Southampton 3 P Bradshaw EDXCW. © AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Pop-Up Spoilers Description  High lift: Slats,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Feb 2009 Introducing ARTIST - Airbus Deutschland GmbH - TBCEI33 Introducing ARTIST Trust and Identification Aircraft Security Presented by Michel Messerschmidt.
Advertisements

ACN/PCN module in PEP Monique FUERI Director Operational Performance
AIRCRAFT FIRE AND CABIN SAFETY RESEARCH CONFERENCE Dr. A. Freiling - Ref. X26PR Issue 1 Relation between active and passive Fire Protection.
VSG – CPDLC Msg Set Validation WG78/SC214 SG (Luxembourg) Feb 2012VSG - CPDLC Msg Set Validation Presented by VSG (Greg Saccone / Jerome Condis)
VSG Input WG78/SC214 SG (Luxembourg) Feb 2012VSG - Input Presented by VSG (Greg Saccone / Jerome Condis)
Standards for Seamless ATS communications transition between different datalink technologies Presented by CONDIS Jerome Airbus May 2010.
Lift Coefficient & Lift Quantity Momentum, Flaps, Slots, Slats,& Spoilers Lecture 5 Chapter 2.
Lecture 3: Take-off Performance
ICAO-UPDATE, ACN/PCN Federal Aviation Administration
The revenue crisis: when will the airline industry recover? Narjess Teyssier ICAO n Chief Economic Analysis & Policy Section Montréal 26 September 2010.
Landing in CONF 3 – Use of reversers Hélène REBEL Head of A330/A340 Operational Standard Presented by:
ME 480 Introduction To Aerospace: Chapter 2 Prof. Doug Cairns.
Cabin Component Design Features Fire Properties of Corefiller, Adhesive, „Ditch and Pot“ March 2009 Presented by Ingo WEICHERT TBCEE12.
State of Air Transport focus on MID Region 1 ICAO Aviation Data Analyses Seminar Middle East (MID) Regional Office October Economic Analysis and.
Southampton 1 P Bradshaw EDXCW. Commercial Aircraft Conceptual Design - Some Considerations 15 th November 2005 P Bradshaw EDXCW Wing & Aerodynamics Skill.
P Bradshaw EDXCW Southampton 4.
Southampton 2 P Bradshaw EDXCW. © AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Develop Capabilities for Multiple Challenges.
ICAO Aviation Data Analyses Seminar Middle East (MID) Regional Office October Economic Analysis and Policy (EAP) Section Air Transport Bureau (ATB)
R&R Consulting Approach
Month 200X Use menu "View - Header & Footer" for Presentation title - Siglum - Reference Large Jig Verification Project LVMC 06 Geraint W Jones Engineering.
npor. Ing. Jan Kalvoda Brno, 2014
Subject: Science Topic: Flight Technology Grades: Teacher Notes.
© COPYRIGHT ABCONSULTING Understanding Flight Operations For Manufacturers by Antoine BRU.
© COPYRIGHT ABCONSULTING Understanding Flight Operations - Part Two by Antoine BRU.
Fuel Tank Inerting Joint Airbus/FAA, A320 Flight Tests
Lecture 3: Basic Aircraft
PRINCIPLES OF FLIGHT CHAPTER 4 CONTROLS.
E-TSI light user manual for Instructors Questionnaire online: How can I show to my Customer to fill in a questionnaire? How can I print directly from the.
AIRBUS SUPPORT IN SOUTH ASIA Contributing to the Safety of Aviation Community April, 2011To 8 th 5 th Presented by Captain Michel MENESTROT Flight Ops.
Airbus Training Perspective
9-Apr-2008 WALLTURB meeting at ONERA Toulouse WALLTURB: CFD results on Surrey Bump WALLTURB Presented by Jerry Benton.
ULD Passive Fire Protected Contact:Dipl. Ing. Robert Huebner BARO-Agentur UG T: Cell: Proven.
Southampton 4 P Bradshaw EDXCW. © AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. A Versatile X- Section Designed around a comfortable.
Aviation Safety in a changing world FSF MED MAY 2014 Airbus Product Safety Frédéric COMBES Head of Accident / Incident Investigation.
Jean-Pierre DANIEL, Airbus at AIAA CANEUS 2004, Monterey CA, USA Structural Health Monitoring for Airliners from research to user requirements, a European.
DCIT / Media Management Session FAA DataComm – OTA FANS Validation Airbus FANS comm media management 17 Nov 2011Airbus FANS comm media management Presented.
Airplanes By : Hebron Yam,Justin Minucci. How do airplane work? Problem???
1. Mission Statement Design Requirements Aircraft Concept Selection Advanced Technologies / Concepts Engine / Propulsion Modeling Constraint Analysis.
Airbus Status on ADS-B In / Out Update
C-Band for AIRBUS Telemetry : status and improvement June 2015 ETTC 2015 Gilles Freaud /Luc FALGA ETTC 2015 Toulouse.
Big Data in Airbus Flight Test and Integration Center
Introduction to Aerospace – Historical Perspective Dr. Doug Cairns.
Friends and Partners of Aviation Weather, Fall 2015, Las Vegas, NV Determining Runway Conditions in Real Time Using Data Obtained from Airplanes during.
Fuel Cell By-Products for Cargo Hold Fire Suppression
Training & Flight Operations Support and Services
Greener Skies 4th Aviation and Environment Conference Hong Kong - September 27, 2011 Presented by Frederic Eychenne, Airbus New Energies Programme Manager.
Uncontrolled copy not subject to amendment
Novec 1230 cold testing outcomes IAFPSWG meeting Nov 2011 Month 200XNovec 1230 cold testing outcomes - IAFPSWG meeting Nov 11 - EET13 - Ref. V26PR
State of the Art of Contaminated Runways Work at Airbus October 20133rd International Winter Operations Conference Presented by Logan JONES – Aircraft.
UBAX14 Microsoft Convention 2013 ‘If you’re trying to get to there…..’
Airbus training support & services Rudder and Loads.
© 2009 Aviation Supplies & Academics, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The Pilot’s Manual – Ground School Aerodynamics Chapter 1 Forces Acting on an Airplane.
© AIRBUS all rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. An Active Safety Net for Runway Overruns Presented by Logan JONES Airbus Flight Operations.
State of Air Transport focus on MID Region
Trust and Identification
AMASIS Exercises Airbus FHS Campinas, October 2016 Thomas Lefrançois
CGS Ground School Principles Of Flight Controls © Crown Copyright 2012
Airfoil Any surface that provides aerodynamic force through interaction with moving air Aerodynamic force (lift) Moving air Airfoil.
Baghdad A300 Incident Discussion
Baghdad A300 Incident Discussion
Baghdad A300 Incident Discussion
ICAO CO2 Reporting and Analysis System (ICORAS)
Baghdad A300 Incident Discussion
ICAO Strategic Objective: Economic Development of Air Transport
Economic Analysis and Policy (EAP) Section Air Transport Bureau (ATB)
Baghdad A300 Incident Discussion
A family of Smart-Galley
Baghdad A300 Incident Discussion
Baghdad A300 Incident Discussion
Unit 2 Unmanned Aircraft
Presentation transcript:

Southampton 3 P Bradshaw EDXCW

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Pop-Up Spoilers Description  High lift: Slats, single slotted fowler flaps & aileron  Roll control: o/b aileron & i/b spoiler  Load control: o/b aileron & o/b spoiler  Lift reduction: Pop-up spoilers  Speed brake: Pop-up spoilers Pros:  No hinge moment  Efficient lift loss & drag  smaller chord Cons:  Chord limited by wing thickness  Structure for high speed use

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Split Ailerons Description  High lift: Slats, single slotted fowler flaps & ailerons  Roll control: o/b aileron & spoilers  Load control: o/b aileron & spoilers  Lift reduction: spoilers  Speed brake: spoilers, split aileron Pros:  Increased drag without lift loss  Improved steep approach capability  Could be used for roll control Cons:  Increased complexity

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Vented Aileron Description  High lift: Slats, single slotted fowler flaps & vented aileron  Roll control: o/b aileron & spoilers  Load control: spoilers  Lift reduction: spoilers  Speed brake: spoilers Pros:  Acts like an aileron  Increased high lift performance Cons:  No negative deflection  Reduced off load capability  Reduced roll capability from ailerons

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Inner Aileron / Flaperon Description  High lift: Slats, single slotted fowler flaps & aileron  Roll control: i/b & o/b aileron, spoilers  Load control: both ailerons & spoilers  Lift reduction: spoilers  Speed brake: spoilers Pros:  Less flutter risk  Loads reduction from locking o/b aileron  No jet interaction Cons:  Flap continuity lost  increase in induced drag

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Pros:  Spoiler 1 can be used in flight  FSS produces drag without lift loss  Reduced hinge moment on FSS Cons:  FSS has lower lift loss  FSS is heavier Vented & Fixed Shroud Spoilers (FSS) Spoiler 1 - Vented S2&3 - Normal S4&5 – Fixed Shroud Description  High lift: Slats, single slotted fowler flaps & ailerons  Roll control: o/b aileron & spoilers (see description below)  Load control: o/b aileron, spoilers  Lift reduction: spoilers  Speed brake: spoilers

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Landing Gears & Airport Compatibility

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Standard Clearances for LG Concept Studies Weight:- Total LG weight typically 3% of MTOW for commercial airliners Tyre clearances:- Spinning Tyre to airframe = 80mm minimum for nominal static structure (50mm after tolerances and deflections) Landing gear structure to airframe = 50mm minimum for nominal static structure (25mm after tolerances and deflections) Airframe skin thickness:- Wing skin thickness = 50mm Belly fairing thickness = 100mm Nose bay skin thickness = 100mm

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Results in an Envelope for LG Fairing Sizing Spinning tyre +80mm clearance to structure +100mm belly fairing thickness +180mm total offset Structure +50mm clearance to structure +50mm Wing skin thickness +100mm total offset Tyre clearance illustration for stowed Main Gear.

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Section through stowed leg in wing Wing surfaces

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Landing Gear - Aerodrome reference code The purpose of the Aerodrome reference code is to match aerodrome facilities to the A/C. It is a two part code.  The first part relates to the A/C reference field length  The second to the A/C wing span and L/G outer wheel span. The details regarding the aerodrome reference code for L/G outer wheel span can be found in the ICAO aerodrome design manual Part 2 Chapter 1 (Taxiways). The code elements are reproduced as follows;

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Landing Gear - Aerodrome reference code The code number for field length is chosen from the list below:- Code numberAircraft reference field length 1Less than 800m 2800m up to but not including 1200m 31200m up to but not including 1800m 41800m and over

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Landing Gear - Aerodrome reference code The code letter for element 2 is determined from the list below. The code letter is selected corresponding to the greatest wing span, or the greatest outer wheel span, whichever gives the more demanding code letter for the aircraft. Code letter Wing SpanOuter main gear wheel span A Up to but not including 15mUp to but not including 4.5m B 15m up to but not including 24m4.5m up to but not including 6m C 24m up to but not including 36m6m up to but not including 9m D 36m up to but not including 52m9m up to but not including 14m E 52m up to but not including 65m9m up to but not including 14m F 65m up to but not including 80m14m up to but not including 16m Outer main gear wheel span bogie track

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. A380 designed for use on Code E / Group V runways possibly with extended shoulders (ICAO) for outer engines possibly with extended shoulders (ICAO) for outer engines 45m / 150ft 10.7m / 35ft 7.5m / 24.6ft A380 will be certificated for 45m runways

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. 23m / 75ft 10.7m / 35ft 10.5m / 34.4ft A380 can use Code E / Group V taxiways

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. TAT Considerations Different requirements from different operators, & different turnaround scenarios;  Quick Turn Around: –No re-fuel –1 or 2 exit doors –Hand baggage y/ n  Not So Quick: –Refuel required according to next scheduled flights; ‘Top-Up’ or Total Refil from empty ? Design Concept Considerations;  Number of exit doors to be used.  Need for ‘Gate’ or intergal exit stairs?  Number of aisles  Cabin baggage policy  Aisle width  Refuel system pipe diameters – vent pipe sizing – BM relief

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. This document and all information contained herein is the sole property of AIRBUS UK LTD. No intellectual property rights are granted by the delivery of this document or the disclosure of its content. This document shall not be reproduced or disclosed to a third party without the express written consent of AIRBUS UK LTD. This document and its content shall not be used for any purpose other than that for which it is supplied. The statements made herein do not constitute an offer. They are based on the mentioned assumptions and are expressed in good faith. Where the supporting grounds for these statements are not shown, AIRBUS UK LTD will be pleased to explain the basis thereof.