A review of research on English-for- academic-purposes instruction: What learning transfers, and how far? Mark Andrew James Arizona State University

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P-20 Data Collaborative Grant University/College Work Group February 24, 2010.
Advertisements

TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
John Clegg. Contents What is CLIL? CLIL objectives What to assess in CLIL Fairness issue Ways of addressing fairness reduce the language demands of the.
Download an electronic copy of the slides and a handout here: projectgladstudy.educationnorthwest.org.
The Landscape of Educational Research
Annie Michaelian Jill Okurowski Stephen Toto. Tri-State Quality Review Rubric.
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP) Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric for Mathematics.
Publishing qualitative studies H Maisonneuve April 2015 Edinburgh, Scotland.
Science Education and Student Diversity: Synthesis and Research Agenda Okhee Lee and Aurolyn Luykx University of Miami This book (in press) is supported.
Problem Identification
Lindsey Martin Meeting the challenges of e-learning: achieving and maintaining an e-ethos in an academic library ALDP April 2007.
Principles of High Quality Assessment
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Assessing Student learning
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Communicative Language Teaching
WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT SOCIAL INCLUSION?. SOCIAL INCLUSION Social inclusion is a process which ensures that those at risk of poverty and social exclusion.
Teaching Reading and Writing to English Language Learners CEDEI Dr. Kathleen McInerney.
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Welcome.
Evaluating the transfer-promoting potential of ESOL materials Mark Andrew James Arizona State University / Sunshine.
Transfer of learning in English-for- academic-purposes (EAP) education Mark Andrew James Arizona State University /
Introducing small-group workshops as formative assessment in large first year psychology modules Suzanne Guerin School of Psychology, University College.
Reviewing EAP instruction research: What learning transfers, and how far? Mark Andrew James Arizona State University
Kazakhstan Centres of Excellence Teacher Education Programme Assessment of teachers at Level Two.
English-for-general-academic- purposes (EGAP) writing instruction and transfer of learning * Mark Andrew James Arizona State University
Lecture 8A Designing and Conducting Formative Evaluations English Study Program FKIP _ UNSRI
Basic concepts of language learning & teaching materials.
Bloom's Taxonomy: The Sequel (What the Revised Version Means for You!)
August 2007FFP Testing and Evaluation Techniques Chapter 7 Florida State Fire College Ocala, Florida.
A Look at Evidence-Based Literacy Research for Students who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing John Luckner, Ed.D. National Center on Low-Incidence Disabilities.
Genre-based teaching and ESP course design Brian Paltridge The University of Sydney.
Session I: Unit 2 Types of Reviews September 26, 2007 NCDDR training course for NIDRR grantees: Developing Evidence-Based Products Using the Systematic.
Part II: Planning Your Research Project Module Four: Research Questions, Purpose, Scope 1 RESEARCH PROJECT MANAGEMENT.
TWS Aids for Student Teachers & Interns Overview of TWS.
Traditional vs. Alternative Assessment
General EAP writing instruction and transfer of learning Mark Andrew James Arizona State University
“Outcomification”: Development and Use of Student Learning Outcomes Noelle C. Griffin, PhD Director, Assessment and Data Analysis Loyola Marymount University.
Educating for Success! Research Review – School Size Prepared for Cobourg ARC April 22,
Transfer climate and EAP education Mark Andrew James Arizona State University Presentation slides and recording will be posted on my website:
Tackling the Complexities of Source Evaluation: Active Learning Exercises That Foster Students’ Critical Thinking Juliet Rumble & Toni Carter Auburn University.
How Much Do We know about Our Textbook? Zhang Lu.
Evaluating the transfer-promoting potential of L2 teaching materials Mark Andrew James Arizona State University
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
The Lesson PlanningProcess The BLaST IU17 Liberty Fellowship September 20, 2011 Dr. Fran Macko
Understanding the Common Core Standards and Planning Lessons to Address The Standards.
Results Table 1 Table 1 displays means and standard deviations of scores on the retention test. Higher scores indicate better recall of material from the.
University of Oregon College of Education Center on Teaching and Learning C TL 1 Recommendation 1 Provide Explicit Vocabulary Instruction Level of Evidence:
Consistency of Assessment (Validation) Webinar – Part 1 Renae Guthridge WA Training Institute (WATI)
Secondary Curriculum, Instruction & EL SERVICES Explicit Direct instruction Orientation Phase October 2011.
IT’S ALIVE!!. or is it??? Are viruses alive ? –How can you tell if something is alive? –What would your evidence be or look like?
Qualifications Update: Chemistry Qualifications Update: Chemistry.
The School Effectiveness Framework
Assessment Small Learning Communities. The goal of all Small Learning Communities is to improve teaching, learning, and student outcomes A rigorous, coherent.
Course design by M.E. Ellen Graber Curriculum design and EFL/ESL.
Preparing Novice Teachers in Classroom Management At The Elementary and Secondary Level By: Yelena Patish Charles Peck Elizabeth West Laura Rothenberg.
COURSE AND SYLLABUS DESIGN
Monitoring and Assessment Presented by: Wedad Al –Blwi Supervised by: Prof. Antar Abdellah.
GET Intermediate Phase CAPS Training 1pas/2012. ASSESSMENT OUTCOMES : At the end of this Activity: participants will be able to differentiate between.
1 Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013 Roanoke Virginia Department of Education Division of Teacher Education and Licensure.
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Pre-Referral to Special Education: Considerations
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
Writing Tasks and Prompts
Laurene Christensen, Ph.D. Linda Goldstone, M.S.
The New Illinois Learning Standards
TALIF Research Project – University of Essex BALEAP PIM at Edinburgh
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Presentation transcript:

A review of research on English-for- academic-purposes instruction: What learning transfers, and how far? Mark Andrew James Arizona State University

Background EAP educationEAP education aims to help learners participate in academic contexts (e.g., English- medium K-12 schools, colleges, universities). for EAP education to be considered successful, students must be able to apply (i.e., transfer) their EAP learning in other courses. Empirical research has provided evidence of transfer from EAP instruction to students’ other courses.Empirical research has provided evidence of transfer from EAP instruction to students’ other courses.... but, there is little detail regarding the circumstances of transfer (e.g., where and when it occurred, what kind of activities it involved).

The transfer taxonomy (Barnett & Ceci, 2002) 6 (of the 9) dimensions are related to transfer distance, i.e., whether transfer is near or far in terms of:6 (of the 9) dimensions are related to transfer distance, i.e., whether transfer is near or far in terms of: knowledge domain (i.e., topics); physical context (i.e., location, people); temporal context (i.e., time); functional context (i.e., purpose, e.g., get grades, make friends); social context (i.e., collaborative vs. individual); modality (i.e., format, e.g., multiple choice, essay).... the other 3 dimensions are related to the kind of learning that transfers:... the other 3 dimensions are related to the kind of learning that transfers: specificity/generality (e.g., narrow facts/procedures vs. general principles) performance change (i.e., quality/accuracy vs. speed vs. approach) memory demands (i.e., elicited recognition vs. spontaneous recall)

Applying the transfer taxonomy Research that has evidence of transfer from EAP instruction to students’ other courses lacks sufficient detail for the taxonomy.Research that has evidence of transfer from EAP instruction to students’ other courses lacks sufficient detail for the taxonomy.... but, research that has examined EAP student learning is suitable for the taxonomy because:... but, research that has examined EAP student learning is suitable for the taxonomy because: although the explicit focus is “learning”, the findings often demonstrate transfer (e.g., performance on a posttest is application of prior learning in a novel context, i.e., transfer); although this transfer does not occur across course boundaries, it does occur between contexts that differ in ways that courses differ (e.g., time, place, subject matter); experimental designs are often used, which means there is substantial detail about the circumstances of transfer (e.g., teaching and testing).

Procedure Research question: What, if anything, might be learned about transfer in EAP education through this analysis?Research question: What, if anything, might be learned about transfer in EAP education through this analysis? Collection of studies: Searched ERIC (i.e., thesaurus categories “English for academic purposes” and “Second language instruction”). Criteria for inclusion were:Collection of studies: Searched ERIC (i.e., thesaurus categories “English for academic purposes” and “Second language instruction”). Criteria for inclusion were: conducted in an EAP setting (elementary, secondary, post-secondary); used an experimental or quasi-experimental design, and findings showed that instruction had led to learning that students could demonstrate; were published in a book or peer-reviewed journal; provided enough detail that they could be analyzed with the taxonomy.

Interpretation Research question: What, if anything, might be learned about transfer in EAP education through this analysis?Research question: What, if anything, might be learned about transfer in EAP education through this analysis? Instruction can result in transfer with EAP students. Transfer can involve various learning outcomes (e.g., specific and general). Transfer can have a positive impact on the quality of students’ work; but, it’s uncertain if transfer can influence the speed of students’ work or the way students approach their work. Transfer can occur in situations that place minimal demands on students’ memories (i.e., recognition), but also situations that place greater demands on students’ memories (i.e., recall). Transfer can occur across varying distances.

Implications Future research might build on these findings by addressing questions such as:Future research might build on these findings by addressing questions such as: whether general knowledge (e.g., grammar rules, reading/writing strategies) transfers farther than specific knowledge (e.g., phonemes, words); whether learning transfers when the distance is far on most or all of the taxonomy’s dimensions. Educators might build on these findings by (a) designing EAP instruction to be similar to students’ other courses in as many ways as possible, and (b) being cautious about expecting transfer when EAP instruction differs from target contexts in numerous ways.Educators might build on these findings by (a) designing EAP instruction to be similar to students’ other courses in as many ways as possible, and (b) being cautious about expecting transfer when EAP instruction differs from target contexts in numerous ways.

... thank you! Feel free to contact me with any remaining questions/comments: Presentation recording and slides can be downloaded at: