IKT Software & Site Evaluation. Overview Part I –A Little Bit of Business –Warm-up Discussion –Site & Software Evaluation –Introduction to Project I Part.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fieldwork Flogging: Learning with Web 2.0 Dr Mary Pryor History of Art School of Divinity, History & Philosophy.
Advertisements

MATERIALS EVALUATION A perspective of evaluation and its application to EFL coursebook selection Prof. Pablo E. Requena.
Deconstructing Moodle for better Learning Design Helen M. Lynch Senior E-learning Consultant Australia’s National VET E-learning Strategy Webinar, March.
Constructing the Foundations of Capacity Building An Activity Theory Analysis of the English in Action Baseline Studies Jan Rae and Adrian Kirkwood.
Evaluating Teaching and Learning Linda Carey Centre for Educational Development Queen’s University Belfast 1.
Created by Rebecca Butzow.  Where we are now › Schools are turning toward technology to keep track of grades, schedules, homework, and much more › Schools.
A PhD research project in second language education.
Virtual Workbenches Richard Anthony Dept. Computer Science University of Greenwich Distributed Systems Operating Systems Networking.
Phoebe: A Pedagogic Planner to Promote Innovative Practice in Design for Learning Marion Manton TALL, University of Oxford.
Authoring The Learning Process. Overview The Authoring course  Writing. How do you write? Tools? Context? Discuss in groups, make lists / diagrams, feedback.
North American Coordinating Council on Japanese Library Resources Training the Trainers Emily Werrell and Sharon Domier August 7-9, 2004.
Facilitator Training Program
Effective Math Online LearningLDT 2001EMOL EMO L Effective Mathematics Online Learning.
Science PCK Workshop March 24, 2013 Dr. Martina Nieswandt UMass Amherst
Lesson planning? It can’t be that difficult! Svetla Tashevska, NBU.
1 Abu Dhabi Women’s College Certified Designer Course.
COMPONENTS OF AN EFFECTIVE WRITING PROGRAM
Teaching Assistant Orientation
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
Action Research / Intervention Project Module II Notre Dame of Maryland University.
Learning Theories. Learning objectives O To recap on theories of learning covered thus far O To contextualise learning theories in view of DFA7130 Assignment.
Université d’Ottawa / University of Ottawa Theory and Practice of Undergraduate Teaching ESG 5300 September 14, 2004.
1 DEVELOPING ASSESSMENT TOOLS FOR ESL Liz Davidson & Nadia Casarotto CMM General Studies and Further Education.
1 A proposed skills framework for all 11- to 19-year-olds.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
COETC Grant May 17, 2012 Facilitators: Ruth Brancard and Elaine Baker.
Communicating Ocean Sciences to Informal Audiences (COSIA) Session 3 Teaching & Learning.
Programs of the Intel Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation. Copyright © 2007 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
EDTE 373A Assessment Lab I Dr. Mark Rodriguez
ELD Transition Sessions
What is Usability? Usability Is a measure of how easy it is to use something: –How easy will the use of the software be for a typical user to understand,
CPLA Video Case Studies Making Media Nursing. Making Media - Background First year, semester long 20 credit core module Involved 200 students with 4 staff.
Project Focus Academy April 10, 2006 iVocalize Session #1 Click the ALL tab Add a comment in the text block, introducing yourself, your school and your.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
Module 2 Wikispaces: A Training Module Patsy Kraj Spring 2011 University of West Georgia.
CT 854: Assessment and Evaluation in Science & Mathematics
How Much Do We know about Our Textbook? Zhang Lu.
A801 Section 8 October 31, 2012 Policy and Program Evaluation.
March E-Learning or E-Teaching? What’s the Difference in Practice? Linda Price and Adrian Kirkwood Programme on Learner Use of Media The Open University.
Welcome Alabama Course of Study Technology Education Workshop.
Copyright © Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
CS 139 – Algorithm Development MS. NANCY HARRIS LECTURER, DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE.
3 Stages of Backward Design 1. Identify desired results. 2. Determine acceptable evidence. 3. Plan learning experiences & instruction.
The Morris School District’s mission is to serve the needs of all students, to accommodate equity, to provide a challenging education and innovative academic.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Part 2 Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Technology Workshop 2 June 22, Extent of Technology Integration in Instruction by ABE Teachers.
Developing Digital Teachers and Learners for 21 st Century K-12 Classrooms Humphreys County Katie Butler Tec Teach K-12.
Training The Spanish Language and Culture Instructors at FSI
E101 Section 8 October 31, 2012 Policy and Program Evaluation.
Programs of the Intel® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation. Copyright © 2007 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
HYBRID INSTRUCTION IN RURAL AREAS Leecy Wise, Reconnection Company
1 Disclaimer This resource is provided for informational and support purposes only. There is no requirement that it be used as- is or as a template by.
1 Annotation Framework March Terminology CV - abbreviation for controlled vocabulary CRS - Community Review System (a collection within DLESE)
Web 2.0 Tools in the 21 st Century Classroom EDU 536 B By: Jeanine Boerio.
True Synergy- …Pulling knowledge from online class activities to benefit blended learning.
Learning Management System
Course goals During the course the students will develop their product development expertise by gaining knowledge on product life cycle impacts, on material.
Copyright © Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
Technical Communication: Concepts and Features
CS 664 Sample Presentation
Distance Learning & Telecollaboration
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING
Trends and Terminology in Online Learning
CS 6640 Sample Presentation
Pedagogical Practice, Shift, and Professional Growth in Online Courses
Benefits of OBL for New Teachers
Presentation transcript:

IKT Software & Site Evaluation

Overview Part I –A Little Bit of Business –Warm-up Discussion –Site & Software Evaluation –Introduction to Project I Part II –Workshop: Getting Started on Project I –Sharing Findings –A Look Ahead

A Little Bit of Business

IKT Kursen Wiki – IKT Kursen Blog – –Please accept the invite sent to your account so that you can post.

Warm-Up Discussion

Questions How do you use technology in your own language learning? What works for you? What do you look for in software/sites/apps)? What about in your language teaching?

Introduction to Site/Software Evaluation

The Definitive March At my own university it is difficult to imagine what it would take to divert the definitive march toward technologizing all aspects of learning and teaching.... As far as I can tell, it was the president of the university who decided that the English Department should have approximately 12 computer labs as a part of an effort to make the university have a high tech look. It seems very unlikely that he first weighed the research results on teaching English in a computer lab before making this decision. (Chapelle, 2003, p. 73))

Why Evaluate – Common Goals What software should be purchased? How well does X software meet Y standards? How can software and sites be redesigned to better meet the needs of users? How well do students feel the software is meeting their needs?

When Formative –Conducted during the development stage –Used to inform the actual construction of the program –Beta testing Summative –Conducted after completion of a project Or –After completion of a major stage of a project

How Checklists –Easy to administer but restricting and easy to incorporate bias (Levy & Stockwell, 2006, p ) Surveys of Users –Emphasizes attitude not necessarily effectiveness (pp ) Designer Oriented Evaluations –Reflects the design goals of the tool but not necessarily the pedagogical goals and needs of users (pp ) General Evaluation Framework –Broadly applicable and situated in a particular theoretical approach (p. 82)

Situating the Evaluation in Theory What type of interactivity is supported by the application? –Type I – unidirectional information such as descriptive or informative text –Type II – computer-tutors that rely on an algorithm to provide feedback on learner responses –Type III – learning tools that enable contact between students and other TL speakers (Levy & Stockwell, 2006: 51)

Situating the Evaluation in Context How flexible or open is the curriculum? –Fixed and rigid curriculum can lead to restricted and unimaginative use of CALL –Too open a curriculum can result in unclear learning goals and insufficient guidance in the use of CALL tools The user’s perspective –What technologies and interfaces are students used to? –How does technology vary from one class to the next?

Situating the Evaluation in Context What institutional standards and requirements are in place? –What technical support is available? –What financial resources are available? –How compatible is new software with currently used systems?

A Return to Why “…to assess the quality, effectiveness, or general value of a program or other entity.” (Johnson, 1992, p. 192 as cited in Levy & Stockwell, 2006, p. 41)

Project 1 - Evaluation 1. Using the evaluation form, critically and thoroughly evaluate a piece of CALL software or a site. sprakundervisning.wikispaces.com/Project+1http://ikt- sprakundervisning.wikispaces.com/Project+1 2. Report your findings in a brief online presentation and in a discussion. Group A: Kent, Linda S., Celine, Lisa, Henrietta (Swedish with Jonas) Group B: Tina, Maria, Linda B., Karina, Helena (English with Shannon)

Possible Sites & Software Below is a list of language learning sites you can evaluate. Some of these will require registration for access. If you would like to evaluate another site/software please let me know. Active Chinese *Active Chinese Babel Online *Babel Online Curso de Quechua Cambridge Ventures and Arcade Innovative Language Learning Online Courses *Innovative Language Learning Online Courses Byki*Byki LiveMocha *LiveMocha Spanish AVE program from Instituto Cervantes +

Workshop: Getting Started on Project I

Instructions The purpose of the after lunch workshop session is for you to familiarize yourself with the evaluation form by working in pairs to explore a single site. Focus on Sections I-VI only. There will be no formal break during this time, so take a break when you need to. We will report back findings as a whole class at 2:30. Randall’s ESL Cyber Listening Lab

Report Back 1.What are the main strengths of the site? 2.What are its major limitations? 3.How could this site be integrated into a language course and for what types of learners? 4.What questions or challenges did you encounter while conducting the evaluation?

A Look Ahead

Next Session Online in Adobe Connect to test out features to prepare for presentation of Project I. Please follow instructions to be sent in . Art by Kresselak on DA