National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Goals of Project NARAP Collaboration General Advisory Committee Project Details (ETS and PARA) Plans for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome to Site Management Amy Thompson. Agenda I.Foundation Introductions Setting the Session Agenda II.Site Management Principles III.Site Management.
Advertisements

PAINLESS PERIODIC REVIEW Cynthia Steinhoff Anne Arundel Community College Arnold, Maryland.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Defining Reading Proficiency for Accessible Large Scale Assessments Principles and Issues Paper American.
Designing Accessible Reading Assessments National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects General Advisory Committee December 7, 2007 Overview of DARA Project.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Defining Reading Proficiency for Accessible Large Scale Assessments Discussion of the Principles and Issues.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects National Accessible Reading Assessment Project General Advisory Committee October Meeting Review.
PARA Project Overview, Results, Next Steps Martha Thurlow and Deborah Dillon National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects (NARAP)
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects (NARAP)
Increasing the Accessibility of Large-Scale Assessments of Reading Proficiency for Students with Disabilities National Accessible Reading Assessments Projects:
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment (PARA) Martha Thurlow.
Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment (PARA) Research Martha Thurlow National Center on Educational.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Principles and Guidelines NARAP Goal 3.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects General Advisory Committee December 7, 2007 Introduction.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects General Advisory Committee December 8, 2006 Overview of.
Principal Investigators: Martha Thurlow & Deborah Dillon Introduction Assumptions & Research Questions Acknowledgments 1. What characteristics of current.
Orelena Hawks Puckett Institute American Institutes for Research PACER Center University of Connecticut Center for Excellence in Disabilities Presentation.
Fairness in Testing: Introduction Suzanne Lane University of Pittsburgh Member, Management Committee for the JC on Revision of the 1999 Testing Standards.
Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel Co-Chair.
State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Wednesday, June 11, :00-4:00pm ET.
How Your Application Is Reviewed Vonda Smith, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
New Hampshire Enhanced Assessment Initiative: Technical Documentation for Alternate Assessments Standard Setting Inclusive Assessment Seminar Marianne.
National Center on Educational Outcomes N C E O What the heck does proficiency mean for students with significant cognitive disabilities? Nancy Arnold,
National Center on Educational Outcomes What Item Level Data Tell Us About Universal Design: Fantasy, Foolishness, or Fuel for Fire? in Large- Scale Assessments.
Trade Study Training Need and Goals Need Consistent methodologies and practices performing trade studies Pros/cons, advantages/disadvantages, customer/management.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Creating Research proposal. What is a Marketing or Business Research Proposal? “A plan that offers ideas for conducting research”. “A marketing research.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Synthesis of Ideas from MERGA Conference 2007 Participants in VP Development Session on National Curriculum Gaye Williams VP (Development) thanks all MERGA.
TIMELESS LEARNING POLICY & PRACTICE. JD HOYE President National Academy Foundation.
Phase II Kick-off Introduction by Commissioner Virginia M. Barry, Ph.D.
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.
A Forum on Comprehensive Community Initiatives How Federal Agencies Can Foster Systems Change to Improve the Lives of Youth and Families Welcome to.
Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.
From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
Atlanta Public Schools Principal Selection Process Human Resources, Center of Expertise Updated March 3, 2014.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Research on Making Large-Scale Reading Assessments More Accessible for Students with Disabilities June.
TRANSITION PLAN STAKEHOLDER GROUP CENTER FOR DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING EDUCATION.
Community Assessment Process WHY?? To identify and document the opportunities, challenges, strengths, and needs of a specific geographic community and.
Research Policies and Mechanisms: Key Points from the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Joan Ferrini-Mundy Director, Division of Research on Learning.
T AXI L IMOUSINE A DVISORY C OMMITTEE C OMMUNICATING AND E NGAGING S TAKEHOLDERS March 25, 2011.
Evaluating a Research Report
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
A Principled Approach to Accountability Assessments for Students with Disabilities CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit, Michigan June.
Get Your "Party" Started: Establishing a Successful Third-party Evaluation Martha Thurlow, Ph.D. & Vitaliy Shyyan, Ph.D.—National Center on Educational.
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Anne Beal, MD, MPH, Chief Operating Officer.
Developing NAEP Frameworks: A Look Inside the Process Mary Crovo Deputy Executive Director National Assessment Governing Board November 17, 2007.
Considering the Roles of Research and Evaluation in DR K-12 Projects December 3, 2010.
Unit 8: Implementation, Part II Seminar Wednesday pm ET.
Advancing Government through Collaboration, Education and Action Institute for Innovation Discussion with Shared Interest Group Vice Chairs October 14,
ATP Meeting September 18, Overview Key components of the 2016 Plan Public Participation Plan Discussion.
Evaluating Engagement Judging the outcome above the noise of squeaky wheels Heather Shaw, Department of Sustainability & Environment Jessica Dart, Clear.
Objectives Definition Instructions Mark Melanson 8 January 2012.
Grant Writing: Specific Considerations in Clinical Studies Ravi Retnakaran MD MSc FRCPC Leadership Sinai Centre for Diabetes, Mount Sinai Hospital University.
A Presentation to the USDOE January 13, 2010 Mary Ann Snider Chief of Educator Excellence and Instructional Effectiveness Race to the Top- Assessment Programs.
Stages of Research and Development
Martha Thurlow, Phd Linda Goldstone, MS APRIL 22, 2017
MUHC Innovation Model.
Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Health System (PRIHS) /2020 Sean Dewitt, Program Manager, Health, Alberta Innovates Marc Leduc,
Presentation transcript:

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Goals of Project NARAP Collaboration General Advisory Committee Project Details (ETS and PARA) Plans for Year 1 Overview

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Goals for Project 1.Develop a definition of reading proficiency 2.Research the assessment of reading proficiency 3.Develop research-based principles and guidelines making large-scale reading assessments more accessible for students who have disabilities that affect reading 4.Develop and field trial a prototype reading assessment

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects NARAP Collaboration Proposal hinted at collaboration and we decided to bring it alive – in several ways: Name for Collaborative Entity Shared Web site Shared Committees (GAC, Definition Panel) Collaboration on Activities

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects General Advisory Committee RFP Language: Form a general advisory committee on which representation is invited from the National Center for Education Statistics; the National Assessment Governing Board; the National Center on Educational Outcomes; the National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing; organizations representing test developers, reading educators, and researchers; disability groups; and other appropriate projects and organizations.

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects General Advisory Committee RFP Language: The primary purposes of this advisory committee are to review and advise on the general plans of the project and to provide liaison with significant stakeholder groups.

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Question Does the Committee have any ideas about how to maximize collaboration between the projects? Or, does the committee have any concerns about the collaboration of the two projects, and suggestions for things to avoid?

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Project Details (ETS) Focus on learning disabilities Component approach to assessing reading –Isolate individual components of reading (e.g., comprehension or word recognition) into subtests –Allows for accommodations (e.g. audio presentation) to be specific to subtest without impact validity of entire test

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Research Agenda (ETS) 2005 –Focus Groups –Differential Boost –Factor Analysis –Differential Item Functioning

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Research Agenda (ETS) 2006 –Focus Groups –Cognitive Labs –Usability Studies –Diagnostic Score Reporting

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Project Details (PARA) Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment Partners = National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST) Westat, Inc. Disability Focus = All disabilities that affect reading (for field test, will have sufficient samples of students with Learning Disabilities, Speech Language Impairments, Mental Retardation, and Deaf/Hearing Impairments)

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects PARA – Seizing the Opportunity to Build on the Expertise of Others! Reading proficiency is being approached from the lens of students with vastly diverse needs There is a need for expertise and input of reasoned scholars, key national stakeholders, expert advisors, and end users of assessments.

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects General Advisory Committee Definition Panel Technical Advisory Committee Principles Committee GOAL 1 Formulate a definition of reading proficiency, analyze the definition in relation to state standards, obtain input, and refine the definition GOAL 3 Develop research based principles and guidelines for making large-scale assessment of reading proficiency more accessible GOAL 4 Develop instruments and methods for assessing reading proficiency that are suitable for large scale administration Review and advise the project on general plans and to liaison with significant stakeholder groups Formulate working definitions of key terms for use in collaborative effort with other funded projects GOAL 2 Conduct a program of research on the assessment of reading proficiency to determine the effects of various factors of test development, design and administration Formulate working papers on research based principles and guidelines for collaborative effort Review and provide technical input on the specific research and development plans and activities Collaboration Project Details (PARA)

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Research Agenda (PARA) General Questions: 1.Sampling Issues: Which students need which kinds of assistance to access the types of reading assessment that states currently administer? 2.Validity of Accessible Assessments: How can a valid assessment be developed that will permit students with disabilities that affect reading to demonstrate their reading proficiency?

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Research Agenda (PARA) General Questions: 3. Universal Design and Individual Student Characteristics: What common forms of assessment are appropriate for group testing that are accessible to students with disabilities that affect reading? 4.Instructional Sensitivity/Opportunity for Use of Access Tools: What opportunities do students with disabilities that affect reading have to access reading through alternatives to print in the classroom?

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Plans for Year 1 Develop reading proficiency definition Projects hold meetings with advisory groups (GAC, TACs)

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Work of the Definition Panel (DP) Leadership Roles, Work Group, Membership of the DP, Tasks and Timeline

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Work Group Group co-leaders: Deborah Dillon, University of Minnesota and John Sabatini, ETS Members: Ann Clapper, NCEO; Laurie Cutting, ETS and Kennedy Krieger Institute; Lee Galda and David OBrien, University of Minnesota

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects The Role of the Work Group Determine membership of the DP Develop agendas for the DP meetings Outline tasks for the DP Identify the products that will emerge from the work of the DP

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Membership of the DP Reviewed the current proposed membership ( 9 members plus 2 from ETS and 3 from the U of MN) Considered new panel members and a rationale for their inclusion Struggled with the need for expertise (re: the task at hand) and the potential for unwieldiness with a large panel

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Agendas for DP Meetings Teleconference Meetingoverview tasks and timeline; begin to identify research that we need to review Document Reviewsrequest that panel members review selected reports and drafts of the Synthesis Document Face-to-Face Panel Meeting/sseek panel members consensus on the working definitions of key terms and the definition of reading proficiency

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects DP Tasks Identify critical issues and terms in addition to reading proficiency needed for the collaborative efforts Identify relevant research literature for the comprehensive review to generate a working definition of reading proficiency and other related terms

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects DP Taskscont. Draft a Synthesis Documentthis document is comprised of key pieces of research, panel meeting minutes, and a review of current literature and research reports (e.g., RAND; NAEP Reading Framework for 2009); a list of key terms (glossary) will also be documented Identify issues and points in the document that need clarification

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Products from the DP and Continued Work Synthesis Document; formulation of a definition of Reading Proficiency Supporting documentation for the definition Focus Groupsindividuals will respond to the work of the DP and offer feedback Reconvene the DP to finalize the definition based on external feedback