IHEQN Conference October 2006 IHEQN “AND NEVER THE TWAIN SHALL MEET”? CASE STUDY OF COLLABORATION 1. Engineers Ireland and University College Cork Denis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regulating the engineering profession Accrediting Engineering Degrees: Practice and Challenges Richard Shearman Director of Formation.
Advertisements

The SEDA Teacher Accreditation Scheme James Wisdom Visiting Professor in Educational Development, Middlesex University
Service to the University, Discipline and Community Academic Promotions Briefing Session Chair, Academic Board Peter McCallum.
As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.
Quality Assurance of Engineering Undergraduate Education: The Canadian Experience Bachelors of Engineering and Technology in Modern Industry, Science and.
© JABEE 2013 Japan Accreditation Board for Engineering Education Washington Accord And International Engineering Alliance Dr Yasuyuki AOSHIMA Executive.
Copyright© 2009 Institute of Engineering Education Taiwan. All Rights Reserved FEIAP Guidelines and Recent Development in International Engineering Accreditation.
1 Graduates’ Attributes : EMF, EUR-ACE and Federal Educational Standards Alexander I. Chuchalin, Chair of the RAEE Accreditation Board Graduates’ Attributes.
ABET-ASAC Accreditation Workshop ABET Criteria and Outcomes Assessment
Quality Assurance and Professional Accreditation - national developments Bryan Maguire Higher Education & Training Awards Council “And never the twain.
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 Part II OSU Outcomes Assessment for ABET EC200.
ABET Accreditation for Surveying/Geomatics Programs in the US.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology ABET 1Advisory committee of
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
University of Dublin Trinity College University of Dublin Trinity College Centre for Academic Practice & Student Learning University of Dublin Trinity.
Outcomes-Based Accreditation: An Agent for Change and Quality Improvement in Higher Education Programs A. Erbil PAYZIN Founding Member and Past Chairman.
ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 To maintain ABET accreditation, Engineering Departments must demonstrate that all of their graduates have the following.
Regulating the engineering profession 1 EC UK Experience in Accreditation of Engineering Programmes Professor Ian Freeston University of Sheffield, UK.
DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel.
The Hong Kong Institution of Engineers 香港工程師學會 1 Accreditation System of The Hong Kong Institution of Engineers (HKIE) by Ir Kenneth HSU Chairman of HKIE.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
FEIAP 2015 Workshop October 2012 By: Engr. Kashim A. Ali, FNSE, mni, President, Council for the Regulation of Engineering in Nigeria (COREN) Theme: Accreditation.
Washington Accord Graduate Attributes: A Metric for the Quality of Engineering Education Worldwide Dr. Malcolm J. Reeves, FEC, FGC, P.Eng., P.Geo. Chair.
Quality Assurance in Engineering Education in Canada - Accreditation Dr. Eric R. Norris, Eng. Former Chair - Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board &
Determining Substantial Equivalency Related to Credentials Evaluation Jim Smith, P.Eng. Canadian Council of Professional Engineers Presented at the 2005.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology - is a non governmental organization that accredits post secondary educational organizations in : 1)
1 Members’ Forum  QP Concept and Philosophy  Transitional Arrangements  Accreditation Process.
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingJanuary 24, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
ABET Accreditation (Based on the presentations by Dr. Raman Unnikrishnan and W. J. Wilson) Assoc. Prof. Zeki BAYRAM EMU Computer Engineering Dept. 14 January.
© Engineering Council 2011 UK Engineering Degree Accreditation Engineering Doctorate EngD ENAEE, November 2012 Deborah Seddon, Head of Policy and.
PRO-EAST Workshop1 Achievement of Learning Outcomes: Assessment Methods and Procedures Ian Freeston Engineering Council UK IET Academic Accreditation Committee.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
A Decade of Experience On Outcome Based Accreditation: Still a Long Way To Go A. Erbil PAYZIN Bülent E. PLATIN Chair, MÜDEK Executive Board Member, MÜDEK.
Day 1 Session 2/ Programme Objectives
OBE Briefing.
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting May 21, 2013.
The Hong Kong Institution of Engineers 香港工程師學會 1 Review of Accreditation Criteria for Engineering Degree Programmes By Albert CHOW Director of Qualifications.
AL-QADISIYIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted by SAR committee.
Alexander Chuchalin Chairman of the RAEE Accreditation Board Further Steps of PRO-EAST and National Accreditation Development Further Steps.
© Engineering Council (UK) 2002 Regulation and Accreditation in the UK Jim Birch Head of International Recognition.
The “Fundamentals” of Accreditation Quality Assurance in Educational Programs Lyle D. Feisel Chair, IEEE Com. on Global Accreditation Activities Dean Emeritus.
PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Final Report, Accreditation Decision, Register and Results Publication Oleg V. Boev, Accreditation Centre, Russian.
PRO-EAST Workshop, May 9-11, 2007, Rome, Italy1 Self-Assessment Report & On-Campus Evaluation How to plan & how to run Professor Sergey Gerasimov Siberian.
Quality Assurance of Malaysian Higher Education COPIA – Code of Practice for Institutional Audit COPPA – Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation.
GLOBAL ACCREDITATION TRENDS Russel C. Jones. Ph.D., P.E. World Expertise LLC USA and UAE.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
Internal Subject Review Training Tuesday 9 th November 2010 Slaveya Angelska, Associate Trainer Sareta Puri, Development Advisor.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Curriculum and Programme Objectives: Mapping of Learning Outcomes Oleg V. Boev, Accreditation Centre, Russian.
Supporting ABET Assessment and Continuous Improvement for Engineering Programs William E. Kelly Professor of Civil Engineering The Catholic University.
ABET is Coming! What I need to know about ABET, but was afraid to ask.
Professor Bob Johnson, Commissioner for Credit Rating, ECBE European Council for Business Education ECBE Accreditation.
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
Briefing Michael Mulvey PhD Director of Academic Affairs and Registrar
The quality assurance of tertiary education in New Zealand
Mutual Recognition of Engineering Educational Programs in the Washington Accord Andrew M. Wo Deputy CEO, Institute of Engineering Education Taiwan (IEET)
Accreditation of study programs at the Faculty of information technologies Tempus SMGR BE ESABIH EU standards for accreditation of study.
Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have the following: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) ETP 2005.
Day 1 Session 2/ Programme Objectives
Quality Assurance and Enhancement at The University of Edinburgh
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
College of Computer Science OBE Implementation on Curriculum Revisions
Making use of Qualification Frameworks
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
EUR-ACE Engineering Programme Accreditations
Accrediting Engineering Degrees: Practice and Challenges
Assessment and Accreditation
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION – AN INTRODUCTION
Presentation transcript:

IHEQN Conference October 2006 IHEQN “AND NEVER THE TWAIN SHALL MEET”? CASE STUDY OF COLLABORATION 1. Engineers Ireland and University College Cork Denis McGrath Registrar Engineers Ireland IHEQN Conference October 2006

Accreditation Criteria 1983 Input-based –Entry Standards –Curriculum Content –Laboratory Facilities –External Examiners’ Reports IHEQN Conference October 2006

Development of Outcomes-based Accreditation Criteria Context ABET move towards Programme Outcomes National Framework of Qualifications in Ireland – 10 Levels Reorganisation of university programmes – heavy emphasis on learning outcomes Standards for awards in institutes of technology IHEQN Conference October 2006

Background Research Accreditation Criteria of other organisations Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (USA) (ABET) Engineering Council (UK) (ECUK) Engineering Council of South Africa (ECSA) Institution of Professional Engineers New Zealand (IPENZ) Engineers Australia (IEAust) Canadian Council of Professional Engineers (CCPE) Hong Kong Institution of Engineers (HKIE) The Engineering Professors’ Council (UK) (EPC) Quality Assurance Agency (UK) (QAA) IHEQN Conference October 2006

Development of Accreditation Criteria Accreditation Board Working Group 2 Years Preparation / Consultation IHEQN Conference October 2006

Accreditation Criteria 2003 Ethos Guidelines on inputs such as entry standard, curriculum content, staffing, laboratories. Prescribed Programme Outcomes. IHEQN Conference October 2006

Accreditation Criteria 2003 Programme Outcomes a)The ability to derive and apply solutions from a knowledge of sciences, engineering sciences, technology and mathematics; b)The ability to identify, formulate, analyse and solve engineering problems; IHEQN Conference October 2006

Accreditation Criteria 2003 Programme Outcomes c)The ability to design a system, component or process to meet specified needs, to design and conduct experiments and to analyse and interpret data; d)An understanding of the need for high ethical standards in the practice of engineering, including the responsibilities of the engineering profession towards people and the environment; IHEQN Conference October 2006

Accreditation Criteria 2003 Programme Outcomes e)The ability to work effectively as an individual, in teams and in multi-disciplinary settings together with the capacity to undertake lifelong learning; f)The ability to communicate effectively with the engineering community and with society at large. IHEQN Conference October 2006

Accreditation Criteria 2003 Programme Areas Sciences and Mathematics Discipline-specific Technology Information and Communications Technology Design and Development Engineering Practice Social and Business Context IHEQN Conference October 2006

Accreditation Criteria 2003 Programme Area Descriptors Describe how the learning outcomes of modules in Programme Areas contribute to Programme Outcomes. IHEQN Conference October 2006

Accreditation Criteria 2003 Sum of Learning Outcomes Programme Outcomes IHEQN Conference October 2006

Accreditation Criteria 2003 Process of Implementation ABET Assessor Training Course, Washington DC Briefings for academic staff in colleges Training of Assessors IHEQN Conference October 2006

Accreditation Visit to College Visiting Panel Accreditation Panel Chairman Registrar – Engineers Ireland Programme Panel for each degree programme -Panel Chairman -Two Assessors, one is Rapporteur Note: One member of Programme Panel from industry if possible IHEQN Conference October 2006

Accreditation Visit to College Pre-visit Activities Final year projects evaluated for achievement of Programme Outcomes – (one assessor) Laboratory facilities evaluated – (other assessor) Initial views on documentation sent to university. IHEQN Conference October 2006

Accreditation Visit to College Agenda – Day One am - Accreditation Panel assembles at university 2.Plenary Meeting between Accreditation Panel and senior Academic Staff to include 15 minute presentation by university, on programmes for accreditation am - Private Plenary Meeting of Accreditation Panel to brief Programme Panels 4.12 noon - Parallel meetings of Programme Panels and academic staff in separate rooms, commencing with 15 minute presentation on each programme 1.00pm - Buffet Lunch – Accreditation Panel & Staff IHEQN Conference October 2006

Accreditation Visit to College Agenda – Day One (cont’d) pm - Parallel sessions in separate “evidence” rooms, of Programme Panels, to include: Meeting to discuss panel views on documentation and pre-visit data Evaluation of “evidence” of achievement of Programme Outcomes –Examination questions and answer books (scripts) for all years of each programme in previous year –Laboratory Reports / Note Books –Project Work –Final Year Projects –Other relevant material (if applicable) Meeting to discuss mid-point findings to date IHEQN Conference October 2006

Accreditation Visit to College Agenda – Day One (cont’d) pm - Private Plenary Meeting of Accreditation Panel to discuss mid- point findings of each Programme Panel pm - Conclusion of Day One 7.30pm - Dinner with Accreditation Panel and Academic Staff IHEQN Conference October 2006

Accreditation Visit to College Agenda – Day Two am - Private Plenary Meeting of Accreditation Panel am - Plenary meeting between Accreditation Panel and selected Academic Staff to discuss matters generally common to each programme 10.45am - Coffee am - Parallel meetings of Programme Panels with Academic Staff to discuss separately (separate rooms) achievement of Programme Outcomes for each Programme 1.00pm - Buffet Lunch – Accreditation Panel and Staff IHEQN Conference October 2006

Accreditation Visit to College Agenda – Day Two (cont’d) pm - Parallel separate discussions on how Programme Outcomes are being reached on each Programme Panel between each panel and a)Final Year Students on each Programme b)Previous Graduates of each Programme c)Employers who have employed numbers of recent graduates from each Programme pm - Private Parallel Meetings of Programme Panels to discuss findings in respect of each Programme IHEQN Conference October 2006

Accreditation Visit to College Agenda – Day Two (cont’d) pm - Plenary Meeting of Accreditation Panel to finalise a consistent set of findings in respect of each programme Deficits (if any) identified –Conditions –Recommendations –Features and Strengths IHEQN Conference October 2006

Accreditation Visit to College Agenda – Day Two (cont’d) pm - Concluding Meeting – Accreditation Panel Chairman / Programme Panel Chairman explains findings in respect of each programme, to senior academic staff pm - End of Visit IHEQN Conference October 2006

Accreditation Panel Evaluation and Report Findings and Recommendations on Accreditation disclosed 5 years, 3 years, < 3 years Clarification given Conclusion of Visit IHEQN Conference October 2006

Accreditation Panel Evaluation and Report Recommendation to Accreditation Board Executive Committee of Council Final decision / final report to college Presentation of Parchment IHEQN Conference October 2006

Washington Accord Signatories AustraliaNew Zealand CanadaSingapore Hong KongSouth Africa IrelandUK JapanUSA IHEQN Conference October 2006

Washington Accord Benefits Mutual acceptance of accreditation decisions Substantial equivalence of degree programmes IHEQN Conference October 2006

Washington Accord Benefits Biennial General Assembly Biennial Workshops Establishment of Permanent Secretariat IHEQN Conference October 2006

IHEQN “AND NEVER THE TWAIN SHALL MEET”? CASE STUDY OF COLLABORATION 1. Engineers Ireland and University College Cork Denis McGrath Registrar Engineers Ireland IHEQN Conference October 2006