Mike Baumann Statewide Utility Engineer January 22, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Constructability Review
Advertisements

Drawings of Sufficient Detail
EFCOG Electrical Improvement Project Electrical Hazards Awareness Briefing Excavation and Trenching Module 5.
Bangor Water Districts Experience With Gas. Bangor Water Districts Experience With Natural Gas.
Project, Cost Schedule, and Work Limits Roadway Character Design Criteria for Bridges Maintenance of Traffic Right-of-Way & Utility Involvement General.
11 Grant Park Sewer Rehabilitation Project BES Project #E10346 Bid # SCOPE: Rehabilitation, Replacement, or Relocation of Sanitary & Combined Sewers,
Oklahoma Department of Transportation Susan McClune Regulatory Services.
Supervision and Administration
Georgia underground marking standards
Route 50 Widening Design/Build Project. 2  Virginia Department of Transportation  Shirley Contracting Company  Dewberry  Fairfax and Loudoun Counties.
North Central Region Construction Conference March 7, 2013.
3-1 Utility Conflict Identification and Management Lesson 3.
New York State Department of Transportation Kendrick Road Bridge Over I-390 Design-Build Project Request for Qualifications Informational Meeting June.
US Highway 17 (Center Street) Sidewalk Feasibility Study Town of Pierson, Florida.
MAJOR REVISIONS TO THE POLICY FOR ACCOMMODATING UTILITIES ON HIGHWAY RIGHTS Presented By: Mark Attaway March 29, 2011.
ESTIMATING By Laith Jacob.
Greenfield District Utility/RR Engineer, INDOT
Work Plan Development Steve Robinson Highway Utility Engineer, INDOT June 11, 2015.
AGENDA  PROJECT HISTORY  NORTHERN SECTION UPDATE  SOUTHERN SECTION OVERVIEW  INTERCHANGES  PROJECT SCHEDULE  UPCOMING ACTIVITIES  OPEN DISCUSSION.
Utilities Drawing Project U N I V E R S I T Y OF K E N T U C K Y.
LPA – Utility Coordination Natalie Parks StructurePoint November 20, 2013.
2014 CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES Estimates Estimates 3 Point of the illustration? Document your assumptions.
1 Introduction to QA/QC Process. 2 CHECKLISTS SheetsItems to CheckGeneral Reference YesYes NoNo N/AN/A General General Plan Content DM=Design Manual General.
Erosion Control/Damage Topic H. Erosion & Sentiment Control Defined by: – Environmental Regulations – State and federal laws – Standard specifications,
PROJECT NO: HWY: STH 441/USH 10COUNTY: WINNEBAGOSHEET: E FILE NAME : _______________________________PLOT DATE : ___________________PLOT BY :
Emergency Action Plans Miriam Gradie Anderson Planning Specialist 608/ Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
Christine Krall, SW Region Environmental Winter 2015.
IDM Chapter 104 Utility Coordination Joe Gundersen Senior Utility Engineer, INDOT August 21, 2014.
Alameda Creek Bridge Replacement Scoping Meeting March 4, 2014.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) Federal Highway Administration Wisconsin Division January, 2010 Jason P. Spilak, PE, ARRA Engineer.
Safety in the numbers Working Safely Around Pipelines Dig Safe BC! Workshop: March 2010.
MnDOT-ACEC/MN Annual Consultant Conference March 5, 2012 Leveraging SUE Data for Utilities on Projects Tom Swafford- Utility Mapping Services, Inc.
A New Paradigm for Utility Coordination Kenny Franklin INDOT Director of Utilities and Railroads.
HIGHWAY/UTILITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW ROADWAY CONFERENCE APRIL 20, 2009.
Things to look for and remember while preparing FD05 Estimates.
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Superstructure and Bridge Replacements in Regions 2 & 9 Design-Build Project (PIN , D900022) Herkimer,
New York State Department of Transportation Accelerated Bridge Program Phase 1B Design-Build Projects Request for Proposals Informational Meeting April.
Project Highlights of Consultant Managed Utility Coordination Efforts Estill County – KY 89 – Irvine 3-lane Kevin F. Damron, PE, Senior Project Manager.
New York State Department of Transportation I-190 and NY Route 265 Over the New York Power Authority Reservoir (BINS & ) PIN , Contract.
Chapter 37 Pipeline Construction. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Explain the.
Highway Utility Engineer, INDOT
Enosburg BRO 1448(40) Bridge 48 on TH 2 Over the Tyler Branch Public Information Meeting.
1 PS&E Plans, Specifications and Estimate. 2 Contract Letting Plans-Show what is being built Plans-Show what is being built Specification-Show how project.
Active Corrosion Process Nisource – COH/CKY. Objectives  Understanding the terminology –Active Corrosion –& Suspected Areas of “Active Corrosion”  Developing.
Construction Review LaVon M Marshall Greenfield District Utility/RR Engineer, INDOT June 11, 2015.
I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE PROJECT State Project No , P101, C501 CITIZEN’S INFORMATION MEETING UPC NOVEMBER 19, 2013.
Planning Commission Public Hearing: SUB Proposed 6-lot Subdivision at Bland Circle December 2, 2015.
General Tab Project, Cost Schedule, and Work Limits Roadway Character
1 PS&E Plans, Specifications and Estimate. 2 Contract Letting Plans-Show what is being built Plans-Show what is being built Specifications-Show how project.
Stacy Hagenbucher.  Process Improvements  Clarification  Trends  Finals Tracking  Trends  Why Missing Dates  Additional Resource  Issues on sites.
Pole Attachment Application Package February 2004.
Civil Engineering Surveying Roy Frank. Basic Route Survey and Design 1.Concept for Route 2.Reconnaissance Study 1.Small scale mapping of region (1”-500’
I-75 Ramp Widening Project Scope of Project – Safety Project to Widen I-75 NB Exit Ramp (Ramp A) and I-75 SB Exit Ramp (Ramp C) at the I-75/US 25W Interchange.
Contractor Utility Coordination WisDOT Projects February 18 th, 2016.
Construction Review LaVon M. Marshall Greenfield District Utility/RR Engineer, INDOT June 22, 2016.
Georgia underground marking standards
2nd Street Drainage and Paving Improvements
Interstate 15 North Phase 4 Cost Estimates 09/03/2015
107th & 110th Avenue North Public Utilities Renewal Projects
Common Surveys Used For Commercial Real Estate Transactions
IA 122 RECONSTRUCTION PRE-BID MEETING
General Tab Project, Cost Schedule, and Work Limits Roadway Character
Research Phase, Indiana 811, Initial Notice, Verification
General Tab Project, Cost Schedule, and Work Limits Roadway Character
Construction Review.
Construction Considerations
Drawing of Sufficient Detail (DOSD)
Project Manager / Utility Liaison
Presentation transcript:

Mike Baumann Statewide Utility Engineer January 22, 2015

 TRANS 220  Proposed Highway Improvement Notice, DT1077  Project Plan Transmittal, DT1078  Utility Worksheet, DT2236  Special Provisions 2

3 Administrative Rule TRANS 220, Utility Facilities Relocation It’s the Law!

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

 Utility facility owner review of 1077 packet  Review 1077 Proposed Highway Improvement Notice  Review and understand project scope/work  Review and understand project limits  Compare system maps to project limits  Review limits of other projects in area  Utilize knowledge from other projects  Potential issues from review of 1077 process  System maps require updating?  Request clarification on project scope/work?  Request clarification on project limits? 12

 Designer review of 1077 process  Review 1077 Acknowledgements  Review system maps  Review TUMS list of utility facility owners  Review Diggers Hotline locate request  Consider experience from other projects/studies  Review field survey  Potential issues from review of 1077 process  Utility facility owner (UFO) provide correct response for 1077 process?  All system maps received?  Utility facilities marked correctly by Digger’s Hotline?  Which UFO’s to send 1078 packet to?  Coordinate changes with design team? 13

14

15

 Designer review for Non-Comp.1078 packet  Cover letter  DT1078 Project Plan Transmittal/Acknowledgement  Plan  DT2236 Utility Worksheet  Project synopsis (typically in cover letter or transmittal)  Construction schedule (typically part of transmittal)  Map of general project area (typically part of plan)  List of possible conflicts  List of utility contacts  List of environmentally sensitive areas  historical  archaeological  environmental 16

 Designer review for Comp.1078 packet  All items from Non-Comp packet  Plat  List of real estate commitments  Agreement  Release of rights document  DT1850 Utility Estimation Report – Lump Sum or Audit Type  DT2249 Utility’s Certificate of Compliance for Steel and Iron Items 17

 Designer review of 1078 packet  All documents in packet?  Are documents filled out accurately?  Is there sufficient information for what’s being planned?  Review plan to determine if additional detail(s) are required? 18

 Utility company review of 1078 packet  Confirm all necessary documents in packet?  Is there sufficient information for what’s being planned?  Review potential conflict list?  Review plan to determine if additional detail(s) are required?  Request electronic files?  Contact consultant designer and/or Regional Utility Coordinator about anything missing or questions?  Return the DT1078 Project Plan Acknowledgement within 7 days 19

20

21

 Key to completing the worksheet is answering the following for each situation :  Who  What  Where  When  How 22

 Who  Wisconsin Public Service, Field Contact Dan Druff  AT&T Wisconsin, Field Contact Forrest Green  Time Warner Cable, Field Contact Kerry Oki  Brown County, Field Contact Olive Branch  Village of Howard, Field Contact Rowan Boatman  Etc……… 23

 What  69 kV overhead electric line in conflict with bridge work  34.5 kV underground electric line in conflict with signs  25 pair copper cable laying on top of ground in conflict with guardrail  24 strand undergound fiber optic cable in conflict with retaining wall  4 inch gas main in conflict with signal lights  16 inch water main in conflict with storm sewer  Sanitary sewer manhole in conflict with concrete paving  Pedestal in conflict with excavation common  Transformer in conflict with street lighting  Vent in conflict with culvert pipe  Etc…… 24

 Where  USH 41 at STA RT  USH 41 from STA RT to STA RT  Mason Street from STA LT to STA LT  Shawano Avenue crossing at STA  Etc….. 25

 When  Prior to construction  Start January 22, 2015, 10 working days as defined in Trans 220  During construction, start once existing pavement is removed, 2 working days as defined in Trans 220  During construction, start once ground is within one foot of finished elevation, 5 working days as defined in Trans 220  During construction, start once topsoil is placed but prior to seed/fertilizer/erosion mat, 7 working days as defined in Trans 220  Etc….. 26

 How  Joint use  Bore machine at STA LT  Open trench that is 2 feet wide by 3 feet deep  Protect in place with sheet piling and concrete cap  Excavate 10 foot long by 10 foot wide by 5 foot deep pit at STA LT  Backfill excavation with granular material  Clear and grub from STA to STA LT  Rock blasting from STA LT to STA LT  Material storage will require 100 foot by 50 foot area from STA LT to STA LT. Storage area is from right-of-way to 5 feet inside slope intercept. 27

 How  Access to work site from USH 41 at STA NB  Shoulder and lane closures are required  Equipment will be stored 30 feet from edge line of USH 41 during non-working hours  Restoration will be completed within 2 days where work is finished 28

 Example  Wisconsin Public Service, Field Contact Dan Druff  4 inch gas main in conflict with signal lights  Mason Street from STA LT to STA LT  During construction, start once existing pavement is removed, 2 working days as defined in Trans 220.  Bore machine at STA LT  Open trench that is 2 feet wide by 3 feet deep  Rock blasting from STA LT to STA LT  Material storage will require 100 foot by 50 foot area from STA LT to STA LT. Storage area is from right-of-way to 5 feet inside slope intercept.  Restoration will be completed within 2 days where work is finished 29

 Example  Wisconsin Public Servie (WPS) has a 4 inch gas main in conflict with the signal lights on Mason Street from STA LT to STA LT.  WPS will relocate the gas main so that it is 5 feet from the right-of-way. The existing gas main will be discontinued in place.  During construction, notify WPS as required by Trans (10) so this work will start work once the existing pavement is removed. This work will take 2 working days to complete as defined in Trans (20). 30

 Example  WPS will have a bore machine at STA LT and will bore to STA LT.  WPS will open trench from STA LT to STA LT. The trench will be 2 feet wide by 3 feet deep.  WPS anticipates rock blasting from STA LT to STA LT. 31

 Example  Material storage will require a 100 foot by 50 foot area from STA LT to STA LT. Storage area is from right-of-way to 5 feet inside slope intercept.  Restoration will be completed within the 2 working days specified earlier.  The field contact for this work is Dan Druff. Dan’s phone number is (920)

 Utilities.  This contract comes under the provisions of Administrative Rule Trans ( )  When interpreting the term “working days” within the “Utilities” article of these special provisions (and only within this article), use the definition provided in Trans (20) of the Wisconsin Administrative Code rather then the definition provided in Section of the State of Wisconsin Standard Specifications for Highway and Structure Construction. 33

 Wisconsin Public Service (WPS) has an under ground gas main along Mason Street from approximately STA LT to approximately STA LT  During construction, WPS plans to relocate the gas main along Mason Street from approximately STA LT to approximately STA LT. The existing gas main will be discontinued in-place.  WPS will store material in a 100 foot by 50 foot area from approximately STA LT to approximately STA LT. The storage area extends from the right-of-way to 5 feet inside of the slope intercept. 34

 As required by Trans (10), notify Dan Druff of WPS at (920) so this work will start after the existing pavement is removed.  WPS anticipates this work will take 2 working days to complete. 35

 Mike Baumann  