The Role of Background Knowledge in Sentence Processing Raluca Budiu July 9, 2001 Thesis Committee: John Anderson, Chair Jaime Carbonell David Plaut Lynne.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
February, CYCLADES An Open Collaborative Virtual Archive Environment Umberto Straccia IEI-CNR (Italy)
Advertisements

Michela MichilliStockolm 11 June Museums best practices.
Università di AnconaCoopIS01 September 6, C OOPERATION S TRATEGIES FOR I NFORMATION I NTEGRATION Maurizio Panti, Luca Spalazzi, Loris Penserini
Universidade de São Paulo
Pat Langley School of Computing and Informatics Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona USA Mental Simulation and Learning in the I CARUS Architecture.
Pat Langley School of Computing and Informatics Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona USA Modeling Social Cognition in a Unified Cognitive Architecture.
Healthcare Informatics Standards Board United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK) Metadata Registry Project Health Level Seven May 8, 2001.
Pat Langley School of Computing and Informatics Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona USA A Unified Cognitive Architecture for Embodied Agents Thanks.
Findings of the ADS-B Technical Link Assessment Team TLAT Co-Chairs April 2001 Constantine Tamvaclis Eurocontrol Experimental Centre ATM/CNS System Engineering.
Take a piece of pizza from the counter.
Communication Theory Lecture 1: Introduction to Communication Theory and Novel Technology Dr. Danaë Stanton Fraser.
Jim Austin University of York & Cybula Ltd
Corpora in grammatical studies
May 8, High Speed Electrical Testing Jim Choate Intel Corporation.
EUNITE 2001, December The Mobile Commerce Quest for Value-Added Products & Services Pirkko Walden IAMSR/Abo Akademi University
TU/e technische universiteit eindhoven WebNet 2001October 26, XML to XML through XML Pim Lemmens Geert-Jan Houben Eindhoven University of Technology.
Speaking English Does Not Necessarily Mean Understanding English Hanadi Mirza
What is Science?.
Module 14 Thought & Language.
Semantics (Representing Meaning)
Modelling the Virtual Machine in Simple Rating and Categorization Tasks Simon Dennis School of Psychology University of Adelaide.
Blueprints or conduits? Using an automated tool for text analysis Stuart G. Towns and Richard Watson Todd King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi.
Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 8 Aphasia: disorders of comprehension.
Figurative Language Development Research and Popular Children’s Literature: Why We Should Know, “Where the Wild Things Are” Kathleen Ahrens.
Theeraporn Ratitamkul, University of Illinois and Adele E. Goldberg, Princeton University Introduction How do young children learn verb meanings? Scene.
Latent Semantic Analysis
Concepts and Categories. Functions of Concepts By dividing the world into classes of things to decrease the amount of information we need to learn, perceive,
Language, Mind, and Brain by Ewa Dabrowska Chapter 2: Language processing: speed and flexibility.
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics Some basic linguistic theory part3.
Learning about Literacy: A 30-Year Journey By P. David Pearson & Diane Stephens Presented by Pat Edwards & Hakim Shahid Edu. 707 Dr J. McEneaney.
Natural Language Query Interface Mostafa Karkache & Bryce Wenninger.
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics Language Comprehension: The role of memory.
Thesis Proposal Raluca Budiu February 9, 2000 The Role of Background Knowledge in Sentence and Discourse Processing.
Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA). Introduction to LSA Learning Model Uses Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to simulate human learning of word and passage.
NLP: Why? How much? How? Peter Wiemer-Hastings. Why NLP? Intro: once upon a time, I was a grad student and worked on MUC. Learned: –the NLP was as good.
Introduction to Machine Learning Approach Lecture 5.
The Characteristics of an Experimental Hypothesis
9/8/20151 Natural Language Processing Lecture Notes 1.
Amira Al Harbi.  Psycholinguistics is concerned with language and the brain.  To be a perfect psycholinguistist, you would need to have a comprehensive.
Word category and verb-argument structure information in the dynamics of parsing Frisch, Hahne, and Friedericie (2004) Cognition.
Lecture 12: 22/6/1435 Natural language processing Lecturer/ Kawther Abas 363CS – Artificial Intelligence.
1 Brief Review of Research Model / Hypothesis. 2 Research is Argument.
A Cognitive Substrate for Natural Language Understanding Nick Cassimatis Arthi Murugesan Magdalena Bugajska.
Discovery of Manner Relations and their Applicability to Question Answering Roxana Girju 1,2, Manju Putcha 1, and Dan Moldovan 1 University of Texas at.
Cognitive Architectures: A Way Forward for the Psychology of Programming Michael Hansen Ph.D Student in Comp/Cog Sci CREST / Percepts & Concepts Lab Indiana.
1 Evidence for imperfect adult performance Depth of processing in language comprehension: not noticing the evidence, A. J. Sanford and P. Sturt, Trends.
Generational Gap: Differences between young and old people Early adoption of Internet by young people A revolution They are changing the languages.
Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Developing and Evaluating Theories of Behavior.
DEVELOPING LISTENING Alejandra Echague C DEVELOPING LISTENING IN A FOREIGN LANGUAGE 1. The foundation skill First to be acquired Mother skill 2.
1 Relationship between Cognitive Psychology and Other Disciplines Eysenck, Michael W. and Mark T. Kean Cognitive Psychology: A Student's Handbook,
Lectures ASSESSING LANGUAGE SKILLS Receptive Skills Productive Skills Criteria for selecting language sub skills Different Test Types & Test Requirements.
Introduction to Dialogue Systems. User Input System Output ?
1 Discussion of: Discourse Referents and External Anchors in Developmental Thought by Josef Perner Alan Garnham Psychology University of Sussex
Cognitive Science and Biomedical Informatics Department of Computer Sciences ALMAAREFA COLLEGES.
King Lear King Lear is old. Cordelia Regan Goneril He has three daughters.
Listening comprehension is at the core of second language acquisition. Therefore demands a much greater prominence in language teaching.
Artificial Intelligence: Research and Collaborative Possibilities a presentation by: Dr. Ernest L. McDuffie, Assistant Professor Department of Computer.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1-b What is Philosophy? (Part 2) By David Kelsey.
Inspiring Success Reading The Orchard School. Reading P atience and Practice U nderstanding & Meaning R esilience- Risk taking P rediction O racy S uccess.
1 Applying Principles To Reading Presented By Anne Davidson Michelle Diamond.
Chapter 11 Language. Some Questions to Consider How do we understand individual words, and how are words combined to create sentences? How can we understand.
Language: Comprehension, Production, & Bilingualism Dr. Claudia J. Stanny EXP 4507 Memory & Cognition Spring 2009.
LITERARY ANALYSIS ESSAY. Writing the Introduction  Provide the necessary background information in 5- 7 sentences.  Title of the Novel  Author/any.
Cognitive Modeling Cogs 4961, Cogs 6967 Psyc 4510 CSCI 4960 Mike Schoelles
PSYC 206 Lifespan Development Bilge Yagmurlu.
Developing and Evaluating Theories of Behavior
Developing Listening strategies
CS246: Information Retrieval
Presentation transcript:

The Role of Background Knowledge in Sentence Processing Raluca Budiu July 9, 2001 Thesis Committee: John Anderson, Chair Jaime Carbonell David Plaut Lynne Reder, Department of Psychology

Thesis Defense, July 9, Ambiguity of Language My mouse behaves erratically lately. -- From an to CS facilities Could you pass me the salt? That's the sun of the egg. -- Child speaking about the yolk of a fried egg

Thesis Defense, July 9, Language and Noise Communication channels are noisy People make mistakes We understand how unfair the death penalty is. -- George W. Bush, speaking of death tax Listeners ignore semantic inconsistencies When an aircraft crashes, where should the survivors be buried?

Thesis Defense, July 9, Insight from this Research Flexibility: stretching words meanings Reliability: ignoring noise & semantic inconsistencies

Thesis Defense, July 9, The Sentence-Processing Model Model Prior knowledge Sentence Noah took two animals of each kind on the ark Napoleon was defeated at Waterloo in 1815 Plato was Socrates student Sentence interpretation

Thesis Defense, July 9, Main Contribution A model of language comprehension that: Offers a unified explanation of several complex linguistic phenomena Is incremental (on line) Is as fast as humans Uses prior knowledge and sentence context to understand vague words Is based on the ACT-R theory (Anderson & Lebiere, 1998)

Thesis Defense, July 9, ACT-R A cognitive architecture based on production systems A rigorous framework for building, running and testing computational models Based on verified assumptions about human cognition (e.g., memory properties, attention) Produces quantitative predictions about human behavior (e.g., accuracy and latency in a task)

Thesis Defense, July 9, Research Methodology Human subjects Experiment Match? Quantitative measures Computational ACT-R model predictions no

Thesis Defense, July 9, Evaluation of the Model The model Can comprehend –Literal or metaphoric, distorted or undistorted sentences –Isolated or in-discourse sentences Can explain patterns of text recall Compares well with people on psycholinguistic experiments Is fast, accurate, and scalable

Thesis Defense, July 9, Outline Introduction The sentence-processing model –Evaluation Comprehension of sentences in discourse –Evaluation Scalability Future work and conclusions

Thesis Defense, July 9, The Sentence-Processing Model Model Background knowledge (words + thematic roles) Noah took two animals of each kind on the ark Napoleon was defeated at Waterloo in 1815 Plato was Socrates student Sentence interpretation Input sentence

Thesis Defense, July 9, Propositional Representation take arkanimals Noah Ark Prop agent verb place-oblique patient Parent Ark Prop Child animals Type patient Noah took the animals on the ark

Thesis Defense, July 9, Associations Noah took the animals on the ark Napoleon was defeated at Waterloo Noah is Lamechs son Patriarch Noah Moses Napoleon take Noah & Activation

Thesis Defense, July 9, Noah is Lamechs son Noah took the animals on the ark Noah is Lamechs son Noah took the animals on the ark Noah Search took the animals on the arkNoah Napoleon was defeated at Waterloo Patriarch Moses Napoleon take

Thesis Defense, July 9, Noah Match took the animals on the arkNoah Noah took the animals on the ark Napoleon was defeated at Waterloo Noah is Lamechs son Patriarch Moses Napoleon take Noah is Lamechs sonNoah

Thesis Defense, July 9, Noah Match took the animals on the arkNoah Noah took the animals on the ark Napoleon was defeated at Waterloo Noah is Lamechs son Patriarch Moses Napoleon take Noah is Lamechs son is took take

Thesis Defense, July 9, Noah Search took the animals on the arkNoah Noah took the animals on the ark Napoleon was defeated at Waterloo Noah is Lamechs son Patriarch Moses Napoleon take took take Noah took the animals on the ark

Thesis Defense, July 9, Final Interpretation Noah took the animals on the ark Napoleon was defeated at Waterloo Noah is Lamechs son Patriarch Noah Moses Napoleon take

Thesis Defense, July 9, Failures of Comprehension burnt offerings on the altar Lamech Prop Noahoffered Lamech Prop No interpretation word offered role verb interpretation Lamech Prop Bug

Thesis Defense, July 9, Summary of the Model Read word Bug no Integration end of sentence Interpretation? yes Search no Match? yes

Thesis Defense, July 9, Answering True/False Queries False = a bug OR no final interpretation found True = no bug AND final interpretation found

Thesis Defense, July 9, Outline Introduction The sentence-processing model –Empirical evaluation Moses illusion Metaphor-position effects Comprehension of sentences in discourse –Evaluation Scalability Future work and conclusions

Thesis Defense, July 9, Moses Illusion How many animals of each kind did Moses take on the ark? Good vs. bad distortions How many animals of each kind did Adam take on the ark?

Thesis Defense, July 9, Moses-Illusion Data Illusion rates for good and bad distortions (Ayers, Reder & Anderson, 1996) Percent correct distortions in the gist task (Ayers et al., 1996) Reading times in the literal and gist task (Reder & Kusbit, 1991)

Thesis Defense, July 9,

Thesis Defense, July 9, Moses Noah Good Distortions take on the ark animals Noah took the animals on the ark Napoleon was defeated at Waterloo Joe raises animals Moses Napoleon take How manydid Moses Adam animals Noah took the animals on the ark

Thesis Defense, July 9, Adam Noah Bad Distortions take on the ark animals Noah took the animals on the ark Napoleon was defeated at Waterloo Joe raises animals Moses Napoleon take How many did Adam animals Noah took the animals on the ark Adam No interpretation Bug

Thesis Defense, July 9, Simulation of Moses Illusion take ark animals Noah Ark Prop agent verb place-oblique patient Moses Adam How many animals did Moses take on the ark Zoo Prop Ark Prop Adam Zoo Prop No interpretation Bug

Thesis Defense, July 9, Metaphor Comprehension Effects of position on metaphor understanding (Gerrig & Healy, 1983) Metaphor-familiarity effects (Budiu & Anderson, 1999) Understanding metaphoric/literal sentences in context (Budiu & Anderson, 2000)

Thesis Defense, July 9, Metaphor Position Stars Prop Container Prop Stars Prop Drops of molten silver filledthe night sky. The night sky was filled with drops of molten silver s 3.68 s Model 3.53 s 4.21 s Humans

Thesis Defense, July 9, Outline Introduction The sentence-processing model –Evaluation Comprehension of sentences in discourse –Evaluation Scalability Future work and conclusions

Thesis Defense, July 9, Sentences in Discourse Create background knowledge from discourse propositions King Lear had three daughters Goneril and Regan declare their grand love King Lear decided to divide his kingdom Cordelia is disinherited … Cordelia refuses to make an insincere speech Cordelia marries the king of France King Lears story

Thesis Defense, July 9, Novel Sentences Use a partially matching interpretation to relate to discourse Cordelia marries the king of France Prop 5 Cordelia is disinherited No interpretationProp 5 No interpretation word married Interpretation Prop 5 …… Bug Integration Prop 5

Thesis Defense, July 9, Outline Introduction The sentence-processing model –Evaluation Comprehension of sentences in discourse Evaluation Scalability Future work and conclusions

Thesis Defense, July 9, Metaphor in Discourse ExperimentsMetaphor vs. Literal Reading Time Ortony et al., 1978 Inhoff et al., 1984 Shinjo & Myers, 1987 Keysar, 1990 Gibbs, 1990 Onishi & Murphy, 1993 slower same Comprehension shallow deep Answer true/false Comprehension (of novel sentences) Our Experiments

Thesis Defense, July 9, Metaphoric Sentences in Context During history seminars, a massive young man always yawned and never paid any attention to the discussions. He was a very good linebacker who had been all-state in football. The seminar always came after his training sessions, so he was very tired. The bear slept quietlyThe bear yawned in class Read new: The athlete slept quietlyThe athlete yawned in class True or false:

Thesis Defense, July 9, Metaphoric Sentences in Context The bear yawned in class True or false: Find interpretation Bug Reevaluate bug The athlete yawned in class Find interpretation The athlete slept quietly Interpretation No interpretation Bug-based integration The bear slept quietly Read new: No interpretation bear Bug

Thesis Defense, July 9, Outline Introduction The sentence-processing model Evaluation Comprehension of sentences in discourse Evaluation Scalability Future work and conclusions

Thesis Defense, July 9, Computational Constraints Speed Accuracy Scalability - Word database Sentence database

Thesis Defense, July 9, Scalability Test 436 noun-verb-noun sentences (Brown corpus via PennTreebank project) 999 distinct words One word repeated in at most 9 propositions Associations based on LSA similarity measures (Landauer & Dumais, 1997) Test for comprehension of a known sentence

Thesis Defense, July 9, Model Performance ExperimentAccuracySwitches/word Metaphor position Moses illusion literal gist> 94%< 0.72 Metaphor verification Metaphor comprehension Text Memory

Thesis Defense, July 9, Summary A model of sentence comprehension with a strong associative mechanism to speed up the search of an interpretation It offers a unified explanation for a variety of empirical psycholinguistic data It is scalable It is implemented in ACT-R

Thesis Defense, July 9, Future Work Extend the model to other empirical phenomena (e.g., priming, text inference, lexical ambiguity) Identify the ACT-R assumptions that are fundamental Eliminate some of the limitations

Thesis Defense, July 9, Conclusions Context can help the comprehension of metaphoric or semantically-flawed sentences Semantic associations between words are a powerful mechanism that allows fast and flexible comprehension Peripheral language phenomena can shed light on deep cognitive processes

Thesis Defense, July 9, Limitations of the Model No syntactic processing Atomic word-phrases (e.g., drops of molten silver) Rudimentary discourse processing Cannot account for sentences containing similar words (e.g., George W.Bush is the son of George Bush) Relationship between discourse and background knowledge Similarities not from ratings No thematic-role cues

Thesis Defense, July 9, Integration Noah took the animals on the ark take ark animals Noah Input Prop agent verb place-oblique patient Parent Input Prop Child Noah Type agent Interpretation LamechProp take ark animals Noah Input Prop agent verb place-oblique patient Parent Input Prop Child Noah Type agent Interpretation ArkProp

Thesis Defense, July 9, Metaphor in Discourse ExperimentsMetaphor vs. Literal Reading Time Ortony et al., 1978 Inhoff et al., 1984 Shinjo & Myers, 1987 Keysar, 1990 Gibbs, 1990 Onishi & Murphy, 1993 slower same Comprehension shallow deep