SSSC 02/18/2010 P. Marcum Science Utilization Policies SOFIA SCIENCE UTILIZATION POLICIES Pamela M. Marcum SOFIA Project Scientist SSSC Feb 19, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Peter Griffith and Megan McGroddy 4 th NACP All Investigators Meeting February 3, 2013 Expectations and Opportunities for NACP Investigators to Share and.
JWST Science Timeline: Current Status Janice C. Lee STScI Science Mission Office March 13, 2014.
Guidance for Year 06 Track 1.0 ART Program Continuation Applications Tedd Ellerbrock, MD Team Leader, HIV Care and Treatment, GAP, CDC Barbara Aranda-Naranjo,
Overview of Mentored K Awards Shawna V. Hudson, PhD Assistant Professor of Family Medicine and Community Health UMDNJ-RWJMS The Cancer Institute of New.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Calhoun County School System Jacksonville, Alabama April 27-30, 2014.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Catalyst High School May 11,12,13, 2014.
SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy DCS PDR at RIT3/7/2000 DCS Preliminary Design Review Sean C. Casey USRA Senior Scientist Lead Scientist.
NGAO System Design Review Response Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team SSC Meeting June 18, 2008.
SOFIA DCS History and Overview Ian Gatley. SOFIA March DCS Preliminary Design Review2 The South Pole CARA Project: A DCS demonstration A data.
DCS Architecture Bob Krzaczek. Key Design Requirement Distilled from the DCS Mission statement and the results of the Conceptual Design Review (June 1999):
SOFIA SSSC Program Status Robert Meyer Program Manager September 29, 2009.
University of Wisconsin-Madison Space Science and Engineering Center (SSEC) 26 October 2005 SSEC/CIMSS Administrative Overview from Wenhua Wu, Tom Achtor.
1 Universities Space Research Association SOFIA Program Options SSSC 18 February 2010 Mina Cappuccio SOFIA Science Project Manager NASA Ames Research Center.
Senior Review Evaluations (1 of 5) Proposals due: 6 March 2015 Panel evaluations: Week of 22 April 2015 Performance factors to be evaluated will include.
Change Advisory Board COIN v1.ppt Change Advisory Board ITIL COIN June 20, 2007.
1 Universities Space Research Association AAS January 7, 2008 Early Science Workshop Range of E&PO Office Responsibilities Public Affairs (Public Information,
Update on the NASA/NOAA/DOE Collaboration on the Utilization of ROA/UAV/UAS for Global Climate Change and Weather Research Will Bolton Sandia National.
Grantwriting. Types of Grants Foundation Grants HancockREADS Grants Hancock Education Fund Grants.
CXC Implementing 2007 NRC Portals of the Universe Report Chandra X-ray Center Recommended Best Practices Roger Brissenden and Belinda Wilkes 25 April 2012.
Major Non-Consensus Program and its review process design Wang Yue; Li xiaoxuan Institute of Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Sciences Zheng yonghe.
DCS Overview MCS/DCS Technical Interchange Meeting August, 2000.
ALMA Operations and the North American ALMA Science Center Al Wootten NRAO.
(Almost) Everything You Need to Know About Preparing and Submitting Proposals to External AO’s Marc Postman On behalf of CMO, SMO, RMO and BRC April 28,
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE.
FEBRUARY 26, 2013 PRE-AWARD MATTERS THAT AFFECT POST-AWARD COMPLIANCE MODULE SESSION 2 OF SERIES III AAPLS (APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON.
Elements of a Data Management Plan Bill Michener University Libraries University of New Mexico Data Management Practices for.
SI team data access Scott Horner 28 September 2009.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
1 INSTITUTE OF SPACE SYSTEMS Universität Stuttgart Universities Space Research Association Deutsches SOFIA Institut American-German.
Research Program Overview National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Robert J. Jaeger, Ph.D. Interagency and International Affairs Interagency.
Options for CBP Agreement and EC Membership For Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March, 2013.
RESIDENT PROJECTS ROBERT LEONHARD QUALITY IMPROVEMENT MANAGER.
Scientific Facility User Access Policy - Synchrotron & Neutron Facilities Chi-Chang Kao Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource March 17, 2011, BESAC.
Cost Sharing James Trotter Quality Standards Manager Sponsored Projects Administration.
NMP EO-1 TECHNOLOGY WORKSHOP Section 2 Meeting Objectives.
Cycle 1 Planning Process B-G Andersson (SOFIA Science Operations Manager) & Ravi Sankrit (User Support Scientist) SSSC, May 11, 2011 Mountain View.
1 QEM/BIO Workshop October 21, 2005 Award Administration.
John Peoples for the DES Collaboration BIRP Review August 12, 2004 Tucson1 DES Management  Survey Organization  Survey Deliverables  Proposed funding.
SOFIA 2 nd Generation Instrument Plans & Technology Development Paul Hertz SOFIA Program Scientist & SMD Chief Scientist SOFIA Science Steering Committee.
MWA Operations Management Plan (OMP, v. 3) Ron Remillard (MIT); MWA Project Meeting, June 6, 2011.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES User Access and Beamline Development John Hill Director, NSLS-II Experimental Facilities Division NSLS-II User Workshop.
The GLAST Science Support Center’s Role in Supporting the User Community [24.10] Thomas E. Stephens (GSFC/L-3GSI) for the GLAST Science Support Center.
Safeguarding Research Data Policy and Implementation Challenges Miguel Soldi February 24, 2006 THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM.
Oct.10, 2007EAMA7 The next-generation Infrared astronomy mission SPICA Outline of SPICA Scientific Research Concept (SciReC) SPICA 研究コンセプト概要 17 th May.
GEOTRACES Program Evaluation Bob Anderson GEOTRACES SSC Meeting Stellenbosch, South Africa October 2013.
Folie 1 > SSSC/SITR Meeting, NASA-ARC > September 28/29, 2009 > D. Lilienthal SSSC/SITR Meeting NASA-ARC, September 28/29, 2009 Dietmar Lilienthal, DLR.
Fees and Services John Curran President and CEO. Situation Fee Structure Review Panel completed and discharged – Final Fee Structure Review Report released.
SSC SI Data Processing Pipeline Plans Tom Stephens USRA Information Systems Development Manager SSSC Meeting – Sept 29, 2009.
May 17, 2004SSWG - PFIS Shared Risk1 PFIS Commissioning, Shared Risk, and Transition to Operations.
NOAA Cooperative Institutes John Cortinas, Ph.D. OAR Cooperative Institute Program, Program Manager NOAA Cooperative Institute Committee, Chairperson.
DRAFT EDMC Procedural Directives NOAA Environmental Data Management Committee 12/3/2015 1
Office of Sponsored Projects The Funding Life Cycle.
1 Universities Space Research Association Introduction, Charter and Feedback Eric Becklin SSSC 18 Feb 2010.
1 Proposal and Observation Handling Ravi Sankrit (User Support Scientist) SSSC May 11, 2011.
1 Universities Space Research Association Martin Ruzek SSSC February 18, 2010 FIFI LS EOOP Extended Observing Opportunity Program Operating FIFI LS in.
Advancing Government through Collaboration, Education and Action Institute for Innovation Discussion with Shared Interest Group Vice Chairs October 14,
1 Universities Space Research Association Science Instrument Pipeline Requirements SSSC 2009 September 29 Erick Young Director SOFIA Science Mission Operat.
The Role of a Program Director NCI Division of Cancer Biology New Grantee Workshop October 18-19, 2010 Jerry Li, MD, PhD Division of Cancer Biology NCI/NIH.
Office of Major Project Development (OMPD) Overview November 2015.
ESS | title of presentation | 2012-xx-xx | name of presenter Roles and Responsibilities sub title.
EMPOWERMENT THROUGH EDUCATION Business Retention and Expansion Task Force Workshop Joe Lucente Assistant Professor and Extension Educator OSU Extension.
LSST CORPORATION Patricia Eliason LSSTC Executive Officer Belgrade, Serbia 2016.
6/7/05 Partner Scientist PI privileges within the GSFC Sciences and Exploration Directorate (SED) Scientists working with SED under cooperative agreements.
Legacy Proposals for GLAST GI Program? (Aug. 04 AI # 11, Josh and Rita) The GI program for GLAST should allow for Legacy Projects defined as: very large.
1 Mission preparation Fred Lahuis SRON / Leiden Observatory MIRI NL Meeting ASTRON, 3 th June 2010.
AISL PI Conference February 29, 2016 Division of Grants and Agreements.
Technology Transfer at SSC Atlantic
Project Management What is a project?
Science Policies and Timeline
Presentation transcript:

SSSC 02/18/2010 P. Marcum Science Utilization Policies SOFIA SCIENCE UTILIZATION POLICIES Pamela M. Marcum SOFIA Project Scientist SSSC Feb 19, 2010

SSSC 02/18/2010 P. Marcum Science Utilization Policies The purpose of this discussion is to give a overview of what the SOFIA Program- level policies are regarding data rights and observing policies. I will be asking for your thoughts regarding the role of different classes of science instruments (FSI vs PSI, SSI) in future generations of instruments. OVERVIEW

SSSC 02/18/2010 P. Marcum Science Utilization Policies The 10 Science Utilization Policies: are defined in a program-level document signed by various NASA HQ officials and the SOFIA Program Office. serve as the basic agreement between the Program and the NASA Science Mission Directorate on the scientific operation of SOFIA once routine science operations begin. are written with the intent to maximize the scientific return from SOFIA and the public understanding of this science, subject to cost constraints. ensure fair access to the mission both for the astronomical community at large and for those who built it. PURPOSE OF THE SUP provide the SOFIA Program some flexibility in their implementation. apply only to the US portion of SOFIA science time (MOU between NASA and DLR establishes the 20/80% partnership)

SSSC 02/18/2010 P. Marcum Science Utilization Policies POLICY 1 – SOFIA Science Operations Profile POLICY 2 – Categories of SOFIA Science Instruments POLICY 3 – Categories of Observing Time POLICY 4 – Allocation of Observing Time POLICY 5 – Protection and Use of Guaranteed Observing Time POLICY 6 – Distribution of Data, Data Rights, Access to Archived Data POLICY 7 – Funding of Data Analysis POLICY 8 – Deployments POLICY 9 – Instrument and Technology Development POLICY 10 – NASA Needs for Support of Other Missions POLICY OVERVIEW

SSSC 02/18/2010 P. Marcum Science Utilization Policies ○ involves science instrument teams, SMO personnel, members of general astronomical community. ○ observatory still in development ○ reduced science capabilities ○ science policies are given in the Short Science and Basic Science Data Rights Agreements ○ overlaps/interleaved with the conclusion of the initial development phase. ○ science flight rate and performance are expected to be lower than what SOFIA will ultimately be capable; facility sensitivity and efficiency will not be guaranteed or perhaps even fully characterized. ○ phasing of development with science observations during this period is a scientific and operational decision made by the Program Manager in consultation w/ the Project Scientist and the SMO Director. ○ starts when the observatory performance requirements have been fully verified/validated (w/ exception of flight rate); all 1 st -generation science instruments commissioned. ○ continues through the end of SOFIA’s operational lifetime. SOFIA SCIENCE OPERATIONS PROFILE EARLY SCIENCE SHARED PURPOSE FULL OPERATIONS

SSSC 02/18/2010 P. Marcum Science Utilization Policies CATEGORIES OF SOFIA SCIENCE INSTRUMENTS FSIPSISSI Nature of instrument General purpose, providing reliable state-of-the-art performance … Special purpose, designed for specific observation(s) not possible with available FSI or PSI; risky “edge-of- the-art” technologies by end of commissioning throughout life of instrument Instrument residence maintenance/operation SSC by SMO staff SI PI institution by SI team Data products Raw data archived Pipeline-reduced data archived Rela t ionship be t ween SI PI and GI t eams None necessaryTBD after proposal selections via mutual consensus GIs partner with the SSI team, at the SSI’s discretion, before proposing Guest investigator time on all instruments will be awarded through a peer-review process

SSSC 02/18/2010 P. Marcum Science Utilization Policies CATEGORIES OF SOFIA SCIENCE INSTRUMENTS FSIPSISSI Nature of instrument General purpose, providing reliable state-of-the-art performance … Special purpose, designed for specific observation(s) not possible with available FSI or PSI; risky “edge-of- the-art” technologies by end of commissioning throughout life of instrument Instrument residence maintenance/operation SSC by SMO staff SI PI institution by SI team Data products Raw data archived Pipeline-reduced data archived Rela t ionship be t ween SI PI and GI t eams None necessaryTBD after proposal selections via mutual consensus GIs partner with the SSI team, at the SSI’s discretion, before proposing Guest investigator time on all instruments will be awarded through a peer-review process Should the distinction between “FSI” and “PSI” be continued in future generations of instruments?

SSSC 02/18/2010 P. Marcum Science Utilization Policies CATEGORIES OF SOFIA SCIENCE INSTRUMENTS FSIPSISSI Nature of instrument General purpose, providing reliable state-of-the-art performance … Special purpose, designed for specific observation(s) not possible with available FSI or PSI; risky “edge-of- the-art” technologies by end of commissioning throughout life of instrument Instrument residence maintenance/operation SSC by SMO staff SI PI institution by SI team Data products Raw data archived Pipeline-reduced data archived Rela t ionship be t ween SI PI and GI t eams None necessaryTBD after proposal selections via mutual consensus GIs partner with the SSI team, at the SSI’s discretion, before proposing Guest investigator time on all instruments will be awarded through a peer-review process Should SSIs be part of the mix of future generations of instruments?

SSSC 02/18/2010 P. Marcum Science Utilization Policies CATEGORIES OF SOFIA SCIENCE INSTRUMENTS FSIPSISSI Nature of instrument General purpose, providing reliable state-of-the-art performance … Special purpose, designed for specific observation(s) not possible with available FSI or PSI; risky “edge-of- the-art” technologies by end of commissioning throughout life of instrument Instrument residence maintenance/operation SSC by SMO staff SI PI institution by SI team Data products Raw data archived Pipeline-reduced data archived Rela t ionship be t ween SI PI and GI t eams None necessaryTBD after proposal selections via mutual consensus GIs partner with the SSI team, at the SSI’s discretion, before proposing Guest investigator time on all instruments will be awarded through a peer-review process Should SSIs continue to play the same role in the GI program?

SSSC 02/18/2010 P. Marcum Science Utilization Policies ○ allocated by the SMO Director, not peer-reviewed by the annual peer review process ○ data not subject to the proprietary period and will be made public immediately. ○ include some TOOs, special projects that the Director feels are important for the good of the observatory (e.g., allowing effective/efficient use of scheduling), and potentially high scientific impact projects considered to risky to propose through the TAC process. ○ allocation of discretionary time reviewed annually by SSPC ○ evaluated via peer review; final selection made by SMO Director ○ proposals for US allocation can be submitted by anyone except those affiliated with German institutions ○ aircraft maintenance and observatory engineering upgrades (calibration, validation) ○ Granted to instrument teams to commission their instruments; additional time as reward for efforts in developing/delivering the FSIs, protected targets ○ special agreement w/ FIFI-LS team to allow general US community access in return for guaranteed time (via Extended Observing Opportunity Program, EOOP) DISCRETIONARY GENERAL INVESTIGATOR NON-SCIENCE ENGINEERING TIME GUARANTEED CATEGORIES OF OBSERVING TIME

SSSC 02/18/2010 P. Marcum Science Utilization Policies 80/20% share between US/Germany time allocation Allocated time for “duplicate observations” must receive explicit approval by the SMO Director ALLOCATION OF OBSERVING TIME

SSSC 02/18/2010 P. Marcum Science Utilization Policies Proprietary period of 1 year; may be extended by the SMO director in cases where an extension is warranted (e.g., major changes in pipeline software) Data obtained through non-peer review (discretionary time, engineering time, calibration time, etc) not subject of proprietary period and made public immediately. DISTRIBUTION OF DATA, DATA RIGHTS, AND ACCESS OF ARCHIVAL DATA

SSSC 02/18/2010 P. Marcum Science Utilization Policies QUESTIONS Should the distinction between “FSI” and “PSI” be continued in future generations of instruments? Should SSIs be part of the mix of future generations of instruments? If so, should they continue to play the same role in the general GI program?