WECC-0071 Common Corridor Issues - Literature Review Drafting Team Meeting, Portland, August 25, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SWAT Common Corridor Task Force Update November, 2008.
Advertisements

1 Changing Profile of Household Sector Credit and Deposits in Indian Banking System -Deepak Mathur November 30, 2010.
WECC Board of Directors April 21-23, 2004 Seattle, Washington WECC Procedure for Reporting of System Events Disturbance Reports Rod Maslowski OC Vice Chairperson.
Summary of Second Draft of the NERC Standard PRC Disturbance Monitoring and Reporting JSIS Meeting August 10, 2010 Salt Lake City, UT.
1 Sunrise Powerlink and Southwest Powerlink Reliability Performance Evaluation Double Line Outage Probability Analysis March 6, 2008.
PCC Update Presentation to TEPPC June 2010 Dana Cabbell PCC Chair.
TRDTF Transmission Reliability Database Task Force Update & Approval Vote Brian Keel SRP
WECC TRD/NERC TADS Webinar
1 MSRATF Update to TSS (Modeling SPS and RAS Ad Hoc Task Force) Scope of Work Approval January 25, 2013 Joe Seabrook Puget Sound Energy.
WECC Standards Committee Joint Session
The Western Electricity Coordinating Council Doug Tucker of WECC & Brian Keel of SRP November 16, TRD/TADS Webinar.
Report of the Planning Coordination Committee WECC Board Meeting San Diego, CA April, 2009.
WECC System Performance Criteria 1st Team Meeting Background
RPEWG REPORT June 2002 PCC Meeting James Leigh-Kendall.
Bulk Electric System Definition Task Force Update Reliability Policy Issues Committee March 4, 2010 Brian Theaker BESDTF Chair.
Icfi.com 1 Framework for Determining Separation Distances Between Transmission lines in Wyoming icfi.com © 2008 ICF International. All rights reserved.
WECC Operating Committee and Planning Coordinating Committee Brian K. Keel Chair – Reliability Subcommittee June 18 & 19, 2009 WECC Reliability Subcommittee.
Speed vs. Velocity.
NERC Reliability Readiness The Next Steps Mitch Needham NERC Readiness Evaluator September 24, 2007.
Chiu Choi, Ph.D., P.E. Technical Consultant OIML workshop on the metrology of vehicle speed measurement devices NIST Headquarters, Gaithersburg, MD July.
(This presentation may be used for instructional purposes)
1 Overview. 2 Benefits of RATC Applications Real-time corrective Hour ahead corrective and preventive Day ahead corrective Day ahead market/economic based.
electric power engineering
1 Capacity analysis of mesh networks with omni or directional antennas Jun Zhang and Xiaohua Jia City University of Hong Kong.
VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT DEPLOYMENT EVALUATION I-270/I-255 Traffic and Safety Conference May 12, 2010 Missouri University of Science and Technology and HDR.
WECC Planning Coordinating Committee Brian K. Keel Chair – Reliability Subcommittee June, 2010 WECC Reliability Subcommittee Report.
Marv Landauer Report to TSS on RS Activities April 25-27, 2012 Salt Lake City.
RPEWG Present and Future Activities Boise, August 17, 2011 RPEWG Meeting 1.
Doug Tucker Associate Staff Engineer TRD/TADS update and Future reporting.
NERC TADS Update Andrew Slone, Engineer, Reliability Performance Analysis WECC RPEWG Meeting May 14, 2013.
Marv Landauer Report to TSS on Annual Study Program Report Review Task Force April 2012 TSS Meeting Salt Lake City.
Capacity to Customers (C 2 C)- Review of Standards – Accommodating Responsive Demand in ER P2/6 24 th January 2013.
1. Four LLs were published in February Transmission Relaying – Undesired Blocking 2.Lack of Separation for Critical Control Power Supply Leads.
Putting Statistics to Work
Sub-Synchronous Oscillations* ERCOT Comments on NPRR 562
1 McGill University Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Goshen Area Bus Reconfiguration
Why TADS Is Needed No systematic transmission outage data collection effort exists for all of North America Energy Information Administration data (Schedule.
RPEWG Report Milorad Papic (RPEWG Chair) Salt Lake City, February 5, 2014 RS Meeting 1.
MARCH 31, 2014 Maine 2014 Outage Coordination CONTAINS CRITICAL ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE INFORMATION – DO NOT RELEASE.
AUGUST 19, 2014 PUBLIC VERSION Maine 2014 Outage Coordination CONTAINS CRITICAL ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE INFORMATION – DO NOT RELEASE.
Chapter 3 Methods for Recording Behavior EDP 7058.
SPS Mis-operation – DRAFT Proposal for ERCOT procedures.
SDG&E Electric Reliability Reporting CPUC Workshops May 26-27, 2015.
U.S. Energy Information Administration Independent Statistics & Analysis ERUS 2014 Bulk Power and Reliability Proposed Changes to Form EIA-411.
Modeling and Simulation CS 313
February 26, 2013 Board of Directors Meeting 2012 ERCOT Region Reliability Update.
The Australian Energy Regulator Economic benchmarking TNSP outputs data.
SINTEF Energy Research 1 Fault statistics in distribution network Regulation of quality of supply Gerd Kjølle, Norway, RT3.
NERC Lessons Learned Summary February NERC lessons learned published in February 2015 Two NERC lessons learned (LL) were published in February 2015.
1 3. System reliability Objectives Learn the definitions of a component and a system from a reliability perspective Be able to calculate reliability of.
Review of TADS Data for 2012 Voltage Class Name Metric AC Transmission Outages - Failed Protection System Equipment AC Transmission Outages - Human Error.
NERC Lessons Learned Summary LLs Published in September 2015.
Operating Guide and Planning Guide Revision Requests Blake Williams, ROS Chair September 13, 2012.
WECC-0100 Scope, Content & Status Update Rikin Shah, PAC Orlando Ciniglio, IPC WECC TSS Meeting, Salt Lake City, UT January ,
1 NPCC – A-2 Dr. Mayer Sasson Transmission Planning Consolidated Edison of New York June 1, 2006 Presented to the NYSRC-RRS.
Project WECC-0100 Standards Briefing WECC-0100 SDT April 7, 2016 W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
Red Line Customer Capacity Update
Project WECC-0100 Update Load Modeling Task Force
Transmission Planning in a Modern Market Environment
Factors to Consider when Designing a Reliable Power Grid
Use of Lightning Data for Electricity Transmission Operations
Workshop Session 1: Overview
Factors to Consider when Designing a Reliable Power Grid
Unit I Module 3 - RCM Terminology and Concepts
Workshop Session 1: Overview
Milorad Papic (RPEWG Chair) Salt Lake City, February 5, 2014
Project WECC-0100 Update Load Modeling Task Force
Planning Meeting November 4, 2010 Marv Landauer.
Presentation transcript:

WECC-0071 Common Corridor Issues - Literature Review Drafting Team Meeting, Portland, August 25, 2010

Outline 1. Overview of published sources 2. Common Mode Outages - Basics 3. Common Mode Outage Statistics 4. Common Right-of-Way Issues 5. Composite System Reliability 5. Next Steps

1. Published Literature Theoretical Approaches Papers published by IEEE Committees & Task Forces Outage Data Statistics Standards Common Corridor Issues Must Read References

1. Must Read References Task Force on Common Mode Outages of Bulk Power Supply Facilities of the Application on Probabilistic Methods Subcommittee of the Power System Engineering Committee, IEEE Power Engineering Society, 1976 (B4) R. Billinton, T. K. P. Medicherla, M.S. Sachdev, APPLICATION OF COMMON-CAUSE OUTAGE MODELS IN COMPOSITE SYSTEM RELIABILITY EVALUATION, Vol. PAS-100, No. 7, pp , Dec (A7) W. A. Mittelstadt, S. K. Agarwal Outage Probability Evaluation of Lines Sharing a Common Corridor, PMAPS 2004, Ames, Iowa (E3) Framework for Analyzing Separation Distances between Transmission Lines in Wyoming, Final Report, ICF International, February 2010 (E5)

2. CMO General Definition: A common mode outage is an event having an external cause with multiple failure effects where the effects are not consequences of each other (Unlike, for example, the forced outage of one transmission line due to a lighting stroke followed by an overlapping forced outage of an adjacent line due to protection relay failure). Two types of Common Mode Outages: Controlled common-mode outages (can be identified and possible eliminated – e.g. protection, separation) Un-controlled Common-mode outages (must be accepted and possible minimized – e.g. tornado, lighting etc.)

2. CMO Basics The State-Space Diagram (SSD) The SSD illustrates the possible failure and repair mode for two components 1 and 2 (single down state) 1 U 2 U 1 U 2 D 1 D 2 U 1 D 2 D λ i – component independent failure rate µ i – component repair rate λ c – component common mode failure rate U – Up state, D – Down State µ2µ2 µ1µ1 λ1λ1 λ 2 µ2µ2 µ1 λ1λ1 µc λc

2. CMO Basics (cont..) The State-Space Diagram (SSD) The SSD illustrates the possible failure and repair mode for two components 1 and 2 (separate down states) 1 U 2 U 1 U 2 D 1 D 2 U 1 D 2 D λ i – component independent failure rate µ i – component repair rate λ c – component common mode failure rate U – Up state, D – Down State 1 D 2 D µ2µ2 µ1µ1 λ1λ1 µcλcµcλc λ 2 µ2µ2 µ1µ1 λ1λ1

2. CMO Basics (cont..) Probability of ith component in up state Piu = µi/µi+λi Probability of ith component in down state Pid = λi/µi+λi for µi = 1/ri, the Pid = (λi* ri)/8760 Probability of circuits 1 and 2 on outage is given by: P12 = (λ1* r1)/8760 x (λ2* r2)/8760 The frequency of circuits 1 and 2 on independent outage is given by: λ12 = λ1λ2(r1 + r2) = λ1P2 + λ2P1 The common mode forced outage probability is given as: Pcmo = (λcmo* rcmo)/8760 The total probability Pt for the contingency of circuits 1 and 2 out including effects of common mode outage is given as: Pt = P12 + Pcmo, The frequency and duration are: λ t = λ12 + λcmo r t = (Pt/ λt)*8760

3. CMO Statistics (cont..) CMO Causes Natural Events –Fire in Right-of-Way (forest, brush, tall grasses, agricultural..) –Foundation or Anchor Failure (flood, landslide, ground subsidence) –Severe Environmental Conditions (hurricane, tornado, icing) Interference –Interference with other circuits. HV crossing of lower voltage circuits –Aircraft interference –Rail and road vehicle interference Examples of common-mode outages are: –A lighting stroke causing trip-outs of two circuits on a common tower –An external object causing the outage of two circuits on the same right-of- way –A tornado causing the outage of multiple circuits even if they are not on a common tower or a common right-of-way

3. CMO Statistics (cont..) Use of Transient and Permanent Forced Outage Data Transient outage data should be kept separate from permanent outage data in the study. Since the different durations have different system impacts, and since, often, the location of the outage cause cannot be defined it is recommended to classify transient outages into short duration or restoration by switching, and momentary duration or automatic re-closure.

3. CMO Statistics (cont..) Calculation of Common Mode Outage Indices: The failure rate in outages per 100 right-of-way miles per year The average duration of an outage The probability of more than one line being out simultaneously per 100 right-of-way miles for a common mode failure on system Similar methods can be used to calculate indices for the following categories by sorting the data as required: Transient and permanent faults Voltage classification Tower type Outage cause

3. CMO Statistics Common Mode Outage – Discussion (Ref. B7) There is a need to subdivide common mode outage events into two separate categories: –Simultaneous common mode outages (SCMO) –Overlapping common mode outages (OCMO) SCMO are outages of those components that occur within one second of each other OCMO are outages that occur at a time interval of more than one second, thus allowing time for automatic RAS to operate

3. CMO Statistics (cont..) Clarification of Specific Entries The line length should be expressed as miles of common right-of- way rather than miles of line Specific records should indicate both the number of lines on a right-of-way and the number of lines out. The common mode outage duration is defined as the overlapping time period only, and should be noted in the appropriate unit. Permanent and Transient outages should all be recorded allowing for future sorting. All common mode outages should be recorded, based on commonality of right-of-way.

3. CMO Statistics (cont..) IEEE Survey Conducted in 1974 (Ref. B4) Of 69 requests, 40 replied yielding 18 useful pieces of information The data did strongly suggest that the probability of two lines being forced out on an overlapping outage when they are on the same right-of-way is much larger than the probability of two lines being forced out on an overlapping basis when they are on separate independent rights-of-way. The amount of data is not significant enough to warrant release of figures at this time.

3. CMO Statistics General observations from MAPP Outage Data (Ref. C7) For the purpose of reporting common right-of-way and common tower events, expose of one mile or more are considered Related outage statistics are compiled by the study of outages that occur at the same time The time frame of ten minutes is used as a guideline for classifying independent outages as related outage events. Common right-of-way outages were not reported in MAPP from Common tower outages were reported 5 in the same time period.

3. CMO Statistics (cont..) IEEE Paper 1985 (Ref. C9) Independent Outage Rate 1.356/year Common-mode Outage Rate 0.174/year Dependent Outage* Rate 0.07 /year Total Outage Rate 1.6 /year *Dependent (Related Multiple) Outage Event A multiple outage Event in which one outage is the consequence of another outage Conditionally dependent outages involve two or more lines and are the result of two distinct causes.

3. CMO Statistics (cont..) IEEE Paper 1984 – Common-Mode Outages in MAPP for the time period (Ref. C6) Common Tower: –Number of outages 8 –Average number/100 Miles-Year = 0.20 –Total Duration (Hours) = –Average Duration (Hours/Outage) = –Average Duration (Hours/100miles-Year) = 9.48 Common ROW: –Number of outages 3 –Average number/100 Miles-Year = 0.14 –Total Duration (Hours) = –Average Duration (Hours/Outage) = –Average Duration (Hours/100miles-Year) = 7.79

3. CMO Statistics (cont..) An IEEE Survey of U.S. and Canadian Overhead Transmission Outages at 230 kV and above(1994) (Ref. C18) Common Tower Common-Mode Outages –230 kV …… 5 –345 kV …… 27 –500 kV …… 0 –Total ………. 32 Common ROW Common-Mode Outages –230 kV …… 0 –345 kV …… 9 –500 kV …… 0 –Total ………. 9

3. CMO Statistics (cont..) Con Edison Outage Data (1981) – Frequency of Forced Outages per Year for Average Con. Edison 345 kV Transmission Line (Ref. C5) Line related Cause –Independent …… (0.236)* –Common Mode… (0.171)* –Dependent ……… (0.044)* Terminal related Cause –Independent …… (0.304)* –Common Mode… (0.037)* –Dependent ……… (0.166)* * Momentary outages are excluded