Mark Svoboda National Drought Mitigation Center Is There a Need for a Water Resources Monitor? With Contributions From: Harry Lins, USGS Phil Pasteris,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEOSS ADC Architecture Workshop Water/Drought Scenario 5 Feb 2008 David Arctur OGC Interoperability Institute
Advertisements

Reducing Vulnerability to Drought through Mitigation and Preparedness Report to the Inter-Agency Task Force for Disaster Reduction Sixth Meeting Geneva,
Mark Svoboda, Climatologist Monitoring Program Area Leader National Drought Mitigation Center University of Nebraska-Lincoln Monitoring Drought Beyond.
Development of Bias-Corrected Precipitation Database and Climatology for the Arctic Regions Daqing Yang, Principal Investigator Douglas L. Kane, Co-Investigator.
Climate Tools & Data. Note: This slide set is one of several that were presented at climate training workshops in Please visit the SCIPP Documents.
National Climatic Data Center Status of Continental Indicators for NADM Richard R. Heim Jr. NOAA/NESDIS/National Climatic Data Center Asheville, North.
Drought Monitoring and Precipitation Data A U.S. Perspective on Current Uses, Needs, and Opportunities Dr. Brian D. Wardlow Director and Associate Professor.
Agroclimate Service in Canada Allan Howard Manager, National Agroclimate Information Service, Agriculture Agri-Food Canada, Regina Saskatchewan XV Session.
MODIS satellite image of Sierra Nevada snowcover Big data and mountain water supplies Roger Bales SNRI, UC Merced & CITRIS.
Algorithm Development for Vegetation Change Detection and Environmental Monitoring Louis A. Scuderi 1, Amy Ellwein 2, Enrique Montano 3 and Richard P.
California and Nevada Drought is extreme to exceptional.
Hemlock Butte SNOTEL March 2008 Clearwater Basin 2008 Forecasts: Over, Under and Right On, and Amount of Snow Needed in 2009 for Adequate Surface Irrigation.
National Climatic Data Center NADM Status and National Drought Monitoring in the USA Richard R. Heim Jr. NOAA/NESDIS/National Climatic Data Center Asheville,
Understanding Drought
CPC’s U.S. Seasonal Drought Outlook & Future Plans April 20, 2010 Brad Pugh, CPC.
Remote Sensing of Drought Lecture 9. What is drought? Drought is a normal, recurrent feature of climate. It occurs almost everywhere, although its features.
WMO-SMN Supported Research On An Expanded Operational Climate Division Network for Mexico Art Douglas and Phil Englehart Creighton University.
Monitoring Drought: Current Products and Technologies Mark Svoboda National Drought Mitigation Center International Drought Information Center University.
Drought Monitor Primer Mark Svoboda, Climatologist Monitoring Program Area Leader, National Drought Mitigation Center University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA.
Economic Cooperation Organization Training Course on “Drought and Desertification” Alanya Facilities, Antalya, TURKEY presented by Ertan TURGU from Turkish.
NORTH AMERICAN DROUGHT FORUM 2010 April 20, Asheville, NC, USA. Fernando Romero Coordinación General del Servicio Meteorológico Nacional NADM. Status.
The Colorado Surface Water Supply Index (SWSI) Performance Since 1981 Nolan Doesken Colorado State Climatologist Colorado Climate Center Colorado State.
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada’s National Agroclimate Information Service’s Drought Monitoring Trevor Hadwen Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Agri-Environmental.
Approaches to Seasonal Drought Prediction Bradfield Lyon CONAGUA Workshop Nov, 2014 Mexico City, Mexico.
Applying New Drought Decision Support Tools Mark Svoboda National Drought Mitigation Center International Drought Information Center University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
National Climatic Data Center Station-Based Indices for Drought Monitoring in the U.S. Richard R. Heim Jr.* NOAA/NESDIS/National Climatic Data Center Asheville,
Slide: 1 Osamu Ochiai Water SBA Coordinator The GEO Water Strategy Report – The CEOS Contribution Presentation to the 26 th CEOS Plenary at Bengaluru,
Climate Services Clearinghouse: A Comprehensive Guide to Climate Services and Products on the Web. Genevieve Maricle and Roger Pielke Jr. March 9, 2004.
Michael A. Palecki USCRN Science Project Manager National Climatic Data Center DOC/NOAA/NESDIS USCRN PROGRAM STATUS MARCH 3, United States Climate.
Implementing Climate Monitoring in the GFCS CSIS Panelist Richard Heim (NOAA/NCDC), Summarizing Workshop Contributions by 31 Participants 1.
Drought Monitoring: Challenges in the Western United States
Apalachicola River and Bay NIDIS System Development Workshop Breakout Session #1 April 27, 2010 Victor Murphy-NWS Southern Region.
GIS Tools at Climate Prediction Center April 20, 2010 Brad Pugh, CPC.
Overview of the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Lisa Holts.
The Making of the Drought Monitor. The U.S. Drought Monitor Since 1999, NOAA/CPC and NCDC, USDA, and the NDMC have produced a composite drought map--the.
National Climate Monitoring Products Andrew Watkins and John Kennedy (updated 28/4/2014)
Drought in Travis County Chris Shaw CE394K.2 Spring 2007.
NOAA North American Drought Monitor (NADM) Sharon LeDuc NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC NOAA - Environment Canada Bilateral Meeting November 6, 2008
The U.S. Drought Monitor and Beyond
1 National HIC/RH/HQ Meeting ● January 27, 2006 version: FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS FOCUSFOCUS.
   Alys Thomas 1, J.T. Reager 1,2, Jay Famiglietti 1,2,3, Matt Rodell 4 1 Dept. of Earth System Science, 2 UC Center for Hydrologic Modeling, 3 Dept.
Northeast Regional Climate Center Keith Eggleston Regional Climatologist.
NATIONALLY AND ACROSS OHIO GETTY IMAGES. DROUGHTOF 2012 DROUGHT OF 2012 PRE EXISTING CONDITIONS PRE EXISTING CONDITIONS COMPARISONS TO THE LAST DROUGHT.
North American Drought Monitor Workshop Mexico City, Mexico October 18, 2006 Jay H. Lawrimore National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) The NADM: Where Have.
Ahsha Tribble, Ph.D. Chief, Climate Services Division | NOAA National Weather Service May 20, 2009 Ahsha Tribble, Ph.D. Chief, Climate Services Division.
Arizona Drought Monitoring North American Drought Monitor Workshop October, 2006 Gregg Garfin, Program Manager CLIMAS/ISPE University of Arizona.
Ag Talk 30 Jan What the Weather Will Bring or Agricultural Weather in Wisconsin Wisconsin Agri-Service Association 9 th Annual Trade Show 30 January.
Developing the Vegetation Drought Response Index (VegDRI): Monitoring Vegetation Stress from a Local to National Scale Brian Wardlow National Drought Mitigation.
June 2009: How severe is the current drought in the Hill Country?
The Vegetation Drought Response Index (VegDRI) An Update on Progress and Future Activities Brian Wardlow 1, Jesslyn Brown 2, Tsegaye Tadesse 1, and Yingxin.
Drought Through a PRISM: Precipitation Mapping and Analysis Activities at the PRISM Group Christopher Daly, Director PRISM Group Assoc. Prof., Dept. of.
Mark Svoboda, Climatologist National Drought Mitigation Center School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska-Lincoln What is the Drought Monitor?
NASA Drought Project Meeting
NDMC NASA –JPL Project Activities Update: Objectives and Deliverables
NASA Drought Project Meeting
Overview of the NIDIS Weekly Climate, Water and Drought Assessment
Drought Analysis of Utah County
NASA JPL Drought Project Kickoff Meeting
Drought Activities at the NOAA/NCDC Climate Monitoring Branch
Improving Drought Forecasts: The Next Generation of Seasonal Outlooks
An Introduction to VegOut
Drought: Lab Exercise Deirdre Kann NWS Albuquerque.
VegDRI History, Current Status, and Related Activities
An Introduction to VegDRI
An Introduction to VegDRI
Changes in Precipitation and Drought
DROUGHT MONITORING SYSTEM IN DHMZ
Drought in Upper Colorado Basin
Shraddhanand Shukla Andrew W. Wood
June 2009: How severe is the current drought in the Hill Country?
Presentation transcript:

Mark Svoboda National Drought Mitigation Center Is There a Need for a Water Resources Monitor? With Contributions From: Harry Lins, USGS Phil Pasteris, USDA/NRCS Frank Richards, NOAA

Water Resources Monitor - Overview Concept Questions Observational/Data Requirements Approach Next Steps

A proposed partnership between the USGS, NOAA, USDA and the NDMC Idea hatched in spring 2003 as a potential answer to the debate of 1 vs. 2 DM maps (short- and long-term drought) and as a better tool for the DM authors A consolidation of indices and indicators into one comprehensive national drought map by basin or hydrological unit The Water Resources Monitor would be updated monthly (?) providing for a general hydro assessment of water resources in the U.S. to compliment the Drought Monitor Water Monitor Concept

Is there a need for a hydro-oriented companion to the Drought Monitor? Who’s the audience? What’s needed to make it happen? Questions

Observational/Data Requirements Primary *surface water *reservoir *groundwater Others *snow *soil moisture *water supply forecasts *PRISM to address elevation

A Possible Approach Start w/ streamflow data Supplement as best as possible w/ other data Base analysis on HUC’s Use GIS/IMS as key tools Map depicts where impact occurs? Value added from experts/subjective assessment and interpretation of the objective factors Maintain web site and open listserver like the DM

Water Resources Monitor

Issues Resources Not another “unfunded mandate” Who does it? Lack of adequate observations (current and historical) Can this product better address the fundamental question of significant rains and how they impact short- vs. long-term recovery Better approach to account for elevation

Next Steps Pitch importance/need for an integrated water resource assessment portal Develop prototype product/website by January 2004 Get input from you!

The North America Drought Monitor - Overview History – Background - Objectives Participants Procedure Input Indicators User Feedback

The North America Drought Monitor Primary Participants U.S. NCDC, US Dept. of Agriculture, Climate Prediction Center and National Drought Mitigation Center Canada Agriculture and Agrifood Canada Meteorological Service of Canada Mexico National Meteorological Service of Mexico (SMN - Servicio Meteorologico Nacional) Comision Nacional del Agua

Evolution of the North America Drought Monitoring Effort November 2001 Meeting of Troika at NCDC to discuss assessment and monitoring of climate extremes across North America Decision to initiate assessment of extremes with most widespread problem – DROUGHT Develop monitoring program similar to U.S. Drought Monitor

Evolution of the North America Drought Monitoring Effort April 2002 Combined U.S./North America Drought Monitor Workshop at NCDC One day devoted to discussions on the new drought monitoring program for N. America December 2002 First experimental North America Drought Monitor Map completed

Development of Monthly NADM Map NCDC receive, process, ingest daily/monthly station data (T x, T n, P, SF) from U.S., Canada, Mexico NCDC compute continental-scale input indicators Monthly station SPI, PCTPCP, Palmer Drought Index NADM Author prepare first draft map From continental-scale indicators & national products Use USDM from month’s final week for U.S. depiction Draft map sent to each country’s experts for feedback Using ArcGIS NADM Author prepare final map & text Released on NCDC website by middle of following month

Data for Continental Indicators Mexico Precipitation data set development for Mexico (Art Douglas and Miguel Cortez) 132 of the highest quality stations from a database of ~1000 stations Begin in 1950 or earlier and continue to provide near-real-time reporting –Some merging of climatically similar stations –Quality controlled using nearby stations –Missing months estimated by using % of normal maps Temperature data set available soon 65 high quality Observatory stations Plus 67 additional stations

Data for Continental Indicators U.S. – Precipitation & Temperature Climate Division Database 344 climate divisions in contiguous US with data from 1895 through the previous month –Using climate division data as surrogate stations –Centroid of climate division 15 stations added along US/Mexico border ASOS data for Alaska (planned) Climate division data begins in 1931 but is not available until 3 to 4 months after the end of the month

Data for Continental Indicators Canada – Precipitation & Temperature Database of ~800 stations, many (~ ) with near-real- time reporting Most stations in southern Canada Homogeneity adjustments to daily data applied by Pasha Groisman before monthly totals calculated Rainfall: 1. Adjustment for the instrument and observation practice changes in the 1970s (peak of changes in 1977); 2. Small wind undercatch scale correction (factor 1.02) Snowfall: 1. Reduction of snow ruler to snow gauge measurements (everywhere); at 540 stations where the switch from ruler to gauge was made in 1960s this affects the homogeneity of time series. 2. Constant wind undercatch scale correction (factor 10/9).

NADM Input Indicators Continental-Scale Indices & Indicators Standardized Precipitation Index Palmer Drought Index (available soon) Percent of Normal Precipitation SSM/I Wetness Satellite Vegetation Health Index Other Streamflow Dugout Levels* * Canada only

Continental-Scale Indicators Standardizing Period: (for PCTPCP, SPI, PDI) Guidance for drought category boundaries across international borders

Continental-Scale Indicators SSM/I Wetness Soil wetness in top layers 1988-present period of record Satellite Vegetation Health Index

Continental-Scale Indicators Station Network Density in Canada Coarse Results in Unreliable Contours

Producing Dot Maps for North America, Contour Maps for U.S.-Mexico * Denser Network of Stations Needed for Contours in Canada

North America Drought Monitor Strengths Continental-scale depiction of drought Consistent across international borders Pool resources, increase communication Future Goals Move U.S. from climate divisions to station network Increase spatial density of stations across North America

NADM Web Site toring/drought/nadm/index.html

NADM Web Site ing/drought/nadm/index.html USDM Web Site NADM Workshop June 25-27, 2003, Asheville, NC, USA rch/2003/NADM-workshop/nadm- workshop03avl.html