Higher Education’s Role in Academic Integrity as it Relates to Technology E-LEARN CONFERENCE OCTOBER 28, 2014 NEW ORLEANS, LA TAMMIE LANG, __________ MERRYELLEN TOWEY SCHULZ, PH.D. COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY

Is it possible that a college graduate could act unethically and, essentially, deceive his or her way to a college degree? Problem is widespread – Community Colleges to Ivy League In 2006 study 41.1% of students reported cheating in an online course (Lanier, 2006) 2014 Study found that 43% of faculty observed acts of academic dishonesty using technology (Lang, unpublished)

Academic Integrity/Dishonesty Honesty and responsibility in scholarship. All academic work results individual's own efforts. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Guide Student claims or takes credit for work that is not his/her original work, without providing a sufficient citation (Becker, Connolly, Lentz, & Morrison 2006). Integrity Dishonesty

Advances in technology, increase opportunities to commit academic dishonesty. Sophisticated cell phones iPods Tablets Internet Electronic cutting and pasting File Sharing Messaging Unauthorized collaboration Tech skills superior to faculty Arhim (2009) p.17

Online Education is Appealing to Millennials Adept at using technologyPrefer collaborative learningNon-linear

Faculty Actions CLEAR STATEMENTS IN SYLLABI REGARDING…  Authorized collaboration on certain activities  Unauthorized collaboration  Allowing students to use outside class materials  Completion of exams  design techniques include creating new questions for assignments, TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES  Create new questions and assignments  Unscheduled assessments  Meaningful use of online discussion forums  Pose follow-up questions to student postings  Utilize essay exams  Use multiple assessment techniques requiring students’ opinion or thought  Use Skype or proctors  Use plagiarism detection applications  Increase proficiency with technology.

Be sure students know what integrity is.

Higher Education Institutions’ Role Honor codes that are communicated to the student body Mandatory training on academic integrity for students and faculty Collaborate with educators to emphasize the seriousness of academic dishonesty. Treat violations as serious offenses with appropriate consequences (Heckler, Rice, & Bryan, 2013). Create a culture of academic integrity, which will lead to student buy in to the importance of academic integrity.

Results  A higher education institution with a strong commitment to academic integrity will be respected throughout academia  Faculty teaching at institutions with strong commitments to academic integrity will subsequently be respected in their fields.  A win-win for the institution, the educators, and the student body

References Ahrin, A. (2009). A pilot study of nursing student’s perceptions of academic dishonesty: A generation Y perspective. The ABNF Journal, Winter 2009, Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2008). Learning on demand: Online education in the United States, Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from Boehm, P., Justice, M., and Weeks, S. (2009). Promoting academic integrity in higher education. The Community College Enterprise. Spring, 2008, Bolliger, D. and Halupa, C. (2012, May). Student perceptions and anxiety in an online doctoral program. Distance Education, 33(1), doi.org/ / Craig, P., Federici, E., and Buehler, M. (2010). Instructing students in academic integrity. Journal of College Science Teaching. (40) Evering, L. and Moorman, G. (2012). Rethinking plagiarism in the digital age. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. 56(1). September, Doi: /JAAL Grijalva, T., Nowell, C., and Kerkviet, J. (2006). Academic honesty and online courses. College Student Journal. 40(1), Heckler, N., Rice, M., and Bryan C.H. (2013). Turnitin systems: a deterrent to plagiarism in college classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 45(3), King, C., Gueytte, R., and Piotrowski, C. (2009). Online exams and cheating: An empirical analysis of business students’ views. The Journal of Educators Online. (6)1, Lang, T. (2014). [Leadership now! academic integrity and technology survey]. Unpublished raw data. Lanier, M. (2006). Academic integrity and distance learning. Journal of Criminal Justice Education. 17(2),

References continued Maslen, G. (2003). 80 percent admit to cheating. Times Higher Education Supplement, (1573), 17. McCabe, D., and Bowers, W. (1994). Academic dishonesty among males in college: A thirty-year perspective. Journal of College Student Development, 5(1), Perez-Pena, R. (2012, August 31). Harvard students in cheating scandal say collaboration was accepted. New York Times. Retrieved from Ritter, D., Shampton, J., and Larson, L. (2012). Who are you? Identifying online students for assessment purposes. Southern Journal of Business and Ethics, 4(1), Sloan Consortium (2012). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Retrieved from Smith, M. Dupre, M., and Mackey, D. (2005). Deterring research paper plagiarism with technology: Establishing a department-level electronic research paper database with . Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 16(1), Stephens, Jason M., Young, Michael F., Calabrese, Thomas. (2007). Does moral judgment go offline when students are online? A comparative analysis of undergraduates’ beliefs and behaviors related to conventional and digital cheating. Ethics & Behavior, 17(3), Insider’s Guide to the Library. Univeristy of Illinois Retrieved October 2, 2014Insider’s Guide to the Library. Univeristy of Illinois Retrieved October 2 Cartoon Ai logo Blue compass Millenials halo