Modeling Tres-Amigas Update Modeling Work Group Meeting February 10, 2011 WECC Staff.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 11 An Introduction to Open Economy Macroeconomics.
Advertisements

2 Draft of proposed metrics for the WEQ BPS to conduct analysis and evaluation of the Parallel Flow Visualization pilot project. (PFV Pilot)
Equilibrium What is the Equilibrium and why is it important to both producers and consumers?
Modeling Tres-Amigas Modeling Work Group Meeting August 27, 2009 WECC Staff.
1 ACE Diversity Interchange. 2 ADI Pilot Project Founded on Negotiation Theory: A transaction should occur if the parties involved are either held harmless.
Craig L. Williams UFAS Liaison Market Interface Manager ECC Cost Benefit Analysis Review July 17-19, 2013 Standing Committees Joint Session.
Pacific Gas and Electric Company Long Term Procurement Plan Proceeding Renewable Integration Model Results and Model Demonstration October 22, 2010 Workshop.
Market Interface Committee Recent Regulatory Activities Philip Tice October 14, 2011.
Demand Resource Operable Capacity Analysis – Assumptions for FCA 5.
System Analysis Advisory Committee Futures, Monte Carlo Simulation, and CB Assumption Cells Michael Schilmoeller Tuesday, September 27, 2011.
Chapter 2 Supply and Demand.
An Introduction to International Economics
SPP-Entergy Market Power Analysis Presented By: David B. Patton, Ph.D. President, Potomac Economics September 16, 2008.
FEBRUARY 14, 2013 RELIABILITY COMMITTEE MEETING Steve Weaver SYSTEM OPERATIONS In-Day Reserves & Supplemental Procurement.
2006 USL Load Data Study Presentation to EB Unmetered Load Working Group Stan But January 18,
Elasticity of Demand and Supply
IMPACT TO FREQUENCY CONTROL DURING STARTUP AND SHUT DOWN OF UNITS
Taina Wilhelms 1 ENERGY YEAR 2010 Finnish Energy Industries
ENERGY VALUE. Summary  Operational Value is a primary component in the Net Market Value (NMV) calculation used to rank competing resources in the RPS.
Will CO2 Change What We Do?
Power Supply Adequacy Assessment Model/Methodology Review Steering Subcommittee Meeting January 29, 2010.
1 Generation Adequacy Task Force Report to TAC April 7, 2005.
Ad Hoc West-wide Resource Assessment Team (WRAT) : Assessment of Western System Adequacy in the Short-term Jeff King Northwest Power Planning Council Presentation.
December 4, 2000© 2000 Fernando L. Alvarado1 Reliability concepts and market power Fernando L. Alvarado Professor, The University of Wisconsin Invited.
Energy and Environmental Economics 1 Avoided Cost and E3 Calculator Workshops Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. October 3, 2005.
INTEGRATION COST. Integration Cost in RPS Calculator While “Integration Cost” is included in NMV formulation, the Commission stated that the Integration.
2011 Long-Term Load Forecast Review ERCOT Calvin Opheim June 17, 2011.
Marginal Distribution System (and Transmission System) Losses Regional Technical Forum August 5, 2008.
John Dumas Director of Wholesale Market Operations ERCOT Operating Reserve Demand Curve.
Utah Schedule 37 Update June 25, Schedule 37 Background Schedule 37 – Published rates for standard power purchase agreements with qualifying facilities.
PLWG Report to ROS July 9, PGRRs needing vote PGRR043 – FIS Scoping Amendment – PGRR043 moves the Subsynchronous Resonance (SSR) Study out of the.
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
MCWG Update to WMS Loretta Martin LCRA, Chair Josephine Wan AE, Vice Chair 03/05/
ERCOT PUBLIC 4/21/ Loss of Load Probability Assessment for NERC April, 2015.
1 Ancillary Services Requirements for Future Ancillary Services Cost Benefit Analysis FAS/SIRS Meeting September 21, 2015.
1 Aggregate Supply CHAPTER 11 © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning.
Bill Hellinghausen EDF Trading North America
ERCOT Planning WMS 10/20/2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System – Methodology.
ERCOT Planning October 2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System - Methodology.
ERS Update Plus Revisions to Proposed Changes for ERS Time Periods Presented to: Demand Side Working Group November 5, 2014.
SM April Peak Week Operations Review Presentation to ISO Business Issues Committee May 22, 2002.
September 21, 2005 ICF Consulting RGGI Electricity Sector Modeling Results Updated Reference, RGGI Package and Sensitivities.
2016 Long-Term Load Forecast
Analysis of ERCOT Regulation Service Deployments during 2011 David Maggio Market Enhancement Task Force Meeting 3/29/
FURTHER INFORMATION ON MISO FTR AUCTIONS For SPP RSC Discussion October 6, 2010.
ISO Proposed Flexible Capacity Requirements Stephen Keehn Senior Advisor California ISO CPUC Workshop January 26, 2012.
FERC Staff’s Report on Demand Response and Advanced Metering.
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
09/17/2006 Ken Donohoo ERCOT Peak Day August Initial Settlement Data by Fuel Type.
SPP.org 1. Status Update for Reliability and Economic Assessments Stakeholder Meeting September 16, 2008 Austin, TX.
1 Proposed Input Assumptions to RTF Cost-Effectiveness Determinations February 2, 2010.
TAS – Review Load and Hydro Shapes for use in TEPPC 2026 Common Case Kevin Harris, ColumbiaGrid TEPPC\Hydro Modeling Task Force - Chair.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
The credit exposure impact of higher system-wide offer caps was estimated using an internal ERCOT model under four scenarios: 1.(Base Case) “Normal” summer.
Capacity Metric & Hydro Capacity Assessment Decisions Mary Johannis PNW Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting June 20, 2007.
ERCOT CWG/MCWG April 24, 2013 DAM Credit Parameters.
Solar Profiling Interstate Renewable Energy Council presentation to the ERCOT Profiling Working Group Jan. 22, 2008.
Atcllc.com Using CEMS Data to Estimate Coal-Fired Plant FORs and Scheduled Maintenance Chris Hagman
August 2012 Wholesale Market Operations Constraints Competitiveness Tests (CCT) – Annual CCT 2013 Study Result with New Approach Market Support and Analysis.
Hypothetical Examples of How Residential Photovoltaic (PV) ESI IDs Could be Settled ERCOT Load Profiling.
Distributed Renewable Generation Profiling Methodology ERCOT Load Profiling March 4, 2008.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
DWG Meeting March 7, 2017 (Update to a Meeting held July 26, 2016)
MWG Recommended Hydro Improvement March 7, 2017
MWG Recommended Hydro Improvement March 14, 2017
MWG Recommended Hydro Improvement March 7, 2017
GENESYS Current Functionality
Capacity Analysis in the Sixth Plan
Planning Reserve Margin
Presentation transcript:

Modeling Tres-Amigas Update Modeling Work Group Meeting February 10, 2011 WECC Staff

Adjustments to the Modeling of the Tres-Amigas Project

Background

Modeling the Tres-Amigas Project This model was developed by Z-Global. This model consists of a set of energy cost curves that describes the price at which the SPP and ERCOT markets are willing to buy or sell power with WECC. The cost curves do not represent the entire supply curves for the ERCOT and SPP markets. Rather the cost curves represent the subset of the generation fleet in SPP and ERCOT that is expected to participate in the WECC energy market. 4

Background At the last Modeling Work Group meeting it was suggested that this approach may be overly optimistic. The subset of generation that was assumed to be available to participate in the WECC market may not always be available due to high loads, forced outages, lack of transmission, etc… Potential over-generation problems during off peak hours in ERCOT and SPP are not accounted for in the current modeling. 5

Background During the last MWG meeting it was proposed to address the concerns stated above as follows: The unavailability of SPP and ERCOT generation to participate in the WECC market could be modeled with an 8760 load shape. Potential over-generation problems during off peak hours in ERCOT and SPP could be modeled with an 8760 generator shape. These load and generator shapes would then be netted against the output of the current Tres-Amigas model. 6

Implementation of the Model Adjustments

Terminology Unavailable Generation Adjustment Accounts for the occasional unavailability of SPP and ERCOT generation to participate in the WECC market. Modeled with an 8760 Load Shape. Over-Generation Adjustment Accounts for potential over-generation problems in SPP and ERCOT in the off peak hours. Modeled with an 8760 Generator Shape. 8

Unavailable Generation Adjustment The Unavailable Generation Adjustment hourly shapes were created as follows: 1. All hours were selected in the 2006 ERCOT and SPP historical load shapes that were within a given percentage of the shapes monthly peaks. ERCOT -> 28% SPP -> 20% 2. The monthly peak was multiplied by one minus this percentage and then subtracted from the selected values. 3. The values were then normalized by multiplying each value by the ratio of the monthly peak divided by the annual peak. 9

Unavailable Generation Adjustment Reasoning behind assumptions Since generation supply shortages and transmission congestion problems tend to occur at times of high load it seems reasonable to use ERCOT and SPP historical load shapes as a starting point. Since many utilities tend to schedule units out for maintenance during the winter and shoulder months it seems reasonable to allow the adjustment to be non zero during these months. Although there is a non zero adjustment during the winter and shoulder months the magnitude of the adjustment during these months is significantly less than the adjustment during the summer months. 13

Over-Generation Adjustment The Over-Generation Adjustment hourly shapes were created as follows: 1. All hours were selected in an ERCOT and SPP wind profile that were within a given percentage of the profiles maximum value. ERCOT -> 40% SPP -> 60% 2. The profiles maximum value was multiplied by one minus this percentage and then subtracted from the selected values. 18

Over-Generation Adjustment Reasoning behind assumptions Since over-generation problems in off peak hours can be aggravated by wind generation it seems reasonable to use wind shapes as a starting point for this adjustment. Only the hours of high wind generation were selected since these are the hours when wind will tend to aggravate over generation problems. 21

Composite Shape The adjustment shapes for ERCOT and SPP were scaled and then combined into a Composite Shape. The adjustment shapes were scaled so that the Over- Gen shapes and the Unavailable Gen shapes had about the same energy. The shapes were then combined by subtracting the Unavailable Gen shapes from the Over-Gen shapes. The Composite shape can be thought of as an adder to the generation in SPP and ERCOT that will be exported to the WECC energy market. 26

Major Assumptions Summary What percentage of the monthly load peaks should be used when deriving the Unavailable Gen shape? Current Assumption (ERCOT -> 28% SPP -> 20%). What percentage of the wind profiles maximum value should be used when deriving the Over-Gen shape? Current Assumption (ERCOT -> 40% SPP -> 60%). How should the Over-Gen and Unavailable Gen shapes be scaled before they are combined? Current Assumption (The shapes were scaled to contain the same energy). How should the ERCOT and SPP Composite Shapes be scaled relative to each other? Current Assumption (Both shapes were scaled with a multiplier of one). 34