Highlights from PIRLS and TIMSS 2011 Jack Buckley National Center for Education Statistics Washington, DC December 11, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TIMSS-PIRLS: The Role of the State Coordinator. Where are we in the TIMSS-PIRLS timeline of activities? TA training: March Preassessment calls have.
Advertisements

Kalispell’s 4 th Grade Reading International Comparison On the th grade PIRLS international Reading assessment, Florida’s performance was compared.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 10, 2012.
Why Common Core State Standards? The Data behind the Common Core State Standards.
1 Assessments. 2 NCTM Assessment Principle Assessment should support the learning of important mathematics and furnish useful information to both teachers.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics October 3, 2013.
5/16/ © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association.
Highlights from TIMSS 2011 Jack Buckley National Center for Education Statistics Washington, DC December 11, 2012.
Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS)
Highlights from PIRLS and TIMSS 2011 Jack Buckley National Center for Education Statistics Washington, DC December 11, 2012.
Design of the 2011 NAEP- TIMSS Linking Study Andrew Kolstad Senior Technical Advisor to the Assessment Division National Center for Education Statistics.
Inside America’s Math Courses The Release of the Algebra I and Geometry Curricula: Results from the 2005 High School Transcript Mathematics Curriculum.
NAEP 2008 Trends in Academic Progress in Reading and Mathematics.
Gary W. Phillips Vice President and Chief Scientist American Institutes for Research August 3, 2015.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2009 Results Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner December 7, 2010.
Scientific Inquiry: Learning Science by Doing Science
The Nation’s Report Card 2009 Reading and Mathematics – Grade 12 National and State Results.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics December 7, 2011.
1 1 EQAO Reporting of 21 st Century Skills Spring Conference 2013 Richard Jones & Carol Ricker-Wilson Presentation to AERO.
NAEP and International Assessments August 28, 2013 DAC Annual Meeting.
NCES International Assessments and the International Data Explorer Education Writers Association April 7, 2011 Dana Kelly NCES.
Looking Beneath the Surface What we can learn from the Minnesota TIMSS Science Results William H. Schmidt Michigan State University.
Mathematics Initiative Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction 2006 Mathematics WASL Released Items for Grades 3–8 December 6, 2006 Slide
1 PISA What is PISA?  International large-scale assessment organized by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)  NCES.
International Assessments September 5, 2012 DAC Annual Meeting
Dubai’s 15 year old students Results from PISA 2009 Fatma Al Janahi Head of International Assessments Knowledge & Human Development Authority GCES Symposium,
Assessing assessment: the role of student effort in comparative studies Ray Adams Jayne Butler.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Insight Improvement Impact ® University of Alabama Birmingham September 11, 2012.
1 Issues in Assessment in Higher Education: Science Higher Education Forum on Scientific Competencies Medellin-Colombia Nov 2-4, 2005 Dr Hans Wagemaker.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics January 25, 2011.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 24, 2011.
November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Results of the 2005 National Assessment of Educational Progress.
0 Michele Sonnenfeld NAEP State Coordinator Florida Department of Education October 2006 Florida Association of Science Supervisors.
Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.
1 Comparing International Assessments to NAEP May 30, 2008 Eugene Owen Senior Advisor, NCES International Activities Program This paper is intended to.
Using Common Core State Standards of Seventh Grade Mathematics in the Application of NXT LEGO® Robotics for CReSIS Middle School Students.
The Nation’s Report Card: U.S. History National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
The Nation’s Report Card Science National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 21, 2013.
1. 2 Overview of the 2006 NAEP Assessments Administered in January–March 2006 National results for grades 4, 8, and 12 Results by scale scores and achievement.
What Use Are International Assessments for States? 30 May 2008 Jack Buckley Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics Institute of Education.
The Nation’s Report Card: Geography National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
Future Ready Schools National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in North Carolina Wednesday, February 13, 2008 Auditorium III 8:30 – 9:30 a.m.
The Nation’s Report Card 4th-Grade Reading SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),
International Large-Scale Assessments – Best practice and what are they good for? Dirk Hastedt, IEA Moscow, October 2015.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics December 6, 2012.
The case for scientific literacy? so pretty i never knew mars had a sun.
The Nation’s Report Card: 2005 Reading and Mathematics Trial Urban District Assessments.
ACT College and Career Readiness Overview Parent Orientation Februrary 2015.
Education Level. STD RATE Teen Pregnancy Rates Pre-teen Pregnancy Rate.
NAEP-TIMSS Linking Study In 2011, both NAEP and TIMSS assessed grade 8 students in Mathematics and Science 2011provided an opportunity to examine the linkage.
NAEP 2005 Reading and Mathematics Results. Overview of the 2005 Reading and Mathematics Assessment 1.
The READY Accountability Report: Growth and Performance of North Carolina Public Schools State Board of Education November 7, 2013.
SSA – Technical Cooperation Fund End of Project Conference The Role of International Achievement Studies (OECD PISA, IEA TIMSS, PIRLS…) Importance of Large-scale.
Understanding your Student’s SAT 10 Score Carole McLenithan & Mark Pendergrass May 22, 2015.
11 PIRLS The Trinidad and Tobago Experience Regional Policy Dialogue on Education 2-3 December 2008 Harrilal Seecharan Ministry of Education Trinidad.
1 PISA 2006 Main achievement outcomes and factors associated with performance on science Eemer Eivers, Gerry Shiel & Rachel Cunningham Educational Research.
NAEP What is it? What can I do with it? Kate Beattie MN NAEP State Coordinator MN Dept of Education This session will describe what the National Assessment.
1. 2 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Survey of academic achievement for the nation and the states Assesses various subjects at grades.
Inquiry and IBL pedagogies
NAEP and TIMSS Mathematics 2015
The Race to Improve Science Instruction
Comparability of Assessment Results in the Era of Flexibility
PISA • PIRLS • TIMSS Program for International Student Assessment
Mathematics Methods Week One: Onsite Session
УМУМИЙ ЎРТА ТАЪЛИМНИНГ ДАВЛАТ ТАЪЛИМ СТАНДАРТЛАРИ ВА ЎҚУВ ДАСТУРЛАРИ
NAEP and International Assessments
United States of America.
Presentation transcript:

Highlights from PIRLS and TIMSS 2011 Jack Buckley National Center for Education Statistics Washington, DC December 11, 2012

Overview  What are PIRLS and TIMSS and which education systems participate in them?  How are U.S. students performing compared to their international peers in:  4th-grade reading?  4th- and 8th-grade mathematics?  4th- and 8th-grade science?  How are students performing in participating U.S. states? 2

What are…? 3 Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) 4th-grade reading assessment * In 1999, no grade 4 assessment. Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 4th- and 8th-grade mathematics and science assessment Developed by the TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center at Boston College, under contract to the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)

4 44 education systems 37 education systems 47 education systems57 education systems 74 education systems 2011

Participating states 5 9 states participated as separate entities to obtain scores in PIRLS or TIMSS or both Each participated as part of the nation and on its own NCES funded participation at grade 8 of all states except Florida as part of a study to statistically link NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) and TIMSS (Florida received other Education Department funding) PIRLSTIMSS grade 4TIMSS grade 8 Florida North Carolina Florida North Carolina Alabama California Colorado Connecticut Indiana Massachusetts Minnesota

U.S. national sample size 4th grade Schools: 370 Students: 12,726 4th grade Schools: 369 Students: 12,569 8th grade Schools: 501 Students: 10,477 6

U.S. state sample sizes (public schools only) 4th grade (FL) Schools: 77 Students: 2,598 4th grade (FL, NC) Schools: 46 – 77 Students: 1,792 – 2,661 8th grade (AL, CA, CO, CT, FL, IN, MA, MN, NC) Schools: 53 – 82 Students: 1,712 – 2,614 7

SCIENCE

TIMSS 2011 science framework 9 TIMSS science Content dimensionsGrade 4 Earth science Life science Physical science Grade 8 Biology Chemistry Earth science Physics Cognitive dimensions Knowing Applying Reasoning

What is on the TIMSS science assessment? 10 Percentage of 4th- graders answering correctly: U.S.: 96% Int’l Avg.: 83%

What is on the TIMSS science assessment? 11 Percentage of 4th- graders answering correctly: U.S.: 90% Int’l Avg.: 73%

What is on the TIMSS science assessment? 12 Percentage of 8th- graders answering correctly: U.S.: 28% Int’l Avg.: 27%

What is on the TIMSS science assessment? 13 Percentage of 8th- graders answering correctly: U.S.: 76% Int’l Avg.: 61%

14 U.S. average score (525) higher than the TIMSS scale average (500) Higher than U.S. Not measurably different than U.S. Lower than U.S.

15 U.S. average score (525) lower than in 12 education systems Higher than U.S. Not measurably different than U.S. Lower than U.S.

16 U.S. average (525) not measurably different than in 10 education systems Higher than U.S. Not measurably different than U.S. Lower than U.S.

17 U.S. average score (525) higher than in 33 education systems Higher than U.S. Not measurably different than U.S. Lower than U.S.

18 *p <.05. Change in average scores is significant. NOTE: Education systems ordered according to average science score in 2011.

19 *p <.05. Change in average scores is significant. NOTE: Education systems ordered according to average science score in 2011.

TIMSS international science benchmarks 20 Grade 4Grade 8 Advanced (625) Students can apply knowledge and understanding of scientific processes and relationships and show some knowledge of the process of scientific inquiry. Students communicate an understanding of complex and abstract concepts in biology, chemistry, physics, and earth science. High (550) Students apply their knowledge and understanding of the sciences to explain phenomena in everyday and abstract contexts. Students demonstrate understanding of concepts related to science cycles, systems, and principles. Intermediate (475) Students have basic knowledge and understanding of practical situations in the sciences. Students recognize and apply their understanding of basic scientific knowledge in various contexts. Low (400) Students have some elementary knowledge of life science and physical science. Students can recognize some basic facts from the life and physical sciences.

21 Percentages of U.S. 8th-graders reaching TIMSS science benchmarks were higher than international medians in 2011 NOTE: All U.S. percentages are significantly higher than the corresponding TIMSS international median at the.05 level of statistical significance.

NOTE: Education systems with lower percentages of students reaching the Advanced benchmark than the percentage of U.S. students reaching the Advanced benchmark are not included in figure. 22 Higher than U.S. (p <.05) Not measurably different than U.S. (p <.05) Twelve systems had higher percentages of 8th- graders reaching Advanced than the U.S.

Summary of change in average U.S. scores over time 23 PIRLS Reading TIMSS Mathematics TIMSS Science TIMSS Mathematics TIMSS Science Grade 4 Grade 8 Change over time in U.S. average scores was statistically significant. Change over time in U.S. average scores was not measurably different.