Mission Statement  Concept of Operations  Trade Trees / Specifications  Structures  Living Units  Launch Vehicle  Propulsion  Power  Controls  Communications  Life Support  Advantages  Questions

Introduction Mission Statement: Our mission is to expand the domain of humanity beyond the Earth for the betterment, preservation, and advancement of all humankind by creating a mobile habitat capable of long-duration, exploratory voyages while ensuring the physical and psychological well-being of its inhabitants.

Concept of Operation Launch individual components into GEO Assemble components autonomously in GEO Send crew to assembled vehicle Transfer from GEO to Earth-Moon L1 Transfer from Earth- Moon L1 to Earth- Sun L1 Transfer from Earth- Sun L1 to near earth asteroid Leave near earth asteroid and enter LEO Return crew to Earth via capsule

Ptolemy 12m 10m 6m 50m 5m Estimated Total Weight: 300MT 16m z xy

Living pods Connecting arm Main hub Power generation Main propulsion system Communications z xy

Truss design for strength efficiency Inner pressurized tube for crew mobility 50 m length, 3 m outer diameter Connecting Arm

Artificial Gravity Calculations

Living Units Occupancy: 6 crew members Volume/Weight: 330 m 3 /20MT Radiation Protection: Greater than International Space Station Ballistic Protection: Micrometeorite and Orbital Debris Shield BA Occupancy: 16 crew members Volume/Weight: 2100 m 3 /65MT Radiation Protection: Greater than International Space Station Ballistic Protection: Micrometeorite and Orbital Debris Shield BA

Launch Vehicle Atlas V-551 Delta IV Heavy Falcon 9 Heavy SLS 130 MT

Propulsion Low Thrust Solar SailsIon Thruster High Thrust Solid Rocket Bipropellant Rocket

Propulsion System DC Power Required : 200 kW Thrust: 5.7 N Exhaust speed: 50 km/s Specific Impulse: 5000 s Thruster efficiency: 72% Vasimr VX-200Comparison Ion Thruster Effective Exhaust Velocity: 50 km/s Specific Impulse: 5,000 s Fuel Mass: 620 kg Bipropellant Rocket Effective Exhaust Velocity: 5 km/s Specific Impulse: 500 s Fuel Mass: 8,200 kg

Power Solar Cells Copper Indium Gallium Selenide Gallium Arsenide Multijunction Dye-sensitized Cells Fuel Cells Nuclear Fast Nuclear Reactor Thermal Reactor

Power Specifications Solar Cells Gallium Arsenide Multijunction Cells Clean and renewable energy Typical efficiency of 30% Most efficient type of solar cell Stored in Lithium – Ion batteries Nuclear Reactor TRIGA Mark III Power output up to 1 MW Pulses up to 6 MW Fuel – High or low enriched uranium Negative thermal coefficient

Controls Attitude Determination & Control Sensors GPSIMUStar TrackerSun SensorMagnetometer Actuators Reaction JetsReaction WheelsCMGsSolar Sails

Controls Specifications Sensors GPS – determine position near Earth IMU – measure attitude, velocity, and acceleration Star Tracker – determine position outside of GPS range Sun Sensor – change angle of solar cells. Actuators Reaction Jets Controls Attitude Controls Nutation Controls Spin Rate Station Keeping Rendezvous Maneuvering

Communication systems External Uplink and downlink radios with high data transfer rate Backup systems with low transfer rates for redundancy Satellite with maneuverability to maintain contact with Earth-Based ground systems Internal Internal Audio Subsystems provides intercom, telephone and alarm systems Two-way audio and video communications among crew

Life Support Food Farming HydroponicsClay ParticlesPeat-Moss Storing Refrigerated FoodFrozen Food Thermostabilized Food Life Support Systems Elektron: Electrolysis splitting water molecules into oxygen and hydrogen Vika: Burning of solid lithium perchlorate to create oxygen Vozdukh: Uses regenerable absorbers to remove carbon dioxide from the air

Life Support Specifications Stored at room temperature Fruits and fish thermostabilized in easy to open cans Entrees in flexible pouches are heated and cut open Dehydrated drinks to be mixed with water or fruit juice Thermostabilized Food Weight of Food per Crew per Day (kg) # Crew Members # Days Estimated Total Food Weight (kg) Total Planned Food Weight (kg) Total Planned Food Storage Surface Area (m²) Food Area Calculations Estimated Volume of 1 Meal (in³)200 # Meals per Day3 # Days730 # Crew12 Total Food Volume (in³)5,256,000 Total Food Volume (m³)86.13 Surface Area Required if stacked 3 meters high (m²) Total Agricultural Surface Area needed (m²) 672

Advantages Food Reduction in volume and surface area No refrigeration or freezing system needed Solar cells Renewable energy Little maintenance required Nuclear power Lowest cost to power ratio Independent of environment Structure Using existing model for the living units (Bigelow Aerospace Models)

Questions?

Backup Slides

Radiation exposure causes direct damage to DNA and indirect effects on health due to generation of reactive oxygen species. Total area to be shielded: 1460 m 2 MaterialSurface area density Mass required Aluminum55g/cm kg Polyethylene20g/cm kg Radiation Shielding

Approximate Days Required to Achieve Required ΔV Number of Engines GEO  EML 1 EML1  C3= 0 C3=0  NEO Asteroid 1507 days51.1 days294.0 days 2254 days25.6 days147.1 days 3169 days17.0 days98.1 days Required ΔV

m T : mass of armm C : mass of capsule L ω r Connecting Arm Calculations

Launch Vehicle Specifications Atlas V-551 – Payload to LEO: 18,814 kg – Payload to GTO: 8,900 kg Delta IV – Payload to LEO: 22,560 kg – Payload to GTO: 12,980 kg Falcon 9 – Payload to LEO: 53,000 kg – Payload to GTO: 12,000 kg Space Launch System – Payload to LEO: 130,000 kg – Payload to GTO: no data