Static Pushover Analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, August 2004
Advertisements

Design of Seismic-Resistant Steel Building Structures
Passive Vibration Control
CALCULATED vs MEASURED ENERGY DISSIPATION.
Robustness assessment for multiple column loss scenarios
SEISMIC STRENGTHENING OF R/C FRAME STRUCTURES USING PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN APPROACH Zdravko Bonev and Stanislav Dospevski 1 65 th anniversary Faculty.
Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo.
ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LABORATORY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COMPILED GREGORY G. PENELIS ANDREAS J. KAPPOS 3D PUSHOVER.
Overview of Direct Analysis Method of Design for Stability
Beam-Columns.
An-Najah National University
ETABS Three Dimensional Static and Dynamic Analysis and Design of Buildings.
Structural System Overview
Lecture 33 - Design of Two-Way Floor Slab System
Rigid-Frame Structures
OBJECTIVE To present a MTLAB program for conducting three dimensional dynamic analysis of multistory building by utilizing a simple and ‘easy to understand’
By the name of the god Graduation project presentation.
Modeling for Analysis CE Design of Multi-Story Structures
Beams and Frames.
Second order effects.
Konstantinos Agrafiotis
Seismic design for the wind turbine tower (WP1.5 background document presentation) Institute of Steel Structures Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki.
Contents : Introduction. Rapid Visual Screening.
Seismic Performance of Dissipative Devices Martin Williams University of Oxford Japan-Europe Workshop on Seismic Risk Bristol, July 2004.
2o Ciclo de Palestras em Engenharia Civil de Novembro de 2003 Universidade Nova de Lisboa-Centro de Investigaçao em Estruturas e Construção-UNIC.
NEWBuildS Tall Wood Building Design Project – Seismic & Gravity Load Analysis and Design Zhiyong Chen University of New Brunswick
An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department Terra Santa School Structural Design and Analysis Prepared By: Bara Shawahna.
by: Jon Heintz, S.E. & Robert Pekelnicky
SAP2000 Title Three Dimensional Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis and Design of Structures.
Level (m-1 ) Level m h (1-c)h ch Rigid Beam x1x1 x k1k1 k2k2 knkn kHkH RC AND SRC SHEAR WALL MACRO-MODELING l Multiple Vertical Line.
#1 212 Ketter Hall, North Campus, Buffalo, NY Fax: Tel: x 2400 Control of Structural Vibrations Lecture.
SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF A CONCRETE BUILDING California State University at Los Angeles Belen Valencia Art Chianello Marlon Calderon Faculty Advisor: Rupa Purasinghe.
Section 2.1 Overview Types of NL Models Inelastic Model Attributes
Dynamics Free vibration: Eigen frequencies
1 ENGI 6705: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS - FUNDAMENTALS.
December 3-4, 2007Earthquake Readiness Workshop Seismic Design Considerations Mike Sheehan.
Streamlined Process for Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis of Nuclear Facilities Utilizing GTSTRUDL and MTR/SASSI Wei Li, Michael Perez, Mansour Tabatabaie,
Structural Engineering
University of Palestine
Jurg Conzett – Traversina Bridge
TOPICS COVERED Building Configuration Response of Concrete Buildings
Structural Analysis and Design of
CTC 422 Design of Steel Structures
Inelastic Seismic Response of Structures
Prepared By: Mohammed wafiq omer Mahmoud hammad Abd Algani Sami Malath omair An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department.
University of Palestine
Building Fun You will have 30 minutes to build the strongest structures you can with only the materials you are provided with. Explain to the class the.
Tall Building Initiative Response Evaluation Helmut Krawinkler Professor Emeritus Stanford University On behalf of the Guidelines writers: Y. Bozorgnia,
Presented by: Sasithorn THAMMARAK (st109957)
Response of MDOF structures to ground motion 1. If damping is well-behaving, or can be approximated using equivalent viscous damping, we can decouple.
Adaptive Nonlinear Analysis as Applied to Performance based Earthquake Engineering Dr. Erol Kalkan, P.E. United States Geological Survey TUFTS, 2008.
SCHEDULE 8:30 AM 10:30 AM Session I 11:00 AM Break 12:15 PM Session II 1:30 PM Lunch 2:45 PM Session III 3:15 PM 4:30 PM Session IV.
BASICS OF DYNAMICS AND ASEISMIC DESIGN
Results Verification Has the model been correctly implemented?
Building Construction
ACI Committee 341-C State-of-the-Art Summary Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit Techniques for Concrete Bridges.
INTRODUCTION Due to Industrial revolution metro cities are getting very thickly populated and availability of land goes on decreasing. Due to which multistory.
Bassam A. Izzuddin* and Bassam A. Burgan†
SHERINE RAJ AP/CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF SCD
(PERFORMANCE-BASED PLASTIC DESIGN)
AQQABA SECONDRY SCHOOL Structural Design.
GUIDED BY, MS. D. DARLING HELEN LYDIA M.TECH., PRESENTED BY,
Bridge modelling with CSI software.
An-Najah National University
Welcome to My Presentation
ASSESSEMENT AND REHABILITATION OF STRUCTURES
فصل اول 1- پیشگفتار 2- کلیات خوشا پیشگفتار: از دستاورد های امروزه مهندسی زلزله و سازه ، می توان طراحی سازه ها بر مبنای عملکرد را بر شمرد که اولا.
Earthquake resistant buildings
Beam-Columns.
Second Order Analysis In the previous classes we looked at a method that determines the load corresponding to a state of bifurcation equilibrium of a perfect.
Presentation transcript:

Static Pushover Analysis Performance Based Design Modeling for Pushover Analysis Use of the Pushover Curve M. Iqbal Suharwardy Computers and Structures, Inc. Static Pushover Analysis for Seismic Design March 22, 1999

Performance Check of Structures Purpose How will a structure perform when subjected to a given level of earthquake? Definition of structural performance Definition of earthquake level Determination of performance level

Performance Check of Structures Process Recently released guidelines for Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings: ATC-40 FEMA 273 (ATC-33)

Types of Performance Checks Linear Static Analysis Linear Dynamic Analysis Nonlinear Static Analysis (Pushover Analysis) Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis

Performance Check Using Pushover Expected Performance Point for given Earthquake Force Measure Performance Limits (IO, LS, CP) Deformation Measure Goal is to predict peak response of building and components for a given earthquake

Why Do Pushover Analysis? Design Earthquakes cause nonlinear behavior Better understand building behavior - Identify weak elements - Realistic prediction of element demands Less conservative acceptance criteria can be used with consequences understood

Steps in Performance Check Construct Pushover curve Select earthquake level(s) to check Select performance level(s) to check Select acceptance criteria for each performance level Verify acceptance Capacity Spectrum Method (ATC-40) Displacement Coefficient Method (FEMA 273)

Constructing Pushover Curve Define Structural Model Elements (components) Strength - deformation properties Define Loads Gravity Lateral load pattern Select Control Displacements or Drifts Perform Pushover Analysis

Pushover Modeling Definition of Structural Model 3D or 2D Primary and Secondary Elements (components) Non structural Elements Foundation flexibility P-Delta effects

Pushover Modeling (Elements) Types Truss - yielding and buckling 3D Beam - major direction flexural and shear hinging 3D Column - P-M-M interaction and shear hinging Panel zone - Shear yielding In-fill panel - Shear failure Shear wall - P-M-Shear interaction! Spring - for foundation modeling

Pushover Modeling (Properties) Force-Deformation Relationship C B Force D E A Deformation

Pushover Modeling (Properties) Force-Deformation (Back bone Curve) Force Deformation

Pushover Modeling (Beam Element) Three dimensional Beam Element Flexible Connection Span Loads Shear Hinge Plastic Hinge Rigid Zone

Pushover Modeling (Column Element) Three dimensional Column Element Shear Hinge Plastic Hinge Rigid Zone

Pushover Modeling (Column Element) Axial Load - Moment Interaction (Concrete) P M

Pushover Modeling (Column Element) Axial Load - Moment Interaction (Steel)

Pushover Modeling (Loads) Start with Gravity Loads Dead Load Some portion of Live Load Select Lateral Load Pattern Lateral Load Patterns (Vertical Distribution) Lateral Load Horizontal Distribution Torsional Effects Orthogonal Effects

Pushover Modeling (Loads) Lateral Load Patterns (Vertical Distribution) Uniform Code Lateral Mode 1

Pushover Analysis (Control) Force controlled analysis Deformation controlled analysis Roof Displacement Generalized Displacement Definitions Limit of analysis Instability - loss of gravity load carrying capacity Excessive distortions

Pushover Analysis (Solution Schemes) Event by Event Strategies Manual Newton-Raphson Type Strategies Constant stiffness iterations Tangent stiffness iterations Problem of degradation of strength Ritz Modes (Reduced Space) Strategies

Pushover Analysis (Solution Schemes) Event by Event Strategy Base Shear Roof Displacement

Pushover Analysis (Solution Schemes) Problem of Degradation of Strength Base Shear Roof Displacement

Pushover Analysis (Results) Force Measure Deformation Measure

Pushover Analysis (Results)

Use of Pushover Curve Capacity Spectrum Method - detailed in ATC-40 - and as alternate method in FEMA-273 Displacement Coefficient Method - detailed in FEMA-273

Use of Pushover Curve (ATC-40) Construct Capacity Spectrum Estimate Equivalent Damping Determine Demand Spectrum Determine Performance Point Verify Acceptance

Use of Pushover Curve (ATC-40) Constructing Capacity Spectrum Base Shear Spectral Acceleration Roof Displacement Spectral Displacement

Use of Pushover Curve (ATC-40) Constructing Capacity Spectrum The displaced shape at any point on the pushover curve is used to obtain an equivalent SDOF system. a is the mass participation and relates the base shears PF is the participation factor and relates the roof displacement to the SDOF displacement MDOF Equivalent SDOF

Use of Pushover Curve (ATC-40) Constructing Capacity Spectrum Spectral Acceleration Spectral Displacement

Use of Pushover Curve (ATC-40) Estimation of Equivalent Viscous Damping Spectral Acceleration Spectral Displacement

Use of Pushover Curve (ATC-40) Estimation of Equivalent Damping Spectral Acceleration Eso Spectral Displacement Ed

Use of Pushover Curve (ATC-40) Response Spectrum (5% damping) 2.5CA CV/T Spectral Acceleration Time Period

Use of Pushover Curve (ATC-40) Response Spectrum (5% damping) CA and CV depend on: - Seismic zone (0.075 to 0.4) - Nearness to fault and source type (1 to 2) - Soil Type (1 to 2.5) - Level of Earthquake (0.5 to 1.5)

Use of Pushover Curve (ATC-40) Reduced Spectrum (Effective damping) 2.5CA/Bs Spectral Acceleration CV/(T BL) Time Period

Use of Pushover Curve (ATC-40) Acceleration-Displacement Response Spectrum T0 Sd = SaT2/4p2 Spectral Acceleration Spectral Acceleration T0 Time Period Spectral Displacement

Use of Pushover Curve (ATC-40) Performance Point Demand Spectrum for effective damping at performance point Spectral Acceleration Capacity Spectrum Spectral Displacement

Use of Pushover Curve (ATC-40) Performance Point Spectral Acceleration Spectral Displacement

Use of Pushover Curve (ATC-40) Verification of Acceptance Expected Performance Point for given Earthquake Force Measure Performance Limits (IO, LS, CP) Deformation Measure

Use of Pushover Curve (ATC-40)

Use of Pushover Curve (FEMA-273) (Displacement Coefficient Method) Estimate Target Displacement Verify Acceptance

Use of Pushover Curve (FEMA-273) Estimation of Target Displacement Estimate effective elastic stiffness, Ke Estimate post yield stiffness, Ks Estimate effective fundamental period, Te Calculate target roof displacement as

Use of Pushover Curve (FEMA-273) Estimation of Target Displacement C0 Relates spectral to roof displacement C1 Modifier for inelastic displacement C2 Modifier for hysteresis loop shape C3 Modifier for second order effects

Use of Pushover Curve (ATC-40) Estimation of Effective Elastic Period, Te Vy aKe = Ks Estimate Te using Ke Estimate Elastic Spectral Displacement .6Vy Base Shear Ke Roof Displacement

Use of Pushover Curve (FEMA-273) Calculation of C0 Relates spectral to roof displacement - use modal participation factor for control node from first mode - or use modal participation factor for control node from deflected shape at the target displacement - or use tables based on number of stories and varies from 1 to 1.5

Use of Pushover Curve (FEMA-273) Calculation of C1 Modifier for inelastic displacement C1 = [1 +(R-1)T0/Te]/R R is elastic strength demand to yield strength Spectral Acceleration C1 = 1 T0 Time Period

Use of Pushover Curve (FEMA-273) Calculation of C2 Modifier for hysteresis loop shape - from Tables - depends on Framing Type (degrading strength) - depends on Performance Level - depends on Effective Period - varies from 1.0 to 1.5

Use of Pushover Curve (FEMA-273) Calculation of C3 Modifier for dynamic second order effects C3 = 1 if post yield slope, a is positive else C3 = 1 +[ |a|(R-1)3/2 ]/Te

Use of Pushover Curve (FEMA-273) Verification of Acceptance Target Displacement (or corresponding deformation) for given Earthquake Force Measure Performance Limits (IO, LS, CP) Deformation Measure

Use of Pushover Curve Do these methods work? Comparisons with: - Nonlinear time history analysis - Single degree of freedom systems - Multi-degree of freedom systems - Observed damage How do they compare with each other?

SAP2000/ETABS Pushover Options SAP2000 released September, 1998 Full 3D implementation Single model for - linear static analysis - linear response spectrum analysis - linear time history analysis - nonlinear time history analysis - nonlinear static pushover analysis - steel and concrete design

SAP2000/ETABS Pushover Options Generally follows ATC-40 & FEMA 273 Available Pushover Element Types - 3D truss (axial hinge) - 3D beam (moment and shear hinges) - 3D column (P-M-M and shear hinges) - Shells, Solids, etc. considered linear - Panel zone (later) - 3D column (Fiber hinge) (later) - Shear wall (plasticity model) (later) - Nonlinear springs (later)

SAP2000/ETABS Pushover Options Force-Deformation Relationship C D B Force E F A Deformation

SAP2000/ETABS Pushover Options Three dimensional Beam Element Flexible Connection Span Loads Shear Hinge Plastic Hinge Rigid Zone

SAP2000/ETABS Pushover Options Strength - deformation and P-M-M curves can be calculated by program for: - steel beams (FEMA 273) - steel columns (FEMA 273) - shear hinges in EBF Links (FEMA 273) - concrete beams (ATC-40) - concrete columns (ATC-40) - shear hinges in coupling beams (ATC-40)

SAP2000/ETABS Pushover Options Gravity Load Analysis - Nodal Loads - Element Loads - Load controlled Analysis Pushover analysis - Starts from gravity loads - Nodal Load Patterns (user, modal, mass) - Multi-step Displacement or Drift controlled

SAP2000/ETABS Pushover Options Available Results for each step of loading - Base Shear - Element Forces - Section Forces - Joint Displacements - Drifts - Element Hinge Deformations - Limit Points (acceptance criteria) reached

SAP2000/ETABS Pushover Options Pushover Curve Postprocessing (ATC-40) - Conversion to Capacity Spectrum - Calculation of Effective Period (per step) - Calculation of Effective Damping (per step) - Calculation of Demand Spectrum (per step) - Location of Performance Point - Limit Points (acceptance criteria) reached

SAP2000/ETABS Pushover Options Visual Display for each step - Deformed Shape - Member Force Diagrams - Hinge Locations and Stages Graphs - Base Shear vs Roof Displacement - Capacity Curve - Demand Curve - Demand Spectra at different dampings - Effective period lines